Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Hybrid/Electric Vehicles: Should I Buy?

Posted by michael on Fri Sep 12, 2003 01:58 PM
from the green-machine dept.
nissin writes "I'm ready to buy my first vehicle, and would like to hear your experiences with either hybrid or electric vehicles. Are they a good alternative to conventional vehicles, or just a geek toy? Do they perform well in the city? How about on long road trips? I am also interested in hearing about other alternative, yet practical, forms of transportation that I may have missed."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by grub (11606) <slashdot@grub.net> on Friday September 12 2003, @02:00PM (#6945212) Homepage Journal

    A friend in another city has a hybrid. According to him the pickup is slow but the fuel economy is great. Pure electric would be super if you didn't have to make long trips and always had an electrical outlet to charge when parked.

    Pet Peeve #843287: SUV drivers that whine about the price of gas. You bought that overpriced penis extension, learn to live with the consequences.
    • by Mr_Silver (213637) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:09PM (#6945391)
      Pet Peeve #843287: SUV drivers that whine about the price of gas. You bought that overpriced penis extension, learn to live with the consequences.

      Pet Peeve #1: All Americans who whine about the price of gas. If you really want to whine, come to the UK where our Government has turned taxing petrol into an art form.

      • by WegianWarrior (649800) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:41PM (#6946045) Journal

        Pet Peeve #1: All Americans who whine about the price of gas. If you really want to whine, come to the UK where our Government has turned taxing petrol into an art form.

        Now, I don't know how much y'all pay for the petrol / gas in the UK, but here in Norway about 80% of what we pay at the pump end up in the coffers of the goverment - taxes, excise duty on petrol, VAT, VAT on the taxes and the CO2-tax...
        I visited the US (West Virginia to be spesific) this summer, and I commented on how cheap the petrol was; just 1$49 for a US gallon (3.7 liter), while back home I pay the equalent of 4$90 for a US gallon (the price at the pump today was 9.49 kroner / liter). So honestly, the people in the US has nothing to complain about as far as the cost of gasonile goes... in fact, if the cost of it was higher in the US, we might see more sensible cars rolling of the productionlines, and less of the gas-guzzling SUVs.

        • by TopShelf (92521) * on Friday September 12 2003, @02:34PM (#6945913) Homepage Journal
          Crippling??? Puh-lease... I get so sick of hearing people complain about the price of gas. Over the labor day weekend, one of the generic TV anchors here in Indy made a comment like, "yeah, with prices this high I'm staying home this weekend."

          I'm sorry, but the price of gas has very little to do with the total cost of going on a trip. Let's say you've got a car that gets 20 mpg, and you want to head to the beach for the weekend (say, 800 mile round trip). You're looking at 40 gallons of gas, so if the price jumped 50 cents a gallon, you're out a whopping $20. Will that make or break your vacation plans? Hardly.

          For all the moaning and groaning, the bottom line is that people's habits haven't really changed much. Look at fuel economy standards, which haven't really gone anywhere in the last 15 years. I say, creep up the gas tax until habits change and people actually start focusing on fuel economy. There are plenty of good things that money could go towards (reducing budget deficits, improving & investing in civil infrastructure, etc.).
      • by randomencounter (653994) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:07PM (#6945358)
        Being more maneuverable and closer to the ground, compact cars are generally safer for people inside _and_ outside the car.
        People who believe that SPUTES are safer really need to get a grip on reality.
      • by TheCarp (96830) * <(sjc) (at) (carpanet.net)> on Friday September 12 2003, @02:25PM (#6945730) Homepage
        Of course SUV drivers don't have a higher survival rate than other cars, they are just more likely to kill others, and not a single bit more likely to survive themselves.

        And the idea that an Economy car is "undersized" is absolutly silly. If anything they are apropriatlysized for the general use case. Thats transporting 1 or 2 people (which is about what you see in 95% of cars on the road at any given time... SUV or otherwise).

        Frankly in the long run its cheaper and safer for EVERYONE to drive an economy car, and rent a larger vehicle when you NEED one. You know that MAYBE once a year or every two years that you might move, or maybe that weekend or two you actually go camping.

        Biut whatever, once oil price hit where they really should be, I imagine the much touted "Market forces" will take care of the SUVs so im not too worried. And I will still be tooling around in the most practical vehicle I have ever owned...
        my motorcycle... 40 MPG in the city, 50 on the highway, small enough to make room and I NEVER have to look for parking.

        Not to mention it can fit between traffic in a jam, out accelerate ANY 4 wheeler (taking off or comming to a stop), and lets face it... get the biggest fucking SUV penis extention you want...

        When it comes right down to it... everyones watching ME ride down the street, you in your SUV are just another boring fish in the sea of SUVs and other cagers... and with all that... an empty tank still only costs me $5 to fill.

