Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Data Storage Government The Courts News

Information Preservation and Data Havens? 413

tiltowait asks: "An interesting story on LISNews.com this morning about savvy U.S. students photocopying textbooks in Mexico then returning them for refunds got me thinking about data havens. There's already few places on the web where you can exploit countries having different copyright durations and eligibility. On the flip side, there's restrictions such as broadcast blackouts and country-wide firewalls. But just as the rich can use of international tax loopholes and in light of the recent file-sharing victory, are there any projects out there, beyond the P2P networks, to distribute possibly-protected information by any means necessary? For example, your company may already outsource labor, but what about an off-site backup in case of an FBI raid?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Information Preservation and Data Havens?

Comments Filter:
  • by Throtex ( 708974 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:07PM (#10050456)
    You mean like Cheney being kept in an undisclosed location?
  • It's crap (Score:5, Insightful)

    by thewldisntenuff ( 778302 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:08PM (#10050463) Homepage
    It is wrong to copy textbooks....I'm not going to condone it...

    But here's where I call bullshit...Why does there need to be a new edition every two-plus years on subjects that do not change at all? What new discoveries come in math? Do derivatives change at all? How bout sine and cosine? Hmm?

    Anybody have an answer?
    • Re:It's crap (Score:3, Insightful)

      by flewp ( 458359 )
      I don't really see copying textbooks as wrong. I think it's wrong to copy them in order to sell the textbook or return it. Basically the whole fair use thing is what I'm saying.

      As for the whole issue of new textbooks coming out constantly, with nothing new, that is indeed BS. Since the laws of math are going to be the same (except maybe at the very highest levels of math where things are still being discovered), it's pointless and stupid to keep printing out new books and charging extremely high pric
    • Re:It's crap (Score:4, Interesting)

      by eln ( 21727 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:16PM (#10050545)
      It's ludicrous. This semester, I spent $350 on books for three classes. All of these classes got new editions of the text this year. In addition, after last semester I had only one textbook that the bookstore would take back, because all the others were being replaced!

      Also, these days a ton of textbooks come with these stupid "learning aid" CDs and access to super-secret "study aid" websites to justify jacking up the price by another 50 bucks.

      Most of the time, comparing two editions of the same textbook side by side reveals very little differences. Often they'll change the order of the exercises in the book, without actually changing any of them, just so you'll have to have the new edition or you'll end up doing the wrong problems for homework.
      • Re:It's crap (Score:3, Informative)

        by gcaseye6677 ( 694805 )
        I place the blame for this solely on the professors. They have been known to receive "incentives" for frequently changing versions. The cost, of course, is paid by the students. If professors stopped choosing the newest edition, which has no additional material from the older one, publishers would stop playing these games.
        • Re:It's crap (Score:4, Insightful)

          by bhima ( 46039 ) <Bhima.Pandava@DE ... com minus distro> on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:28PM (#10050680) Journal
          Often it's the professors writing the new edition!
          • Re:It's crap (Score:3, Informative)

            by Wanker ( 17907 ) *

            Often it's the professors writing the new edition!

            One of my college professors with an overabundance of ethics made it a point to hand out, in cash, his $4 royalty back to each student who purchased his book.

            While this would be ripe for abuse in larger classes (i.e. get in line multiple times) a similar arrangement would be simple to reach with the bookstore where the book simply gets sold for less than normal, and it comes out of the professor's royalties.

            An even better approach would be to contribu

            • Re:It's crap (Score:4, Informative)

              by Wanker ( 17907 ) * on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:56PM (#10050937)
              Opentextbook.org has very little content-- the link I meant to include is http://en.wikibooks.org [wikibooks.org]
            • Re:It's crap (Score:5, Informative)

              by Froze ( 398171 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:58PM (#10050955)
              While opentextbook is an interesting start up, you may want to consider WikiBooks [wikibooks.org]. It is already in a huge number of languages and covers many more topics. Not to mention the other Wiki's [wikimedia.org] available.

