Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Your Worst IT Workshop?

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wednesday December 19, @03:09PM
from the horror-stories-from-the-front dept.
suntory writes "I am a lecturer at a Spanish university. This week had to attend a workshop on 'Advanced HTML and CSS' for the university staff. Some of the ideas that the presenter (a fellow lecturer) shared with us: IE is the only browser that follows standards; frames and tables are the best way to organize your website; you can view the source for most CSS, Javascript and HTML files, so you can freely copy and paste what you feel like — the Internet is free you know; same applies for images, if you can see them in Google Images Search, then you can use them for your projects. Of course, the workshop turned out to be a complete disaster and a waste of time. So I was wondering what other similar experiences you have had, and what was your worst IT workshop?"

Related Stories

Your Worst IT Workshop? | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 497 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

    by dada21 (163177) <adam.dada@gmail.com> on Wednesday December 19, @03:12PM (#21755558) Homepage Journal
    I submitted this post in 1997 when I used the slashdot id suntory. I can't believe the admins are THIS slow. It still was a bad conference then.
    • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

      by Pharmboy (216950) on Wednesday December 19, @03:14PM (#21755592) Homepage Journal
      At least it isn't a dupe.

      Yet.
      • Re:Wow! by Chris_Mir (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:00PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Wow! by fprintf (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @03:18PM
    • Re:Wow! by indros13 (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @03:21PM
    • Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @03:27PM
      • Re:Wow! by Harmonious Botch (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:30PM
      • Re:Wow! (Score:4, Interesting)

        by sumdumass (711423) on Wednesday December 19, @09:14PM (#21760008) Journal
        Oh, it was around. It was back rub for a while and Google.stanford.edu for a while. The google.com domain was registered in 1997 or so and it was moved there.

        I actually remember hitting the Google.stanford.edu implementation a few times. My ISP had a BBS that I used to connect with because I didn't have the Internet connection kit yet. That's what they called the early web browsers. They packaged the browser and some Compuserve 3 month trial thing and called it a kit. (windows still didn't have one stock at that time) The big search thing back then was aggregates like BigFoot where they presented you with what you wanted instead of doing a web search.

        Those where the days when the E-commerce buz meant a business having a single page web presence and a few email addresses they had to check on dial up. It was more like a page in the phone book but without a fancy way of finding entries. But that was when outlook did the mailbox thing and you could basically use it as a fetchmail server and an interoffice messaging system without needing exchange.

        Yea, Good times. the days when C: enter :## wasn't just a joke.
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Wow! by g1zmo (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @03:27PM
      • Re:Wow! by dada21 (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @03:48PM
        • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

          by johnw (3725) on Wednesday December 19, @04:17PM (#21756528)

          Sad, but I do remember when I finally registered here (after months of lurking, I'd say), I felt like my UID was _really_ late compared to a lot of the 4-digits that were posting.

          Wonder where they all went.
          If you get here really early in the morning and keep very, very quiet then you may just spot one.

          HTH
          John
          • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

            by HBK-4G (2475) on Wednesday December 19, @05:25PM (#21757518)
            <david_attenborough>

            The low_uid is primarily a nocturnal poster, but can sometimes be coaxed into daytime efforts by a higher_uid making 'old man of the forest' claims.

            </david_attenborough>
            • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

              by hawk (1151) <hawk@eyry.org> on Wednesday December 19, @08:23PM (#21759562) Journal
              Just keep telling yourself that, sonny.

              oops . . .
              • Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @10:36PM
              • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

                by Gazzonyx (982402) on Wednesday December 19, @11:27PM (#21761032)
                Seriously, do you sub 10K ids have an IRC channel where they announce when and where an id war is going on? It's like someone starts a thread on ids and you guys have responded before the poster has even hit submit! I think everyone under 10K has a Chuck Norris complex or som(*&@*^... *Connection Reset By Peer*
              • Re:Wow! by rlgines (Score:1) Friday December 21, @12:40AM
              • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Insightful)

                by Phantasmagoria (1595) <mambazo007 AT gmail DOT com> on Thursday December 20, @12:13AM (#21761360) Homepage
                There are two possible explanations:
                (1) Most low-uid people have become lurkers. They read a lot but post little. I know this applies to me.
                (2) Nobody really looks at the uid of posters until a uid-war starts, so nobody notices the low-uid people unless there is a uid-war.
                I suspect it's actually a combination of the two.

                What have I done since I joined slashdot? Changed universities, changed a few jobs, changed a few girlfriends, changed a few psychiatrists, and also changed a few passwords. :-P
              • Re:Wow! by monsted (Score:3) Thursday December 20, @03:45AM
              • Re:Wow! by splutty (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @06:54AM
              • Re:Wow! by Lproven (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @11:16AM
              • Re:Wow! by AgentSmith (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @11:52AM
              • Re:Wow! by hawk (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @12:08PM
              • Re:Wow! by Hotawa Hawk-eye (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @04:25PM
              • Re:Wow! by scott4000 (Score:1) Tuesday December 25, @04:16PM
          • Re:Wow! by tjones (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:33PM
          • Ah, they've seen us, scram! by spun (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:43PM
          • Re:Wow! by Tom (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @06:17PM
          • Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:40PM
          • Re:Wow! by Gunfighter (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @12:46PM
        • Re:Wow! by alta (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @04:19PM
          • Re:Wow! by Anarke_Incarnate (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:41PM
          • Re:Wow! by calebt3 (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:42PM
          • Re:Wow! by BrianH (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:50PM
            • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

              by fahrbot-bot (874524) on Wednesday December 19, @05:18PM (#21757434)
              You've only changed jobs twice? Sheesh, I'm on job 17 since joining Slashdot.

