What's Next in CPU Land after Itanium? 589
"I work for a major research organization. Of late a lot of the normal big computer companies have been visiting and preaching the gospel of
Itanium. My question to them, and to the assembled masses here at Slashdot is what happens next when Itanium is real? My world view is that Itanium based systems will become commodity products very quickly after good silicon is available in reasonable volume. At that point, why should one spend $8-10k for that hardware from the likes of HP, Compaq, Dell and others when one can build it for $2k (or even less)? In other words, has Intel finally done in most of their customers by obliterating all the other CPU choices (except IBM Power4 [& friends G4, et al] and AMD Hammer) and turned the remainder of the marketplace into raw commodity goods? Lest you defend the other CPUs... Sparc is dead,
Sun doesn't have the money (more than US$1B we'll guess) to do another round. PA-RISC is done, as HP has
given away the architecture group. MIPS lacks
funding (and perhaps even the idea people at this point). Alpha is
gone too (also because of the heavy investment problem no doubt). Most other CPUs don't have an installed base that makes any difference, especially in the high end computing world. So what's next? I don't like the single track future that Intel has just because it is a single track!"
What's after Itanium? That's easy (Score:3, Funny)
That's probably only funny to chem majors.
Okay, maybe not even chem majors.
Re:Single track (Score:2, Funny)
Next? (Score:2, Funny)
Logically, it should be Anadium (Score:2, Funny)
I can't wait until they get to Hassium. They could name their chip Assium!
According to Mr. Pearson... (Score:2, Funny)
Bet on it.
The newest chip will be called... (Score:4, Funny)
It's release will follow the distribution pattern established by Transmeta.
Just... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:SPARC's death *greatly exagerated* (Score:2, Funny)
Itanic. That's really funny.
(this post is obviously the set-up. now I just need someone to supply the punchline)
Some more SPARC news... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:When will we finally have CLOCKLESS CPUs? (Score:2, Funny)
Imagine a ballet without music.... Very hard to
get things right.
Re:compilers (Score:3, Funny)
Re: Wrong math, was Re:compilers (Score:3, Funny)
Re: Wrong math, was Re:compilers (Score:2, Funny)
(open mount insert foot, chew, spit toes)
That would be approx 30cm/ns, *not* second.
What's 9 orders of magnitude between friends, eh?
-b