              PS. If you run your own linux box, set up a mediawiki on it. I use mine for doing research, homework and keeping course notes. Very nice!
        • Re:It's crap (Score:3, Interesting)

          by phliar ( 87116 )
          Not all professors... when I was one, I: (a) told publishers' reps I'd be happy to review any books they had, and they were welcome to pick them up when I was done (they never did); and (b) told students that it was stupid to buy books just to find homework problems and then sell them back after the semester, so not only would textbooks be optional, they'd be books that I felt would be good references for their future (computer science). I could handle the teaching and homework problem setting myself.
      • Re:It's crap (Score:2, Interesting)

        by highway40 ( 636416 )
        When I was in engineering college and taking a class where I was sure I wouldn't need the textbook ever again I would just check it out of the campus library and hold on to it for the semester. You usually got the book for about a month and could renew it at least once. The late fees were low enough that I only spent about $10 per book for the semester.
        • So you're the bastard who prevented the rest of us from getting a chance to use the Public Copy of the textbooks!

          You singlehandedly increased the cost of my education by about $5k.

          (the term "YOU" in this context is to be construed as the general "you" and indicating a hypothetical person or class of persons exhibiting the behavior described in parent post. Under no circumstances should this post be construed as being directly referring to any specific individual, except in the case where they really did o
      • Offtopic... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by nkh ( 750837 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:23PM (#10050629) Journal
        I'm not american so I don't understand this: what kind of books are you supposed to buy? I'm in college and all the books I would ever need are available at the library (In fact, all my courses are done without books). I only bought two crypto books (Schneier and Zémor) because I told my teacher I wanted to have fun at home.
        • books (Score:5, Insightful)

          by pizza_milkshake ( 580452 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:40PM (#10050788)
          in american universities professors and booksellers conspire to require new editions of books every year or two, and these books costs usually around $50-60 each, larger books will go for $80-100 or more. the professors often get a kickback from the booksellers for every dollar they bring in, and of course they also get paid if they are the author (they often are)

          many students spend >$350 per semester in order to rent the "proper" edition of a book that has not had any significant changes made to it in years, if ever. after 3 months the students "sell" the books back to the bookstore for around 1/4 what they paid, so the books can be put on the shelf for next semester, assuming there isn't a new edition required for the class.

          people tolerate it because "college is important" and you "learn valuable life skills".

          • Re:books (Score:4, Insightful)

            by Kiryat Malachi ( 177258 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:50PM (#10050882) Journal
            I tolerated it because I planned to keep those books as my reference library. It might not be true for some professions, but I always cringed when I saw science and engineering students selling their books back - when you start working, you *will* want those books to refer to.
        • by Cryofan ( 194126 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:50PM (#10050885) Journal
          Is anyone paying fucking attention to what is happening here in America? The conspiracy between the schools, the professors, the bookstores and the publishers is just one example of how America is run for and by those at the top. What I want to know is why the country of parent poster here, which apparently is a country run by the people, for the people, is able to do for him what our America, the "Greatest Country in the World" cannot do for us....

          Free market, my ass....
          • You can do what my friends and I tried... we setup an online bookstore to sell books to students at our university. At the time, the bookstore was selling for about 2% below list price, so we set our prices about 5% below list. Not much, but it was a start. However, we had some problems with the publishers, shipping, delivery, etc., and didn't break even the first semester. It really is a logistical nightmare, but we didn't screw any students... most got their books, and the rest at least got their mone
      • Re:It's crap (Score:3, Insightful)

        I don't know...

        The head of my computer science department wrote a very nice text on Unix programming that I still have on my bookshelf today - and refer to on various occaisions.

        Granted - it was expensive to buy initially (and used at that).

        Actually I have most of my core CS books, as well as my English style guides (and several copies of Strunk & White that I managed to collect and squirrel away for later treasure picking).

        On the other hand, I don't have any of my Math books - and only kept one His
    • $400 is what I spent on books this semester. I live at home with my mother (big surprise, I'm on slashdot right?) and work part time for about 12k a year. Books really really hurt my pocketbook. I'd never feel bad about copyright violations against bookmakers who make huge profits off of people when they're the least likely to be able to afford it.
    • Re:It's crap (Score:3, Informative)

      by bhima ( 46039 )
      Civil Disobedience, GPL and The Creative Commons
    • Re:It's crap (Score:2, Interesting)

      "What new discoveries come in math? Do derivatives change at all? How bout sine and cosine? Hmm?"

