Idea Management/Navigation Software? 66
"The system should be hypertext-based, allowing explicit links between nodes, but it would be nice if it could also derive some relations on its own. Having built-in support for referencing web links, printed publications (BibTeX integration?), and arbitrary files would be great. Text-based and perhaps also non-text-based searching capabilities (e.g., graphical visualization of node relationships) would also be very useful.
I've looked at some wiki systems but the choices seem overwhelming, and most of them are geared towards collaborative rather than individual work. Is there some wiki or database system that does what I need, or should I be looking for something in an entirely different paradigm?"
Bite your pride (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Bite your pride (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Bite your pride (Score:3, Funny)
Now I know nothing about Freemind beyond what I saw following the parent post's link, but the when front page of the site asks, "Did FreeMind make you angry?" you really have to wonder.
Re:Bite your pride (Score:2)
Re:Bite your pride (Score:1)
FreeMind is just a way to write down Mind maps [peterussell.com]. I have tried to use mind maps for my notes at school and when I read some important book. What I don't like about mind maps is that they focus on the organisation, and as a result, the information itself is not prioritized as much as it should be. When I "read" the mind maps after some time, I'm surprised of how little of it is neccessary.
Basicly what I'm trying to say is that min
Re:Bite your pride (Score:1)
FYI in Lila Pirsig describes a system where he keeps his ideas in a card catalogue system similar to those used in libraries. There are different categories as well as meta categories which has "programs" such as "Reorganise this section" and such. It's really quite a facinating read.
Wiki or blog software (Score:2)
Re:Wiki or blog software (Score:1)
I've looked at some wiki systems but the choices seem overwhelming, and most of them are geared towards collaborative rather than individual work. Is there some wiki or database system that does what I need, or should I be looking for something in an entirely different paradigm?"
And you respond with:
That's what wiki / blog software is all about.
Talk about helpful
Re:Wiki or blog software (Score:2)
Next.
Re:Wiki or blog software (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, minimalists love wikis. I'll describe a Wiki for those who haven't seen one: A wiki is a web site where you can modify the pages (usually cgi driven). In its purest form, a wiki is a collection of web page anyone can read or modify, but most wiki software now allows you to restrict access in various ways. Most wikis also version control their pages, so you can undo mistakes made by you, or if it's a world-writable wiki, undo mistakes made by others.
Ward Cunningham wrote the canonical wiki [c2.com], but there are many others [c2.com] now.
A wiki is somewhat easy to modify (typing your changes into a CGI text box is OK but not the greatest), very easy to search, and pretty easy to link pages together. It's biggest advantage is that you can read and edit it from from anywhere you have a browser. I use a wiki to store notes and links -- I don't keep bookmarks on my browser anymore, so now it doesn't matter which browser I'm using or what computer I'm on. I just set my browser home page to my wiki page that has all my links on it.
If you don't want to run your own, there are wiki sites that will lend you space to do your own thing in (Here's one public wiki [swiki.net], but there are others [swiki.net].
Re:Wiki or blog software (Score:2)
I ended up settling on moin [sourceforge.net], for the following reasons:
1. It's easy to set up
2. Stores everything in plain text files: no fancy SQL database backend that I don't need for this small/scale stuff, and I trust text files.
3. It supports uploading of files as attachments to pages in the wiki. So if you come to a PDF document you want to save, you can easily dump it into the wiki.
So far, it's been a pretty nice way to organize stuff like this.
High-tech solution (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:High-tech solution (Score:1)
Re:High-tech solution (Score:2)
I Have A Hideously Bad Idea... (Score:3, Funny)
If you don't care how crude this idea is, you could try this out:
Take all of the scraps you write, and spend a bit of time making 75-100 DPI scans of them. Place all of the images into a folder for "notes" and such. Inside this folder, categorise all the files by using folders/directories.
This does not meet the requirements you set out; and like I said, it's horribly crude. However, it is simple to implement and can easily be combined with any web server software to form an easily accessible knowledge base.
Being a student, this is the system I use to categorise my notes and papers. It is simply not the best system, but it rarely gets any simpler than this.
Hope this was at least slightly interesting.
Re:I Have A Hideously Bad Idea... (Score:1)
Wow...I've been moderated "funny"
I got shot down more than I expected! :p
Maybe try DENIM? (Score:5, Informative)
Emacs is what you need (Score:2, Funny)
try a book (Score:4, Insightful)
I have a small notebook (between 3x5 and 8.5x11) that I keep in my briefcase to and from work and jot everything down in it. It never crashes, it takes only seconds to include complex graphs or equations (no equation editor or LaTeX tags needed!), and can even be backed up via xerox (which I have done with ripped pages--just staple the copied page back in!).
