Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology

Technology for Mapping the Underground? 41

Archon-X asks: "As an avid CaveClanner, I spend my spare time sloshing around underground in drains, and have more than once considered 'mapping' the drains. How would readers approach this problem? Mobile reception and presumably GPS is non-existent, and it's pretty dark and wet down there."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Technology for Mapping the Underground?

Comments Filter:
  • Use a... (Score:1, Redundant)

    by SoCalChris ( 573049 )
    Pen, paper & flashlight.

    Seriously though.. You track around the sewers for fun? You seriously need a new hobby.
    • Re:Use a... (Score:4, Funny)

      by stefanlasiewski ( 63134 ) * <slashdot AT stefanco DOT com> on Wednesday April 30, 2003 @06:56PM (#5848627) Homepage Journal
      Pen, paper & flashlight.

      Hey, don't forget your dice! Last time I let you borrowed mine, you stole my silver-speckled 20-sided die!
    • similar to caving and you have no right to say that. Its probly more dangerous (therefor FUN) than anything you do in your spare time .
      • Re:Use a... (Score:2, Insightful)

        grandparent: You track around the sewers for fun? You seriously need a new hobby.

        parent: similar to caving and you have no right to say that.

        Hey. Where I come people *have* the right to voice uninformed opinions such as that.

        • Ok im sorry, but he is calling this guy a loser for going out there and doing something he enjoys. Of course he has the right to say that but it wasnt a very considderate thing for him to say.
    • Close, problem is that (in natural caves at least) normal paper doesn't last too long, you need some waterproof paper, and special pencil/crayon to write on it.

      You also need a 'Clino (inclinometer (sp?)), and a compass, and a tape measure.

      This has been done thousands of times, google for cave surveying, I'm sure you'll find plenty of ways to do it.

      The hi-tech aproaches I've thought about all fall down on one crucial point - very little electronic gear survives caving. Hell, even caving lamps have a limit
  • by HaloZero ( 610207 ) <protodeka@gma i l .com> on Wednesday April 30, 2003 @06:57PM (#5848637) Homepage
    We started exploring mines, caves and soon included stormwater drains. These days, the Cave Clan have explored just about every type of artificial tunnel or chamber there is: bridge rooms, gas pipeline tunnels, purification tanks, sewerage discharge tunnels (disused), optic fibre tunnels, train tunnels, and many unnameable tunnels and cavities under the City.

    For most mines and caves and such, if the company which bore the caves is still in existance, they may have maps and such for the caves and so on. If not them, then national archives. National archives or local government agencies may also have maps for the stormwater drains, as well.
    • Actually, there is good money to be made mapping and surveying these underground systems. Frequently the exploration is unmanned, such as dragging a camera through a sewer pipe checking for roots and cracks. In the industry they call these dirty movies . :-)
  • GPS can still help (Score:3, Informative)

    by n1ywb ( 555767 ) on Wednesday April 30, 2003 @07:03PM (#5848695) Homepage Journal
    Use GPS to map the locations of any openings where you can get a signal, IE gutter drains, manholes, etc. Inside the drains, use traditional surveying techniques. I am not a civil engineering major so I can't help you much there. You might also build some kind of radio location system based on the troglophone [google.com]. That would be a very interesting project, although one that I would have absolutely no interest in :)
  • Caving (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mugnyte ( 203225 ) on Wednesday April 30, 2003 @07:04PM (#5848705) Journal

    Depends what you're after. lots of string and a compass will give you distances and directions, used correctly.

    to measure the size of rooms, check with architect friends about measuring all dimensions of a space manually

    For crazy insane measurements of large caves, try surveyors tools.

    If you're posting this on /. i guessing you're searching for a computer-vision solution. Digital Rangefinder+Compass+Level = a lot of work to scan a space's distance from a certain spot. Might be neato, but I don't know anyting about that.

    mug
    • lots of string and a compass will give you distances and directions, used correctly.

      Something tells me that being inside a big metal pipe might screw with the compass a wee bit.
  • It is pretty dark and wet in the small intestine as well and these [virginia.edu] seem to work there. Perhaps it would help you out if you flushed one of these down the toilet and picked it up at the waste treament plan several hours later where you can get pictures of it's journey.
  • With a mean DM and you'll figure out the right and wrong way to map underground passages. What was the old rule, keep going left.
  • by Pathwalker ( 103 ) * <hotgrits@yourpants.net> on Wednesday April 30, 2003 @07:27PM (#5848860) Homepage Journal
    Start by walking around aboveground with a GPS, marking the locations of manhole covers, and other features that you should be able to identify when underground. Maybe drop some brightly colored markers down storm drain gratings to ensure you will know which grating you are under.

    This should give you some points of reference that you can build the rest of your map around.

