Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
It's funny.  Laugh.

Most Outrageous Vendor Lie Ever Told? 1314

i8msft writes "CIO published a guide on How To Cut Through Vendor Hype. While light, the article did prompt me to wonder what is the most outrageous lie ever told by a vendor? I mean, in person, face to face, preferably with witnesses (boss, coworkers, someone on your side of the fence). Forget press releases, trade show presentations and the like, where they lie like dogs! Specific examples only, please."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Most Outrageous Vendor Lie Ever Told?

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 24, 2002 @06:55PM (#3217455)
    There are no bugs in the code.

    Sun ad in Unix Review in the mid 90s
  • How about... (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 24, 2002 @06:58PM (#3217475)
    the Mircosoft/Korn shell incident. Classic
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 24, 2002 @06:58PM (#3217476)
    This is actually a multiparter. The vendor basically said that:
    • if the client wanted to have an up-to-date, respectable website, it must have pull-down menus;
    • if they wanted pull-down menus, they must do it in Macromedia Flash; and
    • if they wanted Flash to work on their website, they must switch to Cold Fusion Server.
    The vendor was a Macromedia shop with over a dozen employees; they are now out of business.
  • by sourcehunter ( 233036 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @07:11PM (#3217544) Homepage
    Company providing a huge piece of software for one of my clients - "It has been tested and we have X (don't remember exact number - greater than 5) using it remotely." We ask - how? Terminal services? VPN? PCA? "Oh directly over the network, some via a 56k dialup". Uh huh. Most were using PCA (unacceptable for my client's applications). None were using terminal services, and none had implemented the package in anywhere but the home office.

    I had to write a special app just to get it to work on terminal server. Running it over a Point to Point T1 line was too slow, so even the folks in customer's biggest remote office (connected via the FULL point-to-point T1) have to use terminal services.

    Same company: oh, sure the database is stable. And the ODBC driver works well.

    FEH

    Can't complain too much - their bugs keeps my company busy and hence well paid.

  • by Evil Pete ( 73279 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @07:17PM (#3217570) Homepage
    And who can forget the Ashton-Tate PR guy who stated for the press that DBase IV would be out "Real soon now". Didn't come out for another 18 months. Unwittingly coined a classic description of vapourware. In fact I gotta feeling that debacle was also one of the first instances of the term "vapourware".
    Basic lesson , don't trust them ... even if its in writing.
  • by NanoGator ( 522640 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @07:26PM (#3217617) Homepage Journal
    It is partially true, on a mhz per mhz comparison. I found a Lightwave benchmark site at http://www.blanos.com/benchmark/index.html , it shows that in nearly all cases the Mac was significantly more efficient, mhz wise, to the PC. But what it doesn't show is the price per performance ratio. 1gig Macs just recently showed up at a time when PC's were at 2 gigz. They perform roughly the same.

    Figure Athlon into this, and the benchmarks get more interseting. An Athlon 4 1.2 gig rendered a scene in 130 seconds, a Macintosh 867 took 271 seconds. I think both those processors came out about the same time, but that's a big difference, dontcha think?

    In any case, I agree with you. Marketing has a way of twisting the numbers to their favor. It's funny how if you narrow a perspective a bit, you seem a lot more favorable.
  • Licence? since when? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by oo7tushar ( 311912 ) <slash.@tushar.cx> on Sunday March 24, 2002 @07:28PM (#3217637) Homepage
    "Our product will integrate seamlessly into your system. Just tell your developers to read the documentation and within minutes they'll modify it to match your needs"

    Licence agreement says: Any modification of code is prohibited. Use of external code to modify databases created by our program is prohibited.

    Remember to send at least 10 copies of that line to the purchaser in the company. It's important they read it prior to signing the million dollar deal. It's your ass on the line, not theirs.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 24, 2002 @07:29PM (#3217638)
    ...verify that is something POSSIBLE...
    4/5 years ago a commercial tried to sell to a customer of ours a web site about translation...

    You could browse literal works with a browser; on the left frame there should have been the original version and on the right the translated version (the customer had already the transaltions, obviously)

    In his opinion the end-user would have been able to click on a word in the left frame of the browser to see the "translated word" highlighted in the right frame..

