Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Media The Almighty Buck

Promoting Musical Artists in the Post-RIAA Music World? 83

Mattcelt asks: "While we're all discussing the eventual demise of the RIAA and the triumph of the MP3, what should a small independent music publishing company do to sell a new artist to the public? My publishing company recently ran a $4,000 advertising campaign on a local radio station (107.9 the Link in Charlotte, NC). Despite reaching an average audience of more than 10,000 during peak times, we netted *0* sales. That's right, absolutely nothing. I've made the entire album available in MP3 format on the Ephelian Records website to facilitate adoption, and I know some people have downloaded the songs, but I can't figure out why no one has pre-ordered the CD. How does an indie artist make a living when gig prices for unknown artists will barely cover the gas money and CDs won't sell? Are we really wrong about the availability of MP3s affecting music sales?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Promoting Musical Artists in the Post-RIAA Music World?

Comments Filter:
  • Ahem. (Score:5, Funny)

    by skinfitz ( 564041 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @06:52PM (#6042569) Journal
    I've made the entire album available in MP3 format on the Ephelian Records website to facilitate adoption, and I know some people have downloaded the songs, but I can't figure out why no one has pre-ordered the CD.

    Er, dude...
  • by renehollan ( 138013 ) <rhollan@@@clearwire...net> on Monday May 26, 2003 @06:53PM (#6042571) Homepage Journal
    Sorry to be so harsh, but as someone who has sent good money to indie artists just because I liked the MP3s I downloaded for free, if the talent is there, the dollars will follow (well, some at least).
    • Well, after downloading one of the songs (I'm thinking that it's getting the slashdot treatment... means i should by rights look for the music on Kazzaa in moments, right?) the talent doesn't suck exaclly... but it's nothing to write home about. The singer's voice is washed away by the music, and the words seem to blur together.

      If he sang clearer, and they mixed it with the music a bit quieter, it would probably go over a lot better.
      • Of course you're not looking for music criticism on /., but I don't think your lack of orders has anything to do with MP3 availability.

        I only heard one track -- "Drop of a Hat". The song was interesting but it's crying out for some engineering work and a producer, as implied above. A few simple recording and mixing techniques [powells.com] would render the tune much more listenable [prosoundweb.com]. For me at least, it was hard to hear through the mix to decide if I even liked the song or not.

        It's cool you're trying to promote your wor
        • This isn't exactly Kelly Clarkson or Rueben. Folk and folksy-style music are non-profit endeavors. It will take years for such an artist to find his audience. The terms starving and artist frequently go together no matter how good an artist is.
    • I think it sucks, maybe because I don't like the genre or maybe because it really does.

      Occams Razor... Simplist explaination.

      -- iCEBaLM
    • If you are in it for the money - then you are doing it for the wrong reasons.
      • Well, there's being in it for the money...and there's needing to make enough to get along. Since these guys (girls? haven't listened) are indies I think we should cut them some slack, especially since the complaint is ZERO sales.
    • I think it has to do with the site featuring the mp3s. Some sites just list mp3s, while other's list mp3s and promote the bands and their CDs. SonicAwareness.com is one I can think of off hand.
  • Preorder? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Drakin ( 415182 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @06:53PM (#6042572)
    Not sure, but how many people preorder anything except what they know is going to be hard to get when it first comes out, like software, consols & games, and certain books.

    Unless the band is extreamly hot and popular in the region, why would anyone bother to preorder, when they can just pick it up whenever it comes out, if they want the CD?
    • Well, checking Amazon's top-sellers [amazon.com] in music, I see that:

      • Four out of the top 5... (three are more than a week away)
      • Five out of the top 10... (four of which are more than a week away)
      • Six out of the top 20... (five of which are more than a week away)

      Somebody's preordering CDs...

      Of course, out of those six:

      • Two are CD singles by (I think) the American Idol contestants (ie they have the Fox promotional empire behind them)
      • The remaining four (a Zeppelin live album, a Metallica album, a Jewel album, a
  • by ShmuelP ( 5675 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @06:55PM (#6042589)
    Well, I don't know the answer for other bands, but it seems like getting linked on Slashdot is a good approach.
    • I know I'm going way off topic and maybe even violating some kind of etiquette by commenting on your sig, but I have to note that it is probably the single most poignant commentary on the sick state of "Web development" I've ever read...

