Slashdot Log In
Whither America's Technological Edge?
Posted by
Cliff
on Mon Dec 16, 2002 04:16 PM
from the stuff-to-think-about dept.
from the stuff-to-think-about dept.
baldass_newbie asks: "Ben Stein wrote an editorial titled, 'How to Ruin American Enterprise'. To me, technological innovation is a big outward sign of a successful economy. Sometimes it appears like the U.S. is losing its edge in technology. Well, I was wondering what the Slashdot community at large thinks is wrong (or right) with the U.S. and technological innovation?" The article deals less with technology and more with the society on which said innovation is based, and the problems that may bring it down around our collective ears. Give the article a read, and share your thoughts on whether or not you think it's an accurate assessment on the current and future situation of America's technological advantage.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Whither America's Technological Edge?
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 1194 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Well, let's see (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:5, Informative)
The internal combustion engine is usually attributed to Benz, a German. The american inventor was a patent fraud whose claim to have invented the engine was thrown out by the US courts in the Ford case.
the sowing machine
The first functional sewing machine was invented by the French tailor, Barthelemy Thimonnier, in 1830. There were about 6 previous patents for sewing machines of which the first US one came in at number 5...
electricity
Try Faraday, Royal Society, London
the light bulb
Swan invented the light bulb first and actually filed his patent first to boot. Edison only got a patent because at the time the USPTO did not recognise foreign inventions or prior art.
bar-b-que
I don't think you can count that since the Hawaiian islanders were having BBQ before the US was founded, before Westerners had discovered it even. I don't think you can count inventions aquired by conquest.
the vaccine
"In 1796 English country doctor Edward Jenner found that if a small amount of material was taken from a cow suffering from cowpox and injected into a healthy human child, that child would become immune to smallpox. " [chron.com] - incidentally the term vaccine comes from the Latin for cows.
Should I continue?
Well since that leaves you with only the atom bomb, the telephone, cotton gin and the laser I don't think you should. I'll disallow the Internet and the computer since the first computer design was British, the first practical computer was german (Konrad Zues Z1 and z2), the first electronic computer was british - the programmable enigma machines but was classified research, the Internet is not an invention it is an implementation of packet switching which was invented on both sides of the pond.
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:5, Insightful)
- Who started the computer industry?
- Who invented nuclear power?
- Who put human beings on the moon and then brought them back safely 6 times
Actually, now that I think about it...
Transistor, the team at Bell Labs. Score one for the USA.
Computer industry? I'd say the team led by England's Alan Turing.
Nuclear power? I'd say the team led by Italy's Enrico Fermi, or if you look back further, New Zealand's Ernest Rutherford.
Putting humans on the moon? I'd say the team led by Germany's Werner von Braun.
OK, that's one from four. Nothing to really brag about. And my comment about "in our lifetimes" still stands.
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:4, Insightful)
If the U.S. is still the destination of choice for the best and brightest foreign-born minds, that's going to pay off BIG in the long run. The only challenge I see is Chinese-born professionals starting to feel that China offers enough freedom to make staying there pay off more than coming to the U.S. In order to do that, China has to focus on maintaining its own internal stability, probably liberalize its political system, and will have to take a very calm approach to international relations. That helps the U.S., too, so the downside of being the second-largest national economy won't be so bad.
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:4, Interesting)
If you don't buck up, you'll end up like Britain, spending 50 years celebrating inventing half a dozen invention innovations from steam power through (via an immigrant Italian) radio, to the (mechanical) TV, before realising that Britain isn't really ahead of the rest of the world any more. There was a moment during the 80's that it became obvious, just as we were celebrating our home grown personal computer revolution, thanks to Sinclair and Acorn, and we suddenly realised nobody was taking any notice of the stuff we were putting out, because the rest of the world had raced ahead of us. Sir Clive Sinclair made some comment once that he'd invented the pocket calculator, but the Japanese had made it successful.
There are innovations going on in the US, but there's also an over heavy emphasis on ignoring technologies built outside. That attitude is guaranteed to get the better of the USA, especially if America's dominance as a world power is diminished, as the rise of a united Europe, a restructed former-Soviet Union, and a blue-in-tooth-and-claw Capitalist China, make all too possible.
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:4, Insightful)
The point is, "technology" is a vague word that covers a heck of a lot. It used to be the case that the US was at the top of most technologies in the post-WW2 cold war era. It's still in a very good position. It's just that other countries are *also* starting to do very well now. It's not that the US is doing worse. It just looks that way by comparasin given that everyone else is no longer doing as poorly as they used to.
When free trade is working correctly, jealous feelings about technology shouldn't be common. The more countries performing well in technology, the better it is for everyone through a network effect.
Most technology products these days have components from multiple countries in them, and that's a good thing.
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:4, Interesting)
Yes, leadership in consumer electronic technology shifted to Asia decades ago.
But that has nothing to do with "America's technological edge". Every time this topic comes up, the most common metric for scientific prowess is how many buttons a country puts on its cell phones. That's something, I guess, but it indicates how removed "geeks" are from what's really going on in the research world.
Being in the molecular biology / genomics field, maybe I have a skewed view of how the US ranks in research across the board. But if you pick up any issue of Nature or Science, the US has by far the most publications, in biology, chemistry, geology or physics. Japan, the UK and Germany variously compete for second place, with France, Israel, Korea and some others after them.
Frequently when this topic comes up, I'll grab the latest issue and give a quick total, but right now need to go back maintaining my own edge....
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:4, Informative)
Waay OT (Score:5, Funny)
Hey, are you Eminem's songwriter?
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:5, Insightful)
I quote: "Henry Woodward of Toronto, who along with Matthew Evans patented a light bulb in 1875. Unfortunately, the two entrepreneurs could not raise the financing to commercialize their invention. The enterprising American Thomas Edison, who had been working on the same idea, bought the rights to their patent."
So it seems an American merely financed it (and edison was the Gates of the 19th century remember).
Radio
Nikola Tesla. Born in Hungary, died in America. Did "America" invent radio? Who knows.
Telephone
Yeah
Television
I seem to recall that the first TV broadcasts were carried out by the BBC, using both electrical and the other one (rotary?)
Cars
Inventor of the car turns up no helpful results (I'm googling for these btw), but the internal combustion engine: "Nikolaus August Otto was born on June 10. 1832 in Holzhausen, Germany. At the age of sixteen, Otto dropped out of high school and worked in a grocery store. He also worked as a clerk in Frankfurt and as a traveling salesman. He sold sugar, kitchenware and tea to grocery stores on the German side of the Belgian and French border." - so a german.
Airplanes
Arguable. But I can't be bothered... You get the idea.
In other words, the U.S. invented almost everything. There are only the occasional counterexamples like Russians getting into space a couple days earlier, and Germans making some firsts in rocket and jet innovations.