        -Steve
                    • by FuzzyBad-Mofo (184327) <fuzzybad&gmail,com> on Friday September 12 2003, @03:32PM (#6946990)

                      I for one think a good start to the SUV problem is regulation. Hear me out:

                      1. SUV's are classified as trucks by the EPA
                      2. SUV's are classified as passenger vehicles by the DMV (at least in every state I've seen)
                      3. Some of these monsters approach the weight limit necessary for a CDL (commercial driver's license), yet require nothing more than a standard driver's license to operate.

                      Now the upshot of the truck/passenger vehicle classification dualism is that SUV's are exempt from having to meet milage and emissions standards for passenger vehicles. Therefore most SUVs have more horsepower for a comparable displacement. Yet since they're licensed as a passenger vehicle, the SUV gets cheap car plates and registration. This simply must stop! Either it's a car, or it's a truck. They can't have it both ways.

                      Secondly and perhaps more controversially, I believe that a new license class should be created for large SUVs. There are simply too many people unqualified to handle a 7000+ pound vehicle [new-cars.com] treating these things like big sports car! When I wanted to ride a motorcycle, I had to get a special certification on my license, and so should it be for large SUVs.

      • by CaseyB (1105) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:12PM (#6945473)
        Pet Peeve #843289: The fact that ALL SUV owners have a canned speech to rationalize the fact that they needed to buy their overpriced penis extension.
      • by El (94934) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:19PM (#6945629)
        Subarus (Outback or Forester) get better traction, are safer, hold just as much, and get 25mpg... next excuse? Unless you're towing something or regularly have more than 5 passengers, you don't really need an SUV.

        Oh, and Ford is coming out with a hybrid SUV (Explorer?) in 2004.

      • by Larry_Dillon (20347) <dillon...larry@@@gmail...com> on Friday September 12 2003, @02:24PM (#6945709) Homepage
        I just puchased a '87 Subaru 4wd wagon for $1400 for most of the reasons you just mentioned:

        1. Montana winters
        2. Room for passangers
        3. Room for cargo
        4. Doing my part to NOT FUND OIL WARS

        What I really hate about all of the "super trucks" is trying to see past them at intersections.

        SUVS: Safer for the owners, more dangerous for everyone else on the road.

      • by einstein (10761) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:27PM (#6945773) Homepage Journal
        I'm purchasing at 2004 Prius, and the 0-30 acceleration is VERY good, but it loses some umph in to 30-60 range, because that's when the ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) kicks in for a boost.. I think up until 52 mph, you're usually just on the electric system.

        that is where the complain comes from though.

        From my test drives of the 2003 Prius, this is not as bad as the accelerator of a 4 cycle ICE automatic... in fact, I thought it was quite better.

        and given that the 2004 is more powerful, AND more fuel efficient, I think it should definitely be a consideration if you're looking at a new car.
      • by einTier (33752) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:39PM (#6946016)
        Sure, it has maximum torque at zero RPM (the torque curve is actually flat), but generating that power takes a lot of juice, and delivering it to electric motors without completely draining the batteries hasn't really been solved yet. So, while the car will feel faster than it actually is, it will still be quite slow unless you're willing to trade off a lot of battery life.

        For the record, using Car and Driver's data, here's the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times for the hybrids and a few comparisons (Ford Escape /Mazda Tribute Hybrid not tested).

        Toyota Prius: 13.0 0-60 and 19.2 1/4 mile
        Honda Insight: 11.1 0-60 and 18.3 1/4 mile

        Hummer H2: 10.7 0-60 and 17.6 1/4 mile
        Honda Civic: 9.3 0-60 and 17.2 1/4 mile
        Mazda Protege: 9.2 0-60 and 17.0 1/4 mile
        Toyota Corolla: 8.2 0-60 and 16.4 1/4 mile
        Ford SVT Focus: 7.8 0-60 and 16.1 1/4 mile
        MazdaSpeed Protege: 6.9 0-60 and 15.4 1/4 mile
        Honda Accord: 7.0 0-60 and 15.5 1/4 mile
        Mini Cooper S: 7.0 0-60 and 15.5 1/4 mile
        Mitsubishi Eclipse GTS: 6.7 0-60 and 15.2 1/4 mile
        Subaru Impreza WRX: 5.4 0-60 and 14.1 1/4 mile
        Chevrolet Corvette: 4.5 0-60 and 13.1 1/4 mile

        So, yes, these hybrids are indeed slow. Slower, in fact, than almost any car you can buy. With the exception of the Corvette, which I put in for comparison only, all of the above cars are within a few thousand dollars of either hybrid, and most are cheaper. Just a thought.

