Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Is the Seeking of Lost Skills/Arts a Hacking Analog?

Posted by Cliff on Thu May 22, 2003 06:32 PM
from the hack-the-world-without-a-keyboard dept.
bigattichouse asks: "Having just finished my first batch of home-brew beer, I've been thinking about my attraction to 'lost arts', and collecting books on 'how to do stuff'. Some I try, some I just read: metalsmithing, sewing, baking bread, making soap, knot tying, brewing beer, woodcarving, yogurt and cheese.. there are so many skills 'lost' in the modern 'american' lifestyle... but I find my fellows tend to have books on these subjects lying around, too. Is this common in geekdom? Is this an expression of 'hacking' outside of machinery/engineering?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3
  • SCA! (Score:5, Informative)

    I think this guy's right. If you really want to see a bunch of nerds going crazy with esoteric endeavors, look no further than the Society for Creative Anachronism [sca.org]. They're pretty much the only people left in the world who make battle-quality chain mail, scale mail, and plate mail in the medieval style.
    • Re:SCA! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:38PM
    • Re:SCA! (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:38PM (#6019744)
      We are on watch lists with the FBI because of that also. They consider us a "paramilitary" training group even though the tactics we teach are not necessarily useful against modern weapons. It is a lot of fun though!
      Stephan Von Ardenwald
      Pirateship Beltis
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:SCA! by Anonymous Coward (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:02PM
        • Re:SCA! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @06:27AM
          • Re:SCA! by Lodragandraoidh (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @10:02AM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:SCA! (Score:5, Interesting)

        by BrokenHalo (565198) on Thursday May 22 2003, @08:24PM (#6020473)
        It is a lot of fun though!

        I spent some ten years working as a blacksmith, and believe me, it's a lot more fun making those swords than fighting with them.

        And yes, a blacksmith can, too, be a geek. Just check out some of the literature and mailing lists on archaeometallurgy. There are much too many to list here, but Google will find some of them.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:SCA! by r4lv3k (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:27PM
          • Re:SCA! by BrokenHalo (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:38PM
        • Re:SCA! by Terminal Saint (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:41PM
          • Re:SCA! by plalonde2 (Score:3) Friday May 23 2003, @12:54AM
          • Re:SCA! (Score:4, Informative)

            by BrokenHalo (565198) on Friday May 23 2003, @01:36AM (#6021877)
            my assumption is that the way to go about it is to find a blacksmith and ask to be his apprentice. Is that about right?

            Right. When I got given the heave in 1990 from my systems programming job, and there was no sign of any employment on the horizon, I figured that then was as good a time as any to learn.

            I discovered that there was no longer any formal blacksmith's apprenticeship system here (Western Australia, though I have been told otherwise in Victoria) so I simply did some asking around, and found an old smith who was happy to take me on and teach me. This man had done his apprenticeship in the '40s with the railways and subsequently taught in apprenticeship courses. As it turned out, I got one-to-one tuition, and although I didn't realise it at the time, I was able to do things after a few months that many fully-fledged "master" blacksmiths never learn to do.

            If you're interested in it as a hobby, there are associations and clubs in many places - Google will help. You might even get useful info from your local SCA, though that depends. Some of them are very much in the mickey-mouse category when it comes to craftsmanship.

            I should have said earlier, check out the libraries, there's lots of good literature on the subject. I was taught the way my teacher was taught, etc, but as you go on you learn and refine new techniques for yourself and discard things that don't suit you so well. Any master blacksmith is constantly learning new things about his craft.

            [ Parent ]
        • Re:SCA! by minton (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @07:58AM
      • Re:SCA! by PsibrII (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:04PM
        • Re:SCA! by Fesh (Score:3) Friday May 23 2003, @06:05AM
      • Re:SCA! by sstory (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:06PM
      • Re:SCA! by ColdGrits (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @04:54AM
      • Re:SCA! by TW Burger (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @02:44PM
        • Re:SCA! by unitron (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @07:58PM
          • Re:SCA! by TW Burger (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @10:29PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • They scare me... by Thinkit3 (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:44PM
    • Re:SCA! (Score:5, Insightful)

      They're pretty much the only people left in the world who make battle-quality chain mail, scale mail, and plate mail in the medieval style.

      Not to rain on the SCA parade, but the skills that these guys use isn't what we're talking about.

      Metalsmithing, perhaps. Making "battle ready" chain mail is nothing more than time consuming, and I seriously doubt that any of them (I know of a few, one who makes most the mail in the area) actually know how to make the rings. They know how to put them together quickly.

      Their swords are nothing in comparison to traditional Toledo steel (exclude The Factory, for those in the know.) or Japanese steel. It's really half-assed, industrialized-support endeavors. I've seen SCA steel, and it really isn't anything special.

      The last thing that I want given the unlikely circumstance of needing to know how to do things like make soap, distil water, survive without modern devices, is SCA members running around.

      I think the purpose of this ask Slashdot is not about people running around pretending their in a medieval bubble that is roughly supported by industrialization, but to just learn how worldly things work.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:SCA! (Score:5, Funny)

        by squidfood (149212) on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:07PM (#6019957)
        ...things like make soap...

        That's not the first skill I'd associate with the SCA.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:SCA! by crow (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:28PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:SCA! by featheredfrog (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:52PM
        • make soap; make clean; by xixax (Score:3) Friday May 23 2003, @12:11AM
      • Re:SCA! by PsibrII (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:58PM
        • Re:SCA! by Xerithane (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:25PM
          • Re:SCA! by Omkar (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:33PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:SCA! by Mooncaller (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:22PM
      • Re:SCA! (Score:5, Informative)

        by Goldsmith (561202) on Thursday May 22 2003, @09:39PM (#6020876)
        I don't know who you know in the SCA, but the group I used to run around with in San Diego was nothing like that.

        The first thing you had to be able to do to be considered a "real" member was learn how to sew. Then, you had to learn some woodworking skills. Third you had to learn to cook. This was because everyone was expected to help out around camp and generally keep things going. We were very much about being self sufficient, but self sufficient within the level of being able to pick up tools and raw materials at Home Depot.

        We had a few projects we were well known for. We did things such as build a bridge, portable showers (heated, I might add), and our own trailers.

        No one I know in the SCA pretends that we're doing everything on our own. I joined the SCA because I wanted to learn how things work. In the process I learned how a lathe works (at the take it apart, put it together level), and machine tools in general. I learned how to judge a piece of wood and do some basic woodworking. I learned how to cold shape metal, how to cook, how to sew, and how to make and build a large number of small, simple devices. I learned the basics of brewing beer, making soap, and making cloth.

        Most of all I learned to appreciate the modern world and that it makes it so easy to do all those things.

