Downsides to Intrafamily IM? 514
Frisky070802 writes "The NY Times has run a column on how many families now use instant messaging within a household, for instance to ask what someone wants for dinner. This is especially popular as whole houses get wired (or wireless) and computers are scattered throughout the house. This is the case at my house but I tend to be the only one who stays on AIM reliably. Can Slashdotters offer some personal experience, pro/con, with being instantly and constantly accessible to one's spouse and children? Does this tend to break down your 'personal time'?"
Cons? (Score:4, Insightful)
Try talking to your family... (Score:5, Insightful)
Trust me the small walk from room to room, will not affect your pear like body shape.
way to whore it up (Score:1, Insightful)
KARMA WHORE (Score:1, Insightful)
Why can't people just do this by default? It took me 2 seconds Yeah, and it took me a similar time to register with NYTimes, we are using their service for free after all. And now I have a registration I can log into their website automatically without having to read through comments or looking at google, which saves me even more time
FREAK
Ha ha ha (Score:5, Insightful)
What IM is really useful for, however, is keeping in touch with people long-distance. IM has a relaxed, conversational quality that you can't get from a phone call. With the phone, there is pressure to finish the call quickly, and it is something that you do on special occasions. With IM, you can just say hi, or share a random funny thought, without wasting anyone's time.
Re:Try talking to your family... (Score:5, Insightful)
Your home is a cubicle cluster (Score:3, Insightful)
Real people! (Score:3, Insightful)
Families need to learn to DEAL with eachother, and having your body language and voice inflection sheilded sure as hell isn't going to help.
Kids these days. (I'm 22, and I get scared.)
Re:instant messangers (Score:3, Insightful)
to everyone saying "just yell ..." (Score:5, Insightful)
screaming=kid wakes up = your 20 minutes of private time today is over!
No Downfalls?? (Score:5, Insightful)
Sure, for the teen geeks out there who like a lil privacy (I don't mean like thaT.. well, maybe I guess I do) this is OK for. But for a family to be a family this sure does pose major problems?
A poster a few messages up claimed his wife and him have nothing to talk about when they get home after talking all day. What about for the parent and child who would rather IM while around the house. Doesn't prolonged exposure to this make the child more unwilling to talk to his/her parent face-to-face about sex/drugs/abuse??
I know I tried my damnedest to remain an reclusive troll around my house, but thankfully my parents were active in my life and always asked questions. Hindsight being what it is, I'm glad we came to a good balance between privacy and parenting! That sort of thing requires you to LOOK at your parents and FACE your problems/fears.. not hitting "Block" or "Exit".
I know I have a point here, and I'm trying to find it.
Sometimes this is the only way. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Personal time between spouses (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:this is stupid (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:this is stupid (Score:3, Insightful)
Also, it is cool to IM between roommates/family because you can send links or copy and paste, etc. Its easier to help someone with their computer using IM, then with verbal communication.
Considering how much time people spend in front of the computer, this is a good thing because it allows them to communicate even if they are glued to the PC.
irony... (Score:5, Insightful)
is im or email or irc or phone or letter or videophone or telegraph the same as talking face to face? no, they're all different. and none are best, certain circumstances lend themselves better to certain methods. some people find letters a better method of telling family members bad news. i like people to email me info like addresses, phone numbers or email addresses. irc is a nice supplement to conference calls as it lets taking minutes be distributed.
but i supposed change always sees this. "oh no, it's different, it must be BAAAAD!"
whatever.
ALL the time! (Score:2, Insightful)
Back in the day, we'd end up using IM more frequently than we'd actually go in and talk to each other. Not only was it more convenient, it also let us respond after studying, when we got home, or whatever. With the schedules so different, it was just easier than getting up, banging on the door, then going back and messaging them later on.
But then again, the best way to get each other's attention was to crank up Quake....
Home, no - work, yes (Score:3, Insightful)
For the home I think it's just silly or at the least, lazy. The only time I've ever used it room to room in the home was joking around. "It's 10pm. Do youk now what your son is doing behind your back?"
Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link (Score:3, Insightful)
I didn't refer to the google cache of the article because the google cache isn't intended to bypass site registration policies.
Why can't people register, for free, without complaining?
Damn! (Score:2, Insightful)
This isn't a healthy tendency... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:No Downfalls?? (Score:3, Insightful)
On the other hand, I'd say it's had a positive impact in other areas of my life. I do 'speak' with my siblings more than I would if simply left to my own devices, and keeping in touch with friends that are gone and in college elsewhere has made IM worth it for that alone. Instead of being forced to simply part with old friendships and move on, holding on only to one or two deemed 'important enough,' I've stayed in touch with most of my friends from high school. IE: They didn't just suddenly drop out of my life. I think this is really the greatest impact IM is going to have on the younger generation, such as myself, that's coming up now. I'd suspect that 10 years from now you'll have fewer cases of best friends who haven't talked in years simply because they lost touch - communication is becoming too easy now. Personally, I see that as a good thing.
Re:Back to back! (Score:3, Insightful)
This way, I don't have to teach her how to read and reply to SMS messages, too
Priorities (Score:0, Insightful)
IM to SMS (Score:2, Insightful)
Lots of pros, pretty much combines the pros of IM (instant, and already integrated with your buddy list) with SMS (can get it anywhere). No cons yet though I can see plenty if your SO is the kind that uses it as a new anger communication channel.
The meal coordination stories are classics of course... I know a guy that used this [duncanlamb.com] to make a quick IM bot for his office, listing all local menus and allowing eeveryone in his office to vote for what they wanted to eat that day. Cool stuff. (yes, I am the author of the project)
Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Heh (Score:2, Insightful)
-A
The Killer App ... a Buddy List (Score:5, Insightful)
I asked my daughter why she preferred IM to the old teenage standby -- hours on the phone. The answer surprised me. She could see who was online.
