Viral Marketing - Another Set of New Clothes for the Emperor? 41
fingal asks: "I've recently started working for a company who has decided that viral marketing is The Way Forwards. I've got mixed feelings about this. As the sysadmin who has to deal with the aftermath of hosting our own stuff and dealing with the inevitable congestion associated with the (rapidly increasing) size of attachments that are routinely moved about, it just winds me up. On the other hand - I very much enjoy checking out what people are up to (except when they email it to me and I'm on a dial-up...), but I don't think that I've ever actually bought anything as a result. What does everyone think about about this (either from the viewpoint of a consumer, provider or infrastructure engineer)?" Here is a better definition of the term "viral marketing". What are your thoughts on this subject?
Not anymore... (Score:3, Interesting)
You *may* have just started, but after posting material criticizing your company to Slashdot, I'm dubious that you're going to keep your employment long...
Can we get a 'duh'? (Score:3, Interesting)
I mean, you pay people to astroturf your product. To state their "opinion" about it without adding on "Oh, and I work for XYZ corporation," or, "XYZ corporation paid me $10 to post this." Why do they not say these things? Because they know that if they did, no one would take their opinion seriously. Well, if no one would take you seriously, perhaps your message is lacking.
Which seems to usually be the case. Companies that already get good word of mouth don't need to astroturf.
Re:Correct link for E2 (Score:3, Interesting)
This is closer to what I was referring to when I posted the original story. Or to put it another way [channel4.com]:-
My understanding was that once a sucessful viral campaign was under way, it would become self-sustaining thereby opening up the possibility of exposure to a load more eyeballs...