              Hmmm. Seventeen jobs since joining /. Perhaps there's a correlation? :-)

            • Re:Wow! by James McP (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @05:36PM
              • Re:Wow! by crymeph0 (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @05:41PM
              • Re:Wow! by James McP (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @10:26AM
            • Re:Wow! by jaronc (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:03PM
            • Re:Wow! by ghjm (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @06:49PM
            • Re:Wow! by edittard (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @09:52AM
              • Re:Wow! by Psychofreak (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @11:14AM
          • Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:58PM
          • Re:Wow! by eneville (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @05:58PM
          • Re:Wow! by Toonol (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:13PM
            • Re:Wow! by elvum (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:12PM
            • Re:Wow! by geminidomino (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @08:02PM
            • Re:Wow! by sumdumass (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @10:43PM
            • Re:Wow! by Toonol (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:44PM
            • Re:Wow! by lymond01 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @07:30PM
              • Re:Wow! by jdinkel (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @10:21AM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Wow! by the_brobdingnagian (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:43PM
        • Re:Wow! by DaGoodBoy (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:49PM
          • Re:Wow! by jdjbuffalo (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @06:18PM
        • Re:Wow! by Griim (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:14PM
        • Re:Wow! by Dastardly (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @05:23PM
        • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

          by ChuckleBug (5201) * on Wednesday December 19, @05:54PM (#21757864) Journal
          We are everywhere. We watch, in silence, waiting for the right moment.

          What to do then, I dunno.

          • Re:Wow! by pklinken (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @09:16PM
          • Re:Wow! by Alsee (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @10:09AM
        • Re:Wow! (Score:4, Funny)

          by Geoff (968) on Wednesday December 19, @05:54PM (#21757866) Homepage
          We're still here, though getting on in years. We check in occasionaly to mumble something about "kids these days"...
        • Re:Wow! by elvum (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:09PM
        • Re:Wow! by KlomDark (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:11PM
        • Re:Wow! by kju (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @08:18PM
          • Re:Wow! by pez (Score:3) Thursday December 20, @12:55PM
        • Re:Wow! by Grimbleton (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @09:39PM
        • Re:Wow! by WhiteDragon (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @07:51AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Wow! by quantaman (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @05:26PM
      • Re:Wow! by boredMDer (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @11:10PM
    • gag order by wikinerd (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @03:49PM
    • Re:Wow! by fliptout (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:08PM
      • Re:Wow! by DRAGONWEEZEL (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:03PM
    • Re:Wow! by valentyn (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:19PM
    • Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:19PM
    • Re:Wow! by WhatAmIDoingHere (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:24PM
    • Re:Wow! by pragma_x (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:08PM
    • Re:Wow! by greedyturtle (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @10:42AM
    • Re:I blame DNF by dada21 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:43PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • My personal worst (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 19, @03:13PM (#21755572)
    I took the How to be the Web's Best Editor workshop offered by Slashdot. What a disaster.

    I submitted an article on it a few months ago. They posted it to the front page 3 or 4 times. Just search for keywords: bestt editer
    • Re:My personal worst (Score:5, Funny)

      by myrdos2 (989497) on Wednesday December 19, @04:02PM (#21756336)
      I was taking a University course on C++ and data structures. Big class, maybe 150 people in a theatre-like room. At the front of the room was a PC, connected to a projector so we could see screen. This was a Solaris system. The prof had emailed the lecture slides to himself.

      So to get the slides, he opens a terminal, and types pine. A big list of all his email fills the screen. He starts looking for his lecture notes... at which point some guy noticed one of his emails had the subject "Enormous Pussy". The prof stammered and said it wasn't what it sounded like, that's just a big cat one of his friends has, and his friend likes to send email with provocative subjects.

      At which point someone else saw an email called "Giant Beaver", destroying the prof's credibility.

      The lecture itself was great.
      • Re:My personal worst (Score:4, Funny)

        by quantaman (517394) on Wednesday December 19, @05:34PM (#21757658)

        at which point some guy noticed one of his emails had the subject "Enormous Pussy". The prof stammered and said it wasn't what it sounded like, that's just a big cat one of his friends has, and his friend likes to send email with provocative subjects.

        At which point someone else saw an email called "Giant Beaver", destroying the prof's credibility.
        Huh? What's wrong with a CS prof who likes pictures of animals?

        What? Why is everyone looking at me?
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Speaking of university... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by KingSkippus (799657) * on Wednesday December 19, @05:35PM (#21757662) Homepage Journal

        I took the advanced C++ class at my university the first quarter after they made the class transition from Pascal. I had prior work experience as a C++ programmer, so I figured it would be an easy A. Boy, was I wrong!

        The professor was like 80 years old. He must have been around before they developed the one in binary and only had zeros. That in itself isn't so bad, except that he didn't bother to even crack the book to teach C++. He'd give examples and try to work problems on the whiteboard in some kind of pseudo language that wasn't Pascal, definitely wasn't C++, and that hopelessly confused the students who didn't have a really good grasp of the language. Oh, it gets better, though.

        His TA, the girl who graded our labs, knew even less. We had a lab where we had to implement a complex number class, ho hum. The instructions stated that we had to develop methods to do things like add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc. complex numbers, but they didn't explicitly state what we had to call our functions.

        Any C++ programmer worth anything would know that the obvious thing to do is to overload the +, -, *, and / operators so that they could accept complex number arguments and return the appropriate result. I spent a few hours working on it, churned out my class, and when I got the lab back, she had failed me!

        I asked why she gave me an F, and she explained that I was supposed to implement the functions using names like add, subtract, etc. I told her that that was nowhere in the instructions for the lab, and she admitted that it was okay to use other function names, but operator overloading was a no-no. Of course, I asked why, and her answer—I kid you not—was that because if you overloaded the operators, other programmers wouldn't be able to tell the difference between your class and built-in types. I argued vehemently that that was the point of operator overloading, that it was an extremely common practice in C++, but she wouldn't be convinced.