      • Re:more on hybrids (Score:5, Insightful)

        by vondo (303621) * on Friday September 12 2003, @02:41PM (#6946047)
        Will cause gas prices to rise -- see econ 101 supply vs. demand.

        How's that again? You must have taken a very different econ class from any I ever did.

        The "supply" of oil is a function of the price. Higher prices mean more oil becomes economically recoverable. If the demand for oil drops, the oil that is cheapest to pump gets pumped. The rest sits in the ground.

        Of course, the problem is that the cheapest oil to pump isn't governed by free market forces, it is price controlled (OPEC), so requiring less isn't necessarily going to mean much downward pressure on the price, but it certainly won't cause the price to go up.

        Maybe you are thinking of economies of scale, but oil production is so far beyond the point where that is changing.

        • by JesseL (107722) on Friday September 12 2003, @03:06PM (#6946543) Homepage Journal
          He means low rolling resistance tires. Rolling resistance is primarily due to the sidewalls of the tire flexing (resulting in friction within the tire) as it rolls. This resistance can be reduced by stiffening the sidewalls and using rubber compounds that are more elastic in the sidewalls. To see an extreme example of rolling resistance try pushing your car accross level ground with the tires inflated to the reccomended pressure, then do it again with the tires inflated to half their nominal pressure. Big difference huh? This is why underinflated tires can overheat and catastrophicly fail cough*firestone*cough.
  • Prius rocks (Score:5, Informative)

    by nate1138 (325593) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:01PM (#6945236)
    As the proud owner of a Toyota Prius, I can definitely recommend one. I'm not too hot on the looks, but the mileage rocks, and it's been very reliable so far. And it isn't as pokey as you may expect a hybrid to be. You may also want to look at the Honda Insight (If it is still being made).
      • by nate1138 (325593) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:18PM (#6945617)
        I've got a 2003 Prius, and I wish I had waited a year. Still, the mileage and range kicks ass. The civic is pretty sweet to, though. Especially if you are into modding your car. All the aesthetic and suspension bits from the regular civics fit the hybrid (just no drivetrain parts). The prius has very little aftermarket support.
  • by X (1235) <x@xman.org> on Friday September 12 2003, @02:02PM (#6945257) Homepage Journal
    2 of my friends have hybrids (one the Insight and the other the Prius), and they both like them. They are great on the city streets, very quiet and lots of pickup from a standing start thanks to the electric motors. For longer trips, you'll love the quiet, the fuel economy, and the insane distances you can go without needing to fill up your tank. The downside tends to be that they have poor pickup at freeway speeds.

    The other big issue is the feel of the ride. Some people love it, others don't. They have low-friction tires and stiff suspensions (to minimize the amount of energy loss). This tends to make the car ride more like a sporty car (you feel every bump) than a luxury car (soft suspension smooths out the bumps). Some people love that, others hate it.

    Overall, I'd suggest taking it out for a spin, and see whether you like it. They are practical cars though.
  • by RelliK (4466) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:03PM (#6945265)
    Electric vehicles can't go very far or very fast, and when you drive one people will think you're gay.(*)

    (*)Sponsored by the gasoline industry of America.
  • So why ask slashdot? The moral of the story seems to be that hybrids are ugly (except, arguably, the toyota prius) and slow (the prius is the best of them in this regard) but get great mileage. They get better mileage in town than on the freeway, because of regenerative braking. Oddly enough they are not all that aerodynamic. In spite of its "futuristic" (read: ugly) lines, the Honda Insight has a .24 CD, and my '89 Nissan 240SX has a .26 CD. But anyway...

    Hybrids get great mileage, and they work. What's not to like? Buy a Prius, or a hybrid Civic. Or, wait a couple years, because Toyota is supposedly going to sell everything in a hybrid model by 2005.

  • by rednaxela (609701) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:03PM (#6945285)
    I have a 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid and I love it. Average about 45 mpg. Use it to commute on the DC beltway - plenty of pickup for merging and passing. Have taken 2 4-6 hour trips with the car, and it's just fine - like driving a regular Civic. Really, the only noticeable difference between the Hybrid an the regular Civic is that you can feel the car nose forward just a bit as you press down on the brake pedal and the generator that is driven by the brakes kicks in. You should also note that you can take $2000 off your adjusted gross income on your 2003 taxes, and many states provide addtional incentives. Excise tax was waved in Maryland ($2000), and you can drive in the HOV lanes in Virginia without a second passenger. Bottom line - it's a great car, and a good deal to boot.
  • by starfighter_org (530923) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:04PM (#6945289)
    If you look at the fuel efficiency info on the EPA site, you'll notice that the TDI (Turbo Diesel Injection) Volkswagons can get around 50MPG. They start easy in the winter, unlike the older diesels. Check out www.tdiclub.com. I just got a 2000 TDI Beetle and it's awesome. Also, there are a few modifications that give you loads of extra power from the engine. Some will even increase efficiency and give you more power. These are great cars, go check em out.
    • by Dave Muench (21979) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:21PM (#6945667)
      Mod the above comment up.. TDI Volkswagons are great. Anyone who thinks they are noisy or slow should go drive one and drop their 1980's preconceptions. Diesel is available nearly everywhere (you just have to know where to look) and pollutes far less (not just what comes out your tailpipe, but the refining process is simpler as well). TDI VW's also only require oil changes every 10,000 miles, saving you time and money there as well.

