Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology

Alternative-Fuel Vehicle Recommendations? 1080

Ellen Spertus asks: "My husband and I lease a pure electric GM EV-1, which we love, and need to replace our second car, a conventional Honda Accord, which recently died. We'd get a second EV-1, but GM has stopped making them. I haven't been able to find any available all-eletric car with the range (>=50 miles roundtrip) and speed (>=65 mph) that I need. Does the Slashdot community have any experience, wisdom, or advice on choosing an alternative fuel car?"

"I'm currently considering:

We test drove a Toyota Prius today, and it seems like a nice car. It's said to provide a quieter and more comfortable ride than the Honda Insight, and it uses pure electric power at low speeds. The Honda Insight, on the other hand, has better gas mileage. I could refuel either at regular gas stations. The Honda Civic GX would need to be refueled at special stations, but there are many where I live and work, the San Francisco Bay Area. The GX is the lowest in emissions, which would qualify me to drive alone in the carpool lane. All of the cars are about the same price, around $20,000 new. Used cars are also available."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Alternative-Fuel Vehicle Recommendations?

Comments Filter:
  • retro electric car (Score:2, Interesting)

    by lo_fye ( 303245 ) <derek@@@geekunity...com> on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:16PM (#3850416) Homepage Journal
    these babies are SLICK! they're in Toronto :) http://www.feelgoodcars.com/
  • Convert a car (Score:2, Interesting)

    by shepd ( 155729 ) <slashdot.org@gmai l . c om> on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:18PM (#3850439) Homepage Journal
    Many cars can be converted to run on Natural Gas. Ask someone locally with a car that runs on it where they got theirs done.

    Just note that you'll probably lose a lot of trunk space unless you want to risk running out of Natural Gas between trips.
  • by avi33 ( 116048 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:23PM (#3850496) Homepage
    This one seems to fit the bill, but it just blows away the others in the style department. Too bad that breathy carburated engine sound is replaced with, well, nothing...

    http://www.renewables.com/ElectricSpyder.htm
  • Prius (Score:4, Interesting)

    by dattaway ( 3088 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:25PM (#3850520) Homepage Journal
    My mom had her Prius for a year and loves it. Recently, they took a trip to Minnesota and the cost for gas during the trip was insignificant. While highway driving consumes more fuel due to aerodynamics, I have often been able to get more than 80mpg through the city. If you trick the accelerator pedal, you can get it to run off batteries for several minutes before the engine starts charging and giving a boost.

    The only problem she had with the car so far was running over accident debris that slashed a rear tire. Other than that, its supposed to have an incredible warranty. Something like 10 years. Toyota knows this is an experimental car, so they want to know what kinds of problems we have. None so far.
  • a couplet of ideas (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Pauly ( 382 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:26PM (#3850529)

    First, the Corbin Sparrow [corbinmotors.com] really seems to taking hold in places like Los Angeles and to a lessor degree Atlanta.

    However, the lowest emissions vehicle around is a bicycle [ceejbot.com]. I mean this in all seriousness. The Bay area has a uniquely nice bicycling climate, and since you already have one car, you don't have to give up the occasional hauling-of-big-stuff cars are good at. And don't underestimate the health benefits of such daily exercise. I love it since you don't have to take extra time out of your day just to go to the gym.

    In the Bay Area, there's even a service to shuttle bicycles over the Bay bridge for $1 [transitinfo.org].

  • Re:BIODIESEL (Score:3, Interesting)

    by TheRedHorse ( 559375 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:31PM (#3850582)

    To learn a little bit more about Biodiesel [biodiesel.org] try HempCar.org [hempcar.org], the hemp car (as the title may suggest) is a car developed to run on hemp as a Biodiesel [biodiesel.org]. They are currently driving it across Canada. Sure, not a commercial solution and probably not legal in the US. but it gives you an example of one Biodiesel [biodiesel.org] solution.