    We stopped him just in time... but it was hard to make him understand that

    1) there wasn't the technology to do it (frames were NEW those days)

    2) the only way to link a word on the left frame with one on the right was to hire 5.000 people to create links between them (or using AI... that was out of the scope of a simple web site)

    3) since they were literary works there was hardly any thing like a "translated word"!!!
    (they were REAL translation, not crappy word-by-word translations...)

    And he got angry with us because we "ruined" a sure contract :-D
  • absolute worst lie (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 24, 2002 @07:45PM (#3217700)
    To me and my colleagues:

    "Yes, there's money in the payroll account."

    So we went to the bank that the checks were drawn on, to cash them directly. Once again, his lie bit him in the ass. That was the last time he told me that lie.

    Less than a year later, the loan officer controlling the credit on the store shut it down. Turns out the store owner lied through his teeth about how much business and inventory they had. It was a landmark, almost 100 years old, and now they tore it down and put a bank in its place.
  • by weave ( 48069 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @07:50PM (#3217718) Journal
    The nightmare I have had with this company after buying two of their SANs knows no bounds. After almost a year of begging and pleading, I still don't have a valid service contract with them. The sales rep promised me 3 years hardware 7x24 service on both systems and I still don't have anything in writing on this. I've bitched to all levels of the company as well. I get promises that this issue is getting attention from high levels of the company, and then silence.

    Then there's the software support service contract. It took me months to get them to bill us, then they send a bill for $16K, we send it in, then when it's time to place a service call it's "who are you again?". Our $16,000 is missing, no one knows where it is, even though I have a copy of the canceled check they cashed. We are now getting dunning letters demanding payment at the same time getting a cancellation notice on another contract we had with them along with a credit invoice. So now THAT system is up-in-the-air.

    They are the most screwed up company I've ever had the displeasure of dealing with. I won't even go into the crap software they use. Their linux fiber HBA drivers use sg version 3.0.16 for lk 2.2. When I tried to update it, everything broke. Turns out, and this was told to me from the driver's author no less, that sg version 3.0 was a development branch only, and that every minor release changed the interface and that EMC had *NO* business putting this crap into production. I ended up getting EMC code out of it (thank god I had source) and folding it into sg rev 3.1x under lk 2.4.

    The site engineer I have is the only bright spot in the entire company. He's trying to get my contract issues resolved. It's time critical, because I've heard they are farming out their higher ed contracts to Dell (which actually may be a good thing).

    EMC may be good to megacorps that spend 10s of millions a year on their "frames", but if you only spend a half a mil (which we did), from my perspective at least, it seems like they could care less about you...

  • 384k upload! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Fortuna Wolf ( 191194 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @07:55PM (#3217740) Homepage
    The place I live sells accounts to rooms, single port in a room, you call in, 30 dollars to sign up, and 20 for a month, sounds good, right?
    So I call them up, ask them, what's the service, the plan, the billing, etc...
    don't worry, its 2.2 mbps down, and 384kbps upload!
    Ok, sounds good... sign me up.
    well, aside from a quick little problem with the router attaching itself to your mac address,
    it turns out that its sharing one road runner account through the whole apartment complex.
    I call up tech support "can you tell me why my internet connection sucks so badly?"
    re: "because its a sucky connection on sucky routers" (that's what tech support said, at least THEY were being honest).
    well, can you fix it?
    Sure, let us kick some other people off the network...
    eeee!
    Right now, I download at about 20-30k, and my upload is around the ballpark of .4k
    I can't play CS, because my choke is at 100 and my ping is 2000.
    Give me a 36.6k modem! Pleaasseeee...
  • by Prowl ( 554277 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @07:56PM (#3217744)
  • Re:Sun Whoppers (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 24, 2002 @07:57PM (#3217750)
    ok, the middle two are open to debate.

    but the first and last are flat out wrong. Java is ideal for large systems and servers. Java is also an object oriented language. Whoever says it isnt (including pnatural) deserves to be taken out back for a photo shoot [goatse.cx]
  • by BSDGeek ( 528577 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @08:12PM (#3217823)
    SurfBest [surfbest.net] claimed **unlimited** dial-up access for $12.50 P/Month. They have 8 networks for people to dial into. However, only like one of them has truly **unlimited** service. The other 7 have limits on them, like 150Hrs, 200Hrs, and 250Hrs was the most I believe.
  • by tchdab1 ( 164848 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @08:13PM (#3217826) Homepage
    .... utility packages (costing millions!), the salesman of the vastly inferior product promised me that it would be rewritten to completely match the features of the product I preferred (it had nearly none of them), and that most of it would be done by the next release less than 6 months away. I was then flown to the "developent center" and introduced to the (1) developer who had just been hired, who was told to promise me the same thing. When I asked, I was told there were no plans in place, no direction, no schedule yet to make this happen "but you can be our model customer and drive it!".