        As far as steel goes, I never heard anyone in the SCA talk about making it, but I have that covered too. I'm working on a PhD in Materials Physics. (I agree with you on the chain mail thing... I don't see why anyone would WANT to do that)
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:SCA! by Seraphim_72 (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:16PM
      • Re:SCA! by drinkypoo (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:48PM
        • Re:SCA! by Xerithane (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @12:05AM
          • Re:SCA! by drinkypoo (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @09:20AM
            • Re:SCA! by Xerithane (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @10:38AM
          • Re:SCA! by override11 (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @07:03AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:SCA! by Gordonjcp (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @03:58AM
          • Re:SCA! by drinkypoo (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @09:18AM
            • Re:SCA! by Gordonjcp (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @11:31AM
      • Re:SCA! by Lt Razak (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @08:33AM
      • Re:SCA! by SoupIsGood Food (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @12:24PM
      • Re:SCA! by Night0wl (Score:1) Sunday May 25 2003, @10:03PM
      • Re:SCA! by Lt Razak (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @08:38AM
      • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:SCA! (Score:5, Insightful)

      That question is not whether the skills need to be used or not... it's whether the skills being used are like hacking (in the original sense of the word) in some way. I'd say that they are - it's a bunch of people tinkering with things most people don't really care too much about in order to see how they work and have some fun at the same time.
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Chain mail (Score:5, Funny)

      by GQuon (643387) on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:20PM (#6020052)
      (http://www.etteroljen.no/ | Last Journal: Tuesday January 17 2006, @11:50AM)
      They're pretty much the only people left in the world who make battle-quality chain mail, scale mail, and plate mail in the medieval style.

      Hm, I wonder how medieval style chain mail would look like?

      "Hear ye! Hear ye!
      This chain letter was started by our saviour Jesus Christ the day he died for our sins. And you will be forever damned if you don't follow it's instructions, as it is the words of the Good Lord.

      You will all get rich because of your faithful devotion. You will earn one thousand shilling in just one year. Send one shilling to each of the people on the list. Then strike the name at the top of this list and your own name to the bottom of it. Then send copies of this letter to dozen of your friends and relatives, as Jesus had a dozen apostles.
      If you cannot aford the parchment, or at least a herald, you will just have to go read this message to them yourself. If you cannot read, just learn this letter by heart.
      You must do this within half a dozen moons, and keep the holy chain running, unless you want yourself and your house to be forever damned."


      And yes, I do know that we are really talking about body armor.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Chain mail by BrokenHalo (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:35PM
        • Re:Chain mail by GnarlyNome (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:54PM
          • Re:Chain mail by BrokenHalo (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:30PM
            • Re:Chain mail by GnarlyNome (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @12:22AM
              • Re:Chain mail by BrokenHalo (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @01:42AM
        • Re:Chain mail by ibbey (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:20PM
      • Himmelsbrief by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @07:49PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:SCA! by broody (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:48PM
    • Re:SCA! by Deker (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:55PM
    • Re:SCA! by Planesdragon (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:55PM
    • Re:SCA! by Uncle Gropey (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:24PM
    • oxymoron... by hackwrench (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:26PM
    • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Geeks just want to learn (Score:5, Insightful)

    by captain_craptacular (580116) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:34PM (#6019706)
    Thats why their geeks. The thirst for knowledge need not be contained in any one discipline. I know I personally hop from new hobby to new hobby and become bored with things once I feel I have enough skill.
    • Re:Geeks just want to learn (Score:5, Funny)

      by maxpublic (450413) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:43PM (#6019787)
      (http://slashdot.org/)
      I thought geeks did these sorts of things because they couldn't get laid....

      Max
      [ Parent ]
    • OpenSource your life! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Tirs (195467) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:47PM (#6019824)
      (http://www.tirsabril.com/)
      Well, I moved from a downtown appartment to a countryhouse a couple of years ago, and I began to feel the urge to start doing things like this: beer homebrewing, fruits and vegetables preserving, bread baking, furniture repairing/building, even some basic masonry. Then one day I was sitting by the fireplace (wood cut by myself), smoking a pipe (my own mix of tobacco), and meditating about my life, and this question came to my mind: Why?

      After giving some thought to the issue, I think that the answer is quite simple: for the same reason why I go to FreshMeat to get the source code of the programs I use. I could download the binaries, but I don't; I prefer to go through the pain of ./configuring, making and make-installing, to say the least. In other words: I want to control the process of creation as much as possible. The same spirit of OpenSource which animates most geeks is present in each and every aspect of their lives, not only in computing.

      Self-made-making and Open Source are all about the same: to keep control of our own lives.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:OpenSource your life! by Metasquares (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:23PM
      • It's also being connected to our own lives. by jonskerr (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:58PM
      • You nailed it. (Score:5, Insightful)

        I do these things because I want to be in control. There is nothing worse than a stupid situation that you *know* you could get out of with some basic skill...

        This is one of the greatest attractions OSS currently holds for me. I know that anything I learn to do with OSS tools, I will continue to be able to do for a long time without getting permission, paying fees, or dealing with silly restrictions that only benefit companies who have enough already.

        On a personal level it makes sense as well. Taking the heat for something you are not directly responsible for sucks.

        Anyone willing to stick their neck out in order to champion some proprietary software is just gambling with their career. You think they really care?

        They don't, it is just about revenue and nothing more. If your problem is shared by many you can be safe in the knowing it will be addressed. You can even look like you are on the ball while advocating your marginal 'standard' in the box thinking. The real truth is you are more lucky if you stick with the crowd.

        This attitude promotes strong in the box thinking combined with a healthy and well refined finger pointing and blame shifing skills. Innovation? forget it. Competitive advantage comes down to how hard you can make your people work and how big of a ball buster you have for a purchasing agent. Boy, that sure makes me want to come to work early... (cough)

        I once worked in a shop where one of my job duties was to make sure that what I made was correct and within stated tolerances. This shop had a quality assurance department to help make sure this was true, but it was expected that you had tools, knowledge of the machine and the ability to read and understand the specifications because the quality people sometimes made mistakes too.

        Well, one batch of rather large and expensive parts was found to be defective one day. It was right after I had complted my stage of the work.

        I was found to be at fault for not making sure the guy before me did his job right. I was pissed at first, but thought about it and it made some good sense. Afterall I had the information and tools to evaluate the work done before --why not?

        I made damn sure afterword to have the skill and information needed to evaluate both my own work and those before me just to make sure I had the ability to deal with what I was responsible for.

        So take this ethic in the context of systems being sold and used today. It's scary.

        On one hand you have to trust the software is designed well and does what it says because you cannot actually see the work of others before you --even if you have the skill.