  • Biodiesel (Score:5, Interesting)

    by otis wildflower ( 4889 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:33PM (#3850596) Homepage
    Hi,
    Hybrids really don't count IMHO as 'alternative fuel' vehicles, since they use two fuels that are exceedingly ordinary: gasoline and electricity. They should qualify for partial EV credit, and they're great for reducing fuel consumption, but without E85 they just aren't 'alternative fuel'.

    I would recommend a late-model Volkswagen diesel and biodiesel as a true 'alternative fuel' vehicle. Diesels are more efficient, create less CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and last FOREVER. I just recently purchased a Mercedes diesel with 362000 miles on it, and I expect to get at least another 130000 miles on it with proper care and feeding. My car can't take 100% biodiesel without some fuel-line upgrades (bio eats rubber away since it's more oxygenated than petro) but any diesel since 1994 can take 100%. Another option, particularly in colder climes or with older cars, is B20, which is 20%bio/80%petro. Biodiesel doesn't contain sulfur, and is naturally oxygenated enough to prevent smelly particulate exhaust. In fact, tailpipe exhaust smells like french fries ;) Biodiesel is actually technically non-toxic and very hard to burn, and IIRC can be drop-shipped anywhere, so I _THINK_ you could even have it delivered to your house in large drums.. It's expensive (~$3/gal) but it may be worth it to you if you want to contribute to (a)saving the ozone layer and/or (b)keeping US$ out of the hands of despotic Arab states (and their terrorist pawns)..

    Couple interesting Wired links on biodiesel:
    here [wired.com] and
    here [wired.com]

    Even non-biodiesel is a better global environmental choice than gasoline/petrol since it's less intensive to refine. Diesel creates more NOx, large-particulate exhaust and sulfur (which lead to smog and acid rain), but the balance of impact is in its favor overall due to the efficiency of diesel engines. Also, if we could press for low-sulfur diesel, NOx could be handled with catalytic converters.

    Oh, did I mention that biodiesel can be made from any biological substance that contains triglycerides? Hempseed, soybean, even used cooking fats can be 'cracked' into biodiesel, leaving glycerin. What to do with the glycerin though, that's the main Q...
  • Re:BIODIESEL (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:37PM (#3850654)
    For all those Canadians living in Calgary Alberta, check out http://www.boiledfrog.org/.

    We make BioDiesel, and if you become a member of the Boiled Frog Trading Co-operative you can use our equipment to make your own too!

    I own a VW Golf along with my brother and a friend. We run it off BioDiesel, works great!

    BioDiesel is "carbon netrual" in the sense that the carbon the we're emmitting in our exhaust was sequestered from vegetables; so the carbon cycle is closed -- we're not adding carbon to the atmosphere. Fossil based diesel does, it digs up carbon from the earth.
  • by supernova87a ( 532540 ) <kepler1@@@hotmail...com> on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:39PM (#3850673)
    Here's [bfi0.com] the Honda website on the hybrid civic.

    I test drove this model a few weeks back, and it was an absolute pleasure.

    The best part? Pulling up to a red light, and sitting there in complete silence, without wasting any gas. Ahh...
  • home made diesel (Score:3, Interesting)

    by paradesign ( 561561 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:42PM (#3850719) Homepage
    my friends dad, down in dallas tx, makes his own diesel for his vw. he uses the leftover oil from fast food places, that apparently just give it to him. heres a link on another guy whos doing it linky linky [kelseyville.com] he says he does it to recycle, not really for emisions reasons.

    my chouce would be the hybrid electric civic or the vw tdi based cars [vw.com], friends of mine say they are wonderful.

  • Air cooled Porsches (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Porsche_Pilot ( 527246 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:49PM (#3850778) Homepage

    That is the same thing we say about the older Porsche 911 cars. The air cooled heads can heat up to 400+ degrees (you don't want to much more than that) and burn the fuel very cleanly. They also get about 22 - 25 on the highway, and in the high teens in town. Bear in mind that we Porsche drivers are not the most light footed people in the world. Those mpg figures are comming from a car with carbs or Mechanical Fuel Injection (MFI). The air flow metered CIS injected cars did even better.