        It was toward the end of the semester, so I took the lab to my professor and explained to him what was going on. I even took a C++ best practices book with me to show what I was talking about and to prove that I'm not some crackpot stupid student trying to eek out a few extra points. The professor proceeded to explain to me that the university had just informed him that they were letting him go after the semester, that they were firing him. (His words exactly, not mine.) He said that if I had a problem with my grade, I needed to take it up with the TA, because he wasn't going to override anything she said.

        In all the programming classes I took at the university, that was the only one in which I got a B, and I was absolutely furious. Not so much because of the negligible impact to my GPA, but because it's the only time I've ever gotten a grade that I truly felt like I didn't deserve, and it was all because of an idiot professor who didn't give a damn about anything (gee, I wonder why they fired him) and a TA who didn't know crap about the subject that she was grading us on.

        It's too bad, too. All of my other experiences at the university were relatively pleasant, and I'm a life member of the alumni association today. But that one incident still sticks in my mind as the height of stupidity. I wish now that I had had the balls to escalate it to the dean or maybe even higher. I can't help but wonder how many students failed or otherwise did miserably in that class because of him, and I can't help but wonder if any of them gave up computer science because of that bad experience. God, I hope not.

        • Re:Speaking of university... by bartle (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @06:14PM
        • Re:Speaking of university... by Just Some Guy (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:16PM
        • Re:Speaking of university... by _Sharp'r_ (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:33PM
        • Re:Speaking of university... by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:36PM
        • Re:Speaking of university... by smitty_one_each (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:40PM
        • Re:Speaking of university... (Score:4, Funny)

          by jaxtherat (1165473) on Wednesday December 19, @06:55PM (#21758666)
          Yeah, similar thing happened to me. I had a database luddite for a lecturer and he failed me for using temporary views to solve a certain problem as he'd rather I did subselects, even though my SQL was simpler to read, and scaled a lot better for huge datasets.

          As this was part of the final project, of course I failed the subject...

          The Ironic part was, my solution turned out to be be THE ONLY way to do some complex data mining in MySQL 3.something for my first IT job. Imagine the lulz that were had by my boss when he found out that the solution that got the CFO off his back was also responsible for me failing databases 1001...

          oh the humanity
        • Re:Speaking of university... (Score:5, Interesting)

          by ConanG (699649) on Wednesday December 19, @07:12PM (#21758820)
          You think you had it bad?

          My intro CS "professor" was absolute crap. I was a freshman with no programming experience beyond BASIC when I was 10 years old. I routinely had to correct him, nearly daily in fact. Not because I wanted to be a smartass, but because I could see the puzzled looks of my classmates as he contradicted himself constantly.

          At first, I thought it was just a language barrier (he was Indian), but as I grew more skilled in the subject I realized he was just talking out his ass all the time. This led my and some fellow students to do some detective work on his credentials... where did he get his degree? We eventually figured out he was a big fat liar!

          He claimed to have taught at various universities (I remember Georgia Tech off the top of my head). None of them had heard of him. His Ph.D. turned out to be a mail-in degree from an online school. That was, thankfully, his last semester. Unfortunately, I fear he just got a job somewhere else doing the same thing.
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Speaking of university... by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @07:13PM
        • Re:Speaking of university... by Vr6dub (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @09:12PM
        • Re:Speaking of university... (Score:5, Interesting)

          by dills (102733) on Wednesday December 19, @11:40PM (#21761142) Homepage
          That sucks. I had a different experience.

          My freshman instructor in CS50, the first class you take in CS, was a special guest instructor that year.

          I shit you not, I was taught C by none other than Brian Kernighan.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Kernighan [wikipedia.org]

          Hint: He's the "K" in "AWK". He helped Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie invent UNIX at Bell Labs. He co-authored "The C Programming Language", the very first book on programming in C, and widely considered by most to be the bible of modern programming.

          He was extremely fun and engaging, and I felt honored to be in the presence of one of the forefathers of modern computing.
        • Re:Speaking of university... by moosesocks (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @07:32AM
        • Completely offtopic and random... by danaris (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @09:37PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:My personal worst (Score:4, Funny)

        by ISoldat53 (977164) on Wednesday December 19, @05:58PM (#21757914)
        I had to fly 1800 miles to attend a party at the hq thrown for all of the field personnel to reward them for being away from home so much.
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • I got you beat: (Score:5, Funny)

      by LibertineR (591918) on Wednesday December 19, @05:35PM (#21757668)
      1993: "Lotus Notes: Why workflow matters"

      I swear to God, the first words from the presenters mouth: "That Exchange thing Microsoft is building is no threat to us, and here is why....."

      • Re:I got you beat: by ConceptJunkie (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @05:54PM
      • Re:I got you beat: by blastwave (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @07:24PM
        • Re:I got you beat: by LibertineR (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @07:43PM
          • Re:I got you beat: (Score:4, Interesting)

            by blastwave (757518) on Thursday December 20, @12:06AM (#21761306)
            I always wonder why so much traffic on SlashDot ( or web based public interfaces like this ) can be so confrontational. That was never my intention. I guess, yes, I defend the Notes development process after it got past version 3.x. Internally the first decent Notes was 2.15a and it still used a flat namespace. With Notes 2.15a a person could click on a link on a document and the client would go retrieve the linked to document from some other server and some other database if needed. That was pretty cool when NCSA Mosiac was just getting into the hands of people and Netscape did not yet exist. People could develop applications in a flash, with basic fields and then just drop it on a server and it worked. Debugging was sometimes horrible. Development of more complex applications required some real tricky knowledge at times. Version 3.0c ( a stack of floppies that I still have somewhere ) was a pretty decent revision and I made a ton of money with it. Version 4 was even better with the scripting ability.

            I was at camp Microsoft in 1997 meeting with the Exchange team as well as the early Microsoft Transaction server teams and I am happy to say that I got to meet some really brilliant people. Truely gifted software engineers and developers that impressed me completely. My host was Jeff Raikes and he made sure that the Lotus Notes team people were very well taken care of at a five star golf resort. It was pretty cool to meet a real software billionaire that got up every morning to go to work for another billionaire. He asked for input and he got it, straight from people that lived and breated Notes for years. I was one of those people that had to guts to tell him that Exchange was crippled in many ways despite the lavish hotel. I ended up with a few Microsoft people sitting with me on the plane and we all worked over a business issue and they went off to code it all up in Exchange. I did it in Notes in two days flat.