      http://www.tdiclub.com/

      Hybrid electrics are a joke, a stopgap technology until something better comes along. Don't bother.
    • by Insightfill (554828) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:43PM (#6946077) Homepage
      Agreed. While I ultimately bought the Honda Insight for my daily commute, I looked at the TDIs for quite a while.

      I visited a friend in Tucson once for a long weekend. He had the Jetta TDI at the time and including him, there were five of us in that car touring the city for days. With mountains. The car didn't even breathe hard.

      After 400 miles, the car still had half a tank left.

      People often look at cars as strictly a numbers game, but the TDIs (and hybrids and electrics) can be foolers. All get their pull from very strong, early torque. A good electric job with "only" 60 horsepower has tremendous torque early on, and can seriously give most Mustangs and Camaros a run for the money up to about 30MPH, which is how lots of us suburban/city people live: 0-30-0-45-0, etc.

      Another exmaple of great torque early on are VW's 1.8T engines, which are rated for (depending on model year) 150-190 horsepower, but are incredibly strong right off the line. The turbo is actually ALWAYS engaged, but engages gradually more as the revs climb, giving the engine a very flat torque and power curve. "Turbo lag", as the term normally means, doesn't exist.

      It's often said that people "buy horsepower but drive torque." Something to remember.

      For quite a while, the Insights were besting Miata's and many other "small" cars in class "H" races, I believe, not through big engines, but strong, early torque and very tight handling. I haven't kept up, lately.

  • Get a Prius! (Score:5, Informative)

    by HTMLSpinnr (531389) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:06PM (#6945337) Homepage
    I own a 2002 Prius, and have pre-ordered a 2004 (new and improved). In short, I love my car. It's got plenty of power for your daily commute, and with my 20-25 miles per day driving, I can easily go two weeks or more between fillups. I've also made the trip from Southern California to Phoenix AZ on 6-7 gallons. It's also beneficial to know that I'm not polluting nearly as much as the big SUV's I share the road with, since the current model is SULEV rated, and the new one also carries the AT-PZEV rating for partial zero emissions.

    The current model doesn't carry a whole lot, and you can't tow with either generation, but for most of us, that's not a regular issue. The new version is a hatchback with fold-downs eats, so it solves the "carrying stuff" issue.

    There's plenty of Yahoo! Groups and other forums on electric or hybrid cars. A couple I personally hang out on and post alot of good geek info:

    http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/2004-prius/
    http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/toyota-prius/

    See you there!
  • by JustAnotherReader (470464) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:09PM (#6945393)
    Ars Technica [arstechnica.com] did a really good review of the Honda Insight. You might find it informative.
  • by Jerk City Troll (661616) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:21PM (#6945659) Homepage

    My girlfriend got a 2003 Civic Hybrid with a CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) last April. This vehcile is phenominal. As soon as I have the money, I will be getting one myself.

    With proper driving technique, I've gotten it as high as 52.6mpg (average). (There is an instantaneous mpg meter beneath the average gauge that shows you what you're getting as you go over hills and so forth--it really helps you adjust your driving for maximum efficiency.) Without much thought, it usually averages between 43-46mpg. With a 12.7 gallon (it might be 13) tank, I've gone as far as 620 miles.

    The engineering is quite nice, the car has been very reliable. The ride is remarkably smooth and the acceleration is silky. Handling is amazing. One nasty downside is the car is very light, so it hydroplanes easier than most vehicles. I would highly recommend getting AA-AAA rated tires (like Falkens) if you drive in wet areas a lot. They will help reduce this.

    The interior is great too. If you didn't know it was a hybrid, you would think you were driving a regular car (albeit the console is very slick, kind of a retro look). It's a very spatious, full-sized sedan. The backseat floor does not have a hump in the middle and is also quite generous space-wise. I cannot say enough about the interior: it's a very decent size.

    A quick summary of how it works: you have a small, 1.3L gasoline engine (I think 52hp). Right on the drive train, just before the transmission is the electric motor (that contribute an aditional 41hp for a total of 93). When electricity is "pumped" into the motor, it obviously reduces the load on the engine. This is used for acceleration and hill climbing. When idle, the electric motor does what all motors do when pushed externally: it generates power to charge the battery. The brakes are regenerative. When you stop at traffic lights or stop-signs, the engine stops to save gasoline. Since it has solid state ignition, it has zero turn-over, so it starts instantly (as soon as you let off the brake).