    I know of many Porsches that have had the Catalitic Converter removed, and they still pass the emmissions (some are in CA) with better numbers that almost all watercooled engines (includeing 4bangers).

  • by GMFTatsujin ( 239569 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:53PM (#3850832) Homepage
    I recently had the pleasure of riding in one of these cars, and they're way nifty. Four of us drove from Washington DC to somewhere in central Pennsylvania and back again (about 4 hours at highway speeds each direction) on about half a tank of gas. It lasted a long time between tanks in the city too, even with all the stop'n'go driving of DC. I was *incredibly* impressed.

    It had plenty of amenities too (CD player, AC, power locks and windows), rode quietly, was comfortable enough for a long trip, and didn't feel like it would blow away in a strong breeze. If I hadn't already purchased a new car 2 years ago, I would seriously consider one of these.

    Of course, my opinion doesn't substitute for research, but on an aesthetic level I was happy as a passenger, and on a techie level I was all tingly at the thought of the reciprocating brake system recharging the batteries as we glided (glode?) to a halt.

    GMFTatsujin
  • Alternative options (Score:4, Interesting)

    by m_chan ( 95943 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @01:59PM (#3850883) Homepage
    For our next vehicle, my wife and I are considering the Ford Escape Hybrid [hybridford.com]. Overly-wrought flash page without much detailed info, but they basically say it will be an gas/electric combo SUV that gets ~40mpg and they will have a 4wd option, which is something that we actually need and use regularly as an avid skiers and hikers. We need the cargo space for my two large dogs, which rule out existing hybrid solutions; We currently drive a Ford Explorer and await a more fuel-efficient yet not entirely anemic solution.

    Also, we drive an all-electric vehicle which though outside of the poster's requirements, may warrant consideration for anyone doing short-haul driving in sub-35 mph zones: the line of vehicles from GEM [gemcar.com]

    We have been driving one for about 3 months now and use it for commuting to our offices and to downtown Portland. Neither commute requires us to exceed 25mph.

    It has more pick-up than you might think. In the rain, the vehicle does a pretty good job of keeping water off you (my model doesn't have doors). There are doors available, similar to what you would see on a Jeep CJ, as an aftermarket accessory. It is an ideal neighborhood car.

    Here are answers to some of the common questions we get, often in traffic.
    Q. What the hell is that?
    A. A GEM electric car, manufactured by Global Electric Motors [gemcar.com], a division of DaimlerChrysler Corporation. The specific model I have is the GEM E825 Utility Vehicle (Short Box).
    Q. Is it street legal?
    It is on streets with a speed limit of 35mph or below.
    Q. How fast does it go?
    A. 25 mph.
    Q. How far can you drive it?
    It varies based on the terrain you are driving it on and the ambient temperatures, but I have driven it over 15 miles on a charge. The stated range is 35 miles.
    Q. How do you charge it?
    It charges on household current.
    Q. Stats?
    A. From the GEM website [gemcar.com]
    Curb Weight: 1160 lb. with batteries
    GVW: 1850 lb. (Gross Vehicle Weight)
    Width: 55 inches
    Wheelbase: 71.1 inches
    Length: 116 inches
    Height: 69.5 inches
    Turning Radius: 13 feet 7 inches
    Q. Is it fun?
    A. You betcha.
  • Get a RAV4 EV! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by cdaveb ( 84160 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @02:04PM (#3850930) Homepage
    You've missed one of the best options currently on the market for electric car shoppers in California- Toyota has made the RAV4 EV available to the general public for lease or purchase (previously it was only available to fleets). I got one a few months ago and it's been great. Gets 80-100 miles range, max speed 78mph, has a backseat unlike the EV1. I miss my EV1, but the RAV4 EV is a pretty good car and I think it's the only compelling pure electric currently on the market for the general public. The one annoying part is that the RAV4 EV uses a small paddle charger, and there aren't as many of those as the large paddle ones that the EV1 uses. I've never needed public charging myself, but I don't know if that's an issue for you. I suggest checking with Toyota of Palo Alto about the car- they are one of the best RAV4 EV dealers in the area and know their stuff better than most.