    You might also want to plot those locations on a topographic map, or an arial photo, and play "connect the dots" to try to figure out a simple overview of how the drain system is layed out. Once you have the overview, you can fill in more details as you explore.
  • Inertial Navigation (Score:5, Informative)

    by hectorh ( 113198 ) on Wednesday April 30, 2003 @07:33PM (#5848904) Homepage
    You could try using inertial navigation.

    There are some highly sensitive solid-state accelerometers. I believe that they are manufactured by National Semiconductor. Microsoft uses them in their handheld Sidewinder FreeStyle Pro. They look like fat silicon chips and the interfaces are digital, so they are easily connected to microcontrollers.

    If you need higher precission, you could add gyroscopes. Laser gyroscopes are popular this days and their prices have come down quite a bit.

    When you combine accelerometers with gyroscopes and a fairly high sampling rate, you can obtain high degrees of accuracy and precision.

    If you can use waypoints, then you can calculate drift rates and improve accuracy. If you think that the GPS signal may be usable then you can use a GPS receiver as a waypoint source.

    From my experience, the most common source of errors is high frequency content, specially when walking. A damper would go a long way towards improving the accuracy.

    You should have no problem integrating everything into a small backpack with a laptop (if you need a UI), or a small shoe box if all you want is data logging.

    Hope this helps, if you want more information such as part numbers and suppliers, I could gather some. As for designs and software, .... sorry, it's confidential information. :-)

    Hector
    • Yes, These guys [rotomotion.com] make a nice non-Microsoft part with some cool pictures of their helicopter [rotomotion.com] test system.
      • Very cool. I wonder how accurate it would be if I took one of their six degrees of freedom devices and strapped it to my torso. Add a small laptop or iPaq and (D)GPS for a complete solution. When ever possible correct the system with a good (D)GPS signal (when above ground) or a survay marker. Log all your data in a GIS compatible file format and you could have a powerful little tool.
    • Don't forget to drop the accelerator a few times as you are thrutching around. It sure helps the accuracy :-).

      Seriously, anyone who takes delicate (i.e. shock sensitive, water sensitive, dirtt sensitive) equipment underground is just asking for trouble.

  • by duffbeer703 ( 177751 ) on Wednesday April 30, 2003 @07:37PM (#5848944)
    take a reading every time you change direction.

    gps has made people very, very lazy. navigation isn't rocket science.
    • How well does the pedometer work when
      you're crawling on your belly?
      • then get a surveyor's rolling measuring wheel...

        large ones can be had here:
        http://www.surveyorsupply.com/

        coming up with complex and expensive technical solutions to trivial problems is retarded. people have been mapping & surveying for thousands of years.
    • I'm reading these responses -- use paper and pen, take bearings with a compass, measure distances with paces, a pedometer or a marked string -- and wondering: if you're not already doing these things, what the hell are you guys doing down there? How are you getting out?

      Or is it that in the sewers you can always walk another block and find a manhole?

  • I always thought that you could go down to the city hall and get city drainage plans...these days...i doubt that's the case...or a smart thing to do.

    You could use a compass for heading, and a string for distance. I don't know how you would easily measure the length of the string though. Perhaps put it on a wheel with a counter? For straight shots, you could probably use one of those laser range finders...this would require two people, one at each end, but it might work.

    I highly doubt the ultrasonic range
  • MicroGPS? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by fm6 ( 162816 ) on Wednesday April 30, 2003 @08:06PM (#5849156) Homepage Journal
    What you need to do is reinvent GPS from scratch. You put transmitters at various cave entrances, and use the signal descrepancies to figure out where you are in relation to them -- which is exactly what satellite GPS does. Except I guess the lightspeed delay with be too small to measure. Sonar?

    Hmm, I guess re-inventing GPS technology would be very expensive. Never mind!

  • You could get eaten by a grue...
  • by Violet Null ( 452694 ) on Wednesday April 30, 2003 @08:36PM (#5849346)
    To map a maze of twisty passages, all alike:

    What you'll need: Pen and paper, and lots of objects (at least one for every room).

    What to do: Drop an object in the first room, which we'll call room #1. Make a note of what object you dropped in room #1 (let's say it's a sword). Put a '1' on the paper, with eight lines coming out at the compass points. Pick one at random (let's say north) and go that way.

    You'll be in another room, which we'll call room 2. Drop another object (say, a bell), and make a note. Put a '2' on the paper, with eight lines coming out at the compass points. Finally, put a little '2' next to the line from room 1 you used to get here (in this case, north). You now know that going north from room 1 leads to room 2. Pick another direction (say, north again), and continue.

    If you end up in a room without an object, it's a new room, and you repeat the instructions above. If it's a room containing an object you dropped, then you just need to make a note on the appropriate line from the old room. Pretty soon, you'll have the whole maze mapped.