      Insightfull????? More like TROLL! I think you will find there are many journals dedicated to publishing new "discoveries" in mathematics. You argument smacks of ignorance.

      As for "new editions", Noone has to buy any such thing. A second hand relatively modern edition of a textbook will suffice in many cases.
      • I'm not knocking the fact that there are new discoveries that arrive in many different areas of academia....What I don't understand is the need to update books so often....Update them, fine, but why is there a need to reprint every so often?
      • Re:It's crap (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Aerion ( 705544 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:32PM (#10050711)
        Insightfull????? More like TROLL! I think you will find there are many journals dedicated to publishing new "discoveries" in mathematics. You argument smacks of ignorance.

        Plenty of things are being discovered in mathematics, but they are all at a high enough level that nobody writes widely-distributed textbooks about them. There haven't been a whole lot of advancements that have radically changed the way Calculus I is taught.
      • Insightfull????? More like TROLL! I think you will find there are many journals dedicated to publishing new "discoveries" in mathematics. You argument smacks of ignorance.

        As for "new editions", Noone has to buy any such thing. A second hand relatively modern edition of a textbook will suffice in many cases.

        The grandparent poster specifically excluded higher level courses from his point. There's very little from any journal that's going to make it into a first year maths text, yet they get new editions

      • You're completely wrong. Universities are forced by the publishers to force new editions on students every (approx.) 2 years. The biggest differences between the editions are that the problems are rearranged. Try getting through a class with a second hand modern edition when all of the problems are different, and the homework is graded. Try getting through calc 4 when the brand new book you bought 2 years ago containing the exact same content isn't the required reading, but instead you have to buy anothe
    • Yeah. They want to rip us off? Fine, we rip them off. It's just like piracy, but less convenient since you have to actually photocopy the book.

      I'd rather have the book than a stack of photocopies, but better yet is buying only one book for a group of people taking the same subject. One of my friends spent $950 for the books that were on the "required" list last semester. I spent about $150 and didn't suffer for it.
    • by Ucklak ( 755284 )
      Why in today's tech savvy world can't we just get the E-book for a cheaper price. Printing optional. You pay your tuition to the school, they (the school) subsidise the content maker based on enrollment, you get an E-book and you can either use your computer or pay to have it printed.
    • Re:It's crap (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Lord Kano ( 13027 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:56PM (#10050938) Homepage Journal
      It is wrong to copy textbooks....I'm not going to condone it...

      The RIAA and MPAA have time and time again told us that it isn't about right and wrong, it's about the law. In a place where it's not illegal to photocopy a text book, there is no legal dilemma. Why bring ethics into it?

      LK
    • Re:It's crap (Score:4, Insightful)

      by bcrowell ( 177657 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @07:06PM (#10051009) Homepage
      But here's where I call bullshit...Why does there need to be a new edition every two-plus years on subjects that do not change at all? What new discoveries come in math? Do derivatives change at all? How bout sine and cosine? Hmm?
      Several reasons:
      1. The publishers use it to kill off the used book market.
      2. Accrediting organizations won't let schools use old textbooks, even for something like freshman calculus that isn't changing rapidly.
      3. Some profs like it, because, e.g., frat houses will build up files of homework solutions.
      Of these, #1 is the most important, as demonstrated by the fact that publishers do it more often than is required by accreditation. #3 is the least important, as demonstrated by the fact that most profs I know (I teach at a community college) sympathize with students who are getting ripped off by not being able to buy used books, and very few care about the solution files.

      But putting that issue aside, this is one of the lamest Ask Slashdot questions forever. What the poster is saying is, "I don't want to buy the book, and I also want someone else to pay to store my data for me, and I also want someone else to take the risks associated with my illegal actions, and I'm also too lazy to research the question myself."