  • by anthony_dipierro ( 543308 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @06:56PM (#6042597) Journal

    How does an indie artist make a living when gig prices for unknown artists will barely cover the gas money and CDs won't sell?

    Get a job.

  • You put up MP3s of your CD on the web, of an indie band, and then expect people to buy your CD?

    Not to sound like a troll, but I fail to see your logic. The point of having a few mp3s is to give them a sample of what the rest sounds like. (Or in the RIAA's case, the few good songs on a CD). Also, my experience with indie bands is, well, that they suck. My cousin was part of one, and it wasn't what I would consider remotely stellar.

    I buy CDs for music that I downloaded the MP3s of and found good, but th
    • I think his logic was clear from his last question:

      Are we really wrong about the availability of MP3s affecting music sales?

      It seems that he's fallen for the statement made by many slashdotters and other P2P apologists that the spread of MP3s doesn't hurt music sales.

      It just isn't true. And it goes against common sense logic, as your rhetorical question suggests.

      • It's not that simple. MP3s can be a double edged sword. People know what they're getting before they pay money on it. People will refuse to pay for crap, and are much more likely to pay money for something chancy if it's good.

        This isn't a simple equation where one can assume that changing one variable will result in a change in another.
        • This isn't a simple equation where one can assume that changing one variable will result in a change in another.

          Sure it is... Supply and demand. Increase supply more than you increase demand, and price goes down.

          OK, OK. There are two variables.

      • It seems that he's fallen for the statement made by many slashdotters and other P2P apologists that the spread of MP3s doesn't hurt music sales.

        Hmm, and what about his paid advertising. That didn't seem to increase his sales either.

        And how, exactly does Janis Ian fit into your generalizations? Is she a "P2P apologist"? (She's surely not a /.'er, perhaps you could point out how she's a "P2P apologist"?)

        It just isn't true. And it goes against common sense logic

        Yes, it really is true. It fits in per
        • Hmm, and what about his paid advertising. That didn't seem to increase his sales either.

          One radio commercial to 10,000 people is hardly likely to. I don't see how that's relevant though. The question is whether or not P2P hurts sales. It's not whether or not paid advertising helps sales.

          And how, exactly does Janis Ian fit into your generalizations?

          She's an apologist.

          She's surely not a /.'er, perhaps you could point out how she's a "P2P apologist"?

          "Free Internet downloads are good for the mus

          • First off, sorry for the /.'ing on emprecords.com - 500+ megs of traffic in a matter of hours takes its toll. :-) I will soon have sample tracks available on amazon.com [amazon.com]; sorry for the wait.

            Now, to answer the questions:
            One radio commercial to 10,000 people is hardly likely to. I don't see how that's relevant though. The question is whether or not P2P hurts sales. It's not whether or not paid advertising helps sales.

            Well, it was more like 44 radio commercials... Twelve of which were during peak afternoo
            • Well, it was more like 44 radio commercials... Twelve of which were during peak afternoon driving times (@$250/apiece) on the #1-rated show during in this marker during that time period. Average listening audience is projected between 9,800 and 13,500 or so for those times.

              Well, I don't know enough about radio marketing to comment on whether or not that's likely to get people to buy CDs. Could be that the commercial wasn't done well. Could be that 44 radio commercials just isn't a good advertising mech

    • Oh come on...you obviously haven't heard that many indie bands, or you don't quite understand the meaning of an "indie band". Just because a band isn't signed to a major label does not mean they suck. Take a listen to any band on:

      Matador

      Kill Rock Stars

      4AD (Please don't tell me you haven't heard the Pixies!)

