Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Media The Internet

Obtaining Legal MP3s Outside of the U.S.? 623

frankkubiak asks: "I recently bought the new iPod with 40GB. I understand the arguments of the record industry, that I should buy the music I want to hear. Alright. So I don't want to get MP3 files by file-sharing. But here is my problem: I live outside the U.S., in Germany to be exact. iTunes only offers service to those inside the U.S. (see this related Slashdot article). I don't want a CD, vinyl record, tape or minidisc. I simply want to listen to the music. Even if I decide to buy a legacy audio CD, it is often copy-protected and won't load in my PC. So, strictly speaking, it is not even an audio-CD. Heise keeps a database of those un-CDs (German language. English speakers can use this fish-translated page). It sounds incredible, but even after hours of research on the web, I don't see a legal way to use this device with new songs. The only way I see to use this device is to buy a CD, and if I can't rip it, I'll have to [break the law and] download the MP3-file via file-sharing. I believe there are more people like me out there who want to listen to their music, without feeling guilty. Why is there no one meeting this demand? How does Slashdot feel about this?" Before you mention Napster, let's note that it has similar restrictions (see the "International Considerations" section). So where can non-U.S. internet users go to download the legal MP3s that they want?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Obtaining Legal MP3s Outside of the U.S.?

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Is it illegal? (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:33PM (#8526592)
    yes
  • by Lucky Tony ( 608908 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:34PM (#8526608)
    In a place like Australia, is considered stealing even if you own a copy.
  • Can't? (Score:2, Informative)

    by Vo0k ( 760020 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:34PM (#8526614) Journal
    The only way I see to use this device is to buy a CD, and if I can't rip it

    Did they create a WORKING copy protection scheme yet? i.e. one you can't circumvent by shift key or just by using the CD under Linux???
  • Opsound (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:35PM (#8526633)
    You get them at http://opsound.org !

    Licenced under Creative Commons licence...
  • www.allofmp3.com (Score:5, Informative)

    by budmur ( 748602 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:36PM (#8526652)
    The fine folks over at Allofmp3.com [allofmp3.com] will sell you MP3s for a wide variety of artists. They don't seem to care what country your're in. As far as being legit, they say that they're registered with the Russian copyright authority and that they're authorized to sell what they're offering. I haven't heard about any independant verification of that, though.

  • Good place (Score:3, Informative)

    by 77Punker ( 673758 ) <(ude.tniophgih) (ta) (40rcneps)> on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:37PM (#8526661)
    muzik.agnula.org All of it is Creative Commons licensed music.
  • by Kenja ( 541830 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:37PM (#8526663)
    I use mp3search.ru [mp3search.ru]. They have a deal with the Russian equivalent of the RIAA, so these downloads SHOULD be legal where ever you are. They tend to have the CDs we in the US pay more for because there "imports". Lots of B side selections and remixes. Downloads are around 10 cents a song.
  • Easy: CD-Audio (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:38PM (#8526670)
    I have yet to find a CD which protection cannot be defeated. Remember DMCA's only jurisdiction is USA (or at least it should be), so you are free to break the protection.
  • Comment removed (Score:2, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:40PM (#8526706)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by MikeXpop ( 614167 ) <mike AT redcrowbar DOT com> on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:41PM (#8526708) Journal
    Some record companies [audiolunchbox.com] have no problem with it.

    Audio Luncbox also allows you to have unrestricted mp3 or aac. Enjoy!
  • Read c't (Score:2, Informative)

    by Quo_R ( 734198 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:41PM (#8526709)
    The mentioned magazine c't actually has a test of like 8 or 10 legal online music stores which are accessible from within Germany in its current issue..
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:41PM (#8526718)
    Crippled CDs are much more common in Europe than the US and Canada for some reason. Still, they're not all of the CDs last time I checked and they can still be ripped with a little know-how.
  • bleep.com (Score:2, Informative)

    by ydnar ( 946 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:42PM (#8526725) Homepage
    Warp Records entire catalog, including rare and out-of-print, and vinyl-only stuff available at Bleep.com [bleep.com].

    Good quality VBR, and whole-song preview too.

    y
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:42PM (#8526727)
    Remember the little old lady that the RIAA busted? She claimed she owned all the music on CD already so it didn't matter if she downloaded all the music off the net? RIAA checked the checksums of the files vs her CDs and they were different. She was only able to use MP3s of the songs SHE RIPPED HERSELF from her CDs. You only get the right to own that particular copy of the song, not someone elses ripped copy. Silly, but true.
  • Re:Is it illegal? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Tim C ( 15259 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:44PM (#8526752)
    Indeed it is - without explicit permission from the copyright holder, we UKians do not have the right to make any copy. That includes format shifting, backups, etc.