    On a semi-related note, in response to all those Slashdot readers who keep spouting the same crap everytime an electric car comes into discussion- yes electrics are cleaner even if you do have fuels like coal as the source (which is not a significant part of the power mix in CA) because it is much easier to clean fuel at one place than in every vehicle, and if you want to calculate environmental effects of the production of fuel, don't forget all the effects of making gas . Additionally, if you have the option of selecting your power source like we did (we chose Commonwealth Energy) you can in fact get your power from clean sources.
  • by ecloud ( 3022 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @02:10PM (#3851005) Homepage Journal
    Here are some links for you:

    Toyota RA4 EV [toyota.com] - yes it's an SUV but the NiMH batteries are supposed to last 100,000 miles, maintenance free; and it gets 126 miles to the charge; and it has all the creature comforts. I think it's kindof ironic all this high-tech stuff is being put in an SUV. Just think how much better the range would be if they'd put the same powertrain in a sports car with good drag coefficient and low frontal area. But, as far as I can tell this is the best new EV that you can actually buy right now. Only in California, unfortunately. I presume for charging it uses the GM paddle system like your EV1 but haven't confirmed that.

    You could just get a used one on ebay; I was very tempted to bid on this [ebay.com] but decided to wait on an electric for now. Here's an electric S10 pickup [ebay.com]. I test drove one of these once; it's a lot like an EV1, same technology in a pickup. Supposedly you can buy these in California too, but I'm not sure whether new or used. Otherwise they tend to show up as surplus from electric-company fleet programs now and then.

    How has your service from GM been? I was tempted to buy one of these S10s but I figured GM has been acting like they want to forget that they ever had electric cars, so what are the chances of getting good service 5 or 10 years from now? And these things are too complicated to fix yourself, probably. Whatcha gonna do if the inverter fails? AC drives are not common in conversion EVs, and tend to be rather pricey.

    Finally, if you're not on the EV mailing list [madkatz.com], you should be. You will get a ton of good advice there; most of the subscribers are hard-core electric vehicle hobbyists who build their own conversions at home.

    And congratulations on having a brain and being willing to put up with all the stupid naysayers out there, or the ones who keep repeating the same tired old objections about powerplants using fossil fuels (nevermind that they do it so much more efficiently than even the best IC engine) or "why don't you connect a generator to the wheels and make your own electricity." I'm always surprised how otherwise seemingly-smart people will laugh at you when you mention something about electric vehicles. Every new technology has to have its pioneers. And in the long term the earth isn't giving us much choice about switching away from fossil fuels anyway. This is why I do not advocate hybrid vehicles. You can conserve gas with those, but I think in any conceivable future there will always be some alternative way to generate electricity, so maybe electric cars are here to stay in one form or another.

  • And motorcycles? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Tenebrious1 ( 530949 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @02:11PM (#3851011) Homepage
    in fact i believe it has the best mileage for any vehicle that still uses a fossil fuel of any sort.

    My Suzuki motorcyle would get over 50MPG on the highway (as long as I kept it under 85mph). Even the Honda Goldwings with the 1.6L engines were rated at 50MPG on the highway. Many mopeds and scooters get even higher mileage, some in the 100MPG range. Of these, some don't qualify to be ridden on an interstate, but most are vehicles that require plates and license to operate.

    eCycle [ecycle.com] (oops, is that a deep link?) is working on a hybrid motorcycle that gets 180MPG (using diesel by the way). Pretty cool machine, I'd love to try one out, but with a top speed of 80, it would barely keep up with traffic on NY/NJ highways...