        On the other, the company that pays your way wants you to be held accountable for what those same systems do. You did ok the purchase right?

        The creator of the software takes almost all of your rights through the legal wrapper that comes with the package while you take the heat and have to deal with the issues.

        So you can evaluate basically nothing, must pay blood money for fixes and updates out of your control and take the heat for the fuckups of one of the most cash rich companies around?

        At least with Open Source you can examine what you are getting. You can learn how it works and why it does so. You can implement how you see fit and act in a responsible manner.

        I was called the fool for hosing up so many parts. I was asked why I worked so hard at doing the right job on parts that were wrong.

        Today when I see all the win32 problems I shake my head and wonder at the foolishness of it all. Who in their right mind would actually step up and take that kind of responsibility understanding that they are more or less powerless to act on it?

        I guess ignorance is really an excuse in IT. Can't find any other reason for it.

        Franky, the whole mess makes me sick.

        So, back to the skills. I like knowing that I can go into the woods and make fire, shelter weapons do just fine. Sometimes th
        [ Parent ]
      • Reasoning too fancy.

        Baking bread just plain smells nice. Yum!

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:It's about choice... by a_p_irwin (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:31PM
      • Poltergeeks by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @07:44PM
      • Re:Open Source != hacking by shaitand (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:41PM
      • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Nail on the head. I have taken classes on carving stone, playing the Native American flute, and piano. I also dabble in water colors, writing, and am a licensed pilot. Next on the list is learning gardening and making a compost pile. After that I am leaning towards glass blowing and making my own hot sauce.

      My theory is that geeks have more imagination than the average bear. They look at lines of programming but see not only the code, but also the manipulation of the screen. If you think about it, all a computer really is is a device for changing pixel colors on a screen. Geeks see how the pixels ought to look.

      Its that same imagination that makes reading so popular within the geek community. They "see" what the words convey. That's also why SciFi and fantasy is so popular as well. Every piece of fiction written involves a choice by the author. For something like 90% of them, they choose to set their story in either the world we know or the world we knew. The remander toy with the setting. It is that, I think, which so appeals to the geeks. The boudries are no longer boudries.

      The point of all this, then, is that geeks like to use their imaginations. What better way to do that than to try a variety of different hobbies each of which provides a different sort of stimulous and memory? In so doing it also allows the imagination to be that much more real when it comes to dealing with any of the skill sets involved in the hobby.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Geeks just want to learn by Steven Reddie (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:04PM
    • Hippy influence by nano-second (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:39PM
    • Re:Geeks just want to learn by Information Mechanic (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:05PM
    • Re:Geeks just want to learn by gmhowell (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:16PM
    • Re:Geeks just want to learn by BHS_Turf (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:24PM
    • Re:Geeks just want to learn by LLWhipist (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @10:09AM
    • Re:Geeks just want to learn by SharkJumper (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @10:35AM
    • Geeks in the past by DrCode (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @11:49AM
    • Re:Geeks just want to learn by GnarlyNome (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:23PM
    • Re:Geeks just want to learn by shaitand (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:35PM
    • Re:Geeks just want to learn by shaitand (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:46PM
    • 7 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Soap? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:35PM (#6019715)
    making soap
    Tyler Durden? Is that you?
    • Re:Soap? (Score:5, Informative)

      by linuxwrangler (582055) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:44PM (#6019798)
      You know, the Simple Object Access Protocol?

      Seriously, I remember helping my dad (an electrical engineer) making a batch of soap. Of course this involved many side tracks like measuring the temperature changes when the lye was added to the water and testing various ways to improve the purity of the fat.

      In 5th grade a bunch of my class visited to learn how soap was made.

      My dad stopped when he realized that he had enough to last the rest of his life (it is quite hard unlike store-bought and each bar lasts quite a while).

      He still delivers a bag when he visits so it's the soap I still use as well.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Soap? by Pirogoeth (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:50PM
      • Re:Soap?-Devo soap. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:26PM
      • Re:Soap? (Score:5, Funny)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:32PM (#6020126)
        GF: Mmm, honey, I love the way the back of your neck smells.. what kind of soap do you use??

        you: Purified animal fat mixed with lye. I get it from the butcher, he collects it for me over the course of a month or so.

        GF: Please go far away.
        [ Parent ]
    • Who is Tyler Durden? NT by grahamsz (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:45PM
    • Re:Soap? by weston (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:23PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Wellll (Score:5, Funny)

    by Timesprout (579035) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:36PM (#6019717)
    "Having just finished my first batch of home-brew beer, I've been thinking about my attraction to 'lost arts'

    Drinking a skinful of beer will put these thoughts in your head. I usually solve all the worlds problems after a few. Can never seem to remember the solutions the next day though
    • Re:Wellll by kurosawdust (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:00PM
      • Re:Wellll by Timesprout (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:06PM
      • Re:Wellll by dillon_rinker (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:27PM
      • Home - Eat by Cpt_Kirks (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:50PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Absolutely (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ReconRich (64368) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:36PM (#6019718)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    I've been hacking over 30 years. I also brew beer, distill whisky, hunt, grow food, etc. These are definitely all the same expression: to know how things work.

    -- Rich
  • k5 by anderiv (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:36PM
    • Re:k5 by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:01PM
  • We're all preparing for Y2038.
  • no. i just use google by stonebeat.org (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:37PM
  • Could be libertarian bent... by Thinkit3 (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:38PM
  • Art has to be defined first. by ATAMAH (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:39PM
  • Why do you need to ask? (Score:5, Funny)

    by KDan (90353) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:39PM (#6019751)
    (http://www.inter-sections.net/)
    Hacking is just like being the One. No one can tell you you're hacking, you just do it.

    Daniel
  • How About.. (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:39PM (#6019754)
    Slashdot staff taking some time out to seek the lost art of a decent Slashdot article?
  • by mikerbob (107717) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:39PM (#6019756)
    Engineers love to tinker, find out how it all works, rip it apart and put it back together. Whether it's mechanical, chemical, or physical we want to understand. The only expression of the Renaissance Man left...
  • Definitely! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Moryath (553296) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:40PM (#6019757)
    (Last Journal: Saturday November 17, @02:56AM)
    Isn't it obvious? Hacking is an expression of our inner need. And the inner need we are expressing is for Knowledge, pure and simple. The people who hack, today, are the people who would have been working on their cars 30 years ago. :)
  • A batch of Irish Ale by codepunk (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:40PM
  • hacking life style (Score:5, Interesting)

    by pigscanfly.ca (664381) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:40PM (#6019760)
    (http://www.holdenkarau.com/)
    Yes I would consider that part of the hacking life style . Trying to understand everything around you , maybe even doing it your self is part of the "life style" . Most hackers I know (traditional use) are very keen with not only computers and electronics , but chemistry (read explosives) , metalworking , and a few are interested in nature (they even go out while the "day star" is still outside). The hacking life style is really one about knowledge and understanding so any activity/tool (reasonable priced of course) you can expect a hacker to have at least a passing interest in (and some times more so than one) . That being said , is this worthy of a slashdot article?
  • Add Pinball to the list (Score:5, Interesting)

    Yes, I think you're on to something there. Not only do I brew beer, but we also sell homebrew supplies in my hardware store [cornells.com]. My informal observations of the customers who shop for home brew supplies leads me to the conclusion that most hombrewers are geeks (That's a compliment!).

