It's here. [economist.com]

Furthermore, "Grid Computing" != SETI@Home. Grid Computing is quite a bit more than just donating your spare CPU cycles to something like SETI@Home, distributed.net and such. Grid computing is going to happen. It may not include everyone and their grandmother's desktop machines as cycle providers.

This story was submitted 3 or 4 hours ago, during this robust time of mid-afternoon EDT "surf don't work" time, and yet there is still no lame FRIST PROST posts.

The world has gone mad, unplugged, and I am for some reason the only person able to access Slashdot.

I'm afraid.

Hold me.

<disclaimer class="this is not a first post"/>

Actually, the whole series of articles seems to be available. The issue with this supplement came out a couple of weeks ago, and I'm still just starting to look though it. Interesting stuff.

The series. Some articles are short -- a couple paragraphs -- but most are pretty in depth, like "Computing Power On Tap" as linked to above:

• Invention is the easy bit [economist.com]
• Video-on-demand [economist.com]
• Nanotechnology [economist.com]
• Gene sequencing [economist.com]
• America's roads [economist.com]
• Shrink-wrapped cells [economist.com]
• Paper batteries [economist.com]
• Surround sound [economist.com]
• Extreme lithography [economist.com]
• Gastrobots [economist.com]
• Of high priests and pragmatists [economist.com]
• Computing power on tap [economist.com]
• Profit from peer-to-peer [economist.com]
• Batteries not included [economist.com]
• Beyond cruise control [economist.com]
• Sleeping policemen [economist.com]
• Look, no hands [economist.com]
• The new organ-grinders [economist.com]
• Patently absurd? [economist.com]
• Carl Djerassi, godfather of the Pill [economist.com]

Sorry if I was being a wiseass with the not-first-post. I'm interested in the subject, and was disappointed that no one had commented yet. I browse via the search page now just so that all the articles that never make it to the front page don't slip through; often they're more interesting & the discussion is at a more interesting level. Or not, this is Slashdot after all. Anyway...

Actually, I've noticed that every once in a while, these sort of "Ask Slashdot" questions don't get a frist prost-kind of response. And if your post is not "first post" then does that make mine the first post? This really *IS* the Twilight Zone! My first post is first post!

Globus has a free link to the article at The Enconomist here [economist.com]. I guess the $2.95 is to pay for the privilege of using the search box at the Enconomist ;-)

The electronic version can be found here [economist.com]. However, it requires a subscription or $2.95 to read the article. I have the latter, but no desire to part with it for this :-) Babbage: I think there are so few responses because this article isn't visible on the front page. It takes a search or clicking on "older stuff" to find it. At least that's how I did. I think using spare CPU cycles for such projects is great, as long as:

• the results from the public's participation are made public, not kept for private gain as was reported with some drug and genome distributed research projects. If they want to make money from it, then they should pay for the CPU time, and state what they're doing up front
• computers aren't left on simply to run such programs

When the power crisis hit here in California, SETI@Home [berkeley.edu] specifically requested that SETI users turn off their computers during stage 2 and 3 power alerts, and has since added a page on "running green" [berkeley.edu], which also suggests that you turn off your monitor when not in use, and requests that you not keep your computer on just to run SETI@Home. And it has some handy links to sources about conserving energy, too.

An article on Sun's "Best Practices" website [sun.com] describes the risks of running distributed computing environment clients on a production network.