Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Data Storage

RAID for Zero-G? 123

Cujo asks: "In all seriousness, I need a RAID that supports at least level 3 and stores > 500 GB, and I need to it work in zero-G (but not in a vacuum), and be able to take a fair bit of vibration and noise when turned off. I don't want to spend huge sums: I'm thinking well less than $50,000. I've looked at Apple's XServe/XRaid products, and they look great (about $10,000), but are they rugged enough and who is their competition? Some people make hardened RAIDs for military use, but I'm unfamiliar with the best candidates in that field (and do I really need mil spec?)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

RAID for Zero-G?

Comments Filter:
  • Have you tried IBM? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Zocalo ( 252965 ) on Thursday July 03, 2003 @10:26AM (#6358233) Homepage
    They do use ThinkPads on the shuttle/ISS after all, so they must have the drives capable of this kind of thing. RAID cabinets and controllers have no moving parts (or maybe a fan or two), so I doubt they would be affected by zero G anyway.
  • by Cujo ( 19106 ) on Thursday July 03, 2003 @10:43AM (#6358386) Homepage Journal

    Shuttle middeck. It's an environment beningn enough for humans, so not as bad as an ELV ride. The drives would be off and parked during ascent.

  • Heat and Radiation (Score:5, Informative)

    by ka9dgx ( 72702 ) * on Thursday July 03, 2003 @10:57AM (#6358518) Homepage Journal
    I see three main challenges in this scenario:

    • Heat
      Convection cooling gets assumed into almost everything, so you'll have to make sure the gear gets some air forced over everything to keep it cool. Inside the hard drives, you've got those nice platters pushing the air for you, so that should be ok.
    • Air pressure
      You indicate that there will be air, but not the pressure. You should test your system at the operating atmosphere and pressure for an extended amount of time. This is critical because the hard drives typically float on a cushion of the ambient atmosphere.
    • Radiation
      Since you're outside the 50 or so miles of air which filters out most of the radation common in space, make sure you have hardware ECC RAM, etc. It would also be good to make sure there is a hardware watchdog in place to protect the OS from hanging do to an induced CPU error.
    Testing tip:
    I'd suggest you test the unit, then run the same test with the unit operating upside down, and on each of it's other 4 faces, as a minimum.

    You've got an interesting project, good luck!

    --Mike--

  • by joehoya ( 541611 ) on Thursday July 03, 2003 @11:37AM (#6358899)
    I have worked with these guys [mt-optech.com] before and they are a great group. They have a lot of experience building rugged mass-storage solutions for airborne and military applications. In addition, they are a relatively small company, with a lot of engineering capability, so they should be able to give you personal attention and help you work through the various issues involved in this type of system.
  • Paul, hello, I've just sent an e-mail from my work address. I've got some contacts for you in the Balitimore area. If you would like a sales rep to call, please reply with your contact information via e-mail and I'll pass the info right along, and pass you some names / numbers / e-mail addresses as well.
  • You'll need SCSI (Score:3, Informative)

    by MrResistor ( 120588 ) <.peterahoff. .at. .gmail.com.> on Thursday July 03, 2003 @12:29PM (#6359386) Homepage
    If you want RAID-3 you pretty much have to go SCSI. There may be a way to do it with ATA drives, but I haven't heard of it.

    The other reason you want SCSI is reliability. That's one of the reasons SCSI drives are so much more expensive. I've seen more than one SCSI drive get dropped on a hard tile floor and still be usable for a year or more (These are half hieght Seagate and IBM, 7200 or 10k RPM, YMMV).

    If you do decide to go IDE, try to use laptop drives. They have MUCH better g-force tolerance than the standard 3.5 inch IDE drives. However, I've still never seen one survive getting dropped on a hard tile floor. Shock and vibration are different things, though, so the laptop drives still may be a better choice. You can

    You could go flash, and that would take care of the vibration/shock issue, but at 1GB each that's an assload of IDE controllers you have to somehow get working together. Assuming 4 per controller, that's still 125 controllers. Even if you solved the IRQ problem, where would you put all of them? Space is a precious comodity on these missions. Plus at $200 each that means $100k for 500GB, which seems to be out of your budget range. A custom motherboard with 125 PCI slots is certainly out of your budget range.