    Getting back to my subject, I've also discovered that my passion for pinball [ipdb.org] (started at MIT in 1977) is shared with numerous folks on the net and around the world, and there is definitely a connection between the lost art of pinball (face it, pinball is dying, especially electromechanical machines) and geeks. [myhomegameroom.com] I own an old Faces EM pinball machine [ipdb.org] myself which I've been restoring to it's former glory, in between brewing batches of homebrew and playing Asheron's Call. :-)
  • Yeah, they like nice fancy new things, but they also like the old. The figuring out of where we've been, why a certain path of tech wasn't taken. I think it also has to, at least partly, deal with a want to escape. Most geeks are in front of tech that was unimaginable a few generations ago, and want to get away from it at times, clear the cobwebs and see something else.

    Am I this way? Of course. I love blending the old and the new, the modern with the retro. Hell, my ideal computer case design would be something that would look like it belongs in a victorian parlor. Geeks love the anachronism, because if something from the past Just Works, why not use it?

  • Simply. Yes. by knowledgepeacewi (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:42PM
  • Jeeps! by afreniere (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:42PM
  • Curiosity by just fiddling around (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:42PM
    • Re:Curiosity by csash (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:18PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • "lost arts" and hacking by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:42PM
    • Lindsay Books by A55M0NKEY (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @09:44AM
  • Curiosity (Score:5, Insightful)

    by luisdom (560067) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:42PM (#6019780)
    For me it is just an expression of curiosity. Of wanting to know "how does this thing work" or "how the hell do they make this".
    Computers are (for me) the uber-want-to-know. They are just more complex than every other thing in your direct environment, so we are attracted to them (like a moth to a bulb, if you ask me).
    • Re:Curiosity by tunabomber (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:27PM
  • um. by toothfish (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:43PM
    • Re:um. by sparrow_hawk (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:21PM
      • Re:um. by toothfish (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:01PM
        • Re:um. by sparrow_hawk (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:03PM
  • time by ramzak2k (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:43PM
    • Re:time by ocelotbob (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:54PM
      • Re:time by nelsonal (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:16PM
        • Re:time by drunk_as_in_beer (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @08:34AM
    • Re:time by rossifer (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:17PM
      • Re:time by sowellfan (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:48PM
    • Re:time by Gilmoure (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @02:30AM
    • Re:time by BitchHead (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @06:28AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Rambling thoughts about this... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by TedTschopp (244839) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:43PM (#6019788)
    (http://www.tschopp.net/)
    Tolkien thought that the further you got away from the earth and your ability to live off of it, the more and more you lost your ability to be a creative person. And the less magic you were able to see in the world.

    It is a loss of this self suffency which is going to cause the greatest problems in our society. Just think of much of our food today is preprocessed or transported from someplace else.

    What happens when the whole system breaks down. (When was the last time a complex system like the ones we have today didn't break down).

    I think it's our mentatility to think about these problems becuase we get to think about them every day when it comes to computer systems.

    I suspose I could ramble on about the philosophy and religious implications about subcreation and why good subcreators worry about this, but I think that the skills, determination, dedication, and ego that it takes to be a good programmer/sys admin/hacker are the same skills which cause us to worry about some of the more basic things in real life.

    Ted Tschopp
  • Hacking is like.. by neogeek (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:43PM
  • Absolutely by zhrike (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:44PM
  • Thirst for knowledge (Score:5, Insightful)

    by AndurilSBA (656422) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:44PM (#6019799)
    (http://www.tealart.com/)
    I guess you could consider it related to hacking if one considers hackers to be just people who "thirst for knowledge." I know I rarely sit in one discipline for long and I want to know everything about anything. I don't consider that being a hacker, or part of a "hacker" nature though...I'm just nosy.
  • a few "lost" arts come to mind by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:44PM
  • No, but yes. by Tackhead (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:46PM
  • What our parents didn't teach us. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Mononoke (88668) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:48PM (#6019828)
    (http://slashdot.org/~Mononoke/journal | Last Journal: Friday April 11 2003, @02:45PM)
    In my case I find that I have a voracious curiosity for things my parents didn't bother to teach me, either because their parents didn't teach them, or society (or advertising) was telling them that no one needed those things anymore.

    Just like many of us who weren't taught any social skills, we also weren't shown many of the other things that turned out to be very necessary in the real world.

    My favorite two 'works of written art' when I was a child were the Encyclopaedia and How Things Work.

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by davidgrouchy (661051) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:48PM (#6019831)
    (http://www.branya.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday March 23 2003, @02:55PM)
    That would be the guy that figured out the microwave signal he was working with could also warm his coffee. That is a classic hack. Non criminal, and using availiable materials in an unexpected way. What you're talking about is a return to traditions and historical culture. The very opposite of the convienence that usually comes with hacking. Brewing your own beer is doing it the hard way on purpose. Despite what benifits home brewing may do for your sence of accomplishment.
  • applies to something else, somehow.

    As a musician, I find that my aesthetic for music applies to many other things.

    Less is More.
    Know when to Stop.
    Look like you know what you're doing, and occasionally you will.
    Steal the good stuff.
    Do it for yourself.

    I could probably come up with a zillion more, but you get the idea. Boil it down to the important things in one area, and chances are you can apply the things you've learned to something else.