Re:try a book (Score:1)
I agree. The biggest thing here is that you won't find a nifty new software bit that will magically make all your ideas come together. You'll have to organize yourself before any solutions people mention here will do any good. The greatest software in the world won't help you if you're still making notes in book margins and on scraps of paper.
Get a notebook and pen that you can carry in a briefcase, jacket pocket, or pants pocket. Keep them with you as much as possible, and force yourself to pull them
I use a combination... (Score:3, Informative)
MAK [sourceforge.net] as a group project.
It's awfully dangerous to be honest around here. You get modded as a troll. Actually, I have three sketchbooks going right now.
Re:try a book (Score:2)
Re:try a book (Score:2)
I'll second this one. I kept a notebook for about 3 years of these sorts of things. I always dated the pages too in order to establish when I came up with things.
In the last year or so, I've created a small mysql database where I can jot down notes, mark entries as "related to" other entries. It's not perfect but phpMyAdmin is mind-bogglingly simple to use.
Now I just need a way of representing the inf
Personal Brain (Score:3, Interesting)
If you're running Windows, it's at least worth checking out. http://www.thebrain.com [thebrain.com]
Re:Personal Brain (Score:5, Interesting)
Seriously, by starting with VERY BASIC meta tags (NAME, KEYWORD, DESCRIPTION) we could exponentially expand the productivity of OpenOffice, etc...
The KEY (no pun intended), however, is going to be linking these features among different apps. I can't even count how many times I've done a "locate project | grep png" and NEVER found the image that I was looking for.
Unity is key...
Re:Personal Brain (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Personal Brain (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Personal Brain (Score:2)
Yup. You might be interested in the Ontologic Web Language - you can see, for example, an OWL representation [daml.org] of the projects on SemWebCentral [semwebcentral.org].
Re:Personal Brain (Score:1)
idea (Score:2)
Re:idea (Score:2, Informative)
Notetaker [aquaminds.com]
Re:idea (Score:2)
Palm Piece (Score:5, Interesting)
I have things sorted into a hierarchy that works for me.
But oh, how I would love a cross-platform product that offered deep integration with email, address book, bookmarks, calendar, and random notes, with multiple hierarchical and/or directed graph maps, and good search capabilities. In my fantasy world, it'd run on my PC and on my Kyocera smart phone, and would be compatible with stuff on both ends: Firefox, Thunderbird, the Palm address book, etc. If I didn't have a job, that's what I'd be building right now...
Visual Tools for Brainstorming (Score:3, Informative)
MindManager by Mindjet (Score:4, Insightful)
Have a look at Mind Manager [mindjet.com] by Mindjet.
I use it regularly and I'm still finding new uses for it. It's *very* easy to use yet powerful.
Re:MindManager by Mindjet (Score:1)
Bugzilla (Score:1, Offtopic)
xaraya (Score:4, Informative)
Contrary to most other cms'es of the PHP-Nuke series, xaraya [xaraya.com] has the flexibility to manage all publication types (FAQ, articles, reviews) into one single module, which avoids lots of clutter. You can add fields to each type. Myself, I have created a "research blog" publication type (where I describe what I do each day in a blog format), and then "reviews" (for the books I read), "articles" (the articles I read), "todo", "docs" (for things I keep forgetting). Each of these publication types have one or more category trees associated with them (with some trees overlapping) so that I can search/display my blogs by category and/or by pubtype. Finally, I have set it up so that only I can access it. The permission system allows for you to set up different kind of access to the different pages depending on various criteria.
Using a full blown cms may be overkill but the flexibility and extendability is great. To mention your needs, you can use the autolink module to generate automatic links in your modules, and so on..., search works great, for BibTeX you'd probably need to create your own hooks, which I believe vouldn't be terribly difficult.
A wiki might work, but your pages would look identical across tasks and categories, and I like the ability to visualize different pubtypes and/or categories differently. The tendency to generate a mess is enormous in wikis, but with a single user less so. Good luck.
Slim pickings (Score:5, Informative)
If you don't mind a web environment, Wikis [c2.com] provide easy editing and hyperlinking, but visualization is not their strong suit. If you like the idea of wikis, but don't want the web, and don't mind paying $12 for closed-source, WikidPad [jhorman.org] is an excellent, flexible, Windows-only option (and mildly extendable with an embedded Python interpreter). Combines a tree/outline view and Wiki-like syntax & automatic hyperlinking.