            So, to make a long story short, I defend the Notes process because it works very well. Today and yesterday going back years. I think that IBM has dumped their business units that can not longer show profit ( like PCs anymore ) and they are sticking with technologies that have real serious value longterm. I see Lotus is still in there and Notes just keeps on going and going. I stand by my words that in the event of a complete atomic meltdown there will be cockroaches, UNIX, Lotus Notes and Cher. Not necessarily in that order

            I'm sorry, but I think you were saying that Exchange was potential competition way back then. It wasn't. Still isn't. In my opinion.
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Chicken. by TheSHAD0W (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @08:06PM
      • Re:I got you beat: by dominux (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @07:01AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Securing Voice over Internet Protocol (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Lookin4Trouble (1112649) on Wednesday December 19, @03:14PM (#21755602)
    Getting there was half the fun. Boston. January. 44 inches of snow.

    Then once I got there it was a week of "If you encrypt your traffic," (thusly losing the ability to QoS that traffic), "you only need to firewall your management boxes and vlan off all of your VoIP endpoints!" Cue the rest of the class firewalling off their management boxes from everyone else (including themselves) *sigh*

  • Vendor Name? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by securityfolk (906041) on Wednesday December 19, @03:15PM (#21755614)
    If you can, could you provide the name of the vendor who gave that course? I would like to avoid them at all costs :)
  • I was a co-facilitator at one... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sherpajohn (113531) on Wednesday December 19, @03:19PM (#21755660) Homepage
    with another member of the IT staff from the college I worked at, back in the early PC days. Think it was the fall of 89. It was a half day thing on a Saturday for PC maintenance. In those days power supply to the motherboard was tricky, my co-host found out the hard way when she hooked one up backwards and it kinda went boom when she powered it up.

    That was not quite as spectacular as the time a prof at the college hooked up two PC's via serial cables, one of them being on an AV cart (and plugged into it) - seems the cart was wired wrong, when he fired those up there was an small explosion, a fair bit of smoke and some actual pieces of the serial card from one of the pc's strewn about the case.

    Ah, the good old days - I worked on Tandy machines that had fully exposed power supplies, took one apart once (the PC not the power supply!) and wondered what the whirring sound was, thing was still running ;)

    Oh that I could go back to the day of swapping floppy disks to run stuff.

  • Blah... by creimer (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @03:19PM
    • Re:Blah... by speculatrix (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @03:45PM
      • Re:Blah... by i.r.id10t (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @03:49PM
        • Re:Blah... by DRAGONWEEZEL (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:19PM
    • Re:Blah... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by cp.tar (871488) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Wednesday December 19, @03:47PM (#21756108)

      I'm attending a course on web design in my college this semester.

      The TA that's giving the lectures:

      1. allegedly copied those lectures from the lectures given by our academic research network (I was told that by a fellow student who took the course given by said network)
      2. once actually explained we could use <div> tags as line breaks
      3. teaches all kinds of utterly wrong stuff, including advising us to encode our work in Windows-1250 instead of UTF.

      However, two years ago I took a course given by a guy who told a friend of mine "Stop surfing the internet! Or else you won't know how to use Internet Explorer!" (yeah, it loses a bit in translation).
      He could spend two hours explaining how to navigate to a bloody webpage from IE 6. And then how to add a crappy link to whatever IE calls bookmarks.
      And when I said "could", I mean "did".
      Repeatedly.

      By the FSM's noodly appendage, I wish I was making this crap up.

      • Re:Blah... by alienw (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:20PM
        • Re:Blah... by cp.tar (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:34PM
          • Re:Blah... by jaronc (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @07:41PM
            • Re:Blah... by cp.tar (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @04:04AM
        • Re:Blah... by Lord of Hyphens (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:54PM
      • Re:Blah... by binford2k (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @09:03PM
      • Re:Blah... by Machtyn (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @10:10PM
        • Re:Blah... by creimer (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @10:54PM
    • Re:Blah... by AIkill (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @11:00AM
    • Re:My hero! by creimer (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:01PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Let's go the other way (Score:5, Insightful)

    by PHAEDRU5 (213667) <instascreed&gmail,com> on Wednesday December 19, @03:19PM (#21755672) Homepage
    Since the difference between intelligence and stupidity is that there's a limit on intelligence, let's try naming the *best* conferences we've been to.

    I've been to OOPSLA a couple of times. Very enjoyable and informative. More recently, I just attended a "No Fluff, Just Stuff" conferences in Atlanta. Lots of good information, especially on Groovy and Grails.
  • It was an AskSlashdot (Score:4, Funny)

    by SleptThroughClass (1127287) on Wednesday December 19, @03:19PM (#21755674) Journal
    It was an AskSlashdot session which was full of the worst possible examples.
  • Not the worst for *me*... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Otter (3800) on Wednesday December 19, @03:19PM (#21755678) Journal
    We were getting trained on some desktop sharing / presentation software. The instructor was getting increasingly frustrated with one woman who couldn't seem to manage even the most basic steps. ("Click on the icon. No, the picture thing! Click with your mouse -- no!) Finally she gave that woman control of her own computer...

    **Whoosh**! The woman instantly tears into the instructor's hard drive like in one of those hacker movies and starts moving and deleting files! The instructor dived for her own laptop and yanked the Ethernet cable. I'm still not all sure what really happened there.