  • by winkydink ( 650484 ) * <sv.dude@gmail.com> on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:08PM (#10050474) Homepage Journal
    just spread your data around. Jurisdictional nightmare.
    • One word: SEALAND (Score:3, Interesting)

      by goombah99 ( 560566 )
      the prinicipality of SEALAND [sealandgov.com] wants to be your data haven.
  • Appropriate? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    I like how not one legitimate use is listed among the reasons given.
    • The whole reason for any data haven to exist is to circumvent unfavorable regulations in your own country. So, if you define "legitimate" to mean "legal" then no, there are no legitimate reasons, because if everything you wanted to do was legal in your own country, you would just find a secure data center within your own borders.

      The only legitimate, as in morally correct, reason I could think of to store data offshore would be to protect information such as revolutionary websites from totalitarian regimes
    • Re:Appropriate? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by kfg ( 145172 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:25PM (#10050648)
      Actually, being able to recover your data after the FBI walks off with all of your hard drives is a perfectly legitimate reason. It could even be critical.

      Bear in mind that the FBI often confiscates things from people who are not party to the crimes being investigated. It's called "evidence." Sometimes evidence is in the hands of third parties.

      The FBI also often confiscates things without ever actually filing a charge. You may or may not ever get your drives back, but if you do it's likely to take a few years.

      If you are charged with a crime it doesn't take a great leap of imagination to realize that having copies could be a critical element in preparing your defense.

      Back up early. Back up often. Back up not only off site, but off the radar.

      KFG
  • and after i got a usb watch for xmas last year, i have gotten into the habit of archiving all of my company email every 3 monhhs, and walking out with the archive on my wrist

    i always wondered about the constitutionality of that... it's not really MY email, even though, for all practical purposes, the content of it is more important to me than my company (records of who said what to whom, my ideas, my code, etc.)

    we live in a day and age where corporate rights encroach on individual rights more and more

    i think we should all do our best to fight that, in big ways and small

    walking out with "corporate intellectual property" on my wrist is my way of doing that
    • I work in the mortgage industry, and in this industry, no-compete clauses are very common

      Among the restrictions of the clause, there is one that specifically mentions theft of company information and not directly soliciting any of the company's clients for a period of time.

      If you are in a sales position, taking the archives could represent theft of company data, which would violate privacy laws.

      If you are in a customer service position, taking the archives could also represent theft of confidential infor
      • but all of your concerns consider the rights and exposure of corporations

        not once do you consider the rights and exposure of the individual

        and that's the problem, as i see it, and as i think you fail to grasp

        how am i to defend myself from unfair accusations without a backup of my communications? how am i to work in an environment where the corporation has claims on not only the whole of my production, but also any production i might do or any potential for production in any ideas i may have?

        you can say
      • "I work in the mortgage industry, and in this industry, no-compete clauses are very common"

        It's not because something is written in a contract, it can be enforced in a court of law. Non-compete clauses, for example, usually don't fare very well in California.

    • Where I work that is grounds for instant dismissal so of course I use my iPaq.
  • by Hiigara ( 649950 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:11PM (#10050494)
    I seem to remember reading that some organization was setting up servers on abandoned oil rigs in international waters for just such a purpose. I don't know what happened to them. Something about a giant squid maybe?
    • by Mateito ( 746185 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:22PM (#10050608) Homepage
      Something about a giant squid maybe?

      What? Their proxy failed?

    • You're thinking of the bizzare nation of Sealand [wikipedia.org]
    • Hmm...oil rigs in International waters? Not very likley as some nation is going to want that revenue stream. Even the North Sea is divied up and I think thats outside everyone's 200 mile limit. How about storing them on a ship that never docks anywhere except where the can't reach? With GPS and Sattelite uplinks/downlinks you can find and access your data. Build your submarine if you want to hide even better. IIRC, there was a sci-fi novel about an AI that hid itself in parts across 1000's of servers when
    • About ten years ago I worked in Silicon Valley for a company that had an affiliate in the UK.
      I got assigned to back up all the hard disks once a week. One day I suggested to my boss that we make an extra back-up and send it to our English affiliate. My reasoning was that with all the:

