Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet

Online Community Models? 8

buzzcutbuddha asks: "I have been tasked with creating/finding a Collaboration and Knowledge Management tool for work, and while there are some good commercial ones out there like Intraspect and Microsoft Sharepoint, but I want to look at it from another angle. Most people are aware of online community models like Slashdot, Kuro5hin.org, Everything2.org, it's Perlmonks derivative, and Wikki Wikki Web. Some may even remember SixDegrees from before it was retired. But are there any other notable online communities that have similar functions to the systems described above? I'm looking for a way to let people load documents or link to documents, discuss the documents, moderate the submissions and comments, and do searches. At this point, the underlying technology is not important."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Online Community Models?

Comments Filter:
  • Here's One (Score:2, Interesting)

    by EnVisiCrypt ( 178985 )
    FilePile [filepile.org]

    Users upload documents, rate them, discuss them and such. It's an interesting concept that bears mentioning.

    Another online community that doesn't involve document discussion and the like is Metafilter [metafilter.com].
  • by Anonymous Coward
    You say you've been asked to find a tool, yet the unlying technology isn't important? I don't get it. Do you want sucessful communities (doubtful) or do you want good software? or features for communities? or what?

    A site with sections and story queue is good. Open moderation to stories and comments is its' own problem though kuro5hin seems to function quite well. Comment moderation categories just opens the door to quibbling over whether it's genuinely offtopic, or funny - allowing respondants to HiLaRiOuSlY acuse the moderator of being on crack. Ha! Crack! Genius! Not tired at all!

    E2's messaging is good.

    Zope's slash rip-off (I forget the name, it used to run on technocrat.net) allowed file attachments. That's useful for any distributed software development team.

    A wiki, like any flat data structure, doesn't push old content into depths (something the slash-a-likes are guilty of, being linear, though for a news site it's probably necessary).

    Drupal.org [drupal.org] and Half Empty [half-empty.org] are kinda nice engines. I'm working on my own ("in every mans life there must be one php/mysql weblog - and this is mine").

    Interface wise I have a preference for calenders. I like URLs that are clean looking. I like engines that aren't crufty like PHPnuke.

    • By saying technology isn't important I mean that I don't care if it's Perl, Python, LISP, ASP, PHP, JSP, whatever. Technology is technology, and can be supported by someone (probably me).

      I'm more concerned with the model, features, and concepts behind the community.

      Thanks for the suggestions, they're good ones to follow up one.
  • OpenACS (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mlinksva ( 1755 ) on Thursday December 13, 2001 @10:39PM (#2702557) Homepage Journal
    Check out OpenACS [openacs.org], continuing development of ArsDigita [arsdigita.com]'s Arsgitia Community System. They've had discussion, commenting and other community/collaboration features for years [photo.net] and there are people working on adding more wiki and weblog-like functionality.
  • You might wanna check out LiveJournal [livejournal.com].

    It's ability to easily follow multiple journals, including posting comments to various entries, and it's "communities" make it seem somewhat like your talking about.

    Additionally, all the source code that runs it is available.

    Having people keep "work journals" of what they're working on makes it easy to keep track of who's doing what, and the communities could be very advantageous in a work environement.
  • I have also been looking for something for my company. They have about 100 engineers, and we would like to find a way to document problems for future reference. If possible searchable, but also the topics should be in a tree design.
  • by Xunker ( 6905 ) on Friday December 14, 2001 @12:44PM (#2704726) Homepage Journal

    No, I love the Everything Engine [everydevel.com], and I'm even a code contributor.. but if you're seriously thinking about doing this with Everything, make sure you allocate a lot of time to it's configuration.

    The initial instal is cake, but getting pages, templates, themes and whatnot together does take a lot of time. Of course, the effect is nothing short of amazing when it's finished.

    You first need to ask yourself what sort of a community you're trying to create; news logs like kuro5hin and slashdot have very differnt community dynamic from places like PerlMonks or E2 and you should probably choose based on that.

    And, of course you don't want to drop the possibility of completely rolling your own engine. If you have a grasp of a web-suitable language like Python, Perl or PHP or the like, you could actually hack a small scale content presentation system together in about the time it would take to assemble and Everything based site. If you're into DIY.

Math is like love -- a simple idea but it can get complicated. -- R. Drabek

Working...