Is the Internet Shutting Out Independent Players? 357
"ISPs aren't advertizing routes for competing ISPs, and since IP blocks are heavily filtered upstream, this won't do much good anyway. The reasons for this are clear (Routing table growth was getting way out of hand), hence the introduction of CIDR ? , and the allocation of IPs to ISPs, with a resulting lockout on availability of routable IP space to individuals or smaller groups.
With the availabilty of IPv6, and the cost of RAM, I find it somewhat hard to believe that either IP address blocks are scarce, or that the size of routing tables are unmanageable any more. This might have been true with an 8MB Cisco 10 years ago, but surely it would be a negligible cost to put 1-2GB of RAM on even a reasonably budget router at todays prices.
Obviously, IPV6 isn't really here yet, but i would like to think that when (if) it arrives, we will see a more open routing system.
Is anybody working on returning some kind of equal standing to 'the little guys' when it comes to internet routing infrastructure, and how a more 'open' system could work in practice on tomorrow's (or today's) internet?"
Just make one up. (Score:5, Funny)
Here - 217.53.98.174 - doesn't seem to be responding; use that one.
Re:You can buy multi-homed connections. (Score:4, Funny)
You should be happy (Score:2, Funny)
Re:You can buy multi-homed connections. (Score:3, Funny)
'Just how much can Koala Bear'
Re:Woah. (Score:2, Funny)
=)
Re:Just make one up. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Just make one up. (Score:3, Funny)
NT guy: "Somethings wrong with the network, I can't access my share drive."
LAN guy: "Can you ping your default gateway?"
NT guy: "What address is that?"
LAN guy: (mumbling something about bodily functions and low SAT scores) "Its 172.358.44.261"
NT guy: (remember, he passed Microsofts TCP/IP course) "Nope, it doesn't respond."
IPv6 (Score:2, Funny)