      1) Earthquakes - There was a 7.2 a few years before centered a few miles away. I remember steel tables bouncing several feet in the air off a concrete floor in the warehouse. There was a 7.4 a few months eariler in L.A
  • Sealand (Score:4, Interesting)

    by darth_MALL ( 657218 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:11PM (#10050499)
    This place [wikipedia.org] was referred to in the Wiki article via the link to HavenCo. HavenCo [havenco.com] sounds like it's free of any type of outside infringement. Cool.
    • Re:Sealand (Score:4, Informative)

      by LiquidCoooled ( 634315 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:19PM (#10050581) Homepage Journal
      No.

      Reading HavenCo's User Policy is like a joke.

      Theres no protection at all, everything you do is public, and the best part:

      If a customer is found to have violated the AUP, HavenCo reserves the right to take appropriate action, possibly including permanent filters on a customer's network connection (inbound/outbound mail and web), disconnection, and recovery of costs related to the AUP investigation from the customer prior to return of customer equipment or remaining credit balance. HavenCo also may turn over the results of an AUP violation investigation to law enforcement, other network administrators, or others.

      Would you give your sensitive data to them?
      • Re:Sealand (Score:5, Insightful)

        by WhatAmIDoingHere ( 742870 ) <sexwithanimals@gmail.com> on Monday August 23, 2004 @07:04PM (#10050997) Homepage
        If you violate the AUP. And the only thing the AUP says you cannot do is violate Sealand law. The only thing Sealand law says you cannot do is have child pornography.Mbr>
        All that says is that if you host child pornography, they will report you to the proper people and give them your AUP-violating material. That's it.

        As long as your sensitive data isn't child porn, you'll be fine.
  • One word. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Zangief ( 461457 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:12PM (#10050505) Homepage Journal
    Cryptonomicon. (a book by Neal Stephenson)
  • Easily intercepted (Score:2, Insightful)

    by usefool ( 798755 )
    Off-site backup might help in case of an FBI raid, but what if FBI has a warranty to intercept your data prior to the raid?

    So the night before raid, while you're happily doing a off-site backup, another copy has been acquired by FBI.
    • Off-site backup might help in case of an FBI raid, but what if FBI has a warranty to intercept your data prior to the raid?

      So the night before raid, while you're happily doing a off-site backup, another copy has been acquired by FBI.

      So you use the previos days backup then. The point is to have a backup available to you, not to prevent the FBI from getting a copy. If they sieze your computer it doesn't matter if they have a copy of your backup. The out of country backup is there so that you can get y

  • Reminds me... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by bburton ( 778244 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:13PM (#10050518)
    Reminds me of South Korea.

    The copyright laws there are pretty much non-existant.

    For example you can purchase a jacket or article of clothing, and they will embroider it with just about anything you want, including emblems/logos that in America are Trademarked (Starter, Nike, etc).

    You can also buy fake oakley sunglasses (AKA Foaklies/Oakies) in many parts of the world for $5 a pop.

    The rest of the world doesn't always play by America's rules. But we're working on that. ;-)
    • Reminds me of South Korea.

      Reminds me of New York City. I can buy rip off sunglasses everywhere, and its not terribly hard to find shopes that will put anything you want on an article of clothing.

      But South Korea is coming around to the US point of view as much because they are increasingly not the low cost source, they are making their own movies now, writing software, and innovating technologies. Sure there is some pressure, but its not that effective in reality.

    • You can also buy fake oakley sunglasses (AKA Foaklies/Oakies) in many parts of the world for $5 a pop.

      Canal Street, Manhattan - where NY/NJ/CT residents go for their counterfeit goods.

  • by SoTuA ( 683507 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:14PM (#10050525)
    Somehow I don't think there's a single country in the western hemisphere where the book copying described in the blurb is legal.

    Plus, going to Mexico isn't all that cost-effective. I'm betting you can find someone who will run anything through his copier as long as you pay him as easily in the USA as in anywhere in the world.