    • Re:Not the worst for *me*... by mackil (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:20PM
    • Re:Not the worst for *me*... by andrewd18 (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:24PM
    • Re:Not the worst for *me*... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 19, @04:05PM (#21756390)

      "Those who can, do; those who can't, teach" - old adage that my PhD advisor used to repeat all the time ;)
      That adage is complete crap. Effectively passing knowledge on to students in a way that results in them actually learning something is nontrivial.
      • Re:Not the worst for *me*... (Score:4, Insightful)

        by HTH NE1 (675604) on Wednesday December 19, @06:56PM (#21758684)

        Effectively passing knowledge on to students in a way that results in them actually learning something is nontrivial.
        And no one should know that better than programmers. I quote Douglas Adams:

        "There really wasn't a lot this machine could do that you couldn't do yourself in half the time with a lot less trouble," said Richard, "but it was, on the other hand, very good at being a slow and dim-witted pupil."

        Reg looked at him quizzically.

        "I had no idea they were supposed to be in short supply," he said. "I could hit a dozen with a bread roll from where I'm sitting."

        "I'm sure. But look at it this way. What really is the point of trying to teach anything to anybody?"

        This question seemed to provoke a murmur of sympathetic approval from up and down the table.

        Richard continued, "What I mean is that if you really want to understand something, the best way is to try and explain it to someone else. That forces you to sort it out in your own mind. And the more slow and dim-witted your pupil, the more you have to break things down into more and more simple ideas. And that's really the essence of programming. By the time you've sorted out a complicated idea into little steps that even a stupid machine can deal with, you've certainly learned something about it yourself. The teacher usually learns more than the pupil. Isn't that true?"

        "It would be hard to learn much less than my pupils," came a low growl from somewhere on the table, "without undergoing a pre-frontal lobotomy."
      • Re:Not the worst for *me*... by slapout (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @11:07AM
      • Ummm... by Slashdot Parent (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @02:00PM
      • Re:Not the worst for *me*... by Jherek Carnelian (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @04:55PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Not the worst for *me*... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by littlerubberfeet (453565) on Wednesday December 19, @05:01PM (#21757224) Homepage
      Those who can, do.

      Those who can do more, teach.
    • Re:Not the worst for *me*... by cnock (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @03:08PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • IDIOT by jrothwell97 (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @03:20PM
    • Re:IDIOT by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @03:29PM
    • Re:IDIOT (Score:5, Funny)

      by orclevegam (940336) on Wednesday December 19, @03:41PM (#21756010)
      I once had an instructor at an introductory level programming class (which I was required to take and they refused to let me test out of) try to insist that in C and C++ the int in the line:
      int main()
      stands for initialize. No amount of arguing with the instructor could convince him that it was declaring the return type of the main function as an integer. As it happens the instructor was also head of the computer science department. I spent the rest of that semester teaching the entire class after the instructor left because I felt bad for them. They all agreed I did a much better job than the instructor. I would have gotten a job as a teacher there, but they couldn't afford my rate.
      • Re:IDIOT by whoever57 (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @04:19PM
        • Re:IDIOT by TheRaven64 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:14PM
          • Re:IDIOT by whoever57 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:01PM
          • Re:IDIOT by whoever57 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:03PM
        • Re:IDIOT by LordEd (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:17PM
          • Re:IDIOT (Score:4, Insightful)

            by cp.tar (871488) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Wednesday December 19, @06:07PM (#21758014)

            Hey, you had it great.

            A teacher does not by definition know everything; very often, teachers are wrong about stuff, too.

            A teacher who can stand being corrected is nearly a treasure to be cherished these days.
            Some of the teachers I've had have been patently wrong on come counts, blatantly unknowledgeable on others, yet would not accept any kind of correction, criticism or comment.

            I got my revenge by getting a high grade and writing a poor evaluation.
            Now if only those evaluations really meant something...

            • Re:IDIOT by David_W (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @09:24PM
              • Re:IDIOT by cp.tar (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @04:07AM
              • Re:IDIOT by cin62 (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @12:39PM
              • Re:IDIOT by Nerd4News (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @05:33PM
          • Re:IDIOT by eneville (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @06:16PM
        • Re:IDIOT by KiloByte (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:24PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:IDIOT by cmdr_beeftaco (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:30PM
      • Re:IDIOT by Spikeles (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:30PM
      • Re:IDIOT by Peaquod (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @10:39PM
      • Re:IDIOT by Stonent1 (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @10:04AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • The author has it good by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @03:21PM
  • by Greyfox (87712) on Wednesday December 19, @03:21PM (#21755704) Homepage
    However I DID have an IT guy tell me with a straight face that windows out of the box is more secure than any given Linux install out of the box. He backed down pretty quick when I suggested that we install both OSes on a machine connected to the open Internet, though...
  • HTML, CSS and Websites (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Archangel Michael (180766) on Wednesday December 19, @03:25PM (#21755758) Journal
    While HTML and CSS are important to know still, I can't help but wonder how many people actually still build websites with HTML and CSS and Java and such? I stopped using plain HTML at least four years ago, when I discovered Content Management Systems (WebGUI back then, now using Joomla). I've built or helped build dozens of sites, all part time, using CMS, and most of my clients couldn't be happier. They have access to add content all day long, and don't have to worry about "design".

    If I went to a Web seminar like the one described in the story, and it didn't mention building sites on top of a CMS, I'd question the presenter and the company that paid for me to go. There is no reason that your average person needs to know HTML or CSS, as those should be handed over to DESIGNERS, people skilled with making things look good. If you want to see what it looks like when everyday people do design just go over to MySpace (akkkk).

    Just my $.02 (actual value subject to market forces)
  • InterOp (Score:4, Funny)

    by dave562 (969951) on Wednesday December 19, @03:26PM (#21755770)
    While not exactly a workshop per se, it was the biggest waste of time. My employer basically paid for me to have people try to sell me stuff. Aren't the sales people supposed to be paying me for my time in the form of free lunches, dinners, blow and strippers?
    • Re:InterOp by dgatwood (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:11PM
    • Re:InterOp (Score:5, Funny)

      by Quiet_Desperation (858215) on Wednesday December 19, @04:15PM (#21756510)
      Aren't the sales people supposed to be paying me for my time in the form of free lunches, dinners, blow and strippers?

