Visor Add-Ons That Make It Wearable? 11
afrazer asks: "Anyone know if one could make a springboard module to easily turn the handspring visor into a wearable computer? It would have to let you plug in an input device such as a twiddler and a heads-up display of some sort. Obviously this would not be the most powerful wearable system, but good for keeping tidbits of information handy." This is a good idea! Have handheld manufacturers investigated this kind of usage in any way?
Why a visor? (Score:2)
errrrrr.... (Score:1)
- A.P.
--
* CmdrTaco is an idiot.
Pointing towards a SBC-based solution... (Score:2)
Lol excuse me everyone (Score:1)
It's been 2 days I've not slept and there is not
any cofee left, so pardon me for not using the preview button!!!
Easy wearablizing... (Score:1)
As Handspring's Visor already sports a (mostly unused) microphone, one could write an add-on that recognizes only a (very) few spoken commands (next, back, enter, menu) to navigate through documentation you load onto the Visor.
Re:Easy wearablizing... (Score:1)
Duct tape.
Re:Lol excuse me everyone (Score:1)
Re:Why a visor? (Score:1)
Actually, it has Serial/USB, IR, and Springboard. The solution that would seem to make the most sense to me would be to use USB to talk to the thing, but since it's a USB device and not a host, that might be difficult. The IR sucks up CPU and probably can not be driven properly at the same time you use the Serial or USB, but of course the springboard is just on the system bus.
Regardless, I agree that the visor is completely the wrong approach to wearable computing. It's slow and has very little storage. I'd be looking for something more like the biscuit PCs from Advantech [advantech.com].
Avoid Tern (Score:2)
I have to mention that I've had glorious problems with Tern boards, and I've been personally BS'ed by their CEO, who answered a support call.
He claimed that the reason serial communication was unreliable at 57.6k was that the serial ports on all of my PCs (all fairly new, some Dells) were "non-standard." He claimed I was alone with that problem until later, after some hammering, he told me how a giant client (I won't say who, specifically, let's just say they're incredibly huge and R&D oriented) couldn't get it to work on 100 different computers in their lab. I doubt they had the patience for that.
Then we had a defective board, but hooking it up voided the warranty. We couldn't know it was defective without hooking it up.
There were many other problems, like their built-in timer functions, which were ridiculously inaccurate. A handheld stopwatch timed an 8 second delay to 5.5 seconds. I had to reimplement.
We dumped them after thousands of dollars in replacements and ~5 months of development time.
We went to ZWorld [zworld.com] after that. High quality, cheap boards, and an awesome development environment (Dynamic C, with realtime goodness). I reimplemented the software in a matter of weeks.
Not to be negative, or anything. Just a warning. Tern's stuff isn't all that useful for wearable anyway. The core is usually plugged into a larger board with varying components. You can't really mix and match. ZWorld's PLCbus stuff is small and highly modular.
I'm still thinking of trying out the Emac stuff, though.
Re:Why a visor? (Score:1)
I was looking forward to building my own '486 on a stick hooked on my belt' PC.
Here is something to make Visor wearable (Score:2)