  • Um... by HarveyBirdman (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:49PM
    • Re:Um... by gr0ngb0t (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:09PM
    • Re:Um... by amuro98 (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:12PM
      • Re:Um... by fishbowl (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:53PM
    • Re:Um... by sparrow_hawk (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:27PM
      • Re:Um... by Dun Malg (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @12:07AM
        • Re:Um... by croddy (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @01:42AM
          • Re:Um... by Dun Malg (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @10:50AM
      • Re:Um... by kevmit (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @01:59PM
    • Re:Um... by anagama (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:11PM
    • Re:Um... by CACraw (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:33PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Um... by astro-g (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:39PM
      • Re:Um... by ckaminski (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @10:13AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Is it common? by HotNeedleOfInquiry (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:49PM
  • Are you implying... (Score:5, Funny)

    by poity (465672) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:50PM (#6019844)
    ... that the Amish are the 31337est hackers?
  • note my email address by The Unabageler (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:50PM
  • Is the seeking of lost skills/arts etc. by bongobongo (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:52PM
  • Seeking for lost wisdoms by axxackall (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:54PM
    • Modern noise? by howlingmoki (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:14PM
    • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • 'how to book series' by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:56PM
  • Renaissance man. by SupahVee (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:56PM
  • necessity by cr@ckwhore (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:57PM
    • Re:necessity by cr@ckwhore (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @10:47AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Organic Chemistry! by Gumber (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:00PM
  • RTFJF by ctrimble (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:00PM
    • Re:RTFJF by Stormie (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:47PM
      • Re:RTFJF by ctrimble (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @08:41AM
  • health and longevity by kardar (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:02PM
  • YES! by _ph1ux_ (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:02PM
  • Intrinsic value. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rice_burners_suck (243660) on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:03PM (#6019937)
    (Last Journal: Sunday November 04, @03:38AM)
    I often find myself asking very similar questions.
    • Why am I so fascinated by the old computers of generations gone by?
    • Why are those old mainframes that can do less than a PDA so fascinating?
    • Why would I rather save up money to buy a personally crafted writing table as opposed to a $50.00 one made out of particle board by machine?
    • What is so "magical" about UNIX-like operating systems?
    • Why is it fun to spend a weekend hiking in the desert, where there is no running water, freezing your butt off, sleeping in a tent with all kinds of weird things crawling on you?
    • Why is some really complex source code, script, configuration file, etc. so interesting?
    • Why does code, highly optimized beyond readability (especially assembly) have a "feel" to it?
    • Why is some PDP-11 with tape for storage so intriguing?
    • What is so interesting about Lord of the Rings?
    • Why is it so much fun to play games with words, making up double-meaning phrases and the like?
    The answer is a bit complex.

    First of all, things that are crafted together by skilled hands have an intrinsic value that doesn't exist in mass-marketed consumer products designed for an excessively consuming society. It all ties together. The way yogurt is made, the way beer is brewed, the way a unique muscle car is built, the way a particularly crafty piece of code is written (whether new or old), the way an oak writing desk is made, the way a 25 year old 4-bit computer can multiply 16-bit integers faster than the newest Pentium 4's, the way the computer on Voyager II can be reconfigured from a million billion miles away without crashing, the way your personally hacked Linux kernel does something nobody else has thought of... it all happens because of craftsmanship. Yeah, those old mainframes probably crashed more often than Windows does today, but there is some kind of value (for which I cannot find a word) that exists in things made by the truly skilled... by the wizards, the gurus, the master craftsmen.

    Secondly, there is something in the "hacker culture" (see the Jargon file) that draws people like us to the values that I'm describing in the paragraph above. It doesn't matter what your other hobbies are, whether they involve nature, ham radio, literature, etc. There is something about freedom, quality, beauty (even if it isn't physical beauty), correctness, practicality, craftiness, challenge... It's a way of thinking that people outside the hacker community have apparently forgotten.

  • geeks by chunkwhite86 (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:03PM
  • I agree by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:07PM
    • Re:I agree by ckaminski (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @10:52AM
  • The Need To Hack by Oz_Fozzler (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:10PM
  • mountain climbing (Score:3, Informative)

    by nounderscores (246517) on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:10PM (#6019983)
    Climbers have always customised or made their own gear [planetfear.com]. Perhaps because if it breaks they have to fix it while being snowed on and hanging next to a vertical cliff face. Or perhaps they are happy with taking risks.

    I don't know, as far as the gear that keeps me alive goes,(Eg harnesses and boots) I'm personally happy with getting OTS gear and breaking it in until it fits me. Cutting, stretching, or otherwise structurally altering it is only something that I'd pay somebody else to do, so there's somebody else's eyes on the job to tell me if my idea is suicide.

    On the other hand those modified zipper pulls are damn handy.
  • Historical viewpoint by SharpFang (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:11PM
  • Brewing Beer a lost art??? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Shoten (260439) on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:11PM (#6019989)
    Once homebrewing became legal again (which happened in the 80s, if I remember correctly), the homebrew industry started to regain strength. At this point, I wouldn't say that brewing is by any means a lost art...I've brewed hundreds of gallons at this point. The stuff is like zucchini...if you produce it, you produce a LOT of it...and let me tell you, nothing moves your data mining requests to the front of the line faster than giving the DBAs lots of homebrew! :)
  • Steel files by The Bungi (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:11PM
  • Not a geek thing by mathrawka (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:12PM
  • by codepunk (167897) on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:13PM (#6020009)
    (http://www.codepunk.com/)
    If you live in Wisconsin like I do, brewing your own beer is not a lost art it is required.
  • Huh? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:13PM
  • Ye Olde Darkroom skills by ghostrider_one (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:17PM
  • Yes, IMHO, your quest has to do with hacking... by yashn (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:20PM
  • I'm not the only one! by Hoi Polloi (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:21PM
  • Arcane arts by ^_^x (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:23PM
  • Hacking Ananlog? (Score:5, Funny)

    by American AC in Paris (230456) on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:23PM (#6020073)
    (http://www.snowplow.org/tom/)
    No, no. Building a Moog synthesizer [ucsc.edu] is hacking analog.

    Brewing beer is an excuse to make your apartment smell horrible, making soap is an excuse to see how quickly various household items dissolve when exposed to lye, and metalsmithing is an excuse to pretend that you're Sauron.

  • The One Word Reply by ihatewinXP (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:24PM
  • This makes me think of the Foxfire books ... by JoeGee (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:28PM
  • Observe the Heinlein by bohnsack (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:28PM
  • Anagama by anagama (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:29PM
    • Re:Anagama by mink (Score:1) Thursday May 29 2003, @02:16PM
      • Re:Anagama by anagama (Score:1) Thursday May 29 2003, @07:14PM
  • How about the 'Foxfire' books of rural US life? by digitalmuse (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:30PM
  • "lost" by cthlptlk (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:31PM
  • Lost arts? Come on. by kuroth (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:33PM
  • Only in America (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Hamfist (311248) on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:35PM (#6020139)
    The amazing thing about it all is that in developed world, practicioners of the 'lost arts' make pretty decent money, whilst the artesans in the developing world make very little.

    In Chile one can buy a 4 foot high handmade, hand painted earthernware flowerpot for all of 50 bucks. That same flowerpot in the US would probably cost (if you could find it), 300 dollars or more; all this because the artesan is practicing a 'lost art'.

    Out in the country down here you can still find a 'smith' and a 'cooper'.