      Alternative Tentacles

      K Records

      Thrill Jockey

      Epitaph

      Arena Rock

      Minty Fresh

      Secretly Canadian

      Kranky

      Lookout

      ...and about 1000 other indie labels. And these are just the ones I can pull from memor

      • God Bless you... here are a few more for your list:

        Burnt Toast Vinyl
        Sub Pop
        Jade Tree
        Tooth and Nail
        Darla
        Def Jux
        Misra
        Saddle Creek
        Velvet Blue Music
        File 13
        Drag City
        Nothern
        Barsuk
        Kindercore
        V2
        Anticon
        P o lyvinyl
        Merge
        Tiger Style
        Deep Elm
        Perfect Pop
        Pias
        Fat Cat

        The best way to piss off the RIAA is to buy albums from these labels. Other added benefits... a world of music so great you'll swear you didn't know it was possible.

        ***warning: if you buy just one, you may end up a junkie like me. i tithe about 20% of my payc
      • Oh come on...you obviously haven't heard that many indie bands, or you don't quite understand the meaning of an "indie band". Just because a band isn't signed to a major label does not mean they suck.

        Hear Hear! (Or is it here here?). I was about to reply with the same comment. Last week I was down in Austin, Texas on business. It's an incredible city for live music. Anywho, we checked out this record store "Waterloo Records", it was incredible. They had a dozen listening posts with 5-6 albums per post,
  • by Frac ( 27516 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @07:01PM (#6042625)
    I've made the entire album available in MP3 format on the Ephelian Records website to facilitate adoption, and I know some people have downloaded the songs, but I can't figure out why no one has pre-ordered the CD.

    I suggest you encode it in pristine ogg VBR @ 320kbps. Also, include scans of the album cover and back, a nice .nfo describe the release, a .sfv that verifies the checksums, and all packaged in a nice RAR file. Now put it on Kazaa, and share it on "release" priority on eMule on the eDonkey network.

    Oh, did you ask how to make money off it? Err, nevermind...
    • by Fweeky ( 41046 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @08:05PM (#6042991) Homepage
      Sorry, your release does not meet the requirements for posting on the KaZZa media network. In case you need reminding:
      • For MP3 release, the maximum bitrate is 128kbps if you're using LAME (although not with an --alt-preset); unlimited if using Xing (with a requirement of at least 4 annoying artifacts and 1 annoying flanging effect through at least 20% of the track).
      • For OGG Vorbis, you have two choices: -q-1 (that's minus 1), or any quality setting provided you transcode from an MP3 that passes the MP3 rules. Any and all OGGs must come with ID3 tags; preferably for a different album.
      • No NFO, no scans of albums. Either the ID3 tag must be empty, incorrect or missing, or the filenames must be of the form track[1-12].{mp3,ogg}.
      • SFV's and similar are out of the question unless they were created during processing; i.e. before adding ID3 tags (especially for OGG's), or created using some oddball tool that nobody uses.
      • All these rules may be waived provided the files are only served off a single 200bps modem user in Alaska, who connects for five minutes every week.
      Remember, failing to abide by these rules may result in your removal from the search database (except for those movies and crappy partial mp3's you haven't bothered deleting yet). The KaZZa Media Network thanks you for helping to reinforce the quality of service our users expect from the network.
    • I'm working on it - I've had to much else on my plate, I didn't think about it. I'm fixing that now.

      Go to the EMP Records website [emprecords.com] for a directory listing with the songs in .ogg format.

      Pleasing customers - that's how I plan to make money. "There's your book, now buy it!*" *grin*

      Matt

      * "Bookshop", Monty Python's Flying Circus
  • by clambake ( 37702 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @07:03PM (#6042631) Homepage
    Well, one way to make sales would be to post on slashdot mentioning that you might be wavering on your belief that MP3 sharing may not be all it's cracked up to be... Ahh, I see, you're way ahead of me!
  • by wowbagger ( 69688 ) * on Monday May 26, 2003 @07:06PM (#6042658) Homepage Journal
    <OT>
    "Post-RIAA world"? Quickly, quarentine Cliff - he has Jon Katz disease!
    (Actually, this being Memorial Day, I must admit I actually miss JK sometimes..)
    </OT>

    I would ask this: Is your album available in stores, or only via on-line ordering? If it is only available on-line, how easy to remember is the URL?

    Consider where people listen to the radio - I would say mostly in their cars. Now, here I am, driving along, and on comes your ad. First of all, my ad filter wetware comes online - I hit the button to skip to a new station, or I blank out what is going on.