    It boggles my mind, but many within my own organization believed these people and I had quite the fight to keep from buying this and then being the one whose job it would be to make it work.

    Go figure.
  • by reynaert ( 264437 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @08:16PM (#3217839)
    Scientology has harrassed Slashdot in the past.

    See Scientologists Force Comment Off Slashdot [slashdot.org]. This comment [slashdot.org], also containing the OT III, was removed. I wonder if they'll notice it this time, now it isn't posted in a Co$-related story.

  • CompUSA (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Renraku ( 518261 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @08:22PM (#3217852) Homepage
    The Christmas-before-last, I told my parents I wanted a GeForce2 video card and a stick of RAM for Christmas. Well, they went down to CompUSA, and came back with a video card, 256MB RAM (like I had asked for) also they came back with TV-tuner card, an Ethernet cable (25ft) and a monitor switching hub. We took everything back except for the video card and RAM, and demanded a refund for the stuff, because according to my parents, the salesman told them I had to have the other stuff in order to install the video card and RAM. They were this close to getting my parents to buy software to go along with it. Good thing their budget just ran out.
  • I've mentioned this a couple of times.

    A friend of mine was supporting a group of a few hundred Wintendos boxes, and he ran into a problem where Excel was corrupting files on a semi-regular basis. When he took this to his assigned MS support rep, he was repeatedly told (over a number of months) "It must be something that you're doing wrong because I haven't been able to find anybody else with the same problem.

    One day he was talking to this rep when my friend mentioned that he was talking to person X at company Y.

    "Oh, yeah, he's one of my asignees,' interrupted the rep. "I talk to him all the time."

    "Oh," replied my friend rather acusingly, "then you know about the problem that they've been having".
    (They had been having the same problem for monthes and had been fed the same line by their [this same] MS rep.).

    [guilty silence]

    Busted!

    And for this 'service' we paid thousands of dollars a year on top of the license fees.

  • OneBox.com (Score:4, Interesting)

    by rbeattie ( 43187 ) <russ@russellbeattie.com> on Sunday March 24, 2002 @08:46PM (#3217947) Homepage
    I use Onebox.com as my voicemail box. I used to pay a yearly fee to get my own phone number (despite what it says below about a "free trial"), then they decided to cut the "premium" service altogether, but I got to keep the number. Here's a copy of the Onebox Plus page that's been up for the past year:

    We have concluded our free trial of our Onebox Plus premium service and, due to the acquisition of Onebox.com, we have decided not to offer a paid premium service plan to users of our service. As a thank you for participating in our trial you may keep your Onebox Plus service for free. We have deleted your payment information from our system completely and you will never be charged for the Onebox Plus service.

    If you have any concerns or questions, please contact us using the support form in our Help Center.

    Thank you for your participation,

    The Onebox.com Team


    And HERE is the email I just received from OneBox:


    IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ONEBOX USERS

    March 14, 2002

    Dear Onebox customer,

    Through the years, providing you with a reliable, high quality service has been our primary mission. In order to continue, Onebox will begin charging a nominal fee. If you would like to maintain your Onebox account, we require you choose a messaging package that best fits your needs no later than April 15, 2002. Unfortunately, if we do not receive your selection by this date we will discontinue your account.

    If you have an account with Onebox, you will need to register for a paid subscription prior to this date. To subscribe, please click on the following link http://www.onebox.com/service/indexFounder.html . While registering, please update your profile information where necessary. To make the transition easier, your Onebox user name and password will remain the same and all your messages will stay in your account. However, you are required to change your phone number to a new, toll-free number.


