Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

What Filters Are Right For Kids?

Posted by timothy on Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:20 PM
from the cue-the-scorn-cannons dept.
WaywardGeek writes "My daughter is using phrases like 'hot guys,' and soon will have a chat about the birds and the bees. I believe in letting kids discover the world as it is, and have no Internet controls on any of our systems, which are mostly Linux based. However, it's not fair for aggressive porn advertisers to splash sex in her face without her permission. My question is: What Linux-based Internet filtering solution do Slashdot dads favor, and do they hinder a child's efforts to learn about the world?"
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Good Email For Kids? 489 comments
mgessner writes "My kids are starting to want email accounts of their own. Even though gmail does a pretty good job of filtering spam, it's not perfect. Searching the web the other day for kid-safe email, I found a few sites that say they can do the job. What do others do for their kids' email? Pay for it? Just use a free service like gmail or yahoo? I don't pay for email accounts out of my own pocket, so I don't really see the need, but if the cost was a few bucks a month, I'd do it."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Keep the computer in the living room.

    • Re:The simple one. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by PhilHibbs (4537) <snarks@gmail.com> on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:25PM (#27227943) Homepage Journal

      That isn't going to help against accidental clicks on spam links that take you to places you didn't want to go. What the OP wants is something that prevents accidental exposure to offensive content.

      • Re:The simple one. (Score:5, Insightful)

        by cayenne8 (626475) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:36PM (#27228253) Homepage Journal
        "That isn't going to help against accidental clicks on spam links that take you to places you didn't want to go. What the OP wants is something that prevents accidental exposure to offensive content."

        I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

        I mean, I can count on one hand (I know I know) the number of times I've actually had porn flash up on my browser when I was not looking for it....in all these years.

        How bad a problem is this actually? From anecdotal evidence, I'd have to guess if someone has porn on the screen....they were looking for it.

        • Re:The simple one. (Score:5, Interesting)

          by Sowelu (713889) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:50PM (#27228535)
          Think back to when you were ten, you put a random term into Google, and clicked the first link.

          Or, "I wonder what this ad is about, I think I'll click it".

          It doesn't happen to people who are more experienced internet users, but it does happen. If you didn't use the internet at that age, it probably didn't happen to you.
          • Re:The simple one. (Score:5, Insightful)

            by flitty (981864) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:03PM (#27228769)
            Ok, but now you know exactly how to spot bad links and suspicious websites, right? So this is a skill that can be learned.

            I say, put the computer in the living room, Teach your damn kid what a red flag for a suspicious link/website looks like, and use firefox/noscript/adblock. Those three things should be enough for 99% of people on the net. Otherwise, she's looking for it.
          • by Mr. Firewall (578517) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:03PM (#27228771) Homepage

            Think back to when you were ten, you put a random term into Google

            When I was ten, a google was a fixed (i.e., not random) value. Also:

            • The World Wide Web did not exist.
            • For that matter the INTERNET did not exist.
            • I had never seen a color TV (though I had heard about them, and was curious)
            • Home electronics ran on vacuum tubes.
            • John F. Kennedy was President of the United States.

            So, no, I can't relate to your example. Now get off my lawn.

        • by interkin3tic (1469267) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:09PM (#27228915)

          I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

          Yes, every time my wife or boss walks in and there's porn on the screen? Accident.

        • Re:The simple one. (Score:4, Informative)

          by Ephemeriis (315124) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:11PM (#27228947) Homepage

          I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

          I mean, I can count on one hand (I know I know) the number of times I've actually had porn flash up on my browser when I was not looking for it....in all these years.

          How bad a problem is this actually? From anecdotal evidence, I'd have to guess if someone has porn on the screen....they were looking for it.

          Depends on the situation, the user, etc... But, yes, it does happen accidentally.

          You can throw some pretty innocent phrases into Google and get some pretty interesting results. Some torrent search sites, which are very popular for folks looking to download music, have pretty explicit advertising on them. And it's entirely too easy to wind up on somebody's mailing list and get deluged with advertisements for various adult services. Some malware pops up advertising as well, sometimes it is of the adult variety.