  • by johnny cashed ( 590023 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @02:17PM (#3851080) Homepage
    Diesels do have greater NOx emissions/unit fuel burned. However, Diesel are lean burn engines (hince the greater NOx) and are more fuel effecient. I would not say that they have "vastly" higher particulate emissions, gasoline engines have particulate emissions, but their soot is finer, and not visible (to the naked eye).

    Modern Diesel cars do have catalytic converters, and other emission controls which enable them to have better emissions than gasoline fueled cars. If fueled with biodiesel, they have even better emissions.
  • Some Quick Math (Score:2, Interesting)

    by sterno ( 16320 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @02:45PM (#3851329) Homepage
    Just for the record, I did a little quick research to find out how much farm use this would require. I found an estimate suggesting that 1 acre of rapeseed was sufficient to yield 100 gallons of biodiesel. So...

    Total arable land in the US: 464 million acres
    Max theoretical fuel output: 46.4 billion gallons
    Annual gas usage in the US: 400 million gallons

    Now, depending on the fuel economy inherent to bio-diesel as opposed to unleaded, this would imply that with less than 1% of the arable land in the US dedicated to making bio-diesel, there would be a surplus of fuel available.

    So, I don't think this is a problem unless my numbers about rapeseed to biodiesel conversion are incorrect.
  • by ProfBooty ( 172603 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @02:49PM (#3851357)
    Get a Volkswagen TDI model (http://www.tdiclub.com/). In the US they have TDI jetta's, beetles and golfs (nearly every model in europe has a TDI, passat, lupo etc). In the US they are only rated for about 90hp(and 155hp of torque stock, they can get up to 115hp fairly easily), but get 49MPG (over 700miles a tank) for highway mileage. The TDI lupo (only in europe) is rated for 90MPG and costs far less than a honda!

    They do offer a 150hp TDI engine in europe which still gets really good gas mileage, but won't run on current US grade diesel (which is real poor). There is even a TDI GTI! VW/Audi sells six different diesels in Europe (1.2l, 1.9l - 90hp, 1.9l - 110hp, 1.9l -115hp, 2.5l - 150hp, V8 3.3l - 225hp[available soon]) compared to only the 1.9l - 90hp available in North America. When mentioning these horse power figures though, we must also think where this power is available. On the 1.9l 90hp it peak torque is available at just 1900RPMs with 155 ft/lbs torque up to the V8 3.3l which generates 355 ft/lbs torque between 1800 and 3000RPMs. I guess we can only dream of these really high output models.

    Diesel is good, unfortuneatly it got a bad name in the US due to the amount of black smoke earlier cars and big trucks would put out (about 2% of US cars are diesel compared to over 25% in Europe. A properly tuned diesel shouldnt spew black smole and has gobs of torque which is great for driving around town(you won't win a drag race).

    VW is really the only auto manufacturer who still offers diesel cars, and their prices start around 15k. Plus you get a car which is much nicer than a civic both on the in and outside.

    I expect more manufacturer's to bring diesels over to the US once the fuel standards increase.

    On a side note, is there any technical problem which has stop diesel electric hybrids in cars (they have diesel electric trains). Seems to me you would get a more fuel efficent car than a gas electric.
  • Re:fryer oil (Score:4, Interesting)

    by raddan ( 519638 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @02:51PM (#3851384)
    Here's an article [valleyadvocate.com] about a couple of Hampshire College boys who converted a diesel VW bus into a completely fryer-oil vehicle. Apparently, they also set up a company to make diesel-to-fat conversion kits for diesel vehicles with venture capital, but I haven't heard anything about it lately.

    Apparently, since many of the restaurants they got their fat from had to pay to have their fry grease removed, they were more than happy to give it away for free. The article sez they drove clear across the U.S.