      Here in aerospace, we're not allowed to accept even a freaking mouse pad from a parts supplier.

      Which is probably best, because I'd totally be whoring myself out for meals and gadgets and, if the salesperson was a cute woman, whatever I thought I could get before getting slapped.

      "Yeah, sell me some FPGAs, bitch. Yeah, you like it when I talk like that, don't you? Tell me those gate counts again, you dirty, dirty girl."

      I know. I need help. :(

      • Re:InterOp (Score:5, Funny)

        by dave562 (969951) on Wednesday December 19, @04:18PM (#21756554)
        I know. I need help. :(

        Sounds to me like you just need $1000 and 24 hours in Vegas. ;)

        • Re:InterOp by the1rob (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:49PM
        • Re:InterOp by rk (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:45PM
        • Re:InterOp by mbullock (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @09:38AM
        • Re:InterOp by Quiet_Desperation (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @12:15PM
        • Re:InterOp by Afty0r (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @07:10AM
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:InterOp by Degrees (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @10:01PM
  • maybe no tworst but... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by TheCarp (96830) * <<sjc> <at> <carpanet.net>> on Wednesday December 19, @03:26PM (#21755780) Homepage
    I did attend a USENIX tutorial that was bad. Well maybe not bad in the grand scheme of things, and I liked the presenter, it sucks to have to slam him for this... however...

    It was, if I rememeber right, "Advanced perl CGI scripting", or the moral equivalent thereof. The point was... CGI, PERL, and Advanced.

    It began with a 3 minute speech about how thats what the tutorial used to be, but people kept signing up who barely, if at all, understood perl, and didn't know jack about CGI... so the tutorial had been severely dumbed down.

    After the morning session it became clear that I was going to learn nothing, and so I took the afternoon to find some better way to waste my time, since my employer wasn't getting any value out of sending me to that tutorial in any case, may as well get some value out of the time.

    Again, was too bad, it looked like it could have been cool, and the presenter certainly knew his stuff and could have given a better course. Its just well... lets just say, it looked like I was among the minority who left.

    -Steve
    • Re:maybe not bratwurst but... by UncleTogie (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:21PM
      • Re:maybe not bratwurst but... (Score:4, Interesting)

        by Blkdeath (530393) on Wednesday December 19, @07:19PM (#21758924) Homepage

        Got similar from the "Intro to C++" professor I had. "I'm now showing you an array, which the school doesn't want me to teach," he said. When queried why, it turns out that the morons that the "guidance counselors indicated had high computer aptitude" couldn't wrap their heads around a basic, simple array. We had OUR education dumbed down 'cause of some kid that shouldn't have been in the class to begin with.

        Oh you're telling me. In Ontario, Canada about 4 years ago we were using PII-400s with 4GB hard drives and 64MB of RAM to install Windows NT Server 4 as part of our Advanced Operating Systems course component. Suffice to say it took all class to format/install the OS. Then the instructor informs us that the next class's itinerary included formatting and re-installing NT so we could become more familiar with the installation routine.

        A few of us who were expecting to delve into Linux, Windows XP, domains, etc. at the time asked if we could divert and do some other activities or atleast explore the NT server we'd already installed and he told us no, he couldn't set up individual lesson plans for select groups so we'd have to follow with the rest of the class. So we all developed mysterious illnesses the next day.

        This class was an advanced component covering operating systems in an industry grade (and "industry developed") three year program and it listed no pre-requisites. Some of the people in our course couldn't even type letalone operate a modern PC - forget servers, switches, routers or the like - a word processor was fascinating and the rest of us had to suffer for it.

        Our Telephony course had a mid-term required 30 page (double spaced) report due on the history, present, and future of telephony (one could easily write 300 pages but I digress). So here I am busting my hump, dissapointed in myself for only managing 26 or 27 pages, which I hole punch and hand in in a nicely coloured duo-tang on the prescribed day and what do I see from my classmates? 2, 3 and 4 page reports with a staple at the top corner, pictures galore (lots of photos of Alexander Bell, pictures of old telephones, new telephones) and due to the overwhelming complaints of the students the teacher had to give these people 'A' grades. So 4 pages double spaced with extra wide margins and 25% images with huge headers printed with 30 point font get an 'A' which completely invalidated my 27 page hand-in.

        n.b. Our final exam in that class was open book in absurdia. Anything you could bring in on paper was allowed. If you could wheel a filing cabinet into the exam room it was permitted. The failure rate was more than 60% until the students whined.

      • Re:maybe not bratwurst but... by chartreuse (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @08:28PM
    • Re:maybe no tworst but... by TheRaven64 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:25PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • The worst????? by WwWonka (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @03:27PM
  • Haven't been to many, but (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Lightborn (7556) on Wednesday December 19, @03:27PM (#21755808)

    back in the Tivoli days I got sent to a 2-day class on how to use it. It was about totally worthless.

    I found out the next week that the class had cost $750, and I actually went into the CEO's office and suggested to him that next time they want me to know something, they pay me the $750 and I'd purchase and read the appropriate book. He wasn't especially amused.
    • pay me the $750 and I'd purchase and read the appropriate book

      You are of course correct, but if you speak with some business people you will be surprised why some businesses (and even individuals) take courses and enroll their staff to workshops and training sessions. Sometimes training is done not in order to actually learn something, but only because of various external requirements (eg legal, or requirements imposed or recommended by professional bodies), obscure accounting motives, publicity or advertising reasons ("we spent a million in staff training last year!"), hierarchical or careerist reasons ("manager: I will enroll my staff in extensive training so that my boss can't use their lack of skills as an excuse to fire me for hiring incompetent employees" or even "I, as the training manager, must make everyone attend training sessions because it's good for making me more important within the company"), or sometimes even irrational psychological reasons ("if we lose, it won't be because we didn't try hard but because out training was useless, so it's the trainer's problem not ours"). Yea I know all this is completely anti-productive and irrational, but I have actually seen all this being done in dysfunctional companies (sometimes even required by external agencies or bodies).

