Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Links

Most Usable Bookmark Managers? 88

stewartj asks: "I finally got sick of manually updating my large bookmarks collection between the computers I use at work and home. I've got a permanent connection at home and a personal webserver running, so I thought I'd install a bookmark manager. Searches on SourceForge and Freshmeat have brought up too many options to consider, so I thought I'd ask Slashdot readers if they have any recommendations for a good web-based bookmark manager? Is there a better solution to making my bookmarks available everywhere (but still keeping them secure)?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Most Usable Bookmark Managers?

Comments Filter:
  • by DiSKiLLeR ( 17651 ) on Friday April 04, 2003 @12:01AM (#5658487) Homepage Journal
    Between several browsers on one computer (IE, Mozilla, etc), several computers at home, many computers at school or uni, and now computers at work, it simply fucking sucks.

    I gave up years ago.

    I don't bookmarks url's anymore. Its not worth the trouble.

    I just use my memory.

    Unless your dealing with lots of long complex url's (which i can then store in an email so i don't lose them) i just memorize everything.

    Add bookmark my ass: what about the other 4 browsers on this computer, and 7 other computers i use regulary...

    D.
  • Here's what I do (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Apreche ( 239272 ) on Friday April 04, 2003 @12:21AM (#5658571) Homepage Journal
    I use phoenix. I put phoenix in a shared folder in windows. I export my bookmarks in html format to another share folder. This gives me my bookmarks everywhere, and here is how.

    If I am out of the house and using windows

    I access the share via typing \\mypc.mydomain.edu and then launch phoenix and import bookmarks.html

    If I am out of the house and using *nix

    I access my pc via ssh, launch phoenix using X-forwarding, sftp bookmarks.html over the line and import it.

    If I am out of the house using a Mac

    It hasn't happened yet, but if I buy one of those titanium thingies (which I would if I had my choice of portable computing) It would have OSX, which can SSH and X-Forward AFAIK.

    Problem solved. Same browser everywhere same bookmarks.
    • Re:Here's what I do (Score:5, Informative)

      by PD ( 9577 ) <slashdotlinux@pdrap.org> on Friday April 04, 2003 @12:50AM (#5658693) Homepage Journal
      What a load of work. Everyone, look up a nice little program called 'unison'. It uses the rsync protocol to keep two directories in sync. It's even transitive. You can be working on client machine A, synchronize with server S, then move to client machine B and synchronize with server S. client A and client B will be synchronized with each other.

      I use it on a gigabyte of files in my home dir on my desktop and laptop. It synchronizes in less than 30 seconds on a 128kbit link.

      Everything is managed with a configuration file, so you don't need to manually remember what parts need to update and what don't, and where the little bits need to go in the directory tree.
      • Re:Here's what I do (Score:4, Informative)

        by PD ( 9577 ) <slashdotlinux@pdrap.org> on Friday April 04, 2003 @12:52AM (#5658699) Homepage Journal
        Oh, and I forgot to mention that unison will synchronize using a ssh tunnel. You will be secure.
      • It's even easier if you deploy it as a service. I recall there are HOW-TOs somewhere online... but I'm not motivated to google and I don't care about karma. :-P

      • Re:Here's what I do (Score:2, Informative)

        by muleboy ( 123760 )
        What happens if you make changes on client A, forget to sync, then make changes on client B? That seems to me like a likely thing to happen unless the sync is either automatic or you are very reliable about remembering to do it (I am not).

        I wrote a crude script that will sync bookmarks A and B, but it's not release quality. A really nice GUI version of that is needed.
        • Re:Here's what I do (Score:2, Informative)

          by ibennetch ( 521581 )
          Here [upenn.edu] is the manual's information on conflicts and conflict resolution. If I'm reading it correctly, it prompts you to decide what to do. Although it doesn't seem to mention what I consider to be the idea solution -- merging the files so you don't loose anything from either machine.
          • Although it doesn't seem to mention what I consider to be the idea solution -- merging the files so you don't loose anything from either machine.