    Unless the thief comes by and picks up some of your objects. That'll mess you up. I recommend killing him first.
  • Mapping sewers. (Score:5, Informative)

    by maeka ( 518272 ) on Wednesday April 30, 2003 @08:44PM (#5849395) Journal
    I've mapped many a storm system, and here are a few quick tips.

    1.A compass works well in older systems composed of brick or clay tiles. Concrete pipe and box culverts often have enough iron in them to really mess up your compass.
    2.Most cities have "Atlas sheets" available for all city utilities. Water, storm, and sanitary are often listed on the same sheet. You can usually find these at the municipal utility complex - for free. Just tell the clerk at the counter you are doing a topographic survey for new development, and need to show such on your plot.
    3.I have used a cordless drill, concrete bit, and concrete screws to set points in the ceiling of pipes, at angle points. Use string and a protractor to measure angles. The screw also provides a nice hook to pull tape distances with. There is no way I'm taking a 20 grand total station into the sewer!
    4.Put the tip and straw from a can of WD-40 on a can of funky coloured spray paint. Use the straw to spray out of the manhole lid. This can help you tie your underground survey in with aboveground locations.
    5.Always be thinking like water. Water flows downhill. (duh) You aren't going to find that 10 foot dia. pipe very far from the local river or stream, or whatever your natural drain is. Take a johnboat or raft or such on a slow paddle down the riverbanks, looking for the big outlet pipes, and start your adventure there.
    6.Methane or carbon dioxide poisoning is NOT a major risk in STORM sewers. Watch it in older systems, though. Many of the older ones are combined - still. If there is organic debris on the floor of the pipes you are exploring, that is also a cause for alarm about gas. Clean bottom storm pipes are almost always safe.

    Those who said they have used GPS anywhere underground, near a lid or not, are full of it.
    Who wants to carry a 4' level in the drains? What will you do with it? If you want to measure slope - get a combo compass/inclinometer or fancy yourself one out of the protractor you are using to measure bends.
    Only one way to map a storm system - old school two man. Measure the angle and chain the distance!
    • Clean bottom storm pipes are almost always safe.

      But they are called storm pipes for a reason -- Always check the weather forecast before exploring. And even if you are covertly exploring, make sure someone knows where you are and your timetable. (Obvious perhaps, but safety first!)

  • by auferstehung ( 150494 ) <[ ].und.auferste ... m ['tod' in gap]> on Thursday May 01, 2003 @12:18AM (#5850454)
    You could do it like a real caver (i.e. spelunker). Here are some links: Good summary of technique [nps.gov], Some relevant books [bcra.org.uk], A cave surveying mailing list [tartarus.org], Some software to reduce your raw data [dundee.ac.uk], Links of links to more of the above and cave equipment suppliers [virginiacaves.org].
  • Survex (Score:2, Informative)

    by Froggie ( 1154 )
    No, really, it is called survex [survex.com]. Given data it attempts to construct a map of the cave allowing for inaccuracy. At least, so the author told me. I've got better things to do with my weekend than crawl around wet caves...
    • hehe - what about the program which converts protected ebooks into unprotected files
      "Clit" - convert literature
    • For info, from the site owner:

      "my slashdotting is up to 21 hits now. at peak I was received 2 hits per minute. it's a tribute to linux that the server stayed up"

      ;-)

  • Doesn't the Tube [thetube.com] (London Underground) already have one? [thetube.com]

  • Actually, this is a project I've been dreaming about for a number of years. I'm a big Lego Mindstorms tinkerer, and have a fondness for sensing/mapping devices.

    In short, what I would propose is a pair of optical/LIDAR mapping units, with a tripod or other stable mount. One would also be equipped with a GPS for initialization. The way they would work is:

    Set up the GPS-equipped unit outside the entrance to the underground system. Allow it to acquire a GPS fix to reference the entire system to the real world
    • It would be neat to have a software test-bench for this. Something like a crobots or Robocode engine that allows maps to be used and "equipment" to be added to the bot.

      Has anyone done anything like this? I'd think that it would be an obvious application. (Now that I've thought of it. :^) Perhaps the "bots shooting each other" was too neat an idea?

  • There are a couple of approaches. Having built and used an underwater cave mapper (The Wakulla2 Project) I know of what I speak. One of the guys (not directly involved with the mapper or rebreather of which I am one of the designers) has a technique for locating underground beacons using the Van Allen belt nulls. I do not know the details, but the technique also works in air caves. He places a beacon underground (in this case 300 ft underground and underwater) that is timed to go off at roughly noon.

After the last of 16 mounting screws has been removed from an access cover, it will be discovered that the wrong access cover has been removed.

Working...