    • Re:Haven't been to many, but by ockegheim (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @07:10PM
  • by lawman508 (969924) on Wednesday December 19, @03:31PM (#21755880)
    I've GIVEN some great, and somewhat bad talks in my day - every good speaker will tell you the same thing.
    Most of the bad talks were situations where I was asked to sub for someone - or an area where I "WANTED" to be an expert - but really wasn't.
    Many times, after a talk, I find that something I said was just plain wrong - it happens - to everyone - even the best speakers out there.
    They key is, as an attendee, to not sit around and waste time listening to a bad speaker. I just quietly walk out, picking up an evaluation form in the process, and making sure the instructor gets my feedback.
    As an occasional bad speaker - the best thing an audience member can do for me is to let me know if I have gotten it wrong! In the end, the only way tp turn a bad speaker into a good one - is through feedback - even if it is "YOU SUCK!"
  • Fistfight by boristdog (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @03:36PM
    • Re:Fistfight (Score:5, Funny)

      by flaming error (1041742) on Wednesday December 19, @03:59PM (#21756276) Journal
      That was you? Let me apologize again.

      I had just returned from my Peace Corps stint in Ghana, and I was suffering from highly virulent dysentery. During lunch I discovered my containment garments had a rip in the seat.

        > I finally told him to shut the hell up or we could go outside and I would kick his butt
      As soon as I saw you had symptoms, I decided it was too late to try and convince you.

      But you really should seek professional help. Sounds like you haven't gotten over it yet.
      • Re:Fistfight by AragornSonOfArathorn (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @12:51PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Fistfight by DarrenBaker (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:35PM
    • Re:Fistfight - Balmer Style by Lodragandraoidh (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @01:18PM
  • by Pig Hogger (10379) <pig@hogger.gmail@com> on Wednesday December 19, @03:36PM (#21755952) Homepage Journal
    In University, in a web design class. The teacher was demonstrating coding a page. As he was entring links into URLs, I start spelling "P-L-A-Y-B-O-Y-.-C-O-M", which the teacher dutifully typed. When he realized what he wrote, he backspaced over "BOY" and typed "GIRL", then went on with his demonstration.

    5 minutes later, by accident, he clicks on the link, triggering a cascade of pop-ups with naked men in front of the class, which was laughing it's lungs out...

  • Perl class (Score:5, Funny)

    by HW_Hack (1031622) on Wednesday December 19, @03:38PM (#21755968)
    This was a class offered internally by Intel --

    So this total propeller head who's teaching the class says "Perl is the easiest language to learn - very natural and logical syntax" ...... I lasted until the morning break - then went back ot my office to get some work done .....
    • Re:Perl class by Black Art (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:07PM
    • 2 Lines of Perl by Slashdot Parent (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @02:09PM
    • Re:Perl class by Stinking Pig (Score:2) Thursday December 27, @12:23AM
  • HP (Score:5, Funny)

    by Jethro (14165) on Wednesday December 19, @03:50PM (#21756158)
    I was at a conference one time where an HP guy gave a lecture, and during the Q&A people asked why HP hasn't moved to 64 bit yet, like DEC had, etc.

    Guy got really mad and started pretty much yelling at people, saying that 64 bit has twice as many bits and is therefore half as fast as 32 bit computing.

    People didn't even bother laughing at him. Everyone just looked at him like he was an idiot.
    • Re:HP by wikinerd (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @03:53PM
    • Re:HP by Chirs (Score:3) Wednesday December 19, @04:50PM
    • Re:HP by Sanat (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @07:35PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Wasn't his fault by smchris (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @03:51PM
  • 4Sight Technologies by curmudgeon99 (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @03:53PM
  • SOA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by makellan (550215) on Wednesday December 19, @03:55PM (#21756226)
    I felt bad for the presenter of a two day course on SOA. No one told him that our business model revolves around building totally custom solutions that are rarely, if ever, allowed to talk to the open 'net. I finally explained this to him and he looked crestfallen. He asked the class (of engineers) and everyone agreed that we couldn't use any of it. A waste of time for all involved, costing many thousands of dollars.
    • Re:SOA by curmudgeon99 (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @03:57PM
      • Re:SOA by plague3106 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:36PM
        • Re:SOA by idontgno (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:14PM
          • Re:SOA by rhizome (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:19PM
          • Re:SOA by plague3106 (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @11:56AM
            • Re:SOA by Cederic (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @01:46PM
        • Re:SOA by curmudgeon99 (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @05:42PM
          • Re:SOA by plague3106 (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @11:58AM
            • Re:SOA by curmudgeon99 (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @12:10PM
              • Re:SOA by plague3106 (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @12:23PM
    • Re:SOA by slipi (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @06:31PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Question for the submitter (Score:4, Insightful)

    by apparently (756613) on Wednesday December 19, @03:55PM (#21756234)
    Did you do the attendees a favor and correct the lecturer, or did you just let the misinformation run wild?
  • PLC class (Score:5, Funny)

    by hjf (703092) on Wednesday December 19, @04:09PM (#21756430) Homepage
    I went to this PLC (Programmable Logic Controller, that's industrial control for you computer geeks). It started OK, with some drone showing off Schneider Electric's new Contactor (the TeSys U, a "smart" contactor with a LCD display, over/under load protection, short-circuit protection,.. whatever). Later on comes this guy, making some really bad jokes and then laughing himself -- the rest of us just laughed at the way he laughed, he was really loud. So, he shows some PLC basics. All was fine...

    Next day he said, well, we're finished with the PLC stuff (actually we were finished with some really really bird's eye view of Ladder diagrams), now we'll see some SCADA. So the guy start showing this REALLY CRAPPY 16-bit app, and he showed ONE BY ONE every single widget (buttons, bar graphs, even some motors that changed colors to show when the output was running). And the library was H U G E. THOUSANDS of widgets. And he showed them "oh, look at how many of them there are! Just see how flexible this program is! See! We even have traffic lights! Buttons! Little trucks, big trucks, cars...".

