FTP: Better Than HTTP, Or Obsolete? 1093
An anonymous reader asks "Looking to serve files for downloading (typically 1MB-6MB), I'm confused about whether I should provide an FTP server instead of / as well as HTTP. According to a rapid Google search, the experts say 1) HTTP is slower and less reliable than FTP and 2) HTTP is amateur and will make you look a wimp. But a) FTP is full of security holes. and b) FTP is a crumbling legacy protocol and will make you look a dinosaur. Surely some contradiction... Should I make the effort to implement FTP or take desperate steps to avoid it?"
gopher (Score:5, Funny)
Screw all of that! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:gopher (Score:3, Funny)
what are you serving again? (Score:3, Funny)
heh, most 1-6mb files I see are on irc fserves
"Files," eh? (Score:5, Funny)
Boy do I feel the pain... (Score:5, Funny)
You really gotta watch out for things like this. I know one guy that got a 'click me' sign on his back because he used HTTP instead of FTP.
Re:Both... (Score:3, Funny)
Would you download that on your work connection? Heh.
Daniel
TFTP, definitely TFTP (Score:3, Funny)
Re:do both... (Score:5, Funny)
Then report back to us in the first ever Answer Slashdot.
Use ZMODEM !! (Score:4, Funny)
I remember in my days of BBSes with X and Y Modem, and then when Z-Modem showed up we all couldn't be happier. When some idiot in the house picked up the phone and disconnected you from hours and hours of downloading the latest Liesure Suite Larry, I just reconnected and started to resume my downloads (but only if I had enough credit, then I might have to upload some crap).
Change it to, Ask slashdot to do my job. (Score:5, Funny)
Why do we have all these new ask slashdot question that sounds like a tech with a years experience is asking how to do his job?
I vote for a new section, "How do I do my job" with a dollar bill as the logo.
Re:gopher (Score:4, Funny)
now where did I put that acoustic coupler for my spectrum...
Re:gopher (Score:4, Funny)
$ sz myfile.txt
*SZ
Now downloading "myfile.txt".....
Saved "myfile.txt".
$
Re:how about rsync? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Screw all of that! (Score:1, Funny)
Ah, FTP (Score:2, Funny)
FTP is a quirky, extensible protocol, great for uploading, downloading and sharing files, and you can do wonderful things with FTP and databases which web servers only dream about.
Rich.
Re:gopher (Score:3, Funny)
Re:gopher (Score:3, Funny)
Why /.? (Score:5, Funny)
Look at all the stupid answers... (Score:2, Funny)
So we are left to be smart-assed and provide shots in the dark as to what the "best" solution is to this.
9 out of 10 Anonymous Cowards agree (Score:1, Funny)
Well, I have to go now. Now you can go back putting that chrome exhaust pipe on your Civic.
even better (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I wouldn't worry about it... (Score:4, Funny)
if you're using linux, you can use wget. and if you're on windows, you can get cygwin and then also use wget.. there's gotta be other utilities with the same features, but wget is definitely the classic and does pretty much everything you'd need.
didn't you hear? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:gopher (Score:4, Funny)
((12 * 60 * 60 * 24 * 7) * 2 ) / 1024 = 7,257KBs more per week!
*2, as 2 bytes per char, and
Back then, an EXTRA 7.2M a week was a lot of bad graphics porn.
A real BOFH (Score:3, Funny)
This way you won't look like a wimp. Jaws will drop, you'll be recognized as a uber BOFH and your peers will respect you.
Re:Different, not better or wose (Score:2, Funny)
Hmmm...technically correct, but completely useless answer. What the heck is a Micro$oft rep doing on /.?
Re:Different, not better or wose (Score:2, Funny)
Who's the user? (Score:3, Funny)
Warning! The above is sarcasm. But it is so apropos. Paraphrased quote from a conversation I had with a Windows luser:
"I need to find a good FTP program so I can download this software I found. Which do you think is better, ProFTP2K for $25, or should I spend more for EZDownloadFTPPlus at $50?"
Just put it on an SMB share. (Score:1, Funny)
XML is probably best (Score:2, Funny)
The biggest advantage of XML is that software does not have to be changed for a different XML data format - they all use XML, the standard bracketing syntax. I know most major browsers support an XML view mode, so they don't need to be upgraded to download by XML.
I'm sure that there are people out there saying that XML is inefficient, but that's simply not the case. We can use special XML commands that allow us to include large blocks of binary data -- at the expense of portability to 14-bit computers, of course. In total, an XML download should only have about 30kb of metadata added to it. Author, guid, PGP signature, original source, license, and all that good stuff.
We can hope for the day when the need for binary transfers will be over, since everyone will be using XML files.
Re:FTP is just as doable over SSL (Score:2, Funny)
Frisbees (Score:2, Funny)
The ONLY way to serve files!
Use ICMP! (Score:2, Funny)
Why not implement FTP over ICMP? It will be the best ever!
Re:College blocking ftp? (Score:3, Funny)
You were added to the watch list and the administrators went about doing something more important.
Re:HOW ABOUT UPLOADING??? (Score:2, Funny)
An anonymous reader asks "Looking to serve files for downloading (typically 1MB-6MB"...
That's probably why "It seems everyone talks about DOWNLOADING."... Because some of us read the initial post before replying.