From her perspective it solved two problems
1. You knew in advance who was available to talk (lowered chance of rejection).
2. It avoided the unpleasant experience of having to mediate access through a parent ("he's not in", "he can't come to the phone", "he's been grounded and can't talk"). This is actually a variant of #1.
So it's all about saving face and managing rejection. IM provides lots of strategies and aids to do just that.
Given that it solves or mitigates two teenage problems (potential rejection by absence or parent, and parental control), I predict the first cellphone company to implement a usable buddy list wins.
Re:Another stray from family time (Score:3, Insightful)
We're fed this image of a 1950-60's Leave It To Beaver family, but honestly, that image of perfection has only been a reality in a minority of cases, even then. Given the fact that as the years have gone by, Americans have seemed more willing to shed the old way of doing things, I can't say I'm surprised that the old idea of what family is would be one of them.
Speaking totally from personal experience, almost none of my friends have anything approaching a 50's model family. I've noticed that among most of the people I've grown up with, the emphasis tends to be on extra-familial bonds instead of the tradiontal, genetic family, and this is in the south - the bastion of traditional values. Is this a growing trend, or just a fluke of my hometown?
(Note on hometown comment: I live in a city of approximately 200,000 people which also happens to sit right next to the largest military post in the world, so it is entirely possible that this is just weirdness in my town due to the constant movement of people in and out with the military, even though myself and my circle of friends do not come from military families. End rambling.
changes the nature of things (Score:2, Insightful)
Inter household IM could have a really big effect on the way families communicate.
more communication, not less (Score:4, Insightful)
It's very easy to chat about the day (vent frustrations, really, or the question of what's for dinner and who's picking it up, etc.) while it is happening or we have a free moment. There are days that if we see each other, one of us might be sleeping, so we may not get to chat at home for a few days in a row, but through email and IM we can still communicate ("don't wait up for me" - "dinner is on your own", etc.)
If it weren't for IM, I'd fear that we wouldn't get to talk very often or know what's going on in each other's lives. But since we're usually both wired, we can still communicate even when we're not in the same physical place.
Re:Ha ha ha (Score:3, Insightful)
While I do agree with you about the phone, I've found that while away at college IM has become a sort of annoyance. It pretty much allows my parrents to keep tabs on me all the time. If I'm still up at 3 am and one of them happens online, "What are you doing up so late!?!" If I'm idle for a day because I spent the night at the girlfriend's place, "Where were you all day??? Did you really sleep in til 4pm?"
Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link (Score:2, Insightful)
THEN DON'T READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE Seriously, you want your cake and to eat it. Tough beans, you're using their resources they have every right to do what they're doing. But of course complain because people are spying on you or whatever.
Uh, because we're such a web-enabled family (Score:5, Insightful)
We still IM each other, every day. Why? Because we read a lot of web information and it's just so convenient to post a link to the other about our findings.
Or when a family member IMs one of us, it's easy to just copy the Jabber log out of gaim and paste it into the other's message window and share a conversation.
Or when a client IMs one of us, we can let the other in on the question or panic-stricken demand for help and colaborate on a course of action.
That's why!
Speeding to an eventual linguistic heat death..... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:this is stupid (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Uh, because we're such a web-enabled family (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:this is stupid (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How big is your house? (Score:4, Insightful)
Is it so big that you can't just call out or walk for 10-15 seconds to talk to somebody? I've used IM clients to have a silent conversation in a crowded room before but not for regular communication at home.
I had no idea what fucking luddites you slashdotters are. Do you have any idea what technology is for at all? The point is if I am working upstairs it is damned inefficient to walk all the way downstairs, stop waht I am doing, interrupt someone else, and stop what they are doing, just so I can ask them a one sentence question. It is stupid and unnecessary thanks to technology.
We are not talking about ending family communication. That happened decades ago. We are talking about making it possible again. Families are busy, dispersed, and engaged in all sorts of distracting tasks. There are few chances for familial communication especially with the death first of nightly gatherings for reading and prayer and second with the death of the family dinner.
I am not saying an effort to revive such practices is misguided, but what if you could talk to your family while doing other things? That is what instant messaging was invented for. It is there so you can talk to multiple people at once while coding, posting to slashdot, writing the great american novel, doing your homework, balancing the budget, or whatever it is you are doing on your computer. It means you can talk to the rest of the family and ask simple questions and make decisions together.
Now that the rest of the family have computers, pdas, cell phones and such it is especially spiffy because you can text message and talk to your kids and family members to keep tabs on what they are doing and coordinate that family dinner that died so long ago for lack of coordination and communication.
Also, the internet and instant messaging are great for people who do not live with their families. I communicate with the wired members of my family much more often simply because they are available to me. If you are back in the 19th century sending paper letters through snail mail you get much less communication.
Re:this is stupid (Score:4, Insightful)
Hey dad!! DAAAAAAAAD! Go to ay ess kay dot ess el ay ess H (I don't know how to spell H) dee oh tee dot oh ar gee slash see oh em em ee eh tee ess dot pee el question mark es eye dee equals 91426 and symbol see eye dee equals 7867909... that comment was really funny! What? Emai? Okay.
Re:this is stupid (Score:2, Insightful)
Helpful in hostile situations (Score:3, Insightful)
In the case of a high conflict divorce with children involved, IM'ing can be a relatively low conflict way, for the children to keep in touch with the parent they're not currently with at a given time. (In many cases, the children feel on the spot if they're on the phone with one parent while within earshot of the other.)