    Apparantly, there are also a variety of hacks that can be done to cause it to favor the electric motor more for those of us who are really light on the gas pedal. I haven't really investigated this, so consider them rumors.

    My recommendation: get one ASAP. You will not be disappointed with this car. It could use a few extra trimmings, but even in its simplicity feature-wise, it's a very enjoyable car. My girlfriend calculates it will pay for itself in a matter of 5 years. Nothing much more to say. At least go test drive one.

    Oh, and we also looked at the Toyota Prius. Those things suck ass. They are very rough to drive. The computer screen is always full of motion and it's very distracting without lending much usefulness. Furthermore, it's cramped inside and the vehcile controls are just... bizarre. The engine compartment is also very cramped. Doing work on that vehicle would require taking a lot of shit apart, ergo it may be very expensive to service. Handling sucked. Overall, the Toyota Prius is just as shitty as its Echo counterpart.

    One last note: you may want to hold off on a hybrid from anyone though. Honda has plans to market a fuel-cell powered electric car in the US within the next couple of years. Those will be far more interesting I think, if they ever actually reach dealerships.

    Disclaimer: I do not work for Honda in any way. They just happen to make a spectacular hybrid vehcile.

  • Honda Civic Hybrid (Score:5, Informative)

    by dsz (93759) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:26PM (#6945758) Homepage
    I very happily own a hybrid vehicle - a 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid [honda.com] - and would recommend it highly to the right kind of person.


    First, the good news: I drive my car about 40 miles a day (driving commutes suck!) and get around 55 miles per gallon. My commute is about 70%/30% highway to city driving. When I drive it around the city (which I generally try _not_ to do - Boston is bike-friendly enough, plus I live near the T), I get mileage closer to 50 mpg, and when I've gone on longer roadtrips it's up near 60 mpg.


    More good news: It's a real car. It seats five. It has a reasonable sized trunk (not huge, though). With a few exceptions, it's very similar to the non-hybrid Civic, so my car is comfortable, well equipped (CD player, power everything, ABS, etc.) and pretty well designed. I wasn't interested in the Insight 'cause it's small and somewhat awkward and not what I call a "real" car.


    The not-so-good news: The one large complaint I have about the car is that the back seat does not fold down (that's where they stashed the batteries).


    Some economics: I spent a little less than $20K on my car. The hybrid is about three or four thousand more than the regular Civic. I'll get a $2000 deduction on my 2003 income tax (giving me about $600), and I'll save some (but not tons) on gas vs. the regular Civic that probably adds up to over about $1500 over 100,000 miles. So basically, I break even. If I had bought a used car, I would've spent far less money, even in the long run.


    I think I made the right decision when I bought my car because:

    • I wanted a car
    • I wanted to pollute less and use less gasoline than the average car
    • I wanted to support hybrid technology and send the message to auto makers that people were interested in these cars
    • I happened to have enough money to do the above


    So, the bad news is that supporting hybrid technology and being good to the environment (while still owning a car) is an expensive proposition right now. The good news is that the more and more people are buying the cars and that if you can afford them, they're quality automobiles.


    I'd be happy to answer questions about the Civic or my decision-making process. I also collected some links and made some notes about the car - you can see those here [dsz123.net].

  • by mrv (20506) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:45PM (#6946102) Homepage
    2000-current Honda Insight, 2-seater:
    http://www.hondacars.com/models/model_overview.asp ?ModelName=Insight [hondacars.com]

    2003-current Honda Civic Hybrid 5-passenger compact sedan:
    http://www.hondacars.com/models/model_overview.asp ?ModelName=Civic+Hybrid [hondacars.com]

    2001-2003 Toyota Prius 5-passenger compact sedan:
    http://www.toyota.com/prius [toyota.com]

    2004 Toyota Prius 5-passenger midsize liftback:
    http://www.toyota.com/prius/minisite/index.html [toyota.com]
    (for those who dislike Flash, info here:
    http://www.toyota.com/prius/minisite/html/printabl e.html [toyota.com] and here http://www.toyota.com/prius/minisite/specs/specs_b ody.html [toyota.com] )

    if you live in Japan there is also the hybrid
    Estima (7-8 passenger minivan similar to the Previa),
    and the mild-hybrid Crown large sedan.

    if you can wait a year or so, Ford should have out
    their hybrid Escape (info: http://www.hybridford.com [hybridford.com] (Flash only),
    a "small" SUV/CUV that actually has towing capacity.
    Lexus should also have their RX330 hybrid (the
    RX400H) small SUV/CUV out (see http://www.lexus.com/about/hybrid/index.html [lexus.com]
    with Toyota shortly following with the hybrid
    Highlander cousin.