    I went outside and came back in 1 hour, and the guy was STILL SHOWING the fucking widgets and how to place and connect them. Needless to say, I didn't stay.
    • Re:PLC class by orclevegam (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:21PM
      • Re:PLC class by hjf (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:24PM
    • Re:PLC class by rongage (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:08PM
  • Easy... by jacksonj04 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:19PM
  • third party opportunity by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:21PM
  • Irrelevant and inappropriate by Misagon (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:28PM
  • CompuMaster "Mastering Java Web Applications" by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:31PM
  • Excruciatingly Boring by captainjamie (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:39PM
  • What's a double? (Score:4, Funny)

    by joecarst (801286) on Wednesday December 19, @04:41PM (#21756922)
    I was in a training session where the 'instructor' was asked what a double was and he explained it was called a double becuase it held two variables. I almost walked out of the class.
  • Worst class by WestBoca (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:47PM
  • I think I know that guy by NaCh0 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:51PM
  • Teaching Workshop by saxoholic (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @05:03PM
  • Windows Vista Training by Ohio Calvinist (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @05:08PM
  • "Advanced" Email Workshop (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ancarett (221103) on Wednesday December 19, @05:10PM (#21757338) Homepage
    The university for which I worked promised an "advanced" email workshop. Thinking that I might learn something halfway interesting or useful about the filing system or filtering or whatever, I signed up. After all, I act as my department's tech rep and have to keep up on things in order to counsel my colleagues!

    So I waltz into the computer labs one sunny August afternoon, ready for my "advanced" workshop fun. And what awaited me was the most painful IT experience of my life as the instructor walked us through the "advanced" complexities of logging in, clicking on subjects to read messages, clicking on buttons to reply or delete. We didn't even get to Reply All, CC or BCC, let alone folder, filters or the rest of the software options I'd expected them to cover.

    I asked why this was considered to be at an advanced level. The woman running the workshop said that this was as much as anyone needed to know about the system, really. That's when I tuned out and starting making some ASCII art to pass the time.
  • Topic: How Wonderful We Are (Score:4, Funny)

    by mkcmkc (197982) on Wednesday December 19, @05:31PM (#21757602)
    Once I had a job at a Very Large Telecom Corporation and as a requirement of getting an email account, I was required to attend an e-mail orientation session, which consisted of a PowerPoint talk given by someone in the IT/Email dept. The speaker trumpeted the fact that prior to the procurement of their latest email system, each email had cost the company $1000 to deliver. The new system was much more economical--I don't recall the figure now.

    Needless to say, the talk contained no useful information at all.

  • ECDL by ledow (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:31PM
    • Re:ECDL by Uerige (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @08:41PM
    • Re:ECDL by csrster (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @05:50AM
    • Re:ECDL by Whiteox (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @05:59AM
    • Re:ECDL by Hognoxious (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @11:01AM
  • Workshops are Generally a Waste of Time by CodeBuster (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:33PM
  • The Absolute Worst Conditions... by Bones3D_mac (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:36PM
  • ACS Workshops = Lame by thedude13 (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @05:39PM
  • Worst "IT Workshop" by bigbadunix (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @05:41PM
  • Damn by SoulRider (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @05:42PM
  • Did everyone read the instructions? Good. by jtownatpunk.net (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:56PM
  • LUGs can be a good source for workshops by sr8outtalotech (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @06:05PM
  • Don't have time to read your homework by fm6 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:07PM
  • just last month... by Tom (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:08PM
  • The web in general by DrChuck (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @06:08PM
  • at a real-time systems conference by radarsat1 (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:26PM
  • CA Unicenter 1999 by shippo (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @06:30PM
  • Computers for Chemists by Resnikov (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @07:18PM
  • Table Layouts are still essential by deek (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @08:03PM
  • Introduction to UNIX circa 1994 by Boawk (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @08:43PM
  • IT Training Company Promo Presentation! by rHBa (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @09:14PM
  • by syousef (465911) on Wednesday December 19, @09:24PM (#21760068)
    The lecturer claimed he'd previous been working in the industry developing embedded C code. After 15 minutes of him explaining that # directives are evaluated at runtime, I couldn't take it. I put my hand up and simply said "you're wrong. That's what the precompiler does". I had a reputation for knowing what I was on about (I was there for a qualification, not because I didn't know C). He went beetroot red. In hindsight I should have talked to him after the class and had him correct his mistake the next week, but hey I was a cocky 18 year old, and he was talking BS. He was a nice guy and was genuinely trying to be helpful. He just wasn't very good.
  • Heroes by Scudsucker (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @09:56PM
  • Google Image Search by p0c (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @03:46AM
  • Language barriers by masehare (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @07:18AM
  • I took a one day Linux overview class in 1999 by bealzabobs_youruncle (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @09:52AM
  • 1 button, 1 text box by Bho (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @09:53AM
  • 2 anecdotes by kook44 (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @10:58AM
    • Re:2 anecdotes by wetelectric (Score:1) Thursday December 20, @11:26AM
  • Not sure of this counts, but... by _Shad0w_ (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @11:01AM
  • Structured Analysis by surprise_audit (Score:2) Thursday December 20, @03:25PM
  • Business Courses by mgcarley (Score:1) Friday December 21, @03:22AM
  • Re:the worst things to worship by lysdexia (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @03:59PM
  • Re:the worst things to worship by neo420 (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @04:00PM
  • Re:Google Developer Day by C0rinthian (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @04:47PM
  • Re:The blind leading the blind... by insertwackynamehere (Score:2) Wednesday December 19, @05:36PM
  • Re:The blind leading the blind... by VGPowerlord (Score:1) Wednesday December 19, @06:39PM
  • 16 replies beneath your current threshold.