    Hmmmmm... What part of never didn't they understand? Bastards. I'd willingly pay them money to continue using my voicemail number, but they're not even giving me that option. Despite numerous emails asking about this, they haven't even responded. Bastards.

    -Russ
  • Re:CompUSA (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Junta ( 36770 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @08:57PM (#3218018)
    Hey, that is reminiscent of my Aunt and Uncle going to buy a computer. I'm over there and they bring home everything they bought. They wanted something that could be used for basic word processing and stuff. They come home with a top of the line system, as well as a CD-RW and Uninterruptible power Supply. They said they didn't think they needed this much, but said the salesman first insisted anything but top of the line was a waste of time, even if they just want word processing, and that a UPS and CDRW were absolutely necessary for the computer to function properly...

    Of course, this from the same class of salespeople who said "if you hook a DVD player into a VCR, the VCR will probably fry, so you best avoid going through the VCR, or else you mught void the warranty and have to get a new VCR..." The floor salespeople at most retail outlets are so unbeleivably incompetent..
  • Re:My Vote: (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 24, 2002 @09:25PM (#3218160)
    "A Macintosh version of Babylon 5: Into The Fire will be available simultaneously with the PC release at the end of 1999."
    "A Macintosh version of Half Life will be available shortly after the PC release."
    "A Macintosh version of Tribes 2 will be available shortly after the PC release."
  • by istartedi ( 132515 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @09:45PM (#3218261) Journal

    Me What's that?

    S It's an e-meter. It tells you the state of your health, spirit, etc (I don't actually recall what she said) Do you want to try it?

    Me Yes.

    S OK, hold it like this...

    Me Wow. I can make the meter move pretty much any way I like just by gripping it a little more tightly.

    S Don't do that.

    Me How do you know people aren't doing that subconsciously?

    S You have to let go (or something like that). This was accompanied by a look that told me she knew I was a skeptic, she had dealt with us before, didn't really care, and simply wanted to move on to the next sheep. (it's amazing how much can be communicated with just one look sometimes).

    The only other time I've ecountered a Scientologist was downtown. He asked me if I wanted to see a free movie. I figured there would be at least a half hour of propoganda with the movie, and I didn't feel like sitting through that so I declined.

    The way I see it, Scientology is to the private sector what the lottery is to the public sector--a way to tax stupidity.

  • Re:HP 32-bit thing (Score:5, Interesting)

    by s390 ( 33540 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @10:26PM (#3218438) Homepage
    His answer: "64-bit is SLOWER than 32-bit! With 64-bit there's DOUBLE the memory to go through, so it takes the program TWICE AS LONG to do anything!!!"

    Well, he was partly sorta right. If your programmers misuse 64-bit data operands where 32-bit data would do just as well, the application is going to waste about half the memory cache space (at all levels), so it _will_ run much slower. 64-bit flat memory is useful, especially for large databases, but programmers still have to understand what they're doing (and what the compiler will do, how that will impact the processor, memory, etc.) or they can build programs that run slower than they did in 32-bits.

    See the 64-bit computing faq that's up at AnandTech right now.

  • i saw this (Score:3, Interesting)

    by 2MuchC0ffeeMan ( 201987 ) on Sunday March 24, 2002 @10:57PM (#3218577) Homepage
    i saw this advertisement in the paper once... it said, 'last chance to send your $5 to '

    so me, being the copycat i am, i did the same in my local paper... in BIG bold print, i wrote, LAST CHANCE TO SEND YOU $5 TO ... THIS WILL BE THE LAST TIME YOU SEE THIS MESSAGE TO GET IN ON IT JUST SEND IN YOUR $5!'

    i got about $750 ... but again, i was also 6 years old... i had a hell of alot of fun with that one.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 24, 2002 @11:34PM (#3218721)
    I'm posting this anonymous for a good reason - I know people who have been fired for even hinting at this stuff publically.

    I work for the largest ISP in New Zealand - we are strongly associated with the largest Telco (who have a virtual monopoly on landlines)

    We have been told to outright lie to customers relating to a number of issues, including

    * Dropping port speeds to virtually 0 on a number of P2P applications
    * Running out of IP addresses to give to paying DSL customers
    * DSL network outages due to extremely poor design - we are not allowed to confirm these until "the word" comes through - even when half the country is without service.