BS. America perhaps commercialised the most, but huge numbers of inventions came from Britain, especially during the Victorian era. Inventions I can think of:
First programmable computer
Radar
Steam engine
We can go on like this all night. If you think the US is the innovation capital of the world, or even once was, you need to think again. I'm not claiming the UK is either (it isn't), but really innovation isn't localised except maybe to developed countries.
Re:Since When Did America Have a Tech Edge? (Score:5, Insightful)
With the British-invented and perfected steam engine. Let's give credit where credit is due. James Watt, an Englishman, is considered the inventor of a practical steam engine (back 1769, some seven years before the American Revolution).
While we're at it, I'd like to point out that most of the major inventions that made television possible came from outside the United States: the electron tube (Paul Nipkow, Germany, 1884), and the photocell (J. L. Baird, Britain, 1926).
The microwave oven is based on an electron tube (invented by a German, as noted above).
Automobile: First self-propelled vehicle was built by Nicolas Joseph Cugnot (France, 1789). Much of the pioneer work on modern autos (late 19th century) was done by Karl Benz and Gottlieb Diamler, in Germany. We may have made the auto famous, but we stood on the shoulders of others.
Radio was developed by Heinrich Hertz (German) and Guglielmo Marconi (Italian), based on the researchd by James Clerk Maxwell, a Scottish physicist.
Having established that nearly half the items on your list were not developed by Americans (and for all that, the telephone was invented by Alexander Graham Bell, a first-generation Scottish immigrant), I have to take issue with your cheapshot at the Russians and Germans.
In other words, the U.S. invented almost everything. There are only the occasional counterexamples like Russians getting into space a couple days earlier, and Germans making some firsts in rocket and jet innovations.
The Germans were the first to deploy a working rocket interceptor (the Messerschmitt 163), a working jet-propelled fighter (the Messerchmitt 262), a cruise missile (the V-1), an ICBM (the V-2), and a prototypical stealth fighter (the Horten/Gotha 229).
The Russians beat us into manned space flight by well over a month, and into orbital flight by an entire year. Moreover, the Vostock, their first-generation capsule, was far superior to the Mercury. The Russians put their Cosmonauts up for *days* at a time. The Russian Soyuz vehicle was in many ways superior to the Apollo capsule (built in ship-to-ship docking, longer lifespan), and variants of it are still used to resupply the International Space Station (budget willing).
The United States has made important contributions to science and engineering, but all your post has done, I feel, is to demonstrate a paucity of historical knowledge/background. Funny, I think Stein was pointing to that as an example of what was wrong...
~Chazzf
Money (Score:4, Insightful)
Look at Microsoft, RIAA. They make too much money keeping technology in check.
But then again, competiton (for more money) leads to innovation as well.
Maybe it is the balance between the two that is required.
Insightful??? (Score:5, Funny)
Please, don't drink and moderate!
Re:Insightful??? (Score:4, Interesting)
Yes, the ultimate advancement paradox: money stifles innovation, but the pursuit of money encourages it.
Well (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually, increased productivity is a big outward sign of a successful economy. Innovation (not necessarily technical) allows us to do more with less and, as such, is a driver of productivity.
Stein is talking in generalities. . . (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Stein is talking in generalities. . . (Score:4, Insightful)
But the creative minority has to come from somewhere, ideally from an educated population. I think Ben Stein's point, with regards to education, is that by dumbing down the curricula in schools so much, we are depriving ourselves of creating new generations of the "tech elite" or "creative minority". This IS a serious problem. And we DO need to address it NOW, not wait until the rest of the world passes us by and we become a shell of a nation.
Translation, please? (Score:3, Funny)
Metafilter discussion (Score:4, Informative)
USPTO... (Score:4, Interesting)
-Cyc
Well, duh. (Score:5, Insightful)
How long can America keep pumping out students whose test scores are in the cellar for industrial nations and expect to maintain an edge in technology? As it stands, a lot of our brains are already imported from India and China.
I live in CA, which should stand as a dire warning to the rest of the country: They limit their property taxes, their schools go underfunded, and as a result California natives largely end up working to repair the cars and wash the floors of the well-educated from elsewhere.
The US needs to get serious about education, and fast. With the tech boom and the world shinking as it is, this is a really bad time to be stupid.
Re:Well, duh. (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not just the government. American parents pay lip service to education, but don't really set either a good example nor push their children to excel. I remember in school the classes always had a mix of real poor performers to really good students. The difference was not the teachers, but their home-life and parents. Parents get the kind of education system they want. If they don't care, don't expect the government to care either.
[Insert your favorite bash to blame for this here]
CA schools have money, they just waste it... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Well, duh. (Score:5, Insightful)
This may sound good on paper, but there's a sad human side to it as well, in the form of students spending days and nights outside of class in outside of school courses, known as juku in Japan or hagwon in Korea, in a furious rat-race attempt to succeed. All emphasis is placed on getting into the top schools, to preserve the all-so-important face prevalent in Asian society. It's no coincidence that the suicide rate amongst teenagers in Asia is much higher than the general population over there.
Corporal punishment is practiced in classrooms. The curriculum is homogenous across all schools and teaching method is rote memorization and practice, practice, and more practice, which does not encourage the development of free thinking, and all this talked about "innovation" is generally spawned at the industrial rather than the academic level.
While Asia is indeed impressive, all this comes at a price, and blindly following their methods is. IMHO, not the way for the US to go.
Re:Well, duh. (Score:5, Interesting)
Those societal things are often why the various Asian nations tend not to make advances in science, medicine, and technology, though they may be the ones who best capitalize on it. Innovation, by definition, requires challenging the old order, the hierarchy. Confucian-type values make it very difficult to take this first step.
How many major, reasonably innovative (ie not a clone of Outlook) pieces of computer software (to take an example) are currently or were designed by an Asian (not an Asian American)? I can't think of one off the top of my head. Now how many are being coded by Asians (using design directives from non-Asians)?
This may sound horribly racist, but that is not the intent. If anything, it's pointing out a tension that exists between Confucianism and innovation. The fact that many persons "of Asian extraction" but who grew up in the West are great innovators indicates that it is not an issue of brain capacity; it is an issue of culturally-influenced psychology.
Things wrong with US Schools (Score:5, Insightful)
* The internet will not teach your children -- while it's true there is a fountain of knowledge at your fingertips, there's a ocean full of crap to sift though.
* Stop focussing so much money on organized sports when your school is graduating illiterates.
* Kids using Powerpoint [detnews.com] is not the answer. Unless the question is -- How do we raise a nation of Marketing drones!
Re:Well, duh. (Score:4, Insightful)
Bullshit. There's a lot wrong with California public education, but underfunding isn't one of them [reason.com]. California public schools spent $9,267.00 per student for the education of its kindergarten through high school. That's a LOT of money per kid (you can send your kid to a top flight private school for about half), and most of it is pissed away by the bureaucracy. You don't cure a shopaholic by giving them more money, and you don't solve the education funding "problem" by giving them more money either.
Re:Well, duh. (Score:5, Insightful)
Bullshit.