          • Re:The simple one. (Score:4, Insightful)

            by JCSoRocks (1142053) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:08PM (#27228897)
            I agree. I've been cruising around the 'net since around the same time ('93/'94) and I've never accidentally found myself on a NSFW page. I've been rick rolled plenty, but thankfully there are no memes that involve duping people into going to NSFW sites and getting written up by HR.

            However, I'm not going to say it's impossible. I know of people that have accidentally gone to whitehouse.com rather than .gov. A child learning about the Internet and trying to do a report on the White House could easily make the same mistake.
            • by dawich (945673) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:12PM (#27228969)
              I've gone to whitehouse.com in front of ~80 people, deans and other faculty mainly, doing a presentation on Netscape 2 and all the nifty features including domain completion. "And here you can see I type in 'stanford' and it goes to www.stanford.edu without typing anymore. A handy shortcut. Let's try another, whitehouse, let's see what the president is doi.... aww crap." Projected on a 50' screen. Lovely day.
        • by NeverVotedBush (1041088) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:42PM (#27228373)
          Actually, something like that exists for Linux and any OS that uses DNS - check out OpenDNS.

          http://www.opendns.com/ [opendns.com]

          You can configure what levels of filters to use and even customize the page that opendns supplies when a forbidden link is clicked.

          They are also working to block some of the botnet phone homes.

          All you need to do is use their name servers. You can set up an account and configure what gets blocked and what doesn't.

          Also check out an enhanced hosts file at http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm [mvps.org].

          That will block a lot of requests from ever leaving the computer. You can also add in whatever others you want as well.
          • by WaywardGeek (1480513) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:20PM (#27229109)

            Dude, right on! I'm the original poster, and I have to tell you, this is exactly what I was looking for. I've set filter level to 'medium', for malware/phishing and porn. As the kids grow old enough to figure out how to get around it, they're probably old enough to handle unfiltered content.

            I hate to sound like an add for these guys, but hey, it's free, and in a few minutes of testing, it blocked 100% of the porn sites I tried to visit, but nothing from wikipedia.org. Search for 'sex' on wikipedia, and you still get a useful, informative site. Search for 'sex' on Google, and not one hard-core porn site is allowed, but metacafe.com gets through. The 'cached' links from Google show hard-core porn thumbnails, though. Not perfect, but way better than I was expecting! Thanks!

              • by Calithulu (1487963) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:51PM (#27229741)

                I never understood parents that want to filter their kids internet connection. They'll have to live with the fact that the world is a bad place, and they should learn that naturally - not all at once when they turn 18 and you kick them out.

                Based on the article, he doesn't think she is ready yet and when she is he will happily reduce the filtering or remove it altogether.

                This is exactly the sort of responsible and appropriate response that should be encouraged, by the way. We make our own decisions about what we want censored, and we take action to filter it. No running to the Nanny State and demanding that they protect the children.

        • Re:The simple one. (Score:5, Informative)

          by geminidomino (614729) * on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:04PM (#27228785) Homepage Journal

          Sure it does.

          1) /etc/hosts - Unwieldy, but effective.
          2) apt-get install bind - A little better, zone files are available
          3) OpenDNS and the like...
          4) Privoxy
          5) Squid+Junkbuster
          6) ...

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      The most important thing that you can do is to properly educate her. Obviously don't encourage porn, but you shouldn't need to actually block it. Let her know the rules, and tell her the consequence if she breaks then (no computer for a week). Let her be in control.
        • Re:The simple one. (Score:5, Interesting)

          by The Only Druid (587299) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:12PM (#27228961)
          Blaming everyone else is bad, but you're completely inanely conflating viruses, etc. and porn.

          The truth is, the best situation is to educate the child enough that they can be trusted to navigate the online world without either visiting porn inappropriately (i.e. w/ anyone else around) or downloading malware. The reality is, you have to educate children while using some protections against their mistakes.

          So, teach her about sex, etc. Explain the issues as best you can, and discourage her from visiting it too much (and certainly set rules). But don't pretend she'll never check it out. The truth is, there's no harm in her checking it out occasionally.

          Malware, on the other hand, is actually destructive, hence the use of spam, virus, etc. filters. So, teach her about it, hope she doesn't accidentally infect your system, but use tools to support her.