            Merging two or more files that have a common ancestor isn't a trivial thing to do: a simple text document is the most straight forward. Format dependent text files (e.g. program source, XML) need knowledge of the file format and may require testing for correctness after the merge. Binary file formats require intimate knowledge of the file format and (most likely)
            • Good point -- I was only thinking about the context of the article (bookmarks, which can be a simple text-only file). I momentarily forgot that this program would handle not only text but any file type that happens to be syncronized. Your points, Ian, are very valid and thanks for pointing out my forgetfulness!
            • My script is doing this, but it has a flaw: it is difficult to delete or move folders. I just use a tree-walker to make sure that all the branches at each level of the bookmarks tree match. If a folder is in one bookmarks but not in the other, it copies the folder to the one missing it, and likewise with bookmarks. This requires no intervention because the assumption is always to add missing branches.

              This is OK most of the time since most of what I do is add folders and bookmarks, and much less often m

      • FOUND IT! (Score:4, Informative)

        by mildness ( 579534 ) <bill@bam p h .com> on Friday April 04, 2003 @05:56AM (#5659553) Homepage
        link to unison proggie [upenn.edu]

        Not just Karma whoring, I'm downloading now. (:-{)}

        Thanks for the heads-up PD.

        Cheers,

        Bill

        • (:-{)}

          Uh, wtf? Either you have a mexican style mustache and a goatee, or perhaps more accurately, that's Kripsy Kreme residue around your mouth? ;)
          • Rest assured that there is nothing left to any Krispy Kreme donuts that may fall into my grasp.

            Like it's owner, my smiley is bald, has a mustache and a beard.

            Good guesses. (;-{)}

      • Yeah, that's just great. But it's not like I have a laptop here. I'm out of the house in a library using public computers, or in a lab on campus. If I had a computer I could install software on I would probably have some sort of sync thing. No wait. I wouldn't. I would just have a shortcut to the shared folder. The entire campus has the wirelessness. And if I had a laptop and I was leaving campus the effort it would take to sync them would be like nothing. I could still get at my stuff as long as I
      • unison is a great cross platform tool, I do web development and Iuse it in lieu of sftp/ftp to keep my sites updated on my work station, development and production boxes. For the few customers that do their own updates I have them use the windows version, and it works great! It is very quick, and intuitive. The only drawback I have seen is that it does not preserve the file ownerships when uploading remotely, when using the ssh tunnel. The files will be ownedby the remote user, not the localuser, this
    • I access the share via typing \\mypc.mydomain.edu

      What?! You have SMB accessible externally? Do you have any idea of security?

  • an idea.... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 04, 2003 @12:22AM (#5658577)
    get an easy to remember yet reasonably obscure url, put your bookmarks there, and dont tell anyone that url, or link to the url from anywhere (so that google wont find it), or put the page in your robots.txt file.

    yeah - it's security through obscurity - but it'll fly.
    • to make it actually secure, you could always put it online and access it via a URL containing a username and password, which would be fairly simple to set up server-side. web authentication is more secure than secrecy, at least.

      of course, this only addresses the accessibility issue. there's still the matter of simplifying the addition and deletion of marks from any of the machines you may use...
    • Re:an idea.... (Score:2, Insightful)

      by unsanity ( 18986 )
      this is not "secret"--and don't even mention secure--as you're "obscure" URL will be showing up as the refer in the webserver logs. And a lot of sites generate stats dirctly from these logs (or just dump them to a web-viewable file). Should google crawl to one of these stats pages, you'll soon find your bookmarks showing up in searches for .. whatever it is you're bookmarking.

      Sure, use robots.txt to solve some of that dilemma, but that won't keep a person from following the link on his own. I admit that
  • by funkwater ( 20267 ) on Friday April 04, 2003 @12:31AM (#5658620)
    I had the same problem a while back and found nothing worth using, so I wrote one using PHP/MySQL in a few hours. It's your standard tree-like listing, where links are in folders. It's wonderful to have one central repository for all links.

    It uses only two tables and has one PHP script to add edit/delete bookmarks.

    It's also password protected, so you can keep sensitive info in there and not worry. Also, I made a "sidebar" mode for use in Mozilla.

    Plans had included a SOAP interface for making XUL clients or something, but I didn't find a need.

    If anyone is interested, especially in making it better, I could start a SourceForge project and get it out there. Let me know if there's any takers.
    • That would be interesting. I don't know any PHP to speak of though, and dunno how much I'd use it, but I'll try if you do put it up on sourceforge.
      • That would be interesting. I don't know any PHP to speak of though, and dunno how much I'd use it, but I'll try if you do put it up on sourceforge.