What you're actually seeing is yet another example of my parents' generation (the boomers) once again thoughtlessly gorging themselves at the expense of their children.
They run up huge debt rather than pay higher taxes. They extend the pyramid scheme that is social security so they can benefit at their children's expense. And they underfund the educational system so they can live in a slightly larger house than they otherwise would.
The CA system only really benefits people who already own homes, not new home buyers. So, it's just another example of our parents living at our expense.
Re:Well, duh. (Score:4, Insightful)
The brilliant part is that although this was sold to the electorate as protecting granny in her old house, the "people" it really protects are the business landlords. Most companies don't own their buildings, they lease them long term. So when a business relocates, the owner of the space hasn't changed and the property doesn't get reappraised. Does this rock or what?
This means that the business that's giving people two communities over jobs ('cause the people can't afford to live across the street from the office) isn't paying property taxes (via increased rent to the landlord) to the community whose infrastructure (roads, electrical & phone grid, sewers, water, etc.) it's impacting. Or at least, the taxes it is paying are adjusted to property values as of 30 years ago and not current values.
Some places responded to this with payroll taxes, but that's an even thornier issue than property taxes. What should happen is that the people who benefit from the infrastructure should pay to support it. But what is happening is that the people who pay for the infrastructure are mostly people who haven't yet had the opportunity to derive maximal benefit from it, while the long-term benefits are going to people who haven't been paying their fair share.
Sorry. You don't deserve karma. (Score:5, Insightful)
IBM [ibm.com] spent 5 billion dollars last year on R&D. Microsoft [cnn.com] just announced a boost to 5.2 billion dollars for next year.
A company like Ford would do anything they could to develop a substantial innovation over GM and DB.
Big business is always looking for an edge just
like the next guy.
This has nothing to do with big business, it is about the leisure class gone amuck.
What?? Read the article first!? (Score:4, Funny)
Give the article a read, and share your thoughts
But that violates the /. tradition of posting your thoughts and never reading the article! Heck, some members don't even think about what they're posting.
Re:Ben , ben ... who cares (Score:5, Informative)
Born and raised in privelage then appointed to work for Nixon as an economic advisor. Soon thereafter we had the worst economy since the depression.
I don't know if it's fair to blame the Nixon recession on conservative economics. LBJ had left Nixon with massive military spending on a war in Vietnam and new Great Society spending. And then the Arab nations began their oil boycott.
All three of these factors led to massive inflation (massive spending on the military; massive spending on domestic programs; more young people in Vietnam and fewer young people in the work force; and a rising price of oil, a key price factor in many products). In response, Nixon instituted price ceilings. NOTE: Price ceilings are not a conservative, free-market response to inflation. It is a response generally associated with the left-wing, in fact.
More specifically, blaming Ben Stein for the Nixon recession is foolish - Ben Stein was a speechwriter in the Nixon Administration, not an economic policy advisor.
School (Score:5, Interesting)
This IMHO is the big one. I went to school in England until about age 12, and then came back to a private school in California. Overnight, I went from doing trig, chemistry, latin, greek, french, to gluing fucking popsicle sticks together. I kid you not, our schools are WAY behind the rest of the world.
If you're an American parent, PLEASE either ship your kids over to Europe, or home school them yourself. American society is way too fucked up to allow for anyone to get a decent education. You would not believe the social pressure - I remember it well, and I had to fight it tooth and nail in order to succeed.
Re:School (Score:5, Interesting)
Wow. You must have gone to an old-skool school :) I'm proud to state that the school I went to is in the top 5% of all comprehensives - it's mixed, non selective and state run. We never did latin or greek, that's rather highbrow. We only learnt French because, well, we're right next door to them. Trig at age 12? Man, we didn't do that until we were 15 or 16 (gcses). I dunno how Brit schooling compares to American, but you're experience seems to have been a lot better than normal.
Oh, and for any Yanks wondering - such articles are regularly published in UK media too, and all the parents stress about lack of quality schooling and how India will kick our ass etc. I think it's a western thing, rather than American.
Re:School (Score:5, Interesting)
How could this be, I wondered. I added that from my experience (and the experience related by my friends who did not go to a private school like I did), kids needed *more* homework, not less.
Her reply? "Just wait until you have kids, and have to spend your time helping them with their homework."
And there, my friends, is why our educational system is in the crapper.
Re:School (Score:4, Insightful)
A good mix of thinking and knowing is crucial to get a good education.
Re:School (Score:5, Insightful)
I work with schools all the time, and I can tell you the problem with education in the United States is not teachers. It's not even the politicians. It's the general population which seems to be schizophrenic about public education. There are referendums on school vouchers popping up all over the place. That means people are bailing out on public ed. We have to decide whether we want public schools or not and act accordingly.
As far as marketeers, lawyers, etc., those are the people who have always been successful in the United States. You can't claim that the captains of industry have been brilliant engineers or innovators. More often it seems they're simply people who are ruthless, unscrupulous, lucky, or some combination thereof.
I'm also a little tired of people bashing the education system without offering any constructive criticism. It's quite easy to scream about how bad the system is and stand silent when asked for potential solutions. In the States, we educate a more diverse and larger population than most people who claim to have better systems. There are individual states in the Union larger than entire EU nations. In fact, there are two or three districts in West Texas that are larger than sovereign European states. So don't tell me we're always comparing apples to apples.
In short, I think there's a lot of panic about a situation that would better be solved by reason and open discussion. Let's pay our teachers better, put administrative power over schools back at the local level, trim the bureaucratic fat at the state and federal levels, and demand more from our kids.
Forgive me...I've had way, way too much coffee.
Re:School (Score:5, Insightful)
Apropos of education Stein writes:
"Allow schools to fall into useless decay. Do not teach civics or history except to describe America as a hopelessly fascistic, reactionary pit. Do not expect students to know the basics of mathematics, chemistry and physics. Working closely with the teachers' unions, make sure that you dumb down standards so that children who make the most minimal effort still get by with flying colors. Destroy the knowledge base on which all of mankind's scientific progress has been built by guaranteeing that such learning is confined to only a few, and spread ignorance and complacency among the many."
But later (#10 for all you following at home) he argues against what he perceives to be unfair and heavy taxation. So the US is supposed to improve schools without raising money to do so? At its most simple level, there are two basid problems.
1) Teachers get paid shit in the US. In NYC the average salery for public school teachers is just under $32,000/year (before taxes), which makes it impossible to feed and house oneself in the city (unless there are some other funds coming in, trust fund, spouse, etc). Likewise, a university professor (tenure track) at San Fransico State makes abut $40,000/yr -- in San Francisco! A janitor in a Columbus Ohio high school, on the other hand, makes about $50,000/yr. What does this tell you about the value in which teachers are held?
There are some great dedicated teachers out there, but I have taught more than one, kind well-meaning, and utterly incompetent student who planned to teach high school (and went on to do so). Yes many teachers suck (although I think almost all must be pretty selfless to put up with a very hard job). Look at what we pay them.