    We have to tell these lies every day - I don't think it will suprise anyone to know that Xtra (the ISP) has a content partnership with MSN.

    The worst part is - half this stuff gets out in press-releases before we even get told at the helpdesk; and we're still meant to lie to customers even when the info is public!

    Despicable if you ask me - I'm leaving as soon as I can.
  • by barnaby ( 20280 ) on Monday March 25, 2002 @12:19AM (#3218964)
    Listen here newbie.

    When I fix something I expect it to _stay_ fixed. But since you had to reinstall NT from scratch every now and then, all my hard work at patching the OS goes down the toilet. So I have to decide between loading the service packs in the right order (if your running IIS) and then loading the hotfixes or getting some sleep.

    It's a really shitty product that blames all its problems on its customers.

    Don't get me started on this particular piece of FUD from M$. Next you'll be telling me all 3rd party drivers are buggy and security by obscurity is correct, and my network will just work right when we finally go all M$ and wait of course.. the fix for you're current problem is in the next version, and yes we really did need to break the doc, xls, vsd file standards in order for you to pay us more fscking money next year....

    Get a fucking clue, you're being lied to by M$ and you believe it.

  • Pinnacle Micro (Score:2, Interesting)

    by 3vi1 ( 544505 ) on Monday March 25, 2002 @12:40AM (#3219062) Homepage Journal
    I remember many many years ago, when I was buying my first CD recorder, Pinnacle Micro had just come out with the double-speed RCD-1000.

    Back then, systems were meager and expensive. I wanted to connect it to a PS/2 (yeah, one of those boat anchors) via the Adaptec microchannel SCSI card.

    Suspicious that the setup might not work, I spoke directly with one of PM's salemen. They were eager to talk, cause the drives were $2000 at the time and blank disks ran $25 from them and about half that from other vendors).

    The salesman not only told me that the Adaptec SCSI card was certified to work with the drive, but offered to sell it to me as part of the bundle (with 100% markup on the cost of the card - $400).

    After a month of troubleshooting, the umpteenth tech I spoke to on their support line (not an 800 number, and always a 45 to 60 minute wait on hold before they got to my call) told me that "It's the SCSI card - that particular one won't work with the drive". Then, he did some 'research' and told me of a BusLogic microchannel card that would work.

    So I bought the BusLogic card.

    The thing was still a $2000 coaster making toaster.

    So, over the course of 12 more tech support calls (each with an hour on hold), I finally get escalated up to their head techie, who informs me "That drive doesn't work with any microchannel SCSI card! I don't know where you got the idea it would...." I gave him the names of the salesman who specified the Adaptec card and the tech who specified the BusLogic.

    I finally got the drive working by saving up for many months and buying another (non-microchannel) system ($2500+ more down the drain) to use with the RCD-1000.

    8 months later, the RCD-1000 burnt itself up, and PM wanted to charge me $460 to fix it. They said it was *just* out of warranty. Nevermind the months and months of downtime I had because they had outright lied to me.

    THAT is the reason I will never, ever, again buy or recommend any of their products.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 25, 2002 @01:18AM (#3219222)
    That's funny, but I actually have a card that you can do that with - download the drivers off the card.

    It's a SCSI card for an Apple II made by CV Technologies in the late 80s, and it has a ROM which contains the drivers. When you install the card the rom appears a disk image and you can copy the files from it and run the configuration utility. Clever.
  • Consumer Advocacy (Score:1, Interesting)

    by $beirdo ( 318326 ) on Monday March 25, 2002 @03:03AM (#3219671) Homepage
    I'm really happy to see Slashdot discussing as many consumer advocacy issues as they have been in the past few years. If you agree with the general stance of this forum, there IS something you can do about it!

    Vote Nader! Vote consumer advocacy!
  • by Scipher ( 35125 ) <lachlanpearce@NOSPAm.graffiti.net> on Monday March 25, 2002 @05:09AM (#3219949)
    One time a friend and I were stoned and trying to killing time in the city, when I was given a leaflet advertising "Free IQ test".
    Wanting to see how the green may have affected our intelligence we went to the address to find it was a tiny Church of Scientology hidden away on the third floor of a building that looked condemned. We were greeted and sat down to two tests - an multiple choice IQ test and a timed aptitude test. After completing a drone told us that while the tests were being marked we can watch a film about their organisation. Wanting to get a good look at the religion, I did not hesistate to sit through it. A well-produced piece of propaganda followed. It featured some actor I had never heard of extolling the virtues of finding inner peace and enlightenment through "auditing", and also served to advertise the Scientology meditation retreats (the church owns a large cruise ship, and many hotels). After viewing the film we were presented with the results, both of which were around 140 for the IQ. The IQ results had lines indicating current ability, and the ability levels 1 month and 1 year after joining, projecting 150 and 180 respectively.