    Knot tying is not so big here, but ohhh the cheese :)
  • Go ahead and laugh by shokk (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:35PM
  • No, you've got it all wrong (Score:3, Insightful)

    by CAIMLAS (41445) on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:37PM (#6020151)
    (http://forums.boiledfrog.us/ | Last Journal: Friday February 21 2003, @01:08PM)
    You're trying to pull a "John Katz" type association, ala Columbine: "Geeks are oppressed. These kids were oppressed. Thus, these guys were oppressed geeks, like we are, and we must sympathize and condone what they did." No.

    Hacking is hacking - whether it's with computers, cars, or some other technical device. You're making things work better, improving on them.

    Learning "lost arts" of the likes of brewing, breadmaking, metalwork, etc. are not hacking. Doing so is simply seeking out knowledge. It is the self-enlightenment of the mind. It is the original concept of 'education' (as stated by the Greeks) fullfilled. Hacking might fall into this as a subset, but "hacking = learning" is a crock of katzism: an intellectual and logical farce.

    (Thank the Maker he's not around anymore, btw)
  • Hackers and Hobbies by Noksagt (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:37PM
  • an excellent book on the subject... (Score:5, Informative)

    by reimda (42088) on Thursday May 22 2003, @07:38PM (#6020158)
    of is "The Forgotten Arts and Crafts" by John Semour. Amazon.com [amazon.com] has it and lets you look at lots of it online. Check it out.

    It's full of how to do "outdated" arts like thatching a house, making fences with hand built tools and materials gathered in the forest, and blacksmithing, in addition to household type crafts such as making cream and butter and soap. I bought it a couple months ago after finding an enormously positive review on the net somewhere. It is full of enough diagrams to satisfy the average geek.

    As for why seeking lost skills is an attraction to geeks, I think it comes down to problem solving. Problem solving is a trait universally desirable in geeks. It doesn't matter if the problem is how to get your program to run in less than x seconds or how to get information from here to there quickly over the phone system or how to make your own yogurt. It's all problem solving.

    Books like this appeal to geeks because they open a new (old) world of problems and give elegant solutions to them. The solutions are time-tested and have come from the collective mind of thousands and thousands of clever people. It is a natural geek thing to do to admire their elegant solutions to their problems.

    There's also a huge feeling of escape from the headaches of technology when you imagine life without computers, electricity, etc. I'm not sure about all of geekdom, but I enjoy understanding and imagining a technologically simple life that doesn't include depending on a keyboard and screen for a livelihood.
  • "Lost skills" by windowpain (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:39PM
    • Re:"Lost skills" by SuiteSisterMary (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:04PM
      • Re:"Lost skills" by transient (Score:3) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:32PM
      • Re:"Lost skills" by jmorris42 (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:42PM
        • Re:"Lost skills" (Score:4, Informative)

          by Lazyhound (542184) on Thursday May 22 2003, @10:32PM (#6021129)
          Won't happen. Mr. 9mm makes plate armor suicidal and renders edged weapons of all kinds a niche tool for close in fighting>
          I'm in no way disagreeing with you on any aspect of what you've said, but I'd like to mention that studies from the FBI, among others, have shown that, when edged weapons and firearms are compared at their intended ranges, knives are roughly three times more effective in delivering fatal wounds in the context of a typical urban attack. Why?

          1) Knives deliver multiple wounds quickly.

          2) A stab tends to lacerate multiple organs.

          3) Stab wounds are more likely to remain open (forget the more technical term for this).

          Also, one article I read had some rather creepy statistics (unfortunately, I don't have the link on this PC) derived from the researcher's experience. For example, he conducted a training session with a group of Victoria RCMP officers. Part of the exercise involved a "criminal" flashing a chalked fake knife at the officer, screaming "fuck you, pig", and attacking.

          73 out of 85 of them failed to notice the knife at any point during the assault, with none of them realizing they had been stabbed (multiple times) until seeing the chalk marks left on their uniforms. One officer, who had controlled the attacker's knife arm with both of his hands, and had looked straight at the hand for fifteen seconds, refused to believe a knife had been involved until they replayed the video for him. Even this statistic assumes that a criminal would be stupid enough to brazenly flash a knife like that. It is of course much more common to merely palm the knife until within striking range.

          Pardon my digression.
          [ Parent ]
  • Lost Computer Skills, too... by FlorentinePogen (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:39PM
  • Indeed. by Pfhreakaz0id (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:40PM
  • no... by tongue (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:40PM
  • Hacking outside of Computers by mike_1138 (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:40PM
  • God Bless Your Eccentricity! But... by PHAEDRU5 (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:41PM
  • Got it backwards... by djupedal (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:41PM
  • It's more likely an expression of balance. by Bowling Moses (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:42PM
  • 'Cause knowing stuff is cool by WindPwr (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:58PM
  • I'd say it's a mix of a couple things...... by scoobywan (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:04PM
  • One kind of homebrewing was not mentioned by Muhammar (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:06PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • It's simple, really by dfn5 (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:12PM
  • Congratulations! by version5 (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:12PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Real worth of your skills by efedora (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:14PM
  • this is... by zogger (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:14PM
  • Ricky Jay (Score:3, Informative)

    by robson (60067) on Thursday May 22 2003, @08:18PM (#6020438)
    (http://www.doublefine.com/)
    Semi-tangential, magician Ricky Jay [theonionavclub.com] isn't just a performer; he's also a devoted student of the history of magic. He often talks about how important this historical knoweledge is to understanding his art, and his own place in the greater timeline of that art.

    It's a lesson that could probably be applied to most contemporary professions...
  • Homebrewed beer... by Just Brew It! (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:22PM
  • Hacking, Do It Yourself, Not Invented Here by dsplat (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:26PM
  • not necessarily by X_Bones (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:27PM
  • Self-reliance (Score:3, Insightful)

    by transient (232842) on Thursday May 22 2003, @08:27PM (#6020491)

    For me, it's about self-reliance. I'm a do-it-yourself guy. People in modern society depend on a huge network of people, almost all of them strangers. We all learned in "Intro to Economics" that when two people specialize, they can produce more goods. However, it's satisfying to live by the fruits of your own labor, if only partially. In order to do so, you have to learn a lot of diverse, basic skills.

    I went through a phase where I took this idea to its logical conclusion. I wanted to learn everything necessary to survive by myself indefinitely. This is a daunting (and mildly insane) task, and it should come as no surprise that I backed away from it. But it's still fun ponder every now and then.