Yet Stein is also against those evil teacher unions. I hate to break the news, but most teacher unions are not fighting to lower standards, they are fighting for decent working conditions. Sometimes this involves lowering the bar because standards cannot be held in the conditions in which they work. Bringing us to pt. 2...
2) Given the lack of financial support for education in the US, many schools are falling apart and grossly overcrowded (10% are trying to function at %125 capacity) necesitating teaching in gyms, halls, etc... and creating enormous classes that are impossible for the most dedicated teacher to manage.
So even if we had better teachers, they would have an impossible job to do. So we end up with a nation of illiterates (44 million I think), who don't know anything about the world around them, not to even mention technology or science.
It is all very well to say "Hey we should do a better job teaching our kids," of course we should! But to do that we must spend money. Not that throwing money at the problem will make it go away, but it's a fundamental ingredient for meaningful change -- an ingrediant that the rest of Stein's articles run in the face of.
(sorry for the dangling participle)
Yes, I differ with Stein in a number of ways, we are clearly on different ends of the political spectrum, but I leave it to others to address his other "points to change" in an intelligent fashion. I'm ranted out for the moment
Re:School (Score:4, Interesting)
I recall my 3rd grade class play was a highly professional production with singing solos etc - I move back to the states and I'm the frickin' '3rd upper Molar on the right side' in some banal play about hygeine.
This country's public school system (shy the new 'charter' system) strikes me as Cro-Magnon survival skills in comparison...
Well, he seems largely correct... (Score:3, Insightful)
All the foul language and no-nothing replies I've seen here in response to his article are evidence for his contentions, by the way.
6a. (Score:4, Interesting)
And now for an addendum
6a. Specifically construct laws so riddled with inaccuracy of purpose, incomprehensibility of intent, impossibility of execution, immorality of effect, and plain lack of common sense, that everyone is criminalized equally, and proven innocent $ub$antially due to their per$onal $olvency. Particularly good results may be achieved if the laws in question are ignored as technicalities by the traditionally moral masses.
inspiration for this post, and the poster believes the original article, was gained largely through understanding the logical basis of the works of Ayn Rand, all credit as it is due
Religion (Score:4, Insightful)
Can I moderate Mr. Stein -1 Flamebait? (Score:5, Informative)
Whatever you might happen to think about our current immigration policy (I don't like it much myself), there's no getting around the fact that this is hyperbolic bullshit. The vast majority [usdoj.gov] of illegal aliens in the US are migrant workers from Mexico. (Following Mexico are El Salvador, Guatamala and Canada. You have to go all the way down to #17 before you find a country with any substantial terrorist activity: our "ally" Pakistan [usdoj.gov].) Say what you will about Mexico, but it is not exactly a hotbed of anti-American radicalism.
The rest of this article is exactly the sort of mixture of over-stressed common sense and batshit insanity that I would expect from a former Nixon toady. [imdb.com]
Re:Can I moderate Mr. Stein -1 Flamebait? (Score:4, Insightful)
Anyway, call me weird, but I'm just not that worried about the Mexican army storming into San Antonio, hell-bent on reclaiming Aztlan any time soon.
Stripped down (Score:5, Informative)
1 - Education, real education particularly science and math as well as history and civics, is critical. I can't see how you could disagree with this.
2 and 3- Our lawsuit-happy society needs to change. This does not mean "kill all the lawyers" as Shakespeare is so often misquoted as saying. It means discourage frivolous lawsuits and encourage personal responsibility (e.g. if you do something stupid, you don't automatically have the right to sue someone). It also means legislators should have to write laws simply and clearly and prevent loopholes rather than encourage them.
4 - The emphasis on getting rich through luck/cheating should not be glamorized.
5 - Corporate leaders should be held responsible for their actions.
6 - The law matters. If you oppose a law work to change it, don't just ignore. There are some bad cops/lawyers/judges/etc, but the vast majority are hard working decent people. Treat them that way.
7 - The anti-intelligent attitude of much of popular culture (be it talk radio or eMptyTV) is a Bad Thing(tm).
8 - Roots are a good thing. People are happier and more productive when they have connections to their town/city/etc.
9 - Immigration policy is skewed in very stupid ways and needs to be reformed.
10 - The tax system is broken (I disagree with him about death tax and capital gains, but the rest I agree with).
11 - Our medical system is totally screwed.
12 - Science is fundamental.
Re:Stripped down (Score:4, Interesting)
Hear hear. Our government actively and explicitly enforces the litigation-happy situation (I assume it makes lawyers, otherwise known as "our government," more money).
My employer recently stiffed me out of a week's paycheck in Nevada. Looking up Nevada laws, it's actually quite clear he's violated labor law. I contacted the office of the Labor Commissioner and laid out my case. They wrote me back a nice letter saying it looks like I can afford a lawyer, so they're not going to do their job (enforce labor laws) since I can afford to be a litigation-happy citizen.
I'm stunned.
And then the recent
You'd almost think lawyers wrote our current set of obviously fucked-up laws (yes, I'm aware that laws really are written by lawyers).
What America Exceeds At (Score:4, Informative)
1) Fun: We still produce more films than anyone but India, and not many people outside of the subcontinent watch those anyway. A substantial amount of the television shows (Emeril!) music, video games, theme parks, etc. still come from the good ol' US of A.
2) Pharmaceuticals -- now careful, I'm not lumping these with Entertainment. Prescription drugs are mostly innovated here.
3) Microprocessors -- sure they're manufactured where the labor is cheap, but Intel, Moto, IBM... they're developing the stuff here.
4) Industrial Design -- The shiny new cars that are manufactured by foreign companies use US design teams. Why do you think Daimler bought Chrysler?
What do you expect from a Nixon Speechwriter? (Score:4, Insightful)
1. The duh answer of them all of course is increased school funding. I relize however, if everyone got a decent education, we would have very few people willing to join the military and those who did would join one loaded with officers, and no cannon fodder, I mean elisted men.
2. Not everyone needs to get a four year degree. There needs to be many more professional opportunities for people with 2 year degrees. It would increase tax revenue to have a better paid population, and reduce the burden on four year universities who can better use the money on people who need to spend the time in college.
3. Companies that spend a sigifigant portion (~75%) of thier R&D money in Univeristy based Labs would recive an huge tax break.
4. Medical Advancement: Place a 20 blackout on the production of generics and in return drug companies must reduce prices by 75%. New drug prices are high in this country because a company must recoup the billions it spent on R&D in the first 3 years to make any sort of profit, because after 5 it can be made by anyone dirt cheap.
This give companies much more capital and incentive to innovate instead of copy what the other guy did and sell it cheaper.
5. Government Funded Hard Science: If we rely only on corperations to fund research, then we are going to be limmited to innovations that will make a profit, and we will be worthless as a civilization.
Pointing at a problem is not offering a solution (Score:5, Insightful)
Utopians consistently excel in discovering faults, but those who actually try to fix them usually end up with a situation far worse than the one they were so alarmed about.