    OK, so let's say your ad plays a snippet of the music in question, and I listen to it and say "Huh, that's kinda cool. Who is this?" Then your ad says "That was a sample of Scab - Now the Puss Flows Freely, available for download and purchase at www.fbq39x34.com/~tqxir/49912/pxj36.asp". Now, even if you said that slowly enough I could copy it, I'm not going to whip out a pen and paper and copy that while weaving through downtown traffic.

    That's part of why the RIAA is still pertainent in this world. If all I can remember is the group name (and maybe not even that all that well) and if the group is in Worst Buy, I can find it. But if I have to find them online, and if all I have is some common words that don't lend themselves to Googling....

    Last but not least: how does your website handle orders? Do you hid things behind layers of Flash and Javascript? Do you work only with Exploiter? Do you not accept credit cards?

    Ask yourself this: if I wanted to buy that album, how many impediments are in my way?
    • You raise some very good points. In retrospect, I wish I could have waited to run the ads *after* the release date of the album. I just don't have the advertising budget to do the media blitz and anticipation that a big studio does.

      Problem is, the ad dates were set in February, when the release date was originally set for April 15, and the ads would have run after it was available in several retail stores and Amazon.com. When the album was delayed for a month (unforseen design and printing issues), I thi
      • I used Fat Chuck's Music (which was featured here on /. a few weeks ago) for the ordering pages

        I'm not sure that was the best choice. You may want to consider using a much better established site (e.g. one with over 36,000 artists [cdbaby.com]) and a proven track record [slashdot.org] for sales; i.e. one that has already given $3 million dollars of sales profit to indie bands. They also make it very easy [cdbaby.com] to find indie artists who sound like your favorite bands. That saves having to wade through piles and piles of stuff that's
  • how about making part of the albums available, like this brilliant guy over here [mochipet.com], and sell full cds cheap (what with viral marketing cutting overheads n all)?

    i have been thinking about this quite a lot lately, since i'm kinda guilty of copying a lot of indie-music from friends without buying the cds: even though i could never afford even half price on every cd i've copied, i'm still paying for, lets say every tenth album.

    i'm not sure if this is a working model, but i listen to more music nowdays, and
  • ...and take some of those gigs that barely cover gas and food, just to get your music out there for people to listen to. Most of the indie "success stories" (Big Head Todd & the Monsters, Ani DiFranco, etc.) based their reputations on their live performances, with album sales being just another means of helping to support that primary occupation.

    You can't just throw your music at people who've never heard or seen the band before, and expect them to gladly fork over $10-20 on the chance that it could be good. Until you have some "known" artists, (i.e., they can attract a crowd on the basis of their name and rep for their shows) the label itself isn't going to be a good promotional vehicle. Once one or two of your artists have started to attract some attention, though, the label's name can be an attractor for new talent, and for listeners looking for more of that kind of music.

    It can be done -- my father [day-reynolds.com] has been making a living as an independent musician for a number of years, and after establishing a sizeable local following for his live shows, has managed to self-publish and sell out several 1000-unit batches of his recent CDs. However, it took at least 3-4 years of low-paid live shows, interviews and solo accoustic sets on local radio stations, etc., before he was able to do so.
    • Ani (Score:1, Troll)

      by Gothmolly ( 148874 )
      Except that Ani DiFranco sucks.
      • I know I'm feeding the troll...but, it's worth mentioning that whether Ani sucks (actually she is pretty incredible live--I was seriously disappointed when I bought one of her records though) isn't the point.

        She makes a good living, sells a lot of records at very good margins, and does what she loves (I presume). The advice is sound...Get your ass on the road, and if you have something worth listening too (and sometimes even if you don't), making a living will eventually follow. It is easier if you live
        • You're very right, and that's exactly what my next step is. However, it seems to me that Britney Spears sells magnitudes more records than concert tickets, based on traditional marketing approaches. I figured, in my naïvité perhaps, that I could jumpstart things by taking the same approach.