  • Re:Ethanol (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Geek In Training ( 12075 ) <cb398@hotmaCOUGARil.com minus cat> on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @03:39PM (#3851771) Homepage
    I don't disagree with the pro-ethanol enviromentals, nor the anti-subsidy libertarians... but let's try to take this one at face value:

    "3) It (Ethanol)'s kind of fuel-intensive to make. Planting, harvesting, fertilizing, insecticiding, AND DISTILLING all take machines that use fuel. If you get 20 gallons per acre (totally made-up) and you use 20 gallons per acre (again, totally made up) to make it, how "fuel efficient" is it?"

    Any it does not cost money to survey, drill, extract, store, transport, store again, refine, store again, transport again, store again, and then dispense petroleum distallates (crude -> gasoline)? Just because half of that labor is done at far lower cost than farm workers (who have a strong lobby with bought politicians) by workers of oil companies who have their own competing political pawns?

    Once again, elements of truth and elements of rhetoric in both arguments. Yes, ethanol burns cleaner and is renewable. Yes, it currently costs more to produce... for a number of reasons. But in either case, it costs money to make money, right? It takes energy to produce portable energy as well. The true technological advantages and disadvantages of ethanol may never be known, thanks to this political in-fighting.

    Sidebar: what about the organized labor lobby for highway workers who pour asphalt every four years on every major road in the US? They have successfully negotiated a decades-long congressional moratorium on deployment on an asphalt replacement made out of the chopped up bits of discarded tires; millions of which fill up plots across America. The cost is half as much, and has twice the durability. So there would be less asphalt produced, and half the labor needed. WE CAN'T HAVE THAT, CAN WE??? Jimmy Smith won't be able to lean on his shovel for fiften minutes out of every hour then go back to grinding up the old road surface for $23 an hour (and pay his union dues) if we take away half of his work!!

    Fascinating, how we let the lawyers, politicans, and corporatists rule us; and all the opposition that is out there are corrupt organizations masquerading as consumerists, special-interest groups, and employee-rights advocates, who are mainly just socialists who get a capitalist-sized paycheck. And we just sit around taking it, saying we'll vote for the other guy.

    Hint: There is no other guy.
  • by Prof_Dagoski ( 142697 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @03:41PM (#3851781) Homepage

    I've been doing the cycling thing ever since college. My experience is that a ten mile commute is very doable. The best part is that you wind up in killer shape from that. Ideally you'd live on the temperat west coast or the southwest. I dunno too much about the weather patterns of the Southeast, but I'll assume there's a couple of months out of the year where it's too hot to ride. When I lived on the west coast, my bike journeys were almost always in excess of eight miles due to various circumstances. Eight miles is pretty pleasant and fun unless you have to ride through mountains. Fifteen miles is doable, but not if you're on a tight time table and certainly not every day. Living out in the midwest the main problem I have is weight gain during the the two to three months where it's just too cold an snowy to ride. I find that if I'm dressed right, I can ride somewhat comfortably down to 15 degres F. After that I say F*** it. Getting back in spring takes a month before I'm totally with it. The other positive thing about cycling is that public transpotation is increasingly accomadating bikes. In Ann Arbor where I live the buses now have racks. In Philly where I'm going to be living, the trains let you bring bikes aboard during non-peak hours. This really extends your range. The other cool thing that I see happening in urban areas is that cities and conservation groups are making bike trails along rivers and other green ways. Depending on how they're laid out both can really cut down your time even if they don't cut down your mileage. No stoplights and no traffic after all. One not so postive development is that moutnain bike manufacturers are no longer putting brazings on frames for racks sturdy enough to mount panniers. The big thing right now is disc brakes whose fittings supplant those for racks. I replaced my panniers when they wore out with Dana Design Bomb Pack because it's a big day backpack that does not push your head downwards when you sit on the bike wearing a helmet. 'Course I'm still riding the same old bike, but I dream of getting a new one.

  • Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @04:29PM (#3852138)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @04:31PM (#3852161)
    While not the car answer the story might be looking for, there is a diesel- electric hybrid *motorcycle* being developed by an American company-- Ecycle - http://www.ecycle.com/powersports/hybrid.htm

    "Employing state-of-the-art mechanical and electrical design technology, eCycle is developing a 180mpg motorcycle. The motorcycle features a 219cc direct injected diesel engine and a 8kW electric motor drive. The weight of the motorcycle is 230lbs, with a top speed of 80mph and acceleration of 0-60 mph in 6 seconds. The target retail price is $5,000."

    Last I read you can order one now, for slightly more, before their main production starts this year.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @05:51PM (#3852833)
    I read in a hot rod magazine about an ethanol/gas mix fuel called E-85, the 85 being the ethanol concentration. If I remember, it seems to produce just as much, if not more power than pump-gas.

    Another possiblity would be a propane conversion. In B.C. canada, where I live and work at a gas station, I see a ton of larger trucks and v-8 cars running propane for a couple of reasons:
    1) it burns very clean because it is a much simpler molecule than gas,
    2) it is a LOT cheaper 44.9 cents/L as opposed to 75.9 cents/l for regular gas
    3) it has a Much higher relative octane rating, about 95-98 compared to 91 or 94 for premium/ super-premium. This allows for much higher compression inside the motor, yielding more horsepower through-out the rev range
    4) and lastly, no matter how big or old the motor, you will get basically waved through any emmissions test, even on a big Piggly 454 or 460.

    The one drawback ; however, is that you lose 10-30% efficiency. It still turns out to be cheaper to run that gas: 50% percent cheaper minus max 30% loss in efficiency is a 20% gain.
    Just my 2 cents on the matter.
  • Re:BIODIESEL (Score:2, Interesting)

    by pschmitt ( 579579 ) on Tuesday July 09, 2002 @06:20PM (#3852976)
    With all these discussions of biodiesel and ethanol, my question is this. Do we really need the plants? I mean what we have here is plants that are taking CO2, H2O, and energy from the sun to make hydrocarbon molecules. I'm no expert at organic chemistry, but can't we make our hydrocarbons through various chemical reactions. And if I'm not mistaken, we can just make good old gasoline for which the vast majority of cars are already designed. The CO2 is in the air everywhere. H2O is widely available. And aren't there times and places where energy is relatively cheap. For example, at 3 in the morning when energy use on the electric grids are very low, aren't there nuclear power plants, or hydroelectric dams that have spare capacity that just goes to waste? Or what about that recent article about Iceland having so much cheap energy that they want to use it to produce hydrogen. The only problem is that then they are going to have to convert so many different systems to user hydrogen. Why don't they just produce good old gasoline? I'd love to see the comments of anyone who is familiar with the economics of using organic chemistry to produce gasoline.
  • by Soulslayer ( 21435 ) on Wednesday July 10, 2002 @04:57AM (#3855072) Homepage
    While the waiting list is pretty long and the price is high, you can get an electric car with a 100+ mile range that does the quarter mile [acpropulsion.com] faster than a late 90's Vette [acpropulsion.com]. Go see the T-Zero [acpropulsion.com] at A/C Propulsion's site [acpropulsion.com].

    Another way to go is to find an electric car conversion shop or individual. Purchase a cheap ICE [mindbent.org] vehicle, spend another $6-$10K converting [austinev.org] it and you have a vehicle that will last as long as the body holds up that looks [austinev.org] like everyone elses car, but needs far less maintenence and no gasoline.

    Or you could just do the whole thing yourself [evparts.com]. If done right your range will be between 40 and 60 miles per charge.

    Remember Optima [optimabatteries.com] Yellow Top deep cycle batteries are your friends.

I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato

Working...