  • Copying Textbooks (Score:2, Interesting)

    Unforunetely students copy textbooks a ridiculous amount now adays. Plus, for the popular ones, you could actually just google/emule the textbook name and chances are someone has already done it. With some of the engineering books costing easily over 100 dollars....then running into professors that hardly use the book...one can see why students think this is a viable option.

    I remember I took a class in Emperical Methods. The text book was 150 dollars and was very poorly translated from Spanish to Engl
    • 1) PACS, not PAX

      2) The few hospitals I've interacted with (Including my current employer) do offsite backups for disaster recovery, but that's not the same as outsourcing the data. Any corporation/entity with critical data would do the same.

      With that said, I don't think this is the same thing though. With the offsite backup of the data from the PACS (Which, for anyone not familiar is any Medical Imaging you get done at a hospital. I.e. X-Rays, CT, MRI, Ultrasound, Mammography, etc...) the last thing you w
  • Raid? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by marshac ( 580242 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:19PM (#10050584) Homepage
    If your business model suffers from the possibility of a FBI raid, perhaps it's time to re-evaluate your business? Just a thought...

    Off-site backups are good for other things, such as preparing for natural disasters, fires, etc...
    • Does your business model include an e-mail server? With users that you haven't done full background checks on? Who aren't citizens? Then you too can merit the possibility of a FBI Raid! Just call and let them know you have an insecure network with a possible terrorist message drop.
    • Re:Raid? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Alan Cox ( 27532 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @07:07PM (#10051017) Homepage
      There are lots of legitimate businesses and parties who need strong crypto, offsite data for protection against raids etc - journalists in many countries, unpopular but legal organisations who will be raided just to put them out of business by the powers that be (or by the powers that be on behalf of their paying customers like the IPR businesses)

      One of the cutest I've seen was RAID5 over network block device (encrypted) with the disks all in different legal jurisdictions.

    • Maybe not (Score:3, Interesting)

      by gillbates ( 106458 )

      If your business model suffers from the possibility of a FBI raid, perhaps it's time to re-evaluate your business? Just a thought...

      The problem is that almost every business has proprietary secrets that it can't afford to share with the general public. This usually means using encrypted communications - which may draw the suspicion of the FBI. Take for example:

      • A publisher of children's stories: the publisher wants to communicate with the author regarding changes in the manuscript, but without encr
  • Gmail (Score:2, Funny)

    by eadint ( 156250 )
    I thought thats what a gmail account is for.
    who needs one gig of email
    how about compressing your data and keeping it in your gmail account.
    how can you associate bighardnipples@gmail.com with something like say enron
  • by ElForesto ( 763160 ) <elforestoNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:21PM (#10050602) Homepage
    Anyone remember Sealand [sealandgov.com]? They bought an oil rig or somesuch in international waters and started advertising as a place to store data outside the reach of governments.
  • fbi raid (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mr_burns ( 13129 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:26PM (#10050658)
    I'd much rather deal with an FBI raid I know about than NSA scrutiny I don't know about.

    Of course, with PATRIOT, the distinction is meaningless. The NSA can snoop on citizens domestically and the FBI raids people overseas.

    On further thought. Location of your datastore appears meaningless. Maybe a better idea is good ol' distributed secure p2p (freenet and the like). maybe with some stegonography for good measure.
  • A better solution (Score:2, Insightful)

    by mysands ( 715779 )
    It is wrong ethically and ... to engage in work that is violating laws of our country and taking away from owners their hard earned rewards that they have worked and slogged days and nights to produce. On the other hand... Better way to address your problems are to support and develop electronic formats and buying books in these formats e.g. LaTeX, PDF etc (which don't yet prevent users from distributing) which individual writers can write and make available in formats that allow them to get returns that
  • Offsite backup (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Offsite backup is a very good idea and not just in case of an FBI raid. If your building burns down, you want to be able to rebuild your business. It's much easier if your books still exist!

    It occurs to me that a police raid is enabled by a warrant. The warrant is for a specific location. If they don't know where the backup data is they don't have a carte blanche to go fishing everywhere. Use your imagination.
  • by pjdepasq ( 214609 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:38PM (#10050767)
    As a young(er) Master's student in Computer Science back in 1996, I noted that many of my international colleagues (grad students) photocopying their textbooks and sharing the copies from semester to semester and student to student.