    What I would do is talk to standard RAID vendors like EMC^2 or Ciprico and see what they've got. I know a company that would be happy to design and build a shock-mount for a standard raid chassis for you for probably under $10k. You could also go somewhere like Musicians friend and buy a road case, which will certainly have some anti-shock measures, for a few hundred dollars if your needs won't be too severe.

    I very much doubt that zero-g will be an issue at all. The things that will be problems have already been mentioned by other posts.

  • by p7 ( 245321 ) on Thursday July 03, 2003 @12:31PM (#6359413)
    I don't think hard drives are vacuum sealed. Most of the hard drives I have taken apart have an airhole. I have been told it is for pressure equalization. Some of the old IBM Deskstars have a warning to not cover the hole. So at the very least I would not assume that a hard drive is sealed.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 03, 2003 @02:40PM (#6361024)
    ok..not the shuttle but a rocket (far more hostile than the shuttle i'd imagine). experiment worked for 3 days, data returned safely. equipment :
    2 x 533Mhz Alpha 21264As (164LX boards) with 1Gb RAM (ECC) each, RAID-5 using ICP-Vortex boards with 128MB ECC cache RAM each and 7 x Maxtor 120GB HDDs with hot swap PSUs. systems mirrored each other, so there was 400GB of usable space (roughly, 2 hot space + 1 checksum drive). total cost was around $10K including custom parts (boxes, power distribution, batteries, etc). All usable space in the inside of the boxes and RAID towers was filled with DuoFoam (Its the spray can thingy which expands into rubbery yellow foam in contact with air. Systems were shutdown on the ride up, switched on in freefall and shut down for the ride down.
    2 hard drives failed during the entire trip, one of the alpha CPUs has its heatsink warped by heat and some foam had melted off. all the data was ok, though.
  • by bobbozzo ( 622815 ) on Thursday July 03, 2003 @03:29PM (#6361655)
    I'm not sure if you mean they have a vacuum in them, or if you mean they are airtight...

    They cannot have a vacuum in them, as the head gap is created by the bernoulli effect, and without it, the drive would quickly destroy itself!

  • Re:Scary (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 03, 2003 @03:36PM (#6361750)
    Dear slashdot, I have been having these pains deep in my brain. What sort of treatment and medication can you help?

    Dear Leroy,

    I'm sorry, but the pain will keep getting worse until the hatching. Don't worry - you still have a few months to live, as it avoids eating the vital parts of the brain until near the very end.

    May I suggest making the most of it, and traveling to nations you don't like, in the hopes that the hatchling stays away from people you care about?

    - Mad Scientist # 28

    {*}
  • by rabidlemur ( 686678 ) on Thursday July 03, 2003 @05:41PM (#6363064)
    The Xraid would likely be tought enough, but sadly, the Xserve itself my not be able to handle launch. It's so thin, that many users have bent the tope covers, or had the entire unit warp on them.

    Cooling the units shouldn't be an issue, the fans are powerful enough that in null gravity they'd be able to propel the unit:)

    And, i know that at least one company was planning on using G4's in space, so there should be some studies on radiation effects and such on those processors floating around somewhere....
  • Comment removed (Score:2, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday July 03, 2003 @09:30PM (#6364299)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by AlecC ( 512609 ) <aleccawley@gmail.com> on Friday July 04, 2003 @04:33AM (#6365830)
    Laptop drives have, according to a drive manufacturer, much higher shock tolerances than "normal" drives - whcih in turn are much better than preceding disks. Simply a matter of the components being lighter, but made of the same materials. Unless the storage-to-weight ratio came out really wrong, I would prefer laptop drives to desktop style.

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...