We still lead in one crucial area (Score:3, Funny)
Unfortunately, one area in which there appears to be no gap is the right-wing rhetoric arms race.
The rest of the way there (Score:5, Interesting)
My list need not end here but I got tired of typing. And anyway, I even agree with one or two of Mr. Stein's points. But just as Mr. Stein did I realized that my list was already the program of many of our elected officials. (Hmm.)
It's education stupid (Score:4, Insightful)
Why?
That's actually quite obvious. There are people, probably all neo-cons, that want privatization of our schools. They are vehemently against anything resembling socialism and will fight to the death to privatize everything.
Capitalism can only succeed if we have a mix between private corporations and some socialist programs. Schools should be available to everyone without the contamination of corporations, libraries should available to all, health care to everyone.
So the plan is let the public school system crumble to the ground, show the success of school vouchers for private schools, make public schools private. It's so freaking obvious it's not even worth debating. The Republicans want everything to be driven by capitalism and will stop at nothing to achieve it. The Democrats are too scared to do anything about it for fear of not getting re-elected. The average American doesn't have the time to worry about it because they are working 50-60 hours a week with 1 week vacation and trying to figure out how to afford sending their kids to college.
I hate to say it but we are fucked. We are going to be fucked for quite some time, until the average dumbass figures out he's working harder than his dad did and making less money and paying more taxes while corporations don't pay shit in taxes. It's only a matter of time before the shit hits the fan but I am afraid it will be a few years before the dumbasses realize the situation and a few more years to get it fixed.
My Take (Score:3, Insightful)
Let's first address the physical decay facing our nation's schools. The current conditions facing most students and teachers are appalling. We spend more money decorating the White House for annual holidays than most school districts budget for building maintenance.
Do not expect students to know the basics of mathematics, chemistry and physics. Working closely with the teachers' unions, make sure that you dumb down standards so that children who make the most minimal effort still get by with flying colors.
Standardized testing and federal guidelines must challenge our nation's students. In the last 15 years, federal regulations and state authorities have enacted a wave of PC rules that force schools to combine students of varying learning abilities into one large class. In that class, is expected that a student with a reading ability of an 8th grader to complete the same work as a student with a reading ability of a 12th grader.
What happened to Remedial and Honors classes?
Encourage the making of laws and rules by trial lawyers and sympathetic judges, especially through class actions. Bypass the legislative mechanisms that involve elected representatives and a president. This will stop--or at least greatly slow down--innovation, as corporations and individuals hesitate to explore new ideas for fear of getting punished (or regulated to death) by litigation for any misstep, no matter how slight, in the creation of new products and services. Make sure that lawsuits against drugmakers are especially encouraged so that the companies are afraid to develop new lifesaving drugs, lest they be sued for sums that will bankrupt them. Make trial lawyers and judges, not scientists, responsible for the flow of new products and services.
There is no question that this country needs to address Tort reform. In addition, we as a nation need to recognize that regulation is not what the founding fathers had in mind when writing the Constitution. I don't need the FCC protecting my children or me from televised orgies; I am most capable of regulating my children and myself. I don't need lawmakers asking what is popular with the country. I need lawmakers that are not afraid to do what is right, even if it is not what is popular.
Create a culture that blames the other guy for everything and discourages any form of individual self-restraint or self-control. Promote litigation to punish tobacco companies on the theory that they compel innocent people to smoke. Make it second nature for someone who is overweight to blame the restaurant that served him fries.
We must encourage and teach our children to take responsibility for their actions. Simple as that. If you drink and drive it is not the responsibility of the bartender, it is your responsibility.
Sneer at hard work and thrift. Encourage the belief that all true wealth comes from skillful manipulation and cunning, or from sudden, brilliant and lucky strokes that leave the plodding, ordinary worker and saver in the dust. Make sure that society's idols are men and women who got rich from being sexy in public or through gambling or playing tricks, not from hard work or patience. Make the citizenry permanently envious and bewildered about where real success comes from.
Continue making music videos that display a non-reality. For example, Jay-Z does not make 10 figures a year and selling 10 millions albums does not make you rich: ask TLC. In addition, be honest and open about the
Hold the managers of corporations to extremely lax standards of conduct and allow them to get off with a slap on the wrist when they betray the trust of shareholders. This will discourage thrift and investment and ensure that Americans will have far less capital to work with than other societies, while simultaneously developing that contempt for law and social standards that is the hallmark of failing nations. Hold the management of labor unions to no ethical standards.
Halliburton. WorldCom. Enron. United Airlines. But why are we upset? Why are we surprised? This is not the first time that CEOs have raped us. Oil companies did it in the 70s. Savings and Loans did it in 80s.
While you're at it, discourage respect for law in every possible way. This will dissolve the glue that holds the nation together, and dissuade any long-term thinking. Societies in which the law can be clearly seen to apply to some and not to others are doomed to decay, in terms of innovation and everything else.
I don't imagine that a 31 year-old black woman who shoplifts $5100 in merchandise from Macys would receive probation and community service. I don't imagine that anyone but a star baseball player would be charged and convicted of DUI, possession, and assault 4 different times before seeing the inside of a jail cell. I don't imagine that anyone but a star basketball player could physical assault their coach/boss, and then be offered a 7 figure yearly income with another team/job.
Encourage a mass culture that spits on intelligence and study and instead elevates drug use, coolness through sex and violence, and contempt for school. As children learn to be stupid instead of smart, the national intelligence base needed for innovation will simply vanish into MTV-land.
It is sad when video games outsell books. It is deplorable that most teenage boys can spew more slang for a woman's genital region, than he can name past Presidents.
Mock and belittle the family. Provide financial incentives to people willing to live an isolated existence, vulnerable and frightened. This guarantees that men and women of sufficient character to bring about innovation will be psychologically stifled from an early age.
Why do my wife and I pay a higher percentage of our income in taxes than single people?
Enact a tax system that encourages class antagonism and punishes saving, while rewarding indebtedness, frivolity and consumption. Tax the fruits of labor many times:
First tax it as income.
Then tax it as real or personal property.
Then tax it as capital gains.
Then tax it again, at a staggeringly high level, at death.
This way, Americans are taught that only fools save, and that it is entirely proper for us to have the lowest savings rate in the developed world. This will deprive us of much-needed capital for new investment, for innovation and our own personal aspirations. It will compel us to ask foreigners for ever more capital and allow them to own more of America. It will also promote an attitude of carelessness about the future and, once again, encourage disrespect for law.
There isn't anything I can add here. Ben Stein is dead on. As a young couple and making over $100K a year, my wife and I still don't know how we are going to afford a house, retirement, etc... It sounds far-fetched, but given taxes and more taxes, there is very little that we can save.
Have a socialized medical system that scrimps on badly needed drugs and procedures, resorts to only the cheapest practices and discourages drug companies from developing new drugs by not paying them enough to cover their costs of experimentation, trial and error.