          The key idea is to support your child's growth, not to restrict it.
    • Mod parent down (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Sowelu (713889) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:30PM (#27228105)
      -1, totally missing the point. The OP specifically wants to let his kid explore. However, exploring kids are quite likely to wind up places THEY don't want to be, once they start looking around. I'm sure you can think of a few search terms that might give you relevant, useful information on Wikipedia...but that you might not ever want to type into GIS. Heck, my reading of the question was more like "How can I let her wander the internet ON HER OWN, going wherever she wants, without having to call me in to close a barrage of pop-up windows".
  • Cheesecloth works pretty good to get the chunks out.

  • by aapold (753705) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:23PM (#27227903) Homepage Journal

    Filter or no filter, its just bad for them especially at that age.

  • Adblock (Score:5, Informative)

    by antifoidulus (807088) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:23PM (#27227923) Homepage Journal
    Seriously, if all you are worried about is her getting porn ads when she doesn't want them, just use adblock.
    • by Itninja (937614) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:34PM (#27228195) Homepage
      With those two in place she will never see a dirty picture she didn't look for. More than once I have recommended a site (usually a hacking or cracking site) to a friend and had them remark on how much porn advertising was on the site and all the porn popup ads. I hadn't even realized it because I was using AdBlock[er] and NoScript and wasn't seeing any of that.
      • Re:Privoxy (Score:4, Informative)

        by LateArthurDent (1403947) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:02PM (#27228739)

        If he wants a filter that is more difficult to bypass by the child, Privoxy is pretty handy.

        Well, he specifically said he doesn't. He said he "believes in letting kids discover the world as it is" and that it's not fair for porn advertisers to display sex "without her permission," he didn't say his. I think that means he wants her to be able to bypass it if she wants to, but doesn't want her to be exposed to things she's not specifically looking for.

        Pretty reasonable stance, and I think adblock is the way to go.

  • by SlappyBastard (961143) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:24PM (#27227937)
    Um . . . "splash sex in her face" . . . oooooh-kaaaaaay . . .
  • Use openDNS (Score:5, Informative)

    by sammy_cda (783295) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:26PM (#27227993)
    Use openDNS and set up an account. Point your router's DNS settings to their servers. It allows a few different levels of filtering. You can change the levels of filtering as she grows older.
  • Adblock (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Nick Ives (317) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:27PM (#27228013)

    I never, ever see porn ads because I've got Adblock Plus installed in FF. If she prefers IE for some weird reason then just put an ad-filtering web-proxy on your network like Junkbuster [junkbuster.com].

    Redirect all outbound connection attempts on port 80 through your router to that proxy and you'll be good to go. That way she won't have porn ads splashed in her face but she'll still be able to Google for hot guys [google.com] with SafeSearch turned off :).

    • Re:Adblock (Score:4, Funny)

      by trold (242154) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:44PM (#27228417) Homepage

      If she prefers IE for some weird reason then just put an ad-filtering web-proxy on your network like Junkbuster [junkbuster.com].

      If she is clever enough to get IE to run properly on the aforementioned linux systems, she is clever enough to configure her own porn-blocker...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:27PM (#27228027)

    That should scare her away for a couple of decades.

  • OpenDNS (Score:4, Informative)

    by jkupko (645842) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:28PM (#27228039)
    Just change your DNS servers to OpenDNS (http://www.opendns.com/ [opendns.com]) and register your IP with them. You can use their category-based filtering to block the pr0n. Block adware, malware, and phishing while you're at it. Oh, and enjoy a faster DNS service and extensive stats pages. If you are worried about a dynamic IP from your ISP, don't be: most ISP's preferentially reassign IPs to customers instead of switching it up. Happy censoring!
    • Re:OpenDNS (Score:5, Insightful)

      by wykell (1323665) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:37PM (#27228261)
      I'm a big fan of OpenDNS. It makes my browsing faster than dealing with my ISP's overloaded DNS servers, and allows me full control over my network. For safety reasons, so far I have blocked NBA.com, and I occasionally block perezhilton.com, just to piss my girlfriend off.