    I've also heard of the GM/Saturn Vue, the Nissan
    Altima (I think that's the model), and the Toyota
    Sienna, as next on the block with hybrid powertrains
    (i.e. full/assist hybrids).
  • by meehawl (73285) <meehawl@spam.gmail@com> on Friday September 12 2003, @02:55PM (#6946311) Homepage Journal
    Whatever about the mileage improvements of a gasoline-electric vehicle, many posters have already pointed out that current clean-burning modern diesel cars already get 50-70 mpg. All the major manufacturers (yes even the American ones, though of course the Europeans are ahead in diesel technology) are bringing out diesel-electric hybrids [google.com] over the next few years. This innovation should add around 50% to the mileage of typical diesel cars. Within 10 years we will see 100mpg diesel-electric hybrids.
  • I drive one (Score:5, Informative)

    by jACL (75401) on Friday September 12 2003, @03:30PM (#6946945)
    Have had it for a year, and learned a lot about them.

    There are three hybrids being sold right now:

    - Honda Civic Hybrid
    - Honda Insight
    - (2003) Toyota Prius

    The Hondas use a gas engine as their primary engine with an electric engine (which doubles as a generator during braking) as a secondary source of acceleration. Think of this arrangement as a gas engine with a massive-battery-powered electric supercharger. If the electric engine fails, the gas engine will still get you there -- it just accelerates slower.

    The Prius is the other way around -- its primary engine is electric, and a secondary gas engine gives it the acceleration. In the Prius, it is possible to drive (with very little gas pedal pressure) on electric alone -- something the Prius owners call "Zen driving." If the gas engine fails, you can still drive on the electric.

    Reliability:
    I know people who own both a Honda Civic Hybrid (HCH) and a 2003 Prius. I personally own the HCH. I would have no hesitation in buying one again. I average 54 MPG in the summer, and 45 MPG in the winter. Range is ~600 miles per tank; I drive 50 miles a day, and fill up twice a month. I have heard that it is possible to get ~700 miles/tank in a Prius, but have never got a first hand report of that.

    The Honda had one early bug with deep, cold weather -- very occasionally, the electric system would shut down and not restart until the car was shut down and restarted. A flash of the computer firmware fixed it. Many people reported this problem. It also had an issue with a squeak in a support pillar, fixed by shimming with a business card. Maintenance visits are scheduled for every 10000 miles. Gas mileage is better on the highway (51 mpg) than the city (49 mpg).

    The 2003 Prius has had more problems. Issues were with "highway wandering" -- it feels like the car wants to migrate around the road -- and shaking of the steering wheel at low speeds. Cause: the entire power steering rack needed to be replaced. There's also the gas engine failure called the "Big Hand" that's fixed with a similar car reboot, but it's caused by the Accelerator Pedal Assembly needing to be replaced. Many people report that they've had both of these problems. Maintenance is more frequent at 7,500 miles. Gas mileage is better in the city (51 mpg) than the highway (49 mpg).

    I don't know anyone who drives a Honda Insight. Supposedly they still make ~1500 of them a year, but rumor has it that Honda is going to be dropping them.

    Near-term and Farther-out Models:
    The Prius has been out longer than the HCH, and is getting a technological refresh in 2004. The 2003 Prius and the HCH are both 4-seater compacts, but the 2004 Prius will be a mid-size, with better mileage (59 city, 51 highway) and better acceleration (0-60 in 10 instead of 12). There is currently a waiting list for them.

    Cars/Trucks/SUVs due to be released as hybrids in 2004:

    Honda Accord,
    Honda CR-V,
    Ford Escape

    2004 or 2005:
    Chevy Silverado
    Saturn Vue
    GMC Suburban

    Here's an in-depth look [ucsusa.org] at Hybrid technology from the Union of Concerned Scientists (Google HTML translation here [216.239.51.104]).

    Here's the best description [arstechnica.com] of what it's like to drive one.

    There is a federal tax deduction of $2000 [fueleconomy.gov] for buying a new hybrid. Several states also offer their own tax deductions or credits -- check here [dsireusa.org] to look them up. Some states (but not all) also let you drive them in their high occupancy lanes, even though you may only have one driver in it.

    Oh, by the way -- I know that the 2003 Honda Civic Hybrids are
    • Re:Waiting it out (Score:5, Informative)

      by bman08 (239376) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:08PM (#6945370)
      Those were electric cars. The EV1 in particular, I think. It had nothing at all to do with the EPA and everything to do with the charger bursting into flames. On the upside, Electric cars park free at meters in L.A.
    • by pixelpusher220 (529617) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:22PM (#6945680)
      Actually I just bought a 2003 Civic Hybrid on Sept 1st. And I can't really complain about much. No the pickup isn't spectacular. It's a 4 cylinder engine and a small one. Total HP is somewhere around 90 *I think*. You don't buy this for power.