If you don't think we have socialized medicine in the US, then explain to me what an HMO is.
Elevate mysticism, tribalism, shamanism and fundamentalism--and be sure to exclude educated, hardworking men and women--to an equal status with technology in the public mind. Make sure that, in order to pay proper (and politically correct) respect to all different ethnic groups in America, you act as if science were on an equal footing with voodoo and history with ethnic fable.
Because it is important that we return school prayer. Forget that schools cannot afford textbooks and some children cannot afford lunch, we have to work together to return school prayer. School prayer will make everything better.
And make sure that we give equal time to Darwin and the Book of Genesis when discussing the origins of the Universe.
But I stopped at a dozen because I realized that this is already, in large measure, the program of so many of our elected representatives. The debauchery of our tort system is already in place, and the rest of the agenda is under way.
Enough said. Out.
just another yahoo article (Score:3, Insightful)
let me just translate a few points from the column
[1] please allow us to take exemptions for sending our children to private religious schools, which admit only certain religions, teach religion in school, and teach creationism.
[2] pleaase allow law to be made only by "nonsympathetic" judges, and only by big corporations. and please help us get rid of the scum of America by putting them on deathrow.
[3]Keep guns legal and keep the governemtn in the pockets of tobacco companies and NRA. never mind that our country has become the primary source of guns throughout the world--including places like Columbia. OH, and while you are at it, make cd players and debuggers illegal , they can be used to commit "crimes".
[4] please introduce a flat tax --everyone should be charged $100, no matter how much they earn. After all the government doesn't do more work for the rich, does it?
Never mind the fact that in a supply-and-demand society, it is the rich who will want to pay the $100 for building a road, while the poor will want to spend his $100 on preventing self-starvation rather than getting that road built. Forget supply-and-demand. whoever said that that's what governs a free market??
[5] let me try to coopt a "left-wing" agenda here, because it is popular nowadays. Why not slip in a barb against (the nearly outlawed) labor unions?
[6] more power to cops and ashcroft please. and it is the drugs that kill, not guns.
[7] Darn, did you read the bible before having sex.? Note that it's that what causes all the violence and deaths, not the guns.
[8] Family values! now! Oust gays and outlaw prostitution. oh wait, already done.
[9] continue allowing big industry to manipulate our immuigraiton policty to make evryone believe ther'es shortage of high-tech workers.
[10] Flat taxes! now!
[11] darn, out drug companies are not making enough. They need to be able to patent more stuff, people's genes, ancient medicines, oh, done, cool, hmm, anything left that i can think of? Body parts? yeah!
[12] The only allowed religioun should be a monotheistic christianity. And the worst religion of all should be atheism. In God We Trust.
List doesn't end here....but i repeat: our country will go to hell if we don't do something about these nonchristian "scientific" types soon.
Trade Secrets, Copyright & The Erosion Of Pate (Score:3, Interesting)
Trade secrets has allowed companies to essentially patent the unpatentable and protect concepts and ideas far past the patent limit.
Copyrights are even worse in that they have allowed companies to publish software and legally protect it without actually publishing the source code.
Consider Microsoft's successful squashing of any 'unauthorized' books regarding API calls. To me Microsoft would be truly covered if all the API calls were actually published and therefore copyrighted, but they are not. So what is covered is not actually known to the public or described in any public way, yet Microsoft can continue to have them and be legally protected by just copyrighting the distribution of the executables.
This is an abomination of the entire point of having a patent or a copyright system- to encourage innovation by giving the user exclusive use and rights legally protected for a time in exchange for having the body of knowledge published publically.
Why bother to patent when trade secrets or copyright can protect you longer with no public release of knowledge or concepts?
We have drastically erred on the side of use and rights without the fair exchange of public knowledge. Until we fix this part our innovative tech base will continue to suffer.
Technical edge is not enough. (Score:3, Insightful)
- point 3. Promote litigation to punish tobacco companies on the theory that they compel innocent people to smoke.
Sorry, but this is very bad exemple, while I agree that in the US there are too many litigations, I also believe that tobacco companies do try to compel innocent people to smoke by running ads targetted to young teen.
In France, after a long battle, the problem has been solved in a radical way: any advertisement for tobacco is forbidden in any media.
- point 12. Uh? I've always seen American people as being in general higly religious which apparently haven't prevented the US from being the richest nation.
I don't really thinks that the nature of the religion is important wether it is catholicism, mysticim, or other things (except sects of course)
But I'm an atheist, so I'm not very knowledgeable into religions and I don't care, to be honest.
Also the article somehow insists too much on the technical side of the affair: US has not have the best student or best researchers for a long time, still the US is still the first nation on a big number of field, why?
Because the transformation of new idea into industries which sells works very well in the US whereas in the other country usually it doesn't work so well.
And another thing: the article didn't list the patents as a highly dangourous thing: they could slow down inovation very much..
You Gets What You Pays For (Score:4, Insightful)
We do not value little smart gadgets like the Japanese do, so we do not make them as well or as consistently. The Japanese do not have per capita square footage like we do, so anything that gives them more capability in a small space is prized. Electronics are also a very profitable item to ship, so it was an excellent arena for the Japanese to specialize in.
Being behind in consumer electronics is not new. Our broadcast standards have been absolutely behind most of the world for decades, for instance. But a clear picture wasn't as important to us and so we have lagged until HDTV.
On the other hand we feel a need to have a strong military. So we put our money into all sorts of hideous toys that are so far ahead of everyone else's that Pax Americana is an absolute fact. No matter how much Japan or France or Russia or China may want to, they simply cannot build an F-22 for a long time to come.
Unfortunately F-22s do not readily translate into consumer products, but items like BOMARC and B-52s translated into the 747, still a world-beater product.
I'm not suggesting that the military-industrial complex is our technical salvation, but since we prioritize and pay for it we get that kind of technical edge. If we want innovation in other sectors of our economy, we will need to prioritize that, either as a government initiative or the natural course of market desire.
And we need to stop whining if we don't absolutely dominate every global industrial endeavor. As long as we can offload the commoditization to Japan or the Little Dragons and keep the innovation in-house, who cares if we all have Playstations instead of Ataris?
The Roswell well has run dry, almost. (Score:4, Funny)
USA is going down the drain frankly. (Score:4, Interesting)
All these stupid decisions gives the ball to other countries to play with. I think the USA can very well go the same way as Japan did in the 90's. With current leadership in the states that is dangerous as hell. Bad economy? Start a war and focus the citizens on another direction.
It happens right now!
Our technological edge (Score:3, Interesting)
Technology is one of the most dangerous risks to take. Not only are you pouring money into something that has never been done before, but you are doing it for a product that has never been created before. Usually, the results of your investment will not be seen for several years or more.
Ben Stein is right on the money. Those things that liberals want to do -- uproot our society, change the way everyone lives over night, and throw away everything we built our country on -- means that the future is unpredictable.