      As far as "filters" for kids - I grew up with a liberal(ish) mother who taught Sexual Education courses for a while. I was exposed to all of her programs, from "abstinence only" to "safer sex" and everything in between, and to be honest, what I learned from that level of exposure is that the BEST defense is a good offense. Teach your kid the values of sexuality you feel are healthiest and know that no matter how much you try to keep them protected from exposure to "bad" things, they are going to find those things on their own, one way or another. Giving kids the proper tools and knowledge on how to deal with the "bad things" is far better than trying to protect them with any sort of shell.

  • by StevenMaurer (115071) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:29PM (#27228077) Homepage

    That seems reasonable enough. If your daughter isn't actually going looking for porn.

    If she is, you need to have a talk. Not porn=bad because that won't work. Rather: porn=unrealistic. And that she needs to understand that much of what she will see is the result of payment to foolish and desperate people.

    Oh, and build up her self-esteem. That is the critical factor in teen girls getting into situations they're not ready for.

  • by SlappyBastard (961143) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:30PM (#27228109)

    And we all turned out alright.

    Your kids are gonna find out. Accept it. The right approach is education. And not retarded "well, ya see, when a boy and girl really, really like each other" education. Real education. And approval thereof. Tell them about condoms. Tell them about birth control. Tell them about a pumpkin-sized blood-covered creature ripping out of the girl's crotch leaving behind so much damage that the doctor quits using stitches and opts to replace everything with a steel plate.

  • by MikeRT (947531) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:32PM (#27228157) Homepage

    My question is: What Linux-based Internet filtering solution do Slashdot dads favor, and do they hinder a child's efforts to learn about the world?"

    It may go against conventional wisdom on Slashdot, but filters don't particularly hinder a child's efforts to learn about the world. If there is something that they want to see, they can ask you if it's ok and you can unblock it. That's the 21st century version of the way that parents used to do it. Part of being a parent is being a gatekeeper. Some information your kids just need to be largely innocent of until they become adults. It's one thing to know that the ugly side of the world exists. It's another thing to take few measures to stop your kids from participating in it out of curiosity.

  • AdBlock (Score:3, Informative)

    by Todd Knarr (15451) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:33PM (#27228159) Homepage

    Being Linux, you're likely using FireFox or one of it's builds (eg. Debian's IceWeasel). I recommend the AdBlock add-on, and possibly the NoScript add-on as well. In the process of blocking ads in general, AdBlock's going to get most of the porn ads as well. Set up bogofilter for e-mail filtering and you'll quickly get all the spam (including all the porn spam) diverted into a junk folder (Thunderbird has similar filtering built-in with it's junk-mail flagging feature, I use bogofilter mainly because I alternate between Thunderbird and Pine as my mail readers and want the junk-mail filtering to happen regardless of which one I'm using at the moment). That should take care of the majority of the problem. What's left will be search result spam, and those are mostly obvious from reading the result without having to visit the site to find out.

  • NOW.

    Filter out the obvious stuff. You won't stop a dedicated teen from finding what they want, but you can try to stop them from getting things they don't want that are inappropriate.
    I have a daughter and a son, and yes, knowing there will be a day when my kids are looking for 'Hot [Gender of choice]' scares the shit out of me.

  • DansGuardian [dansguardian.org]

    Either put it on their desktop or install on a server if they use OSX/Microsoft windows.
  • by dr_dank (472072) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:44PM (#27228407) Homepage Journal

    I only whitelist the sites that teach good lessons for their development into adulthood:

    Zombo.com: You can do ANYTHING there.

    Goatse: What better way to show what one can accomplish if you put your mind to it?

    2G1C: Teamwork and empowerment

    Lemonparty: Appreciation for the elderly.

    I'd list more, but CPS is here. Must be donation season or something.

  • by Beelzebud (1361137) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:47PM (#27228485)
    You demand that the government censor the entire internet for the safety of The Children!

    ;)
  • by yuna49 (905461) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:01PM (#27228721)

    I've been a single father for most of the past sixteen years. I did hardly anything to screen out offensive material when my daughter was younger. Not only that, I let her have her own computer in her room, so I wasn't there to watch over her shoulder either.