          Now there are a couple of possible differences here - 1) I don't have much radio play yet, 2) I don't have the budget that Sony et al. have, or 3) I don't know what the hell I'm doing in the marketing busines
  • by Tumbleweed ( 3706 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @07:24PM (#6042753)
    The music sucks? Just a shot in the dark, there. I just checked out one mp3 posted on your site and it was pretty bad - much worse than the kind of dreck that usually makes it to the Top 40 playlists, in fact. But, there IS a market for just about anything, so let's think about some other possibilities.

    What was the nature of your 'advertisement' on the radio? Was it a sample of some songs? Or was it just "we have good music - come here to buy it"?

    Did you advertise the right kind of music to the right radio audience?

    Are your prices out of line?

    Are your CDs available in stores? Many people don't buy stuff online, and if it can't be found in a 'real store', they're not gonna buy it.

    Do you even know what your target audience is LIKE?

    Just some thoughts.

  • Did you consider that maybe your music might suck? Maybe your marketing the wrong crowd. Get a better manager maybe (or at least ask some of them if you suck), and try and get a deal with a bigger record company.
  • What about music? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by fm6 ( 162816 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @07:29PM (#6042773) Homepage Journal
    Despite reaching an average audience of more than 10,000 during peak times, we netted *0* sales.
    Not that hard to explain. How many of those 10,000 even own a computer? How many of them just tuned out your ads along with dozens of other ads? How many are going to stop what they're doing and write down URL (especially if they're behind the wheel of a car!)? How catchy was your ad? And finally, how many of them even liked your music?

    Big record companies spend millions on advertising and promotion, all done by experienced professionals. And they still sometimes lay an egg. Spending a few thousand dollars is no guarantee of anything.

    If you want to make a place for your music, there's no substitute for the simple hard work of developing your art, finding your audience, and gradually making a place for yourself. This doesn't always work out, and it takes time and effort in any case. But there's no magic shortcuts.

    • Good point. I used to listen to the Link back when I lived in Charlotte (and even after I moved, until ASCAP shut down online broadcasts). It's a listen-in-your-car and listen-at-work kind of station. People at either of those places are only going to buy your album if they remember the hook and the name of the band or album. And chances are, they're going to walk into Blockbuster Music looking for the album, not preorder online. The Link's audience is about as mainstream, middle of the road as you can get
  • It's *hard* to make music good enough to sell. The album you're trying to sell (and I'm thinking that you are the artist, as this "label" has only one artist) is extremely well produced. That's about all it has going for it, and low production values have never held back good music.

    At the same time, you've got overworked, long intros (leave that for the live album 20 years down the road), several insturmentals (which almost never do well - how many of James Taylors insturmentals can you recall?), and a singer that sounds like he's been training in high school chorus for the solo for the spring musical. Yes, I can say that, as I've had albums that flopped, and I sound nasal and grating.

    Plus, having listened to the first half of all the songs, none of them really caught my attention and stood out. Sorry - it's *hard* to push albums. Live gigs? Sure - even I can fill a local venue. Selling albums across the country? You're competing with thousands of other bands, mostly comprised of veteran performers who are band-mate swapping every year or so, hoping to mesh with somebody for that next great hit. Plus loads of semi-successful or career artists like Throwing Muses and Men Without Hats, both of whom just released new albums and are trying to push their own stuff in the exact same way you are - with pre-built in name recognition.

    To sum it up - making music is easy. Making good music is hard. Selling your music is the hardest thing of all and involves some amount of luck. There are bands that gave up, only to have their album suddenly take off two years after they gave all the copies away at live performances.

    Incidently, I *assume* you're performing, pushing your stuff with at least two gigs a week. If you're not, you're not doing the work. Regardless if you make it this time around, constant gigging vastly improves your ability to perform, and if that's what you want to do in life, you have to work at it.

    Incidently, while I ripped apart the *album*, you've got some decent songs. I'd sit and have dinner with you performing somewhere. And that's where 98% of all artists will spend almost all their careers. That's the music biz.

    --
    Evan

  • by Apreche ( 239272 )
    your music has to be good. I'm not going to pay for music that sucks. The future of music advertising I think is in non-conventional methods. I highly suggest you get a third party to make a meme out of one of your songs. I found out about an awesome dude Master Zap http://www.z4p.com after hearing one of his songs in an anime music video. I found out about Tatu because Gabe from Penny Arcade told me about it. Just making a website with mp3s and advertising isn't enough. Your music actually has to be g
    • Yeah, car commercials are becoming the Next Big Thing in music promotion. Even established artists like Sting are resorting to having their music used to sell cars to get their stuff out there (especially now that you can go to the car company websites and find links to buy the CDs the songs came from, in some cases).

