Slashdot Log In
Spyware More Common in Popular Software?
Posted by
Cliff
on Mon Apr 12, 2004 11:45 AM
from the watch-what-you-install dept.
from the watch-what-you-install dept.
Keith Young asks: "Over the past month, we have seen a 1500% increase of spyware denials on our firewall primarily due to WildTangent 'spyware' installed with AOL IM 5.5 and adware installed with Weatherbug. Since many of these widely-installed types of applications have an automatic upgrade feature, how can these be tested for license agreements, spyware, and security 'irregularities'? Is this another reason to approach management to choose only open source alternatives?"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Spyware More Common in Popular Software?
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 71 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Opensource is good but... (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.allaboutgames.co.uk/)
free apps aren't free (Score:5, Insightful)
GAIM (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.frontrowcrew.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday June 16 2004, @09:55AM)
Just a friendly reminder in case there's anyone out there in slashdot land who still doesn't know about it. Works perfectly with AIM/ICQ and Jabber (and those other services no one actually uses ^_~) Even has a Win32 installer.
Re:GAIM (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.mcgill.ca/)
You'd be surprised how few VoIP proggies exist for OS 9 machines, and even rarer still, proggies that also have Windows clients...
Apart from MSN Messenger (which requires at least 9.2.2), AIM seems to be the only solution.
Use Gaim (Score:5, Informative)
(Last Journal: Sunday October 10 2004, @02:36PM)
I use gaim [sourceforge.net] instead of AOL instant messenger. It's got just about every feature that AOL instant messenger has, plus a slew more (plus it can consolidate chat clients). It is easy enough to use for non techies that all my friends and family are on it instead of the AOL version. There are OpenSource projects out there for everything. Check out Sourceforge [sourceforge.net]. And, if you really like the product, and it saves you some money, donate some money to the project so it can get even better.
Weather *Bug* (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.ultranet.com/~kujawa/)
AIM/gaim video chat (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://nekobox.org/)
Is there something out there that does? I was looking forward to AIM 5.5 connecting with iChat to do video chat with my dad and friends; now I may have to avoid that if the AIM spyware is bad (sigh)
screensaver.com (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Monday September 25 2006, @01:19PM)
Weatherbug? (Score:3, Informative)
(http://slashdot.org/~Asprin | Last Journal: Wednesday November 05 2003, @03:24PM)
I know older versions of Weatherbug included Gator, but my understanding was that they had stopped bundling this garbage in favor of a more unintrusive ad-only revenue model. At least the last couple of versions I scanned with Spybot S&D and Ad-aware tested clean.
Did I miss something?
Oh, and more on-topic, YES. Spyware is a big reason why I use open-source software whenever possible.
Why even allow WildTangent? (Score:2)
Use older versions. (Score:1)
I use some older 4.x version of AIM. Not at my desk so I couldn't tell you the exact version.
It was one of the first ones that let you store your buddy list on the server, but it doesn't have any annoying features that suck up bandwith, along with memory/cpu cycles.
WinPatrol (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.bleedingelectrons.com/)
Most spyware tend to set themselves to run automatically on startup, and WinPatrol's watchdog will bark at you whenever a program does that, and let you confirm or deny. (If you register, they'll give you information about tat program to help your decision).
Most Managements (Score:2)
(http://aol.com/)
There is no easier way to fight the paranoia about open source s/w , if you work for PHB.
AOL advocates using Ad-Aware (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://flet.ch/)
Of course, that was probably posted long before Ad-Aware would actually remove parts of AIM itself.
Really don't like ad/spyware in stuff I PAID for! (Score:1)
(http://www.jasongtaylor.com/)
HOWEVER, I've bought software only to get ticked off because it wants to installed crap like Gator or worse on my system. Many times, this isn't part of a EULA (if there is even one). That's one way to get me ticked off. I PAID for the software to NOT be bugged! In particular, this was selfware that looked cool (puzzles and card games) and that I picked up at Target. I'm sticking with "download before you buy" stuff.
WeatherBug alternative (Score:2)
Spyware and Adware (Score:2)
(http://www.geocities.com/orion_blastar/contact/ | Last Journal: Tuesday April 03 2007, @07:19PM)
I recall there was a plug-in for Kazaa that removed the Spyware/Adware and kept Kazaa working. Diet-K was the name I think.