    To me this seemed like absolute BS.

    They then started the hard sell, personal testimonies and all. I remember freaking out that these people had so much faith in the fictional construct of a long deceased sci-fi author.
    All we could do was to refuse several times the offer to buy some literature (we asked for it for free; denied) and headed out of there.

    It was a pretty funny afternoon.

    - Scipher
  • by Sir Tandeth ( 543411 ) on Monday March 25, 2002 @05:13AM (#3219960)
    This was a very popular and ill fated ad campaign. http://online.securityfocus.com/news/308
  • Y2K! (Score:2, Interesting)

    by bunhed ( 208100 ) on Monday March 25, 2002 @09:56AM (#3220704)
    I still can't get over the BS that I heard re Y2K. The best (or worst if you will) was one of my clients was told they had to upgrade their AIX, plus more memory plus a bigger SCSI drive, all total around $10k. I did some research and they didn't need the upgrade. The vendor insisted to the point of threatening to drop support if they did not comply. So I took the president of the vendor company out for lunch and asked him what he was doing. "You know they [my client] don't need to this upgrade." I said. He looks me in the eye and says, "I don't care want you say, I want my money."
    I'm so proud the be a tech specialist at moments like that.
  • by ProfBooty ( 172603 ) on Monday March 25, 2002 @11:08AM (#3221058)
    I used to be a sales engineer, the company eventually changed its policy and we couldn't go to the development engineers to get technical info, we had to get the "marketing" approved version. Sufices to say, the marketing version was dumbed down and totally lacking technical detail. Long time clients weren't particualy happy about this.

    It used to be that they hired engineers to sell the product, spent months training them on the software making you actually learn how to use the software so you could sell it (thereby giving you more credability). Eventually they switched over to more salesly types who totally depended on applications engineering support staff to answer any technical questions. These guys would promise the moon and some of them were quite successful without any real understanding of what the software did or how it worked. On the otherhand, sales engineers like myself were more likely to flat out tell you if you actually could use or need our product other than wasting your time on it.

    What I would find amusing some times about the job was that when you would give a presentation that there was always one guy in the audience who wanted to be a jackass and ask stupid questions or attempt to make you(the sales engineer) look stupid, it was always funny to give him the correct answer to shut him up as the guy usually never realised that you were a real engineer at one point in your life. Kind of reminds me of the dilbert comic where he talks about abusing sales people as it is the one thing he can do in his life where its ok to be rude and demeaning to people(some sales people desirve it).

    On a side note, the reason salespeople act the way they do for the most part is because it works. I always treated everyone with respect, but the salesguy constantly calls you once you express interest to force you to move on it else you forget or get distracted with something else (in sales your job is always on the line, sales is usually the first staff to get cut when times start to go bad).

    If you wan't to get the real deal on anything, go speak with the applications engineer who supports the sales staff, they will usually give you an idea of the true capabilities of the product. Never trust the marketing guy, he will stretch the truth far more than the sales staff.

    Lastly, if you are an engineer who can write and talk well and likes working with people, try sales or applications engineering at somepoint in your career. The money is VERY good. Besides you can always go back to your old job.
  • by KosovoYankee ( 310988 ) on Monday March 25, 2002 @11:28AM (#3221180) Homepage
    A while back, I was setting up PC's for a small research company. 2 of our brand new Dell's had arrived, but when plugged in, they wouldn't display anything properly. I called up Dell, and they assured me that they were aware of the problem, and that there was a "virus" in the video card of each machine. A "virus" in the videocard, I asked disbelievingly? Yes, they replied. I asked them how it had gotten in there, just to play along, and they informed me it must have been introduced enroute from their packing facility to my office. Somehow, a "virus" had transmuted into vapour and then lodged itself in the VIDEO CARDs of our brand new machines. But don't worry, they told me - there was a patch available from their website that would fix everything.