      • Not only are established artists like Sting doing commercials these days -- it's not uncommon for up and coming indies like The Shins and The Moldy Peaches to do commercials as a way to push their music and make a little money as well. I can't say that I love it, but if they're cool with it, then whatever...
  • A good musician can get of a bus in a strange town, find a likely spot and within half a day make enough tips to keep him going for the day. He will make enough to pay for accommodation and food and a bit extra in that time. He'll be able to find a bar that will supply the drinks for him in return for playing in a corner of the bar. By the end of the day he'll usually have an invite to stay at someone's house for a couple of nights.

    People can and do travel this way. Good musicians don't starve. If you c

    • Since you're blogging away on Slashdot, I'm guessing that you have a 'day job', and hence, are not one who could wander the world as a travelling minstrel.
      • You're spot on regarding my musical ability but your reasoning sucks. I'll give you on example. My brother in law is both a talented cabinet maker and a talented fiddler. He chooses to make a living from working with wood, but when he travels he covers his costs by taking the fiddle he made himself into the street and practising.

  • Re: Gigs (Score:2, Informative)

    You say that gigging barely covers the costs, but every story I've heard about a succesful band almost always contains a variation on the following quote:

    "...they built up a a dedicated following through a hard schedule of concerts..."

    Unless you're groomed beforehand by the big labels, that seems to be the way to raise your profile and make some sales: hard work.
    • Exactly, Cap. Hard frikkin work. As a gigging musician for more than 5 years, I have spent some months playing 6 - 8 shows all over the northeast. Sometimes it was New York on a Friday, Boston on Saturday and New Hampshire on Sunday for a total net of: NOTHING! You have to bust your ass as a touring act to build up a dedicated following. And usually, the grueling schedule and anti-climax of playing to near empty rooms your first time in a new market will weed out the artists not cut out for it. In any ev
  • by KILNA ( 536949 ) <kilna@kilna.com> on Monday May 26, 2003 @08:16PM (#6043055) Homepage Journal

    Firstly, take any advice from me with a grain of salt, I'm not a successful indie artist... I'm just an indie artist. Firstly, you've done something good. You're on slashdot. You have managed to get free marketing in a venue where people "get" the idea of sampling a product before purchasing it, and many see the value in paying for a product they already have for free. This is a good thing.

    However, for a pre-order scenario to work you really need to add value to pre-ordering it. You can do this by giving it away before selling, but the only ones who will bite are the ones who only want to listen to your music on a manufactured CD delivered at some point in the future, or wish to contribute based solely on the music they already have for free. So far, from your account of the situation, this number is zero. Now, if you relase a few of the tracks and make it so the rest aren't made available until a certain number of pre-sales are placed, then you're getting somewhere. Put some documentation on the web as far as how close you are to your goals. If you make it less expensive to purchase the CD on a pre-order, that helps too. I have 2 CD singles with mixes completed, the current plan is to release one outright and not release the second until sales of the first and pre-sales from the second will cover my costs.

    Another plan for my music is to see if there's any chance in hell I can get it covered on slashdot. Perhaps your $4000 wasn't wasted, it just got funneled into sales in a way contrary to your expectations.

  • Digital music distribution will only take off once we ditch the CD format. In a post RIAA world (may that day come!), the only way to ensure that piracy of music will stop (and i dont care what you tell me, it IS stealing. youre getting music that you didnt pay for, period.), is to distribute the music in a DRM enabled format..and i mean DRM enabled, not DRM castrated..fair use is the key. When people move away from physical CD based distribution, and we all use solid state/HDD based players, or whatever th
  • by rudy_wayne ( 414635 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @08:54PM (#6043315)
    That your music sucks? Just because you recorded it (no mater how hard you think you worked and no matter how good you think it is) doesn't mean anyone else likes it.

