Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education Programming IT Technology

CS Master's Degrees - US vs. EU Programs? 124

Monty asks: "I'm currently exploring my options and I've been wondering, is it worthwhile to seek education overseas--specifically the EU? Edsgar Dijkstra was of the opinion, though controversial, that American and European CS programs were fundamentally different (see his later writings in the E.W. Dijkstra Archives). What makes the EU interesting, in that light, is that it seems to have more openly embraced things like functional programming. So, if I want to focus my study on something of a more functional nature, are schools in the EU a better choice? What are the implications of returning to North America for employment with a foreign degree? Do they have to be accredited as proof of validity or are they usually recognized by themselves here in the US?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

CS Master's Degrees - US vs. EU Programs?

Comments Filter:
  • by MerlynEmrys67 ( 583469 ) on Tuesday September 09, 2003 @07:52PM (#6916186)
    US/EU/India/AU... all of these degrees come down to, what is my impression of their program. If I had to choose someone from MIT/Stanford/UCB vs. someone from noname tech.germany of course I'd pick someone from MIT, however if the choice was from a top graduate program in Finland vs. someone from a no name school in Iowa... Well Finland wins that one.

    Of course it never comes down to someone from one school, vs someone from another, there is history, communications ability, interviewing skills etc.

    so in that sense it doesn't matter where you get your degree, it is what you learn, and what you can show to an interviewer

  • by D.A. Zollinger ( 549301 ) on Tuesday September 09, 2003 @08:18PM (#6916345) Homepage Journal
    I think a major portion of your concern is the ability to get a job in a different market after graduation. While I do not know about the advantages of the programs offered overseas, I do know of two things that will capture a potential employer's interest. A well known school (even if it isn't known for their CS degree), and what extra curricular projects you have been involved with.

    For example, if you come back to the States with a Doctorate in Computer Science from Oxford University, and contributed heavily to the SATA, USB2, and Firewire code in the Linux Kernel, your interviewer will drool at the opportunity to have you working for them. On the other hand, if you come back with a Doctorate in Computer Science from St. Etienne Community College, and contributed heavily to gwine [tuxfamily.org] (with no disrespect to Sylvain Daubert or his work), your potential employer might be asking you where St. Etienne is, and what gwine is ("is that related to the Wine is not an emulator project?").
  • if you have a choice (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Ender Ryan ( 79406 ) on Tuesday September 09, 2003 @08:52PM (#6916534) Journal
    If you have the option, study overseas, then work overseas. Just take a look at the industry in the States, we're fucked. The U.S. is going to potentially fuck open source, and on the other end of the spectrum Microsoft and other proprietary vendors are moving all their development overseas, to India, etc. That's what business is about in America these days, fucking ourselves...

    If I didn't already have family, friends, and own a house here, I'd look into leaving. It just seems to me that the U.S. is on a slippery slope downhill. I think whatever your political viewpoint is, it's all downhill...

    But that's just my opinion, and I could be wrong.

  • A couple arguments (Score:2, Interesting)

    by blate ( 532322 ) on Tuesday September 09, 2003 @09:28PM (#6916791)
    1. As a hiring manager, unless you go to a school I've heard of, in an English-speaking country, I'm probably not going to think very highly of your degree. Honsetly, for most geek jobs, the cultural diversity factor you'll gain is rather irrelavent. If you end up doing some important work or publishing in major journals, then you might be OK.

    2. From a pragmatic perspective, you're going to end up spending more money (tuition, exchange rates, visas, long distance, airfare) and at best get the same education you'd get here.

    3. You need to consider what you're going to do with the degree. If you're shooting for a terminal MS (i.e., not going on to a PhD), then what you're basically doing is getting advanced job skills training -- IMHO, it's best to get that in the US so that you're on the same page as the rest of us.

    If you're going to do a PhD, either in Europe or back here, then the argument is different... If you work with a prestegious research group or professor in Europe, and produce some results, then you may be more attractive to Doctoral programs in the US. Then again, unless you're shooting for a career in academe, you'll most likely get out faster if you do your MS and PhD at the same university in the US (where language and cultural bullshit won't be an issue).

    Personally, I thank my lucky stars that I stuck it out and got an MS... I'm a much better engineer for the experience and it's gotten me more than one job. I tailored my graduate program in such a way that if I decided to continue on in a PhD program I'd be in good shape, but also such that if I bailed with an MS I'd still have a lot of useful content under my belt. I suggest that you do the same.

