Alternative-Fuel Vehicle Recommendations? 1080
Ellen Spertus asks: "My husband and I lease a pure electric GM EV-1, which we love, and need to replace our second car, a conventional Honda Accord, which recently died. We'd get a second EV-1, but GM has stopped making them. I haven't been able to find any available all-eletric car with the range (>=50 miles roundtrip) and speed (>=65 mph) that I need. Does the Slashdot community have any experience, wisdom, or advice on choosing an alternative fuel car?"
"I'm currently considering:
- Toyota Prius, a hybrid sedan
- Honda Insight, a hybrid two-seater
- Honda Civic GX, a compressed natural gas (CNG) powered sedan
BIODIESEL (Score:5, Insightful)
Just don't try to start that french fry grease up on a cold morning.
Ethanol (Score:3, Insightful)
Simple. Don't (Score:2, Insightful)
1. For any given task, a certain amount of energy is needed.
2. Batteries are highly inefficient as stores of energy.
3. Admittedly, gasoline isn't much better, but it is somewhat more efficient.
4. Highly efficient fueled cars such as the VW Jetta TDI (4 cylinder diesel) can get upwards of 50MPG on the highway, and 40-45 city.
5. The vast majority of electric power comes from...wait for it.. fossil fuel plants.
So thus, in the context of a car, you ARE going to consuming fossil fuels directly or indirectly. Given that, to minimize environmental impact, find the most fuel efficient car you can.
EV1 == very interesting ride (Score:3, Insightful)
It is disappointing that electric cars are not yet economically viable. Just take one for a test drive and you will see that there is a lot more work to be done in improving personal transportation.
Still delighted with my Prius (Score:3, Insightful)
Society of Automotive Engineers voted it best engineered car of 2001. I think it's the car Dilbert would drive.
The Honda Civic hybrid is the most direct competition. The Prius transmission is more elegant and *may* last longer, and the availability of pure-electric drive means the engine never needs to do destructive low-speed operation once it's warmed up. You may prefer the feel of the brakes on the Civic, and in ten years I bet it's easier to find Civic parts than Prius parts.
On a side note... (Score:3, Insightful)
GM stopped making electric vehicles, but they will probably spend $10 Billion over the next several years advertising how green they are.
Re:Whatever you do, don't go with the Prius (Score:1, Insightful)
But the Prius also does that well in city driving. No non-hybrid does that.
Jetta TDI has better mileage (Score:5, Insightful)
http://www.vw.com/engine/index.htm?locnav=jetta
Re:Whatever you do, don't go with the Prius (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:BIODIESEL (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Whatever you do, don't go with the Prius (Score:3, Insightful)
In addition to getting excellent gas mileage, the prius is also a SULEV (your other car is maybe a LEV if you're lucky).
Insight, if you are careful (Score:4, Insightful)
The battery pack is replaced often.. If you get one get the hyper-extended warrenty, as you will be replacing that battery pack many many times.. my friend has had his 18 months and has replaced his 3 times.... and from what I hear this is not uncommon for insights that are used as a daily driver in anyplace that is not 70-72degF all the time. winter causes the packs to die horribly.
weight limit.. I CANNOT ride in his car (Ok I'm a fat ass..) as I with him exceed the car's weight limit completely... most any american couple will do this unless you are in souther california and live the bolimic lifestyle or are not normal weight (180 - 230 lbs typical american weight.)
finally , they ding really really easy. a pop can has thicker metal. dont lean on it, dont fart at it dont even look at it funny as it will ding/dent instantly.
Diesel and Biodiesel (Score:3, Insightful)
Scoot the seat back! (Score:2, Insightful)
--Z
Re:Simple. Don't (Score:3, Insightful)
50mpg = 50mpg, however you look at it. Which is heavier, a pound of feathers or a pound of lead?
Re:Bumper Stickers (Score:3, Insightful)
"I support a foreign terrorist regieme, but what do I care, I like driving my SUV"
In the end, they gave a message about buying foreign oil.
Re:Ethanol (Score:5, Insightful)
The bad things with Ethanol are:
1) Its a false economy. Subsidized by lots of taxpayer dollars (direct, and indirect via forcing it into mixtures with gas). Its really just a crutch for farmers who can't quit the corn habit and ADM, which can't quit the free-government-money habit.
2) It mostly (exclusively?) uses corn as its source, and I'm not convinced that corn is the best crop to provide a fuel source. What about hemp or some other crop that might require less insecticide, fertilizer, etc etc.
3) It's kind of fuel-intensive to make. Planting, harvesting, fertilizing, insecticiding, AND DISTILLING all take machines that use fuel. If you get 20 gallons per acre (totally made-up) and you use 20 gallons per acre (again, totally made up) to make it, how "fuel efficient" is it?
4) There have been complaints about ethanol wreaking havoc with engines. I'm pretty sure I've seen warnings in owners manuals not to use too high of an ethanol concentration.
I'm sure there's a plant-to-fuel combination thats a winner -- low mechnical input to growth and harvesting, low energy input to distillation. Unfortunately I don't think ethanol is it -- its a way to get more money to corn farms in the midwest with some marginal pollution and oil dependency benefits.