      500 miles on a tank of gas IS pretty spectacular, when said tank is only 13.2 gallons. 42 mpg average so far, with a mix of commuting and highway driving. That figure is still rising too. I did about a 100 mile round trip highway, and got 53 mpg. Damn nice on the wallet.

      The Civic Hybrid is just that. A Civic. The only significant difference is that you can't fold the rear seat down because that's where the battery pack is mounted vertically behind the read seat. Trunk space? you couldn't even the tell battery pack was there if it wasn't pointed out to you. Plenty of space for normal people.

      The dealer readily admits they aren't entirely sure how long the battery pack will remain useful. So it comes with an 8 yr 80k mile warranty on that system; independant of the vehicle warranty. I got a 6 yr 100k total vehicle warranty so it's good for as long as I realistically plan to have it.

      Geek factor: I'm finding it's cool being able to watch (& feel) the electric assist kick in. Or the engine shut off while I'm braking to a stop. The engine shut off is selectable; there's an 'econ' button on the dash. If it's not selected then the engine won't stop. Summer and needing AC are the main reason for that. The AC doesn't run if the engine isn't running. The fan still works but it can get warm. Having the option is a nice touch.

      I'm still in the 'new car' mode of figuring things out, but this has a whole knew paradigm of stuff to figure out. The dash gauges are a pretty informative mix of what's going on. It has a instant mpg bar that goes up n down as you drive, as well as displaying the overall mpg for a trip mileage. (2 of these). One I have on total vehicle mileage so I can see what I'm getting as I continue driving. The other I use for various trips to see what different types of driving produce fuel economy wise.

      All in all I'm very happy with it so far.

      • by mentin (202456) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:49PM (#6946179)
        42 mpg average so far ... damn nice on the wallet.

        Do the math: let's say you drive 12k miles a year, this is 285 gallons of gas. So you pay around $500 a year for gas. A regular sedan owner with 21 mpg would pay twice as much, ie $500 a year more. In 10 years he will pay $5k more. Person who bought hybrid already paid ~$4k more when he bought the car, and will pay at least ~$1k more for more expensive service.

        So from the point of view of money, hybrids do not worth it - and would be considerably worse if automakers were not forced to sell them (some percentage of total cars sold should be hybrid or electric in U.S.).

        I think hybrids are great for environment and a cool techno gadget, but hopes of saving on gas - forget about it. Not in the U.S. where gas is still very cheap (compare with Europe).

      • by ElectricMayhem (592404) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:55PM (#6946288) Homepage
        Trunk space? ... Plenty of space for normal people.

        And with the 500 miles off of a single tank of gas, there is no credit card trail at gas stations on the way to drop off the body. Efficient and practical.
        • by Bradee-oh! (459922) on Friday September 12 2003, @03:23PM (#6946833)
          "The dash gauges are a pretty informative mix of what's going on. It has a instant mpg bar that goes up n down as you drive, as well as displaying the overall mpg for a trip mileage. (2 of these). One I have on total vehicle mileage so I can see what I'm getting as I continue driving. The other I use for various trips to see what different types of driving produce fuel economy wise."

          My parent's 1988 Ford Aerostar had all that. My dad's 95 VW Jetta had that, as does my brother's 2000 Jetta. I'm sort of amused that most people haven't had this kind of thing for years.

          I think you missed a key point - he's not talking about mileage, he's talking about a REALTIME miles-per-gallon display. That is the instantaneous mpg your vehicle is traveling at a moment in time. I have a 2000 Jetta with every option, and unless he added it afterwards, your brother does NOT have this option. :)

          On a different note on this feature, the only cars I've seen with a real-time mpg display before the hybrids started coming out was all the BMWs (that I've driven) for the last decade or so. It is a very handy feature that I think more cars SHOULD have. It's amazing to see how little changing your highway speed in a BMW M3, for example, makes the different between a constant 20mpg on the highway and between a constant 25-30mpg.

          It's also very amusing to watch your realtime mpg when you're jaunting around a racetrack. If you want to see how hard you're really driving the car, it's alot more telling to watch the mpg instead of the speedometer or even the tach. I still get a thrill everytime I blip the throttle to downshift to third at turn 11 at Thunderhill and watch the mpg dial spike from 20 to almost zero in an instant. :)
    • by Golias (176380) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:32PM (#6945874)
      If you are considering a hybrid vehicle, there are two words you need to examine closely before going through with it:

      repair costs

      What makes hybrids affordable is that there are massive government subsidies reducing the price of the car. This masks the fact that many of the parts for these cars are enormously expensive. A hybrid Civic that gets into a minor city-street collision with a minivan or SUV is probably going to be so expensive to repair, that the insurance company will want to total it out.