    What I did do was set up transparent proxying through Squid on the Linux box that runs as our house firewall so I could scan the logs from time to time and see where she was going. She knew that her usage was being logged, but beyond that I did nothing at all. In reality a much bigger problem than porn was the extent to which supposedly kid-friendly sites actually contained a large proportion of drive-by installs mostly for advertising crap. I ended up with a Squid acl list largely composed of places like atwola.com and Gator. I never had to add a block for any site containing pornographic or other questionable materials. After a couple of rounds of cleaning this type of junk off her (then Windows) computer, I decided the only solution was to block it at the router. These days she uses Ubuntu, so adware is much less of a problem.

    The bigger problem actually began when I let her have an email account (indeed she owns her own domain). Despite years of experience scanning email for myself and my clients, it was still impossible to keep the occasional attached gif from getting through. Unfortunately these tend to the more disgusting end of the porn spectrum; I would have been less disturbed by her seeing more conventional sexual behaviors. The couple of times this happened she mentioned it to me and said she had deleted the offending message immediately. We had a talk about not opening messages from people you didn't know, but often a graphic will show up in the message preview windows (in Thunderbird in our case) without any active choice by the reader.

    Now I only have the one girl, so I don't know how generalizable this experience might be. I do know that, at seventeen, she harbors little or no interest in porn and had, if anything, even less interest in it at 11-13. If she were male, the story might have been different. However my attitudes about her Internet usage were consistent with the general degree of freedom I permitted her in other realms of life. She always had a lot of freedom and today seems much more mature and self-disciplined than some of her friends and acquaintances who grew up in stricter households. I'm proud to call her my daughter.

  • "soon"? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by v1 (525388) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:34PM (#27229411) Homepage Journal

    My daughter is using phrases like 'hot guys,' and soon will have a chat about the birds and the bees

    Since there isn't always a clear red flag to let you know the absolute last minute you can put that conversation off, you should get it out of the way when the time is approaching. Procrastination here is not a good thing.

    By the time my parents worked up the nerve, my school had already provided me with good sex-ed. I think in some respects I knew more than they did, which was kinda funny. Correcting your parents during this chat just makes them turn different shades of red and purple. Not many schools do that though, but if you wait too long you too may get to experience that.

    • Re:How about.... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Nick Ives (317) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:34PM (#27228197)

      He's just looking for an ad filter, he's clearly stated that he doesn't want to censor the internet.

      Good for him too, I started online at the age of twelve in 94' (NCSA Mosiac FTW!) and eventually figured out how to setup a USEnet client. Abpe.* and all its life lessons (women do that with horses??) followed. I made a bit of money by selling those lessons on floppy disk at school too, it was a step above the random porn mags that seem to litter all the woods in this country!

    • Re:How about.... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by ojintoad (1310811) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:35PM (#27228221)
      A parent asking for advice about filtering software by no means implies that they are not living up to their responsibilities and your entire post presuming such is in bad taste.
      • Re:How about.... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by novalis112 (1216168) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @12:53PM (#27228601)
        Mod parent up!

        A parents job is not to shadow their children around 24x7 for the first 18 years of their life, that is just absurd, and part of the general "paranoia" that our culture seems to be cultivating right now.

        A parents job is to establish a safe environment in which their children can grow up in, and learn how to be an adult in.
    • Re:How about.... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Fished (574624) <amphigory AT gmail DOT com> on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:10PM (#27228931)

      It's this funny thing about being a parent... you see, you have other things to do than be your child's content censor all day long. I'm a single father of four, and I also have to do things like cook dinner, help my other children with their homework, clean, go to the bathroom, etc. etc. If I were to attempt to monitor my children's Internet usage like you demand, they would get to use the Internet... oh, around 15 minutes a week. Maybe.

      Now, maybe in some elevated sense of the word I "ought" to be able to watch each of my four children like a hawk, all the time. But I can't, and a bit of content filtering allows my kids to get the benefits of Internet access without me having to be a content Nazi.

      (And before you criticize me for having four children, originally my wife was a stay-at-home mother, but she died of cancer. So frankly if you want to blame me for having too many kids you can go to hell. There is something sick about a society that insists on a level of public depravity that makes it impossible for parents to have enough children to even maintain its population.)