Conservatives have had it right all along. We should be building on the past, not tearing it down and starting from scratch.
The REAL reason this country's going to hell... (Score:3, Funny)
(Story continues after advertisement)
-DoctorB
Ben Stein, luser (Score:3, Insightful)
Following Ben Stein's implied prescription as to the cure to what ails America would do it once and for all. If he'd ever done anything constructive with technology for a living, he might be clued enough to make his perceptions about what makes technological innovation of value. Reading his article makes him wonder what planet he moved to after his job with Nixon quit him. As well as why he returned and why Forbes decided to give him a public forum.
As a casual observer of what makes this country work and what stops it cold, I hereby offer a few suggestions on how we can ruin American competitiveness and innovation in the course of this century.
His suggestions might be worth something if he'd ever gotten closer to real technologists than any article in the financial press could have taken him.
I think the reader will agree with me that we are already far down the road on many of them:
1) Allow schools to fall into useless decay. Do not teach civics or history except to describe America as a hopelessly fascistic, reactionary pit.
He wants schools to leave the Nixon era out of history books? Not that I blame him, he's one of the guilty parties, he was on the Nixon staff. But he isn't important enough to be mentioned by name.
Do not expect students to know the basics of mathematics, chemistry and physics.
A couple of hours ago, I helped an average high school student in an average suburban high school make a model of the sodium atom. In large part, the science textbooks are finally becoming adequate and much better than the ones I used in high school (graduated at mid-term in 1972).
Working closely with the teachers' unions, make sure that you dumb down standards so that children who make the most minimal effort still get by with flying colors. Destroy the knowledge base on which all of mankind's scientific progress has been built by guaranteeing that such learning is confined to only a few, and spread ignorance and complacency among the many. Watch America lose its scientific and competitive edge to other nations that make a comprehensive knowledge base a rule of the society.
We're going to lose our competitive edge to the RIAA/MPAA cartel long before the educational system has time to do what he describes.
While public education is in serious disrepair, the problem (at least in California and other states which are finally enforcing some) isn't standards, it's structure and methods. The standards for high school graduation in a local California school district I reviewed are perfectly adequate. I'm at something of a loss as to how their educational methods are going to accomplish this, from what I've been able to see, the teachers are using homework not to reinforce the classroom instruction given during the school day, but to force parents to provide the instruction the teachers weren't able to provide. The money is probably adequate, but is dissipated in "administrative expenses" having little discernable relationship to classroom instruction.
2) Encourage the making of laws and rules by trial lawyers and sympathetic judges, especially through class actions. Bypass the legislative mechanisms that involve elected representatives and a president. This will stop--or at least greatly slow down--innovation, as corporations and individuals hesitate to explore new ideas for fear of getting punished (or regulated to death) by litigation for any misstep, no matter how slight, in the creation of new products and services. Make sure that lawsuits against drugmakers are especially encouraged so that the companies are afraid to develop new lifesaving drugs, lest they be sued for sums that will bankrupt them. Make trial lawyers and judges, not scientists, responsible for the flow of new products and services.
I'm a hell of a lot more concerned about the unrestrained influence of the lobbyists of the Hollywood content cartel than I am about tort law, which has largely already been reformed in the direction Mr. Stein asks for. The factors that restrain innovation in the pharmaceutical industry are more that companies have found that paying lawyers to build patent portfolios from previous work is more profitable than hiring scientists and engineers.
We're finding that entertainment industry executives are even less safe technology gatekeepers than trial lawyers ever were. If he wants to point a finger, he should look to his own employers.
3) Create a culture that blames the other guy for everything and discourages any form of individual self-restraint or self-control. Promote litigation to punish tobacco companies on the theory that they compel innocent people to smoke. Make it second nature for someone who is overweight to blame the restaurant that served him fries. Encourage a legal process that can kill a drug company for any mistakes in self-medication.
IIRC, the overweight person got his fat ass kicked in court, and he can't name any drug companies that have gone out of business over a patient's fuckups any more than you or I can. However, the evidence is simply inconclusive. I can cite examples where these cases got tossed out of court and cases where the plaintiffs won.
Make it a general rule that anyone with more money than a plaintiff is responsible for anything harmful that a plaintiff does. Promulgate the pitiful joke that Americans are hereby exempt from any responsibility for their own actions--so long as there are deep pockets around to be rifled.
4) Sneer at hard work and thrift. Encourage the belief that all true wealth comes from skillful manipulation and cunning, or from sudden, brilliant and lucky strokes that leave the plodding, ordinary worker and saver in the dust.
Does anyone know of any examples of people who've gotten seriously rich (say, over $100M) solely by hard work and thrift? It's rather telling that Ben doesn't know of any, either. We know this because he didn't cite examples. Hard work only counts when one is doing the right things, and thrift is only a good thing when one economizes on the right things... i.e. don't spend $1K of your investors' money per employee on office furniture in a high tech startup, and DON'T try squeezing nickels when it comes to picking server hardware when your site is already getting 1M hits a day.
Make sure that society's idols are men and women who got rich from being sexy in public
Presumably, he means entertainers. Hmmm... why are we using the badly informed remarks of an entertainer as a basis of public debate?
or through gambling or playing tricks, not from hard work or patience. Make the citizenry permanently envious and bewildered about where real success comes from.
Anybody sufficiently interested in finding out can discover where most individual fortunes came from, including the parts the founders of thse fortunes would really rather we didn't know about. Of course, knowing where wealth comes from doesn't necessarily imply that one can make it even if one has the knowledge and talent to create intellectual capital. Knowing who Ann Winblad is doesn't mean she'll give you the time of day, unless you encounter her through the right "insider" VC community channels.
Hint: If Bill Gates hadn't had substantial family money behind him, would we have ever heard of either him or Microsoft?
5) Hold the managers of corporations to extremely lax standards of conduct and allow them to get off with a slap on the wrist when they betray the trust of shareholders. This will discourage thrift and investment and ensure that Americans will have far less capital to work with than other societies, while simultaneously developing that contempt for law and social standards that is the hallmark of failing nations. Hold the management of labor unions to no ethical standards.
Odd that he got that one almost right. Now why did he personally invest in Enron and Worldcom to begin with?
If he's as well informed as he pretends to be, he'd know that the reason for the spectacular stock swindles perpetrated by Enron, Worldcom, and many other companies was reduced oversight by the SEC, which the Bush Administration insured by gutting the agency's funding. Corporate leaders will cheat if they can get away with it, that's why the SEC was invented in the 1930s. Why is he putting Ben Stein's money into funding the GOP if he really believes there's a problem?
6) While you're at it, discourage respect for law in every possible way. This will dissolve the glue that holds the nation together, and dissuade any long- term thinking. Societies in which the law can be clearly seen to apply to some and not to others are doomed to decay, in terms of innovation and everything else.
No argument here. However, he's a former scriptwriter for Richard Nixon, who left the White House barely in time to avoid public trial for "high crimes and misdemeanors". The GOP is the very center of the cultural imperative that says the law is for everyone except the wealthy. A good argument, but is he really the one to make it?