      If the long-term potential costs of maintenance and parts doesn't scare you off, and you don't expect to haul a boat trailer or something, then the hybrid cars can be a terrific way to go. Fantastic gas millage and a super-quiet ride. The inventor of regenerative breaks should get a medal.

      Personally, I'll stick with my Crown Victoria for now. It may drink gas, (I get about 20 MPG from my highway and city driving combined) but it's safe, it seats six, and has a trunk big enough to easily fit three dead hookers. More, if you chop 'em up and put them in bags. Plus, the V8 is powerful enough to tow a lot of stuff when I need to, and the suspension is so smooth, it's like driving a hovercraft. Best of all, the reputation for being an "old man's car" means cheap insurance in spite of being almost the same car that the cops are tearing around town in.

      The Crown Vic LS is like a Lincoln town car for half the price, and is the most under-rated car of the last decade, IMHO.

      If you really want to get a hybrid car, consider looking for a used Toyota Prius, perhaps sold by some Yuppie asshole who only bought it to be trendy, and wants to trade up to a Mini Cooper S now that Minis are considered the New Hotness.

      • by mithras the prophet (579978) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:55PM (#6946299) Homepage Journal
        What makes hybrids affordable is that there are massive government subsidies reducing the price of the car.
        Not that there aren't massive government subsidies reducing the price of oil, of course... $167 billion this year?
      • Get real! (Score:5, Informative)

        by El (94934) on Friday September 12 2003, @03:24PM (#6946847)
        A hybrid Civic that gets into a minor city-street collision with a minivan or SUV is probably going to be so expensive to repair, that the insurance company will want to total it out.
        A Honda Civic Hybrid that gets into a "minor" collision is going to use the exact same parts to repair as a non-hybrid Civic!!! Meaning there is less chance of it getting totaled, because it cost more!!! The only non standard parts are the engine, batteries, and dashboard. The batteries are in the safest place in the car -- behind the rear seat. If your batteries and dashboard are destroyed, you've got bigger problems then replacing your car -- you're most likely dead. "Minor" collisions rarely require replacing engines; if you're in a collision that requires a new engine, your car is probably totalled regardless of whether or not it is a hybrid!
        • by Elroy Jetson (590373) on Friday September 12 2003, @05:29PM (#6948307)
          Indeed. Driving style can make a HUGE impact on fuel economy. I've got a 2001 Insight with the CVT transmission. If I drive like Joe Sixpack in his '84 Mustang (crushing the gas on every takeoff and waiting 'til the last second to brake), I get around 45mpg. On the other hand, I've had trips where I've averaged over 90mpg. The major keys to high gas mileage on my Insight are:

          1. Try to maintain a constant speed.
          2. Accelerate evenly when taking off, using a moderate amount of electric motor assist.
          3. Try to maintain a steady cruising speed between 35 and 45mph. The mpg bar will show you know when you've found the "sweet spot".
          4. Gas mileage is noticeably higher in warmer weather.
          5. Maintain large following distances, avoid hard braking, and roll through stops whenever possible. If you start braking early enough for that stop light, it could turn green while you're at 12mph instead of sitting at a dead stop.
          6. Use the hardest, lowest rolling resistance tires you feel comfortable with (the stock Bridgestone Potenzas are good for me). Keep them properly inflated; underinflation decreases fuel economy.
          7. Above about 30mph, you get better mpg with the windows up and air conditioner/vent in "economy" than with the windows down. Never use "auto" mode, since it disables the Insight's auto-stop feature.

          Contrary to popular opinion, using a higher-grade gasoline has shown no noticeable affect on fuel economy.

          My lifetime mpg over ~22,800 miles is 59.7mpg, including a trip from Louisville, KY to Seattle, WA and back by way of Montana. Through Snoqualmie and Lookout Pass. In January. With stock tires & no chains. As long as you don't try to plow through snow deeper than about 5-6", you should be fine through the winter.

          Final note: don't forget to check with your accountant for a possible tax break (both state and federal) on your "green" vehicle. Being able to write off a couple thousand in taxes can make that $20,000 Insight a hell of a lot more appealing.
    • by NaugaHunter (639364) on Friday September 12 2003, @02:57PM (#6946362)
      Let's see...

      1999..........$0.899
      2003..........$1.799

      Yeah, it can't possibly double by 2007. Why, we'd have to get involved in a war in the Middle East and have accidents at offshore oil rigs and have problems with the Alaskan Pipe line and have an energy company-friendly administration that won't release oil reserves...