    I brought this up at a department meeting I was a student-rep for, and the grad program chair said something like "why should we care?"

    I was shocked at this attitude and lack of concern about the actions of those doing the copying. Yes, it is/was illegal and something should have been done/said about it. However, since I knew that several tenured professors didn't care, me saying anything to anyone wasn't going to change the situation. Perhaps, in hindsight, I should have alerted the book companies.
    • Ah yes, hindsight is always 20-20.. Had you indeed informed the publishers, and had there been a clampdown, there would never have been the Textbook shortage of 1999, or the hours upon hours of newscoverage on TV of literally starving authors..

      We would instead have textbook upon textbook competing for the same spot, each only slightly different, new versions each year and students being forced to buy the new version (sometime authored by the professor that gives the course) because of minor differences, li
    • by Eil ( 82413 )

      As a young(er) Master's student in Computer Science back in 1996,

      It's obvious, then, that you have no idea how much college costs the average student now. Just since 2001 we've seen the largest tuition hikes ever. What's left after tuition is usually gone after the parking fees, registration fees, technology fees (?!) and everything else they nickel-and-dime you for.

      Textbooks were the last refuge for the poor student. The thrifty student could usually buy them used or barter for them and then sell them
  • If you did that, and if they can prove intent to defraud, ( which is easy ) you goto jail anyway...
  • mexico? (Score:2, Informative)

    by Gajon ( 573633 )
    Just to make it clear. IT is ilegal to photocopy a book in Mexico. If you get caught you could have serious problems. The thing is that the people who attend the copying machines doesn't give a crap if you are doing something ilegal, you don't even have to bribe nobody, that's why it is "easier". But it is ILEGAL anyways. And yes, I live in Mexico.
  • by tiltowait ( 306189 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:44PM (#10050829) Homepage Journal
    LISNews.com [lisnews.com] is a farily active and popular (almost 10k stories) library and information science news site. Many of the stories on Slashdot crossover with LIS and vice versa. Just recently, for example: And since a lot of IT crosses over with what librarians do nowadays, this site really is worth a look-see. Just don't feed the GNA^H^H^H Boston Public Library troll (no, really! [stormloader.com]). So sign up now while we're still on 4-digit UIDs!

    ps. Yes I've read Cryptonomicon [cryptonomicon.com] and have heard of what Sealand [wired.com] is doing, but was wondering about any other efforts.
  • by Jack Action ( 761544 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:50PM (#10050883)
    At PG Australia [gutenberg.net.au] you can download texts that you can't get at the main Project Gutenberg because of U.S. copyright laws. Though they do have a nag warning:

    Do not download or read these books online if you are in a country where copyright protections can extend more than 50 years past an author's death.

    Among other things you can download Orwell's complete works [gutenberg.net.au] and The Great Gatsby [gutenberg.net.au].

    The University of Adeliade has a slicker version [adelaide.edu.au] of the same texts.

  • by evilned ( 146392 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @06:51PM (#10050894) Homepage
    I'm taking a macroeconomics class and I had a choice between an internet version of the class, which all class materials, including the text are part of a pay to access website. Its $40 for the whole semester. The website is run by the professor who wrote the class materials, and after hosting costs, all of the money goes to him. The other choice was to buy a $100 text book which may or may not be bought back by the bookstore, and I have no want to look at after the semester is over. Guess which section of the class I chose. This is what should be making publishers scared, not some people in a border town making photo copies. I got a cheaper class, my professor makes more money, and the publisher can go to hell.
  • why mexico (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Agrippa ( 111029 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @07:00PM (#10050969)
    Why do they have to go to Mexico?

    When I was a student at University of California, San Diego I had to go to Kinkos to copy some material a fundraiser for Boy's Club my fraternity was putting on. I had to wait an hour while a team of medical students copied every page of all their textbooks and monoplized all the copiers. I asked them what they were doing and was told point blank that they had just bought those books and they were copying them with the intention of returning them the next day for a refund. I pointed them to a sign hung above the copiers that had a warning about duplicating copywrited material and they just shrugged.