  • Beer? Ha! by mnemotronic (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:31PM
  • Not just doing something that takes great skill... by lostchicken (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:38PM
  • DIY! by Gilmoure (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:43PM
  • I made beer in college-- true story by Esion Modnar (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:56PM
  • It's a self-sufficiency thing, I think by SiW (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:59PM
  • Pipes! by Kchuck (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:01PM
  • by gripdamage (529664) on Thursday May 22 2003, @09:05PM (#6020687)
    People who hack have other hobbies. Big deal. Lots of people have lots of different hobbies, and hacking doesn't necessarily have to be one of them. Most total slackers I've known have been interested in things like "metalsmithing, sewing, baking bread, making soap, knot tying, brewing beer, woodcarving, yogurt and cheese." Those are the kinds of things they do instead of working.

    As to this going to the core of some essential geekness, I think that is just self-centered, elitist garbage. The human race is such a diverse set, that attempting to draw boundaries around groups based on many traits usually ends up being vapor.

    So now that the geeks have claimed interesting hobbies, does that mean the cool slackers will have to watch more television or something? Perhaps we could patent all these hobbies, and sue the slackers for infringing on our turf.

    I don't mean to be a party pooper. By all means, all of you go ahead. I just won't be participating in the circle jerk. I hope you don't revoke my membership to geekdom. Fleeing elitism and arrogance is what made me an outsider in the first place.
    • Re:Dear Slashdot, why are we so f-ing great? by Little Brother (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:25PM
      • by zwoelfk (586211) on Friday May 23 2003, @12:55AM (#6021776)
        (Last Journal: Friday September 19 2003, @08:16AM)
        So basicly you're trying to say you're better than everybody else here because you're not an elitist? Um.... Something doesn't work here.

        No. What I think gripdamage was basically saying was that there is nothing here. That there is no essential "geekiness", no "special light which shines from within them", etc. We/they are the same as everyone else whether we like it or not. I agree that most of the replies on this subject are complete elitist crap.

        He (?) is not saying that he's better. He's just saying that perhaps some people should stop trying to justify their hobbies with some higher purpose, and maybe, just enjoy.

        I think he's welcoming them back down to Earth.

        Z.

        [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Chill out by chthonicdaemon (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @04:16AM
    • Re:Dear Slashdot, why are we so f-ing great? by bacchusrx (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @04:03AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Honestly, who cares? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Ryan Amos (16972) on Thursday May 22 2003, @09:08PM (#6020705)
    I'm not trying to troll here or anything, but what does it matter? If you like doing it, keep doing it, it's basically the same with hacking (or any other hobby.) Some people like working in their yard, some people like doing weird science projects, some people like hacking. It's not the same thing, but they're both good hobbies.

    I do have to say though editors, can't we get some more relevant questions? I thought this site had "Stuff that matters."
  • Humans are hackers by willpost (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:14PM
  • Many of these skills also give you control by Bolen (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:24PM
  • Make some clothes by jpmkm (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:26PM
  • does it count? by Tablizer (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:30PM
  • We all have plenty of time for this stuff... by aquarian (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:36PM
  • It's the DIY factor (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jabber01 (225154) on Thursday May 22 2003, @09:37PM (#6020857)
    Computer hacking is just one way to reclaim self-sufficiency.

    It's been my experience that hackers are fiercely self-reliant. Not only do they resent being micro-managed at the office, they hate being "consumers". They hate depending on others, because they are, by nature, distrustful.

    All hackers I know embody the "if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself" mentality. This is why they learn to code, for when the system fails them. This is why they learn to defend themselves, for when the system fails them. This is why they learn to hunt/make food and basic essencials of life, for when the system fails them.

    Hackers are, in very many ways, survivalists, adapted for the "Information Age".
  • Eureka! by digitalcowboy (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:38PM
  • Thank you all! by mcSey921 (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:47PM
  • Literally Hacking Analog by confused one (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:58PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Yes you're a hacker by glenebob (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:00PM
  • I'd like to hack chemistry stuff... by frank_adrian314159 (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:04PM
  • Foxfire books by meador (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:06PM
  • Hacker "lost" arts by MsWillow (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:08PM
  • Your Skill Level Has Increased +1 by Proudrooster (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:10PM
  • Self Sufficiency in a Spoon Fed World by quinkin (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:29PM
  • Let's see... by dlakelan (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:39PM
  • Hacking as a way of life by CadmannWeyland (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:47PM
  • Hacking Analog? by delmoi (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:50PM
  • there are so many skills 'lost' in the modern 'american' lifestyle... Is this common in geekdom?

    Years ago I did a yoga retreat, and learned enough of the history to discover that some millenia ago, yoga and meditation were the hot happening things that occupied the brainiest people then living, the then-equivalent of today's startups and stock options and IPOs. Interesting.

    This essay [accesstoinsight.org] describes a historical cycle that takes place in Thailand, repeating every century or two. Somebody goes out into the forest and meditates like crazy, rediscovers the Buddha's original findings, and starts a monastic forest tradition. Then the local authorities re-domesticate Buddhism, harnessing it for nationalistic and social purposes. After a few generations the forest tradition burns out, leaving behind a state-endorsed religion that discards the investigative orientation on which the forest tradition thrived. A century or so later, somebody else starts the whole thing up again.

  • A thought by nelsonal (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:27PM
    • diy = man by djupedal (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @12:03AM
  • BTW, By Design, Chemistry = Lost Art by LaCosaNostradamus (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:39PM
  • Beer, for Pete's Sake by Robotech_Master (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:54PM
  • Let's just define hack. by drinkypoo (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @11:56PM
  • Nancy, is that you? by boatboy (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @12:14AM
  • Look up the foxfire books. by Unknown Poltroon (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @12:14AM
  • In a perverse way by Angst Badger (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @12:31AM
  • FOXFIRE! (Score:5, Informative)

    by gcondon (45047) on Friday May 23 2003, @12:58AM (#6021784)
    I hope I'm not too late in this thread but I am surprised that nobody has mentioned the Foxfire books (at least I haven't seen anything modded up yet).

    The Foxfire Fund was established to preserve the vanishing folkways of Appalachia and, let me tell you, those people knew how to provide for themselves.

    There is an extensive series of books covering such diverse utilitarian topics as wood lore, blacksmithing, instrument making, weaving and so on.

    Check it out at The Foxfire Fund [foxfire.org].
    • Re:FOXFIRE! by EvilBudMan (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @02:38PM
  • The question is... by blisspix (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @02:07AM
  • Most important crafts of all by kanku (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @02:27AM
  • Agree by lbonser (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @02:47AM
  • organic gardening by sparkes (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @02:50AM
  • It's all about the Creation Baby by OugadasBob (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @03:15AM
  • Makers versus Consumers (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Brown Line (542536) on Friday May 23 2003, @03:21AM (#6022150)
    The answer is yes, in my experience hackers tend to be the sort of people who do things like brew beer or garden or make their own furniture or play their own music.