7) Encourage a mass culture that spits on intelligence and study and instead elevates drug use, coolness through sex and violence, and contempt for school. As children learn to be stupid instead of smart, the national intelligence base needed for innovation will simply vanish into MTV- land.
Still whining about youth culture after all these years. I guess he figures that he fooled the public during the Nixon era with this, (the 1972 Nixon campaign was basically an attack on youth culture) he can still get away with it. He will be happy to know that the current version of youth culture is just as likely to turn out amoral suits to provide the kind of "innovative" business leadership he seems to be looking for as any idealism out of the hippie era.
The PC he presumably typed these grave pronouncements on and the ones we're reading and writing this on are as much a product of the 1960s youth culture as acid rock and love beads. Those of you who are too young to remember this from being there can pick up the history from Hackers by Stephen Levy. Though looking at pictures of Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak around when they started Apple should give you the idea. Those of you who are a bit older will remember when I say Whole Earth Catalogue gave Homebrew Computer Club its startup funding. And the world indeed changed as a result.
What will the current participants in the current revision of youth culture come up with in the way of technology? There are more young computer programmers around than in any time in previous history, and most of you are probably here. Isn't it sad that Ben Stein doesn't like your musical tastes?
8) Mock and belittle the family.
Last time I heard, The Osbournes are still the hottest show on TV... the family might not be the one that Ben Stein grew up with and Ozzy Osbourne isn't exactly Ozzie Nelson, but the family actually seems to work.
Provide financial incentives to people willing to live an isolated existence, vulnerable and frightened. This guarantees that men and women of sufficient character to bring about innovation will be psychologically stifled from an early age.
Let's be polite here and figure that he botched this one on the basis that he stopped doing his own income taxes as soon as he could afford to do so, probably in the early 1970s. The rest of us need only flip through our form 1040 booklets to figure out what tax breaks families get that singles aren't eligible for.
9) Develop a suicidal immigration policy that keeps out educated, hardworking men and women from friendly nations and, instead, takes in vast numbers of angry, uneducated immigrants from nations that hate us. This, too, leads to the shrinking of our knowledge base and the eventual disappearance of social cohesion.
He's never heard of H1B and we're supposed to take his pronouncements on how immigration law works seriously? Perhaps Forbes should have gotten Madonna or Eminem to write the article instead. I don't see how they could have done a worse job. Where the hell does he think the casual labor that keeps his yard in good shape comes from, under a cabbage patch?
10) Enact a tax system that encourages class antagonism and punishes saving, while rewarding indebtedness, frivolity and consumption. Tax the fruits of labor many times:
First tax it as income. Then tax it as real or personal property. Then tax it as capital gains. Then tax it again, at a staggeringly high level, at death. This way, Americans are taught that only fools save, and that it is entirely proper for us to have the lowest savings rate in the developed world.
We also have the lowest total tax rate in the developed world once all these layers are added up, and those who invest as companies in technological businesses can pick up an R&D tax credit. If he were qualified to speak on technological innovation, he'd know it.
This will deprive us of much-needed capital for new investment, for innovation and our own personal aspirations. It will compel us to ask foreigners for ever more capital and allow them to own more of America. It will also promote an attitude of carelessness about the future and, once again, encourage disrespect for law.
Tell that to Bill Gates. Fortunes are still being made in America. Though Gates doesn't have much to do with innovation, there are others who've made high-tech fortunes in the system he condemns, and a whole lot of us who'd be happy to give it a try given access to venture capital.
11) Have a socialized medical system that scrimps on badly needed drugs and procedures, resorts to only the cheapest practices and discourages drug companies from developing new drugs by not paying them enough to cover their costs of experimentation, trial and error.
Which country does he think he lives in? The USA has the most expensive medical system in the world on either a per capita basis or in terms of total dollars. Attempts to introduce universal health care have been uniformly squelched by millions of dollars spent by the US health care industry and in particular, insurance companies who would be forced to stop profiting from health care if the US health care system became "socialized".
12) Elevate mysticism, tribalism, shamanism and fundamentalism--and be sure to exclude educated, hardworking men and women--to an equal status with technology in the public mind.
With the exception of the Xtian fundamentalists, all the groups he's whining about are very well represented in technological innovation. Anyone who doesn't quite get this should try googling for:
technopagan VRML
Make sure that, in order to pay proper (and politically correct) respect to all different ethnic groups in America, you act as if science were on an equal footing with voodoo and history with ethnic fable.
If he'd had the guts to go after fundamentalist Christians pushing "Creation Science", I'd agree with him. As far as I know, this is the only significant example of religion overriding science that's going on right now.
My list need not end here.
Would it be uncharitable to suggest that it ended because he'd run out of ideas? Perhaps a few more hours of listening to Rush Limbaugh would have given him some.
But I stopped at a dozen because I realized that this is already, in large measure, the program of so many of our elected representatives. The debauchery of our tort system is already in place, and the rest of the agenda is under way.
The only agendas I see in progress right now are that of restricting civil liberties in the guise of "protecting us from terrorists" and the Hollywood content cartel's anti-tech agenda. Either are as dangerous to America's ability to innovate and compete as the decline of public education. Ben Stein deals with neither. If Ben Stein got paid for this article, Forbes should retract the article and try to get their money back from him.
Ben Stein was practically the only GOP contributor among the ranks of Hollywood entertainers, look him up [opensecrets.org]. (search under individual donors, enter STEIN, BENJAMIN)
Benjamin J. Stein is a lawyer, economist, writer and actor, and host of the game show Win Ben Stein's Money.
If Ben Stein ever devotes a show segment to public policy and has an honest judge score the contestants, he's going to lose a bunch of Ben Stein's money. The guy does have style, but I never realized before reading his article how little he's got to back it up with.
RTFA (Score:3, Insightful)
He in no way said anything Right-Wing, he simply spoke of fiscal responsibility, aligning with neither extreme.
Re:RTFA (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually what he's trying to say is that schools spend too much time on pointless activities designed to "raise self-esteem", rather than actually teaching useful material. But thanks for the perfect example of liberal debating technique: "you don't agree with me, so you're a bigot".
Re:Join fingers...let's code for America (Score:3, Insightful)
Your son is not your property.
Re:Bleh (Score:5, Interesting)
The article was written in the 20's by a British publication about the US.
These things go in cycles, as each country gets a crisis and a generation gets burned. They work hard and raise their kids in a more stable world. Their kids, in turn, have it way too easy, but the grandparents who originally learned the lessons don't run the country anymore, and the bust, boom, bust cycle resumes. It takes about 60 years to go from one bust to the next. (You can trace back US GDP back to the American Revolution and see this cycle, but it happens everywhere.)
In the 90s, the Americans looked to the Japanese, and the Japanese soon experienced a banking bust of enormous proportions.
"The Great Reckoning", while dated, is a great read on this topic, and others.