    I really need to get my work done so I talked to a Kinko's employee and asked him why he wasn't doing anything about the fact these medical students were blatantly disregarding not only Kinko policy but the law as well. His answer: We put that sign up but we don't really care if they do it. Shocked, I asked for his manager, explained the situation, and was given the exact same reply. Yea, the sign was up there, and the students knew they were doing something illegal in full site of people with the power to stop them, but as long as Kinkos was making money they didn't care.

    .agrippa.
  • Netlibrary.com (Score:4, Interesting)

    by jlseagull ( 106472 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @07:07PM (#10051018) Homepage
    NetLibrary [netlibrary.com] has a stupid interface - you log in from a member institution, then you can view books online. Good idea, right? Wrong. All of their content is crippled - you can't print it more than a page at a time, save it to a file, or even look at more than two pages consecutively without going through a screen that says "Please type the letters you see in the box. This is to protect against actions you have performed that appear to violate copyright." This is after simply viewing three pages in a row quickly, because I wanted to find a particular equation!

    So what did I do?

    Right.

    I wrote a script that brought up each of 280+ pages sequentially and printed them to TIFF files, popping up a browser so I could perform their human-detection action when required. The I packed the whole thing into a PDF, and ran an OCR on the whole thing. Presto! The original book, in un-DRM'd form, happily readable and printable.
  • by lawpoop ( 604919 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @07:53PM (#10051399) Homepage Journal
    Offsite backup partnering. [halfbakery.com]

    It would be nice to find offsite backup partners on some kind of P2P network. If you have 80 gigs to back up, you need to have 80 gigs available on your system to trade off. All encrypted, so it's safe. And if you're extra paranoid, find 2 or more partners!

  • by travler ( 88311 ) on Monday August 23, 2004 @08:17PM (#10051622)
    This is just my personal opinion so if you don't agree feel free.

    There is a fundimental difference between information and physical property.

    Information can generally be used simultainiously by multiple people without interfering with any of the other users of the information (we can all listen to the same song/hear the same joke/run the same program without 'taking away' from anyone else who 'uses' the information).

    Physical property can generally only be utilized by a single person simultainiously (Only I can use my car/socks/toothbrush during a specific point in time).

    This is a big fundamental difference.

    It would be nice if information could fit into the physical-property category but it simply doesn't.

    The reason it sorta-kinda did for so long was that the copying mechanisms were rather slow/expensive and the end result was always a physical item (paper-book, chemical-film, etc).

    Now we have finally gotten to a point where the information is more-or-less 'free' from the physical information-carrier.

    The major publishing-house people (those that make the physical items that are used to carry information) seem to be hopelessly trying to re-combine the physical with the informational. This isn't going to happen but they are currently causing a lot of harm in attempting to do so. The longer this 'transitional period' takes the longer all the misery is extended.

    The really funny thing in my opinion is that so many people in general also buy into the concept of 'information as physical-type property'.

    I would ask that you honestly think about the harm this idea causes vs the 'good' that results from it. I think that if you really truely honestly evaluate it you will see that these laws are causing much more harm than any good that they could ever do from this point forward.

    I feel that slowly we are outgrowing this outdated idea just like we outgrew other ideas that no-longer worked in our society. The only real question is how long it will take and how much suffering will be caused during this transition.

    In my opinion the actions of the students in this article are much more helpful than harmful. They help bring to light the fact that this system is hopelessly broken.

    I flat out reject the argument that just because a law exists that it is somehow a 'moral imperitive' that it is followed. Laws have no inherent moral function. Morals in themselves are not objective but always subjective. Think about the laws on slavery that used to exist if you need a point of reference.

    I would also like to state that I make my living as a software developer and physical-media artist. I think/read a lot about history and economic issues and consider myself very much a pro-capitalist strong-physical-property-rights sort of person. I am NOT any sort of socialist hippie tree-hugger type that doesn't understand how the world works and wants everything for free.

BLISS is ignorance.

Working...