    Why? Because hackers see themselves as artisans, not consumers.

    Artisanship is, in my experience, a strong influence in the makeup of many hackers. The best ones remind me of my father, who was a master calligrapher: in their love of making beautiful things, and in the scrupulousness with which they treat their "mystery". I dare say that hacking is the last bastion of artisanship left in our consumption-oriented McSociety.

  • dear choir, do we like to sing? by jorgeluisborges (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @03:28AM
  • No, it's just you. by Big Nothing (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @04:36AM
  • It's our dark side by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @05:39AM
  • A few good books... by ChefPsyconaut (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @06:13AM
  • My two cents... by dcs (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @06:53AM
  • in my case by ajs318 (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @06:57AM
  • Candle making by lazurs (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @08:02AM
  • I'm there... by trevorlee_nc (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @08:08AM
  • Lost Arts and Geekdom by Thumper_SVX (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @08:25AM
  • Foxfire! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @08:33AM
  • Not an expression of hacking by mr breakfast (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @08:50AM
  • Arts vs. Crafts by mjolnir_ (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @09:04AM
  • Only Terrorists want to be self-sufficient by nurb432 (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @09:09AM
  • We also build our own airplanes. by Flyer (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @09:12AM
  • You can pay for quality goods with your time by smokin'moses (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @09:12AM
  • woodworking, homebrewing... by BirksNCap (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @09:20AM
  • How it works by gone.fishing (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @09:30AM
  • Reading/writing by dr_eaerth (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @09:49AM
  • Lost Arts by Orion Blastar (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @09:54AM
  • It's called art school by bloodgroove (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @09:55AM
  • As Geeks Grow Up by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @09:59AM
  • 2 steps back = 1 step forwards? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Lordofthestorm (675024) on Friday May 23 2003, @10:04AM (#6023871)
    I've seen several articles bashing 'rediscovering' older techs at unneccessary but those people are missing a key point. Some of these 'older'concepts haven't been revisited in a while and could probably be improved by a creative insight with modern techniques.

    A significant portion of our technology is based off of early 1900's designs. For example, the way we generate electrical power (ie heat + water = steam >>> turns turbine > spins magnet > generates electricity) hasn't changed since it's discovery. There are some newer areas (solar cells, fuel cells) but for the most part we power 99% of our society this way.

    A lot of basic technology is still very fundamental to our culture and I'm glad to see people revisiting it - it's the only way to continually shock the technology base of an advanced civilization.

    These advances can come from anywhere, so what if the SCA are rebuilding medieval style armor? What if one of them comes up with a superior chainmail and merges it with Kevlar, reduces the weight and sells it to the military?

    How about new designs for soap? New styles of paper? Are the old ways the best? You'll never know until you research a couple. There were tons of expirements in radio control in the early 1900's many of which were abandoned because the technology wasn't there - how many of those could be useful now?

    Do the funamentals of our wireless transmitters remain the most efficient way to transmit information?

    And it's fun, did I mention it's fun? ;-)
  • Indebendence and the longing to understand/control by Qbertino (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @10:49AM
  • In computing... by strombrg (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @10:59AM
  • You're right. Get the Bootstrap Encyclopedia by advid.net (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @11:24AM
  • working w/ your hands is fun by Codger (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @11:26AM
  • Geeks: Monks of the 21st Century? by bethanie (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @12:36PM
  • forces you to think outside of the box by guest12 (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @12:39PM
  • I suppose... by TaleSpinner (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @01:04PM
  • Homebrewing and Hacking (Both Science and Art) by Enkerli (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @01:19PM
  • Brewing ain't a lost art by Hayzeus (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @04:58PM
  • another thought by jomiller (Score:1) Saturday May 24 2003, @09:41AM
  • Learning... by The Kenman (Score:1) Tuesday May 27 2003, @03:29AM
  • Re:Not Quite by John3 (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:45PM
    • Re:Not Quite by seanmckay (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:02PM
      • Re:Not Quite by John3 (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:14PM
        • Re:Not Quite by torndorff (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @01:21AM
          • Re:Not Quite by hesiod (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @01:20PM
    • Re:Not Quite by chthon (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @05:55AM
  • Re:Not Quite (Score:3, Insightful)

    by homer_ca (144738) on Thursday May 22 2003, @06:50PM (#6019850)
    "Lost" implies that they need to be "found" for some compelling reason. They have been supplanted with skills necessary for the modern world, such as computing, engineering, math, making $100 million movies, watching TV, surfing pr0n, and building space shuttles.

    The world needs historians as much as it needs rocket scientists and porn stars. These skills are documented because people are out there keeping the knowledge alive. He's not suggesting that everybody give up their modern conveniences and go back to the 19th century. It's just that the old school arts and crafts give you a connection to the world and the way things work that's all too missing from our pushbutton world.

    As for your suggestion to grab a Bud instead of a homebrew- you might as well say don't bother with a homemade Thanksgiving turkey, go grab an Oscar Mayer Lunchable.
    [ Parent ]
    • Re:Not Quite by moehoward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:44PM
      • Re:Not Quite by BrokenHalo (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:04PM
    • Re:Not Quite by olethrosdc (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @04:46AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Not Quite by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:53PM
  • Re:Imagine. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:57PM
    • Re:Imagine. by boulat (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:10PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Imagine. by fputs(shit, slashdot (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @06:58PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Imagine. by titzandkunt (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:11PM
  • Re:Try the Foxfire book series by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:18PM
  • mod down parent! by ratfynk (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:19PM
  • Re:Hacking is for COMPUTERS by sparrow_hawk (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:43PM
  • Re:Hacking is for COMPUTERS by xutopia (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:44PM
  • Re:Damn hippies by Mattwolf7 (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:47PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Not Quite by moehoward (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @07:48PM
  • Re:Not Quite by seanmckay (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:52PM
  • Re:Imagine. by datazone (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @08:58PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Damn hippies by Bush Pig (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @09:48PM
  • Re:Beer Brewing == Great Science Hobby by Just Brew It! (Score:1) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:09PM
  • Re:Not Quite by Gumber (Score:2) Thursday May 22 2003, @10:32PM
  • Re:Not Quite by ncc74656 (Score:2) Friday May 23 2003, @01:37AM
    • Re:Not Quite by ckaminski (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @09:34AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Hacking is for COMPUTERS by aphexddb (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @03:08AM
  • Re:Not Quite by punkelf (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @05:38AM
    • Re:Not Quite by stanmann (Score:1) Wednesday May 28 2003, @01:04PM
  • Re:in the know... by ckaminski (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @10:06AM
  • Re:spudguns, trebuchets, catapults, robots, etc. by asscroft (Score:1) Friday May 23 2003, @05:18PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 49 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2 | 3