        I don't know php either... but if you put it in sourceforge I'll try it too... I might even help me learn php...
    • Hilarious.

      I did, well... exactly the same thing. I could help with this.

    • I've contemplated doing something like this for a while. Then a new feature came along to make it more challenging:

      "Bookmark this group of tabs"

      I love this feature. It's how I lay out my morning reading. One click, and then it's ctrl-W until done. All my comics, all the blogs, and a weather report.
      • Agreed, this is a killer feature. I use it to follow the war by opening 5 tabs of the top news sites.

        It may be possible to hack this in with javascript, but I haven't tried anything with javscript and tabs yet (I'm sure there is no standards here either).

        I'll start a SourceForge project this weekend and post it here.
    • I'd be interested in working on this, but I'd probably want to convert the MySQL to a flat file since my provider doesn't give me mysql...

      email me if you want to discuss further...

      Thanks,
      M.
  • by NotoriousQ ( 457789 ) on Friday April 04, 2003 @12:31AM (#5658621) Homepage
    • Run your own secure site (SSL, passwords), and just keep an html page with links. Extremely portable, but you will have to update the page yourself, no real managers. (Although Mozilla/Netscape bookmarks.html might be adequate)
    • Keep your profile on a network mountable partition. Problem: may have problems mounting through firewalls and machines not owned by you
    • Keep your profile on a USB flash drive keychain.

    Note that these do not solve the problem of different formats. Nothing will fix this until some kind of RFC standard is made (probably based on XML). It would be nice, but it is not for real.
  • by Zach Garner ( 74342 ) on Friday April 04, 2003 @12:38AM (#5658647)
    I would love to use a more robust References database to store my bookmarks. BibTeX is nice. It's not great for my purposes, but nice. Specifically, it does not handle URLs very well. Many of the bibtex style's don't understand the URL field (though I usually stick it in "howpublished"). In fact, there really needs to be a URI Entry (i.e. at the same level as Aricle, Book, etc). Maybe BibTeX is antiquated and a new and improved system for managing references to content is needed. (And this is what is really needed, don't think in the small domain of webpages, think bigger)

    With that, my ideal system would also act as a cache (think google) and give me a way to reference specific parts of the webpage. Squid would probably be useful here. Think how often your bookmarked link gets removed from the webserver. Why not have your bookmark manager save a copy in a cache, for future use.

    Also, when you are only interested in one part of a huge webpage, or wish to refer to a specific sentence, a mechanism for highlighting specific parts of a webpage would be great. I've seen some programs that work like this for changed material (that is, it highlights changes). This would be difficult to implement, but maybe a Mozilla plugin would be sufficient.

    So, ideally, I want a references database that can cache websites, ftp downloads, etc, etc, then take that cached content and mark parts of it for specific referencing. When I view the database, I can go directly to the content, or go to the highlighted cache.

    -----

    More on topic, perhaps: I suggest you treat google as your bookmark manager. It really is easier this way, if your memory is good. For many things, you just think about what you are interested, type it in google and on the first page or two is the link you visited last week. Or maybe you need to remember something close to the title of the website. Google is your friend, it'll help you out if you aren't exact.

    This doesn't work well for hard to find pages, for pages you don't access very often or if you have LOTS of links. But, hopefully there aren't many of those links that you need to store.

    I use a combination of above. Projects (both those at work and at home) have BibTeX databases for long term access and documentation. Short term interests and those websites I access often are kept in my mind, though I have to google for them some times.
  • Backflip (Score:4, Interesting)

    by XBL ( 305578 ) on Friday April 04, 2003 @01:00AM (#5658730)
    Give this [backflip.com] a try. It's a free, advanced web-based bookmarking service. Lots of features.
    • And there's a Mozilla sidebar for Backflip too. http://dmoz.org/Netscape/Sidebar/Computers/ The Backflip Buddy sidebar is at the very top of the list. I use Backflip exclusively for all my bookmarks for over a year and a half. Occasional downtime aside, it's a godsend.
  • Wiki (Score:2, Interesting)

    I keep a bookmarks folder called To File. Every month or so I dump the whole thing to a Bookmarks page on my wiki.