    4. Another person suggested moving to Europe for good, given the job market here. That's not the choice I'd make, but it's a resaonable suggestion. If you think that you'll want to work in Europe or work at an international company doing business in Europe, then doing some graduate work over there, even if it's only for a semester or two, sounds like a great idea.

    5. One last thing to consider is that two jobs after graduation, the school you went to, and even the type of degree you have (MSCSE, MSCS, MSCSEE, etc) doesn't really matter. The fact that you have an MS combined with your work experience will be what gets you the interview. If the MS is from a big-name CS department, that can't hurt either, but it won't be a deciding factor.
  • by Tom7 ( 102298 ) on Tuesday September 09, 2003 @09:45PM (#6916901) Homepage Journal
    It's true that there is a lot more functional programming going on in Europe. But there is also plenty in the US. If you have an interest in a particular subject, find faculty who have published good, readable papers in the area, and then apply to the schools where those faculty work. I can tell you that CMU and Cornell have great typed functional programming groups (very European style, in fact), although CMU at least does not have a general CS masters program; you'd have to do a PhD. Several other schools like UPenn, Berkeley, and Harvey-Mudd are building strong programs in the same vein as well.
  • by Zachary Kessin ( 1372 ) <zkessin@gmail.com> on Wednesday September 10, 2003 @01:40AM (#6918630) Homepage Journal
    First of all you can't compair "US Programs" vs "Non-US Programs" in a general way. you have to look at specific departments at specific schools. If University X has a good program in what you are interested in start thinking about it.

    But before you go remember these things, unless you go to an english speaking area most programs are in the local language. How well do you speek it? To take a masters level class in Computer Science you will need to speek it quite well.

    Costs, not just tuition, but also things like airfare back to the USA to visit people and so on.

    Quility of Life, I have lived in the USA, England and now Israel, life is different, in some ways better in some ways worse but different, think about how it will affect your lifestyle.

    Now if you decide that going outside the USA is for you, go for it, there are some very good universities in many places around the world (and some very bad ones)
  • by sbszine ( 633428 ) on Wednesday September 10, 2003 @04:20AM (#6919188) Journal
    I assess international qualifications for an Australian university, and we consider US qualifications to be about a year behind Aussie and western European quals (UK etc). The US education system is about on par with Hungary and Pakistan in the view of our assessors, but we consider UK and many Indian quals to be on par with our own.

    The main factor in deciding the quality of a particular country's qualifications is not the curriculum, facilities, or anything along those lines. It's the quality of the students, determined mostly by whether students gain their place at university through academic merit, or by buying a place. In the US you mostly buy a place, so consequently the value of degrees from the US suffers.

    I would advise anyone trying to choose between the US and Europe for a degree of any kind to go to an English university. They don't hand out testamurs from Oxford to any sub-literate with a fat wallet.
  • Canadian Quals (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sbszine ( 633428 ) on Wednesday September 10, 2003 @04:47AM (#6919262) Journal
    Quick question: how are Canadian universities seen? Canadian education system is sometimes similar but, at the same time, remarkably different from the American counterpart...

    [Gets big 'C' book from shelf...]

    Canada is seen as high quality, on par with UK / Australia, and ahead of the US by a year or so. The high school diplomas / matriculation certificates are highly regarded also. Further, the French and English institutions are considered on par with each other. Canada would be a good choice for postgraduate study.
  • by BigBadDude ( 683684 ) on Wednesday September 10, 2003 @06:57AM (#6919573)
    having worked with some guys from Stanford, MIT and CMU, I can tell you people that many MIT graduates are dumb as hell (no flame), but will get a job anyway just because they are MIT graduates. How did they made it, I dont know. But your discussion about MIT being better than Univ-of-EU-Whatever is just plain stupid.

    What have MIT done in the past 10 years in the field of, say, AI?? Functinal Languages [which I happen to hate]?

    Why should someone from no-name-german-univ be worse than a guy that paid $xxxk just for a name?

    my final question: are everyone with a XXX degree from high profile YYY university smart?
  • by Cwaig ( 152883 ) on Thursday September 11, 2003 @08:36AM (#6929533)
    Even in the UK, it varies widely...
    But no "high school" awards degree's of any type in the UK - only universities do that.

    Most universities subscribe to the 3years==Batchelor's degree (BSc / BEng)
    +1year == Masters

    Some also do 4 year masters in engineering subjects (where you don't get a BEng, you go straight to the MEng after 4 years).

    The top UK universities (eg. Cambridge) use a totally different system altogether...

Waste not, get your budget cut next year.

Working...