By my definitions, Spyware and Adware are malware and unethical to force the users to install with the free or shareware software.
Many PHBs confuse free or shareware with open source software and claim that open source software contains spyware/adware. I've ran into that before, they need a clue-by-four upside their head to convince them otherwise.
Re:I am a Mac user. (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://amazing.com/)
But when I clicked on the link, it returned "Not found", and even an extensive search of the site revealed nothing.
You're either a great troll (people click Insightful without clicking on the link?) or there's something odd going on.
And yes, I did remove the "here" from the end of your URL and tried a bunch of other things and nothing got me to the link
D
Re:I am a Mac user. (Score:1)
(http://slashdot.org/)
I have never seen an installer... (Score:2)
(http://youtube.com/watch?v=FCDJ0jhWKno | Last Journal: Tuesday November 14 2006, @01:31PM)
Hey, we're going to install software on your machine that pops up advertisements whenever you do anything on the internet, and sometimes when you're not! Also, we'll record all the sites you go to. Hope you don't mind!!!! LOL
Re:Sick of the spin on this site (Score:1, Interesting)
There is nothing wrong with Directed Advertising, get it?
-----
Nothing wrong with door-to-door evangelists stopping by during dinner either.
-----
First of all, how is it stealing when we clearly state in our EULA what we're doing?
-----
A jerk that hides behind an EULA is still a jerk.
-----
but rather ask them if we can use their data to make adverts which are more successful
-----
As long as you specifically ask me for each and every piece of data each and every time you want it and give me the option to say "No, and don't bother me ever again" then I'm okay with it.
-----
and get better adverts about stuff they might be interested in
-----
I know what I'm interested in. I don't need to pay you to figure it out for me. Directed advertising works for advertisers and for sheeple. Don't hold up a zombie citizen as an example of how you're serving _ME_.
-----
But you feel the need to impose your choice on them.
-----
Funny. You were just talking about telling consumers about things they "might be interested in". You're selectively forcing your choices on them.
-----
Instead of charging people to use GPL'd software, you "charge" them by agreeing to set free their own personal hard work and sweat.
-----
Darn sure of it. Don't be mad at me because I've ditched your little monkey for my OSS alternative. Groups that lobby for laws such as TCPA/DRM which make my OSS alternative impossible to achieve only prove my point about their character.
-----
I could point to 100 times as many Open Source projects out there that could severly [censored] up your computer. But that's OK, is it?
-----
Yes, it's okay, because the OSS projects aren't charging money, they aren't gathering info and collating databases, they aren't selling my name and info to any clearinghouse with a dollar. At the same time, because it's free, I don't hold them accountable. If you charge me money or make use of my information then I should be able to hold you accountable for anyone who misuses my data which you sold to them.
The fact that "directed advertising" hides behind multiple levels of database clearinghouses makes me sick. See my statement about the EULA.
-----
Let's face it, if we offered you a job, you would jump at the chance
-----
You're right. The same guy that's milking our society dry is funding directed advertising because it feeds his profit margin and helps him figure out new ways to milk the economy dry. Nice vicious circle which keeps me scraping for any job available.
+++ATHZ
Re:No (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.emprecords.com/)
Say, would you like a brand-new weather cover for your car? Oh, good. *small print* oh, by the way, we're going to watch everywhere you drive, everyone who gets in, what songs you like to listen to on the radio, what your gas mileage is, what sorts of add-ons you buy and install, what sort of add-ons you don't buy but feel compelled to install anyway, and what conversations you have while you're driving. Even when the weather cover isn't on.
Sounds a little different when you're talking about a car, huh? Just because a company *chooses* to give something away does not mean that I should have to give up my privacy to them or anyone else!
Re:No (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I am a Mac user. (Score:3, Interesting)
A suggestion to OS X users: get a copy of Little Snitch [obdev.at]. Any time an "unauthorized" connection is innitiated from your Mac, Little Snitch will "blow the whistle" on the offending app. It is also vey easy to set up a list of un/authorized apps and the port(s) they are not/allowed to talk on.
After I started using it, I was a little surprised at how many junk/spam email I found calling home either to pull in some content or to log which email@address had actually clicked on the spam. Previously, I knew this was going on (email/web-bug), but I was just surprised at how prevalent it had become.
cheers- raga