If you don't mind closed source, The Literary Machine [literarymachine.com] provides a lot of power in a Windows environment. The basic version was free last I checked, though he's ceased development on it in favor of the Pro version ($20), which is being actively developed and integrates a number of new features (but I haven't tried it yet). It organizes everything based on a non-hierarchical keyword association system, and while it takes some getting used to (and can be downright messy sometimes), it does allow for the discovery of connections between notes that you might not have put together otherwise.
If you don't mind closed source, paying through the nose ($145), and OS X, then there is one app which fits all of your other qualifications: Eastgate's Tinderbox [eastgate.com] has powerful hyperlinking, programmable agents, RSS and web integration, powerful search, graphical visualization, and plenty more. To tell you the truth, my next computer will probably be a Mac because of this one, though a Windows version [eastgate.com] is on the horizon (was slated for an early 2004 release, but looks like it's slipped back to Real Soon Now). This has been the sleeper hit of the past couple years--everyone who uses it raves about it, but it's relatively unknown.
Re:Slim pickings (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Slim pickings (Score:4, Informative)
Ah, if we're talking Mac OS X then you might want to look at VoodooPad [flyingmeat.com]. Quite a bit cheaper (has a free version actually), and seems to do much of what the poster wants.
Re:Slim pickings (Score:2)
Re:Slim pickings (Score:2)
Tinderbox looks cool from the website, but when I downloaded the trial version I was completely turned off by the Carbon dialogs. Maybe I'm a snob, but I can't really imagine paying a lot of money for software that looks bad, especially on Mac OS X.
todo.txt as recommended at ETCON (Score:5, Insightful)
"It's the 10-second rule: if you can't file something in 10 seconds, you won't do it. Todo.txt involves cut-and-paste, the simplest interface we can imagine."
"Power-users don't trust complicated apps. Every time power-geeks has had a crash, s/he moves away from it. You can't trust software unless you've written it -- and then you're just more forgiiving.
Text files are portable (except for CRLF issues) between mac and win and *nix.
Geeks will try the Brain, etc, but they want to stay in text."
Another idea (Score:2)
I know it's probably not very helpful, but honestly I'm pretty cynical about high-tech solutions for these things.
On the other hand, emacs with Wiki mode isn't bad....
ThoughtTracker (Score:2)
Basically you have text nodes with arbitrary names which can be "linked" with any other nodes. You can thus follow a train of thought by at a later date going to a node, and then following its links for as long as the related thoughts go.
Re:ThoughtTracker (Score:1)
First CDBakeOven, the coolest burner ever, and now this. I've got to stop getting attached to programs...
Re:ThoughtTracker (Score:1)
Write that down somewhere.
Idea Management (Score:1, Interesting)
what we teach here for brainstorming (Score:1)
I use Treepad (Score:2, Informative)
The combination of organizing your notes in a tree, with hyperlinks between nodes, and a good search feature makes it a great way to keep track of things.
It isn't open source, but there is a free 'lite' version, plus a couple inexpensive full-featured versions (including versions for Linux).
infoSelect by microLogic (Score:1)
Review page of Windows outliners (Score:2, Interesting)
This really useful page...
http://john.redmood.com/organizers.html [redmood.com]
I have been in your exact shoes and have installed Twiki [twiki.org] and have the following generalization...
Wiki's aren't as easy to use as they seem. When using a wiki, there's actually a very distinct (but non-obvious) obstacle course between the urge to write
Re:Review page of Windows outliners (Score:1)
http://www.ms.lt/ms/projects/toolkinds/organize
and
http://www.ypsolog.com/docs/comp/other/pim.html
It sounds like Inspiration and Zoot might be useful as well.
How adventurous are you? (Score:1)
With a basic setup, it might help with what you need.
With a little tweaking (perl knowledge, html knowledge, a little patience...) it can do most anything "data" and quite a lot more [everything2.com].
-swinters
Smart Braindumps (Score:1)
Try kaspaliste (Score:3, Informative)
Kaspaliste is a literature database. It handles all kinds of books, articles, journals, webpages etc. The database goes beyond storing bibliographical information. There is the possibility to create annotated links between pieces of information (like the content of a book chapter) and to group links into categories.
The user interface works just like a web browser: You may follow the links to open records. You may walk back and forward through previously edited records, change fields, and create or delete links, publication, authors etc. on the fly with just one mouseclick.
Kaspaliste does not only store pieces of information about publications. It stores files as well. Kaspaliste handels various formats like html, pdf, ps, dvi and pictures (depends on your KDE-installation since the kpart-technology is used). You can for example store ocr'ed parts of interesting publications. The fulltext search covers these files.
Thanks! (Score:2)
And another.. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I maybe reading it wrong... (Score:3, Informative)
http://everydevel.com