    Those lying jerks - why couldn't they just tell me there was a driver problem, and I could download the fixed drivers? WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
  • Winmodems (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Glanz ( 306204 ) on Monday March 25, 2002 @12:12PM (#3221495)
    The biggest and most prevalent lie I come across is "winmodems are cheaper"... The fact is they are cheaper because M$ insists on encouraging their proliferation to discourage in "a little way" the use of Linux to connect via modem. if makers all used simple UART hard modems internally, they would me even less expensive than so-called soft modems.
    Another good one is, when trying to order a PC without a MicroSlop OS pre-installed: "It's illegal to sell you one like that." And last but not least this is my favorite lie: "Windows is the most stable and secure OS, so why would you want a blank HD?"
  • by free_at_last ( 568811 ) on Monday March 25, 2002 @03:33PM (#3223103) Homepage
    Back in the spring of 1999, I had an e-commerce site that was showing promise but needed a more sophisticated shopping cart program. An Oracle rep promised me that if I spent $62K on their iStore e-commerce package, it would meet all my stringent requirements -- and I could install it myself with a little help from a CS student. And if I bought it at by the approaching end of the fiscal year, I'd save $80K, because the prices were going up.

    I sent Oracle almost all of the money I'd saved to start the business. My delighted rep then asked me to speak to the Oracle quarterly meeting of top sales reps to help them get to know the small dot-com customers. He wanted his colleagues to be able to help other startups like he'd helped me. I was hoping to become an Oracle PosterGrrl -- and thus attract investors, partners, and customers.

    I spent a couple days preparing a talk, flew to Boston, and told 400 reps and managers about my company and why I'd chosen Oracle's iStore. My favorite slide was one showing a bungalow and a half -- because I had just written Oracle a check worth 150% of my first house. And I had gotten a mortgage to pay for the house!

    As I talked, I could see some of those shining faces showing more and more concern. Afterwards, an Oracle consulting rep told me I'd really need his team's help because no one had EVER installed the package they'd sold me without extensive help from their consulting branch. He estimated I needed another $100K. I had less than $10K left.

    I flew home with the stunned feeling that Oracle had taken my money with the knowledge that this act would immediately drive me out of business.

    A few weeks later, the prices did go up and the package I had bought completely disappeared from their website. Oracle wouldn't refund my money or apply it to other purchases when it became obvious I couldn't use iStore. And the last I'd heard, my accountant was still trying to get them to reimburse me for my hotel and meal expenses as promised. I wound up selling my company to get enough funding to continue.

    So Larry Ellison, please feel free to send me a check for $62,259. And the rest of you, don't make the mistake I did in thinking that Oracle wants to help you grow so they can profit from a long-term relationship. They just want to devour your seed corn.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 25, 2002 @05:47PM (#3224327)
    As an ex-Xtra worker, I can add something to this:

    1) The dropping of port speeds is now a well known issue, but this isn't just port blocking, its also combined with the sheer number of users taking up the bandwidth on Xtra Jetstart, which then results in the low speeds (especially o'seas connections).

    2) As far as I've seen, they're pretty quick to fix the "running out of IP addresses" issue. Of course it should never happen in the first place ...

    3) The DSL network outages are nothing to do with Xtra, they are purely Telecom issues. With exchange upgrades, firmware upgrades, phone line maintenance etc etc, there is no way you could expect Telecom to offer 100% service time.
    (They don't even OFFER 100% service ... bring on the 5 9's ;)

    However, Xtra does still have to "fob customers off" by referring them to Telecom, or back to their DSL modem vendors etc. The helpdesk technicians try .. they really do. They work in an unbelievably stressful environment, and get nothing but abuse from customers and poor wages for their time.

    The Xtra helpdesk takes literally thousands of calls a day (not even counting email communication). They are a production line created to churn through the calls as quickly, efficiently, and effectively as possible. Its a sad thing that complete open honesty to customers, and time to spend on calls with customers appear to have flown out the window.

    I was happy to leave the helpdesk, and was sad to see so many people having to stay there. I sincerely hope their working conditions improve dramatically in time to come!!

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...