  • by AlphaOne ( 209575 ) on Monday May 26, 2003 @09:19PM (#6043501)
    I mean no offense by any of this... hopefully you'll take it constructively.

    First, I listened to the ad on the website... I'd assume it was produced by the station itself and frankly, it's horrible. It generates no excitement and it isn't catchy enough to stick out of the crowd of other ads. In short, few people even heard the ad. I did radio work for many years and I think you were screwed by the station production people. That ad could have been formatted in a dozen other ways and had more impact.

    Second, you're advertising on the wrong station. "The Link" looks like a hot AC station and your music just doesn't fit into that demographic. Have you tried a college station? Send them a gratis CD and see if they play it.

    Find a station that plays something similar... I'd call it easy listening or maybe even jazz if I had to put it in a genre, but maybe you know better where you want to head with it. Once you've found your station, toss out some teaser ads and see what gets caught in the net.

    Good luck!
    • Why is this only scored at 2+1? He's one of the few people that actually took the time to review the needs of the asker and offer a serious solution.

      I'm definitely willing to blow some of my extra karma to say mod this parent up.
    • I mean no offense by any of this... hopefully you'll take it constructively.

      Certainly.

      First, I listened to the ad on the website... I'd assume it was produced by the station itself and frankly, it's horrible. It generates no excitement and it isn't catchy enough to stick out of the crowd of other ads. In short, few people even heard the ad. I did radio work for many years and I think you were screwed by the station production people. That ad could have been formatted in a dozen other ways and had more i
      • Since a ton of people commented on what was good / bad, etc. I feel its important to note a couple things:

        For starters: Any ad on its own (I don't care what kind) is useless unless you have at least three or four other promotional ideas in place. If you have a radio ad, you more than likely want to tie that to a retailer or website where the CD is already available.

        If you were expecting pre-orders... I mean.... pre-orders are not where your focus should be. Like at all. Orders, period. Any band that puts
  • "... I can't figure out why no one has pre-ordered the CD"

    You're asking people to pre-order a CD? You're asking regular, average, CD-buying people to preorder a CD?

    Average Joe does not preorder anything from an unknown entity, much less for music that they've heard maybe 5 or 10 times in their life. Pre-orders work for groups that have dedicated following, who are willing to say, "Here's my money now - you can pay me with product later." You are trying to go backwards and develop a following by having non-followers preorder a CD.

    I wouldn't do it, myself, unless I felt passionate about the music, and I doubt your music causes much feeling in me at all, nevermind passion. Even if I really liked the music I would say, "Well, I'll visit infrequently over the next few months - if they have anything they can ship tomorrow then I might buy it." But since the MP3s are freely available, I might not even check back.

    Going back to your original question:
    what should a small independent music publishing company do to sell a new artist to the public?

    I suspect, but don't know, that a publishing company will have to take a hit on a few albums before the artist takes off. Like a web site it takes years, not months, to gather enough followers to make ends meet, without breaking a profit. Some artists biff, some make it big, but you have to hold onto them, develop them, produce two or more EXCELLENT polished albums, get some regular airplay on several stations, and put some blood, sweat, and tears into your work.

    How about this:
    Quick, easy/cheap, profitable.

    Pick two. The RIAA does quick and profitable by pouring money into it. You will never be able to compete on their field, so don't try.

    -Adam
  • It's been a few months since I got my iPod and my 2,500 track music collection is just starting to feel small. I realised that I haven't a clue what interesting music is out there, no idea what to get next, if anything.

    In the past I've found out about music in many different ways: MP3.com (Electrostatic), news articles (Kyoko Date), anime (Sharon Apple), soundtracks (Craig Armstrong), free samples on the InterWeb (Delerium), radio, TV, friends, etc. Recently I haven't found any musical acts worth followin

  • oh man.. (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward
    is this a plant by the RIAA to make us think we need them?

    so many things wrong with this..

    1) I listen to the radio to LISTEN TO SOMETHING. If you're talking about something else I can listen to, and it costs money, I'm going to tune it right out. Would you put an ad for bottled water on a Coke can?

    2) People are up to their armpits in music. Your music won't "sell itself" (*especially* to the 107.9 audience). I haven't listened to your music but I'd imagine it sounds a lot like a whole bunch of other musi
    • is this a plant by the RIAA to make us think we need them?