Ethanol is no solution, it's part of the problem (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Bogus Environmentalism (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Whatever you do, don't go with the Prius (Score:3, Insightful)
Get a Prius! (Score:1, Insightful)
As someone else stated, the Prius is a SULEV while the Insight is only a ULEV. In addition to having lower emissions, the Prius uses its electric motor for more than 30% of its power. The Insight uses electricty for about 20% and the Civic Hybrid uses electricty less than 15%.
Pure Electric, Bad!.....Hybrid, Good! (Score:2, Insightful)
The Idea is that everyone will recharge at night and, drive to work, finish recharging, then go home and be used to fill local high deman areas. Unfortunaly, what happened almost all of the time is that people go home, at about 5 o'clock, and plug in their cars, and start charging them, so that they can go out that night and do the movie thing, the bar scene, or whatever. Now you have the largest peak consumption time in the day growing to an even higher peak. This ofcourse has made the power transmission/generation shith their collective nickers. This makes the problimatic california even more so. This is one of the reason the major companies have stopped pushing it.
This still dosent bother CARB, even though the most in-efficeint sources are used at peak loads. These sources would be coal-fired steam plants in wyoming. Which is fine for california, they have moved their pollution across state lines.
The key is using state of the art stuff and non petrolium sources in conjunction. Current market level stuff uses brushless DC drives...ICK! Now here is some truely cool stuff [acpropulsion.com].
More poillution than a Hybrid ... (Score:3, Insightful)
PURE electrics are responsible for the generation of more polution than comprable hybrid vehicles.
No ? Just look around at EV sites and it wont take you long to realized that generating electricity at a plant ??? miles away, transmission loss and all the fun add up to MORE FRIGGING polution in the generation of that electricity than a hybrid creates.
Not to metnion the long term battery and chemical disposal issues. Thats a whopper too.
Wait for one of the Borax Powered Hydrogen Fuel cell vehicles from Chrysler. Cost is supposed to be low, and emission zero.
Barring that look at some of the hybrid vehicles.
Sometimes I have to question peoples motives of EV , if its convinience thats OK, my neighbor has been using the same elctric lawn mower for 20 years, its easy, quiet cheap, the only thing he spends money on is a new extension cord every 3 years or so after he's chopped his umpteen times. If you are looking at an EV for enviromental reasons, PLEASE get a clue. PURE EV pollute more than hybrids, and some more than LEV.
My favorite action by an enviromental group was the guys in Calif, that burned an allotment down under construction. POINTS , 1 for burning, 2 like inscurance isnt going to pay and end up cutting more trees to rebuild ? 3, the fumes from all the insulation cooking ? 4 we deforest more area to rebuild an allotment "TREE HUGGERS" were protesting the cutting of trees ?
I would seriously wait for the Chryslers to be sold they seem AWFULL SLICK !
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/auto/article/0,125
If you havent seen or heard about it
Re:The technology's a little old... (Score:2, Insightful)
You want low emissions and breathable air? Stop driving so damn much in the first plce. In fact, stop driving altogether if you can-- at the very least share cars [sfcarshare.org] more often... that the original questioner here is looking to buy a SECOND vehicle is a big red flag that someone has lifestyle issues that aren't going to be solved by simply saving a few miles per gallon.
Most of the driving done by Americans is done in the name of personal convenience: to save a few minutes of having to sit next to your fellow human being on the bus or train or to prevent you from having to walk or bike a few feet.
As I see it, the environmental, social, and psychic impacts of car culture go way beyond just the emissions questions. Personally I'm finding that the less time I spend in cars, the more time I have to read (on the bus), the more time I spend seeing neighbors (on the bus or while riding my bike). Not only that, I feel healthier than I have in a few years, since getting some exercise is no longer optional.
What the hell happened to gas mileage? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Big fan of CNG (Score:3, Insightful)
P.S. If you have a hard time believing any of this stop for a moment and think about UPS which maintains one of the biggest, if not the largest, fleets of CNG vehicles. It had to make sense to some of their bean-counters.
Site your sources (Score:3, Insightful)
-Dave
Re:Some Quick Math (Score:3, Insightful)
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/hsfaq.htm
Specifically they show motor fuel usage about halfway down the page:
In 2000, gallons of fuel consumed were:
128,883,609 (Gasoline - highway use)
33,376,587 (Special fuel - highway use)
162,260,196 (Total fuel - highway use)
2,971,636 (Non-highway use)
Actually I just realized I added those up incorrectly and total use (according to them) is actually lower by these numbers. It should be Total fuel plus non-highway use. But I agree with you that this number doesn't make sense, so I'm guessing there's an order of magnitude that they aren't making clear. So hunting elsewhere:
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question417.htm
Okay, so from there we get 360 million gallons of gas every day. Sounds like a more realistic number. So multiply that and we get roughly 130 billion gallons of gas every day....
So, nevermind then, if we took every single piece of arable land we wouldn't come close to the amount needed. So go with hydrogen, there's plenty of that around
Re:Ethanol (Score:2, Insightful)
oh no... you can't run 100% ethanol... but at least do your part, and if nothing else, pay your countrymen rather than the foreigners... (and besides, it's cheaper because of the tax differences)
Re:Bicycling, the unsubsidized solution (Score:3, Insightful)
Bicycle paths are mostly meant to mitigate the danger created by motorists on other roads, which are subsidized.