    It's easy to edit, as well as easily accessible.
  • For Mozilla... (Score:3, Informative)

    by elfkicker ( 162256 ) on Friday April 04, 2003 @01:41AM (#5658855)
    Some guy has been working on this for over a year. Haven't tried his patch, but you might want to take a look...

    bug 124029 [mozilla.org]

    I believe there are other bugs/implementations in bugzilla, so you might want to hunt around.
  • yahoo bookmarks (Score:4, Informative)

    by zeenixus ( 571630 ) <(moc.oohay) (ta) (suxineez)> on Friday April 04, 2003 @02:20AM (#5659011)
    yahoo has an online bookmark "manager" (for lack of a better term). Via my.yahoo.com (and a yahoo id) you can customize the the layout and content. Add the "my bookmarks" panel and then import (upload) your bookmarks to there. It supports netscape (and thus mozilla/phoenix), ie win32 and ie for macs.

    I upload my bookmarks every so often manually, although I'm sure with some hacking one can make a script to automate the procedure (maybe someone already has). If you don't "yahoo", I'm sure there are other free online services that have an equivilent.
    • If you download the Yahoo! Companion software, you can add a toolbar to your web browser (of course, it's Internet Exploder), but you can add bookmarks directly to it, and it carries over to any machine you have the companion installed on.
    • Re:yahoo bookmarks (Score:3, Informative)

      by seanmeister ( 156224 )

      Also - you can add your Yahoo bookmarks to the Mozilla sidebar using the following procedure:

      1. Make sure your Moz sidebar is visible (press F9)
      2. Go to this page [netscape.com].
      3. Enter "Yahoo Bookmarks" (or whatever you want) in the Tab Name field.
      4. Enter the following URL in the Tab URL field:

        http://my.yahoo.com/internet/t/sites.html
      5. Click the Preview Tab button - this will actually add the tab to your sidebar.

      Works for me :-)

    • That's what I use. I've set up my own my.yahoo page and keep my important bookmarks there.

      Now what's an important bookmark? Links to the web interfaces for the various servers I manage. Custom search links for our request tracking system (RT).

      For anything else I rely on memory or Google. And certainly if there's an important URL I forgot and can't find again when on another system, I put in onto Yahoo as soon as I track it down again.

      But I'm not one of those people who's saving tons of bookmarks all
  • Make an HTML document with all the bookmarks that you want to keep. You can organize this in an outline format so it's easy to navigate to the bookmark you want.

    You can burn this onto a credit card sized CD and keep it with you all the time. You can also burn some images and stuff on it. The only problem is that you can't really update this easily.

    You can also take this HTML document and copy it to a floppy disc. This way you can update it at any time.

    I know that this doesn't solve the problem of havi
    • You can always leave this html file on a server (passwd protected/https/whatever) if you want, then you can easily update it with an ssh session or an upload, and you can get at it from wherever you like.
    • The HTML document you refer to is "bookmarks.html" (if you're using a reasonable browser). Why not load it on a USB disk and take it with you?
  • by hkon ( 46756 ) on Friday April 04, 2003 @03:00AM (#5659122) Homepage
    A couple of years ago, I found it to be easier just to look stuff up with google than to try and maintain a bookmark-list across accounts and OSs. Just try to remember as much specific stuff from the website as possible, whole centences work great. You'll be amazed at how well it works.

    (of course, when I say "does anyone still", I mean "I don't and everyone should be more like me" :)
    • Thats great, when you want to look at new sites, or only want to keep track of a few.
      When you want to look up a lot of the same sites regularly any method other than bookmarks/open in tabs simply doesnt cut it imho. E.g. I have one set of tabs for all of the news sites/forums I read - just fire up open in tabs and post away, or much more valuable, all the web comic sites I read daily (userfriendly, garfield, dilber, sinfest, megatokyo etc..) are in a sinlge bookmark folder, which saves me having to type in
  • Too bad you're using Windows.

