Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Wireless Networking Hardware

A Wireless USB Cable? 18

Posted by Cliff from the not-necessarily-what-the-developers-intended dept.
doggkruse asks: "For a while I have been trying to come up with a way to attach my USB devices, wirelessly. Today I stumbled upon this Bluetooth wireless print link. It appears to simply replicate a usb cable because it works on OS X which lacks support for Bluetooth printing. Is it possible to use this for other devices? Could I simply plug this into a hub and make all USB devices wireless." It's an interesting thought, but that depends entirely on the device. Has anyone tried doing this, with this or another device?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A Wireless USB Cable? More

A Wireless USB Cable?

Comments Filter:

  • Yes, but not quite yet (Score:5, Informative)

    by prostoalex ( 308614 ) * on Saturday September 27, 2003 @12:21AM (#7069959) Homepage Journal
    Okay, I will have to assume you are not an employee of Cypress Semiconductor [cypress.com], trying to create a "buzz" on the Internet about the new product family. Cypress Semiconductor created such technology and currently touts it under WirelessUSB brand. Granted, I don't think there's a consumer device using WirelessUSB just yet, but Cypress is currently selling the chips and chipsets to the OEMs. The prices are quite good, by the way, if you're involved with embedded devices or home automation products.

    The WirelessUSB specs from Cypress Web site [cypress.com] - "..The wireless connectivity is transparent to the designer at the operating system level (no drivers needed), as the WirelessUSB system acts as a USB HID class device..."

    ZDNet on WirelessUSB [zdnet.co.uk]

    Naturally, Google [google.com]

    • Re:Yes, but not quite yet (Score:3, Interesting)

      by rreay ( 50160 )
      Cypress's WIreless USB chipset is simply a USB device with a serial link to the other radio. USB traffic does not go across the wireless link. Notice the spec sheet says transparent to design at operating system level that means it's not transparent to the hardware or firmware.

      This is simply marketing spin on a processor with a USB SIE and a custom radio link.

  • Wireless USB Cable (Score:5, Interesting)

    by NanoGator ( 522640 ) on Saturday September 27, 2003 @12:54AM (#7070061) Homepage Journal
    Well the title of this article painted a different image in my mind. I thought it meant a cable that links two wireless devices together. Defeating the purpose? No. My company built a system that has a video camera sending digital data to a small PC. Instead of a monitor, they use an iPaq wirelessly connected to the capture unit to do things like change exposure and start/stop record. It doesn't need to be on all the time, but rather it works a lot like a remote control.

    Unfortunately, not all areas are WiFi friendly. I remember bringing this unit to Siggraph one year and there was so much interference we couldn't connect. Because of this problem, we also have to include an ethernet card + cable to physically link them.

    Gotta wonder, why don't they provide some sort of standard cable to link wireless devices in the event of interference?

    Okay, not really on-topic, though it would help this guy if he did use the wireless USB device. It'd be another sysadmin type tool to keep around this house in case the microwave screws it up or something.
    • Take a glimmer at the Veo Observer..

      I own one, works great, they have a wireless version too,

      records audio, video, and quite adjustablke, wired for 200, wireless for 300..

      You could buy the wired version, and add a linksys wifi-ethernet brige for less than 100$. you can do this to almost ANY device with ethernet.. and instead of asking, does it have a wired port for backup- you can add wireless to the wired device

  • Nice idea but... (Score:2, Informative)

    by Ins. Gimmik ( 711343 )
    I use Bluetooth all the time. In my experience it lacks the bandwidth for your idea to work well. Supporting evidence: Bluetooth hotsyncs take longer between my Tungsten and my Powerbook. A wifi hack would be better.

  • Wasn't that what Bluetooth was supposed to be? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by wowbagger ( 69688 ) on Saturday September 27, 2003 @10:34AM (#7071831) Homepage Journal
    Wasn't "Wireless USB" pretty much what Bluetooth was supposed to be?

    You had FireWire, which was to "move lots of time sensitive freight".

    You had USB, which was to "connect everything with wires".

    You had BlueTooth, which was "Connect everything without wires".

    That's what I thought as well when I saw the Cypress Semi ad for their "Wireless USB" chip.


  • I don't see how you expect the slashdot communicty to by knowledgable about a device that isn't even out. From their store, they claim it is due out on Tuesday (30th Sept.).

    Anm
  • Did anyone else notice that the throughput is only "up to" 320 KBps. Seems like this would become a bottleneck, especially if you print a lot of large pdf's.

Slashdot Top Deals

It seems that more and more mathematicians are using a new, high level language named "research student".

Close