      Nope, it's an honest question.

      1) I listen to the radio to LISTEN TO SOMETHING. If you're talking about something else I can listen to, and it costs money, I'm going to tune it right out. Would you put an ad for bottled water on a Coke can?

      No, but it would be pretty dumb not to put an ad for coke on the side of a soft drink machine, don't you think? Why do you suppose Amazon.com puts "if you like this, you might like that" links on their websit
  • Ads aren't the only way to make money. You need to play gigs, even if playing gigs means not eating like a rock star, or driving the best car. You can't get exposure unless you play. Bands are seldom made overnight, and many bands (smashmouth comes to mind) play for years *10-20 is not unheard of* before making it big. Be patient, the RIAA isn't the cause of *ALL* the worlds problems.... yet.
  • They had professionally made CD's minted with a nice silk screen on them. In quantities of 400+ they get them done for about a buck a CD. Then they sell them for a dollar at their gigs. They also give some of them away through audience participation like who can answer trivia about the band. Many half drunk people will shell out a buck for a CD especially when they just paid $2.50 for a beer.

    Now you say, well how do they make money on that deal? They don't expect to make money from CD sales. But by getting
  • Live Shows. Playing live is the best way to promote yourself if you're not being pushed by one of the RIAA (or to a lesser extent a successful indy) labels. It always has been, and chances are it always will be. If you're good then you'll grow a fanbase who are the best at spreading the word. MP3 (and a website) are nice to have once you've got something established -- they allow your fanbase to keep tabs on what you're up to -- but a career can not be built on MP3s, webpages or
    radio promotions alone.

    G
  • In addition to the other comments people here have made, people seem to be skirting one big issue.

    I'm sorry to have to say this, because he's probably a very nice guy but your singer is flat. Totally, completely, almost painfully flat. This wouldn't be as bad but his voice is also too loud on most (though not all) of the MP3's. Re-balancing the songs would be a good start, but quite frankly as I listen to "Reluctance" in the background (one of the few well-equalized songs in the bunch) it does not seem
  • by Harik ( 4023 )
    So, your $4000 advertising campaign failed, and the free-MP3 download campaign failed, how can you possibly get your name out there?

    My reccomendation would be to post it to a highly-trafficed internet site and use sympathetic keywords like 'End of RIAA' and 'independant publisher'. Try to make it look like a real story rather then just an ad, and watch the money come rolling in!

    Cynically, this probably IS a paid placement, folks. Welcome to the New Slashdot.

    --Dan

    • Re:Simple! (Score:2, Interesting)

      by Mattcelt ( 454751 )
      Well, it's not a paid placement, but I can't say that I'm disappointed that people are checking out my site.

      Honestly, I did it because I wanted to find out what the people in the /. community thought about my ideas, and where I went "wrong". And I've gotten a lot of great feedback.

      You're right, this has been a priceless set of links for me, but I think the real value is in the suggestions, not in whatever sales might or might not derive from it.

      Matt
  • 1. Write good music
    2. Play it well live
    3. Build up a fan base
    4. Sell stuff (CDs, t-shirts, tickets...)
    5. ...
    6. Profit!

    Try looking at these guys [katsuiswatchingyou.com]. They're doing alright. Not quite to the Metallica, Creed, Brittney Speares level of riches yet, but they definitely hold their own for a small town with more local acts than it knows what to do with.

    -Ab
  • The album is called Snapshots, by someone named Matthew O'Reilly, someone I haven't heard of before now. The MP3s can be found at this link [emprecords.com].

    First off, a hint for the original submitter: You don't need full-bitrate MP3s for a preview. 56Kib/s would have done, and would have been a lot faster to download. Further, it would also encourage people to buy the album if they liked it, just to get something they could get a higher bitrate from.

    Tracks:

    • Drop of a Hat: Okay, so I knew nothing about this album
  • Personally I make all my bands music available on the web. We get cd orders by mail and sell merch at all of our shows. I think the mp3 is a good promotional tool. How else is someone in California going to find out and listen to a local band out of the midwest?!?! http://www.faultland.com

Don't panic.

Working...