    If you were using, say, Linux, you could just mount a NFS or SMB share and make your bookmarks file on the client a symlink to the one on the host.
  • Remember when Bookmarks were stored as HTML? And you could view them on any computer or share them on the internet easily, with absolutely zero conversion?
    Wasnt that simple, sensible, and a generally good way to do things?
    Why the fuck did everyone stop doing that?
  • I use SaveThis [savethis.com] which is run by an offshoot of CNN (IIRC).
  • CVS! (Score:2, Insightful)

    by balog ( 13684 )
    Put up a CVS repository somewhere you have a shell, create a script that does things in this order:

    1: updates your bookmark file against the cvs
    2: starts mozilla
    3: commits any changes (to be run when mozilla exits, of course)

    Of course this seems like overkill, but it'd work
    (now i know what i'll be doing the rest of the afternoon. ;))

    BTW. This would have the added bonus of having the possibility to delete bookmarks you haven't used for a while without loosing them for ever...
  • If you've got a server online with MySQL and PHP, try Active PHP Bookmarks (google it, but I found it on Sourceforge).

    It's a sinch to set up, the interface is nice and simple, it has a few extras that make it quite a nice little tool.
  • Some sort of auto-categorizer, which compares the contents of your bookmarks to each other and automatically organizes bookmarks according to most frequent word or phrase or concept. User input would be by what factor to make the tree deep or shallow.

    I've searched for something like this but have only come up with a dissertation on the subject with a stone age non-available implementation for some old version of Unix. Naive Bayes is not really going to work unless you want to hand categorize many documen
  • Please forgive the blatant advertisement! :-)

    Sure it costs $6 a year, but I'd rather pay than use some free site that may or may not exist in the future. (Backflip was down for 2 weeks last November). I wanted something that I knew could sustain itself and I didn't like all the marketing with other free sites.

    Flyrt has:

    a Javascript flyrt tool that you put in your toolbar to easily bookmark sites

    A Mozilla side bar

    A pop-up window of your links for IE users

    Easy import/export of bookmarks

    Make folders pub

    • I highly recommend Flyrt. I've been using it since last November and I can't imagine living without it. My favorite feature is the sidebar for Mozilla. I also like how it keeps track of the last folder you were using so when I open the sidebar at home I see the last set of links I was using at work and vice versa. It's also nice that when I add a bookmark I can choose to email it to a friend. Overall, it's well worth the $6.
  • Definitely check out PowerMarks [kaylon.com]. It's shareware ($25) w/ a trial version, and needs windows, but they'll basically store your bookmarks on their server (no extra charge) & sync your bookmarks from each location.

    The downside (and why I don't personally use it) is that any category information for a bookmark(what subfolder you used to keep it in) is lost. You search for a particular bookmark using keyword searches (kinda like Opera's bookmark-search).

    Other options, without the sync functionality:
  • ACAP (Score:2, Informative)

    by Engdy ( 124179 )
    Does anyone have any experience with ACAP [cmu.edu], the Application Configuration Access Protocol? It's somehow related to the Cyrus IMAP project, and claims to be able to store bookmarks, address book, etc. in a central location. Are there any ACAP clients?
  • I use Bookmarker [renaghan.com] and have for about 3 years. PHP based, runs on the server, authentication, public viewing, etc. Works great!

    • It's a nice little tool. it's got some rough edges, but the javascript "quick-mark" works great and It means I can quickly access my bookmarks from 3 machines with no real effort.
  • I was trying to figure out a way to get a handle on my bookmarks about three months ago. I wound up trying a bunch of different programs, including some shareware demos. I wound up getting Powermarks [kaylon.com]. It will read in the bookmarks from all the browsers on your computer, and you can export all of the bookmarks to html. The feature that got me hooked is that you don't have to sort your bookmarks in to categories. When you create a bookmark, the name, keywords and description fields are retrieved from the
  • I use Konqueror, as it can import from and export to Mozilla's bookmark format. But I don't ever have to worry about IE, so...

    -Nick
  • There is a Yahoo plugin which adds a toolbar to either Netscape or IE (no Mozilla yet). It has a bookmark feature which you can use as ubiquitously as the one embedded into the browsers. When you add a bookmark on one system, it automatically appears in the others.

    All of the programs which mearly copy the bookmark files around don't work for Mozilla at all, and don't work well for Netscape (not sure about IE). As they don't have predictable behavior when the bookmark file is modified while they're runni
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • http://bookmark4u.sourceforge.net

    This is the program ive used for quite some time now.
    Its multi-user, and you can flag bookmarks as public/private.
    Anyone with an account can see all users public bookmarks.
    Private ones are hidden (except for your own of course)

    Lets you add buttons to netscape/moz/ie to a) bring up the bookmarks, and b) add a bookmark to the server.

    You can import/export netscape file bookmarks as well as some others, and it reads the file that IE exports to in netscape format.

    I've found u
  • ...but in the process of looking, I never found one that I felt met my needs. I needed something that didn't seem to be offered, or if it was, it cost money, or wasn't private, or both. There were a few good ones on freshmeat, and I reccommend you really look there first - there might be something that meets your needs (heck, there might be something there now that meets my needs - but my project began as a way to really learn Perl, so I am sticking with it).

    My needs are varied. I am (because I am not quite

  • If you use a Mac, try URL Manager Pro [url-manager.com]. It's been around for quite a while, and the developer is great (back in the day he added FTP storage by request).

    To tightly integrate the product, he just went and invented shared menus, then quickly ported them to OS X when it came out.

    Good stuff.
  • This has been one of my pet peeves for awhile. Forget portable bookmarks for now -- it's hard enough managing them on one machine, or within each browser! Mozilla still uses a crusty old Netscape design, where moving bookmarks around, sticking them in folders, etc., is a real pain in the ass. IE is the same way. I can imagine Microsoft and Netscape might want to make this difficult, to keep people from zapping the bookmarks (advertising) these companies stick into their products.

    I suspect this because
    • Duh. You can still do this - IE's 'favorites' are nothing but file system objects that you can manipulate via Explorer or even a command line. You can zip them, archive them, massage them or whatever. And because the format of the .url file itself is identical to that of an INI file, you can write a simple C++ or VB or Delphi app to manage them as well.
  • blogs are great for pointing to sources, but lack the timeless quality.

    bookmarks are more suited to these, resources. these sites of permanent use and interest.

    we need a way to leverage the personal databases that are bookmark files, into a format along the lines of dmoz.

    ie: googling only your own (sub)tree of bookmarks for results.
    -so you can keyword search only, and all, the sites in your "blog" bookmark folder at once.

    and even better: googling the bookmarks of the people that you have bookmarked.
    -so
  • I use
    http://devel.thcnet.net/phpbookmarks/
    it's php based, with mysql, you can easily make it secure if you wish. it works well, it's themeable to:)
    never had any problems with it... just find yourself some webspace, and stick it up.
    mines currently holding around 200 links or so, so those who are syaing just rember them, well, I don't have that good of memory, and google can't always find the exact link you need.
  • by mindslip ( 16677 ) on Saturday April 05, 2003 @03:17AM (#5667612)
    Hi!

    Great timing on your question. I just wrote SiteBar, which is a very convienent, low-demand server based bookmark organizer.

    The nicest bit, is it's made to run in the Mozilla/Netscape Sidebar, but can just as easily be run in a main window.

    Looks just like your bookmark folder. I'm working on a Mozilla importer, so stay tuned.

    Sign up to use mine at:
    http://www.mindslip.org/sitebar

    or go get it at:
    http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/sitebar

    Hope it's as addicting to you as it is to me.

    mindslip
  • If you use multiple browsers and you want identical bookmarks in all of them, then get Bookit. [everydaysoftware.net] $12 shareware, I paid for it within 10 minutes of trying it out.

    It lets you edit your bookmarks, and will sync the bookmark files of the following browsers:

    Safari
    iCab
    MSIE
    Mozilla
    Navigator/Chimera/C amino/whatever they're calling it this week
    Netscape
    OmniWeb
    Opera

    If you want to put the same bookmarks on additional Macs, you can do that as well, with a little work.

    Bookit also gives you the option of putting bookmar
  • Anybody use Powermarks from kaylon? What's interesting about this little program is that instead of using the default tree view for storing your bookmarks, you associate each BM with a few keywords. Makes searching and categorizing much easier, and it's very fast too. Unfortunately, it's only available on windows. Maybe there's a linux close out there... On the other hand, I'd like to hear for your experience with the few online bookmarks managers available. Which one's got the best/most important features?
  • This is what I use currently.

    Free
    Extremely fast
    Good user interface
    Upload, Download feature so that you can synce between diffrent locations.

  • I use Slashdot to store to my bookmarks. :)

    These are all the server-based tools mentionned in the above discussion:

    Active PHP Bookmarks [freshmeat.net]
    Bookmarker [renaghan.com]
    Bookmark4U [sourceforge.net]
    PHP Bookmarks [thcnet.net]
    Sitebar [sourceforge.net]

"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe

Working...