    Kinda sucks, really - I guess that 260GBP iRiver I bought is just a nice USB hard-drive with built-in mic and FM tuner, as I certainly can't buy electronic versions of the music I like (ebm, goth, etc). Hell, some of the stuff I like is hard enough to get on CD...

    On the plus side, the law is effectively unenforceable - I don't know a single person who doesn't have some sort of audio device, be it cassette, mp3 player, minidisc, or whatever. I suspect that the vast majority of people in the UK have broken this particular law at some point, most likely right now.

    On the minus side, that really means that, should they want to investigate you for some reason, that's another line of attack they can take. Remember, they *wanted* Al Capone because he was a gangster. They *got* him for tax evasion...

    Paranoia aside, it damages the Law as a whole to have unenforced/unenforceable laws on the books. I don't see it changing any time soon, though - in fact, in light of recent events (the EU "super-DMCA"), I can only see it getting worse.
  • by nocomment ( 239368 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:45PM (#8526756) Homepage Journal
    Could you use an american proxy server to make your connection appear to come from here?

    http://www.atomintersoft.com/products/alive-prox y/proxy-list/
  • allofmp3.com (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:47PM (#8526779)

    Simple - allofmp3.com [allofmp3.com] - they're located in Russia, where the royalty laws for downloading music work similarly to those for radio airplay in North America. Because of this, they are able to offer a HUGE selection of music without having to hammer out deals with the major labels.

    How much does all this cost? How about $0.01 US/megabyte downloaded? What if I told you that the vast majority of their catalogue was available in high quality formats, that you can encode to your file format of choice (including LAME with --alt-presets, or OGG)? Would that sweeten the deal?

    Frankly, I don't know why these guys havn't taken off in North America, aside from a lack of publicity. I suppose there is some fear of giving your credit card to a Russian company, but their processor is highly reputable, and they now also accept PayPal.

    Here's some reviews and FAQs about their setup and its legitimacy:

    http://www.techimo.com/newsapp/i9599.html [techimo.com]

    http://www.techimo.com/newsapp/i9599.html [techimo.com]

  • CD... Baby, ermm. (Score:5, Informative)

    by igrp ( 732252 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:47PM (#8526786)
    There's always CDBaby [cdbaby.com] which has a an awesome collection, at least, as far as I am concerned and does kick back a good percentage of its profits to the artists themselves (and not their labels). As far as I know, international users are just as free to purchase songs as domestic users.

    Looks like Apple's itunes won't be available in Europe anytime soon [macworld.co.uk] (apparently Napster seems to want to come back in Europe [macworld.com] though).

  • Re:Legal Issues (Score:3, Informative)

    by Tim C ( 15259 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:55PM (#8526870)
    Fair use is a nice idea, but as a legal concept it doesn't necessarily exist.

    I agree wholeheartedly that I should be allowed to rip any CD, cassette, LP, etc that I have bought to whatever format I like, in order to be able to listen to it more conveniently. Eg, I should be legally allowed to convert my entire CD collection to oggs to play on my nice, shiny new iRiver HP-120.

    Unfortunately, I live in the UK, where doing so without explicit permission is copyright infringement. Oh sure, no-one is ever going to get sued for it, much less lose a court case over it, but that's not the point. I do not have explicit permission from the copyright holders to do what I have done, so I have broken the law.

    Just ending up in a non-US court would guarantee nothing. Each country has its own version of the RIAA, and its own copyright laws, not all of which have any concept of fair use.
  • Re:www.allofmp3.com (Score:5, Informative)

    by pbox ( 146337 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:56PM (#8526878) Homepage Journal
    According to them, when you purchase those songs you legally own them in Russia. Buying it from outside of Russia means that you are importing those songs. Usually laws differ for importing it commercially or for personal use (not for resale). The US law says that you can import music legally for personal use, as long as you don't import multiple copies of the same music piece (even on multiple trips). However it is clear from the text of the law that it was written with the intention of regulating physical importation of the music on media. (See amazon.com, where US residens can buy legally imported foreign CDs). However importing it via the Internet, the law might or might not apply. We would not know until after it has been tested in a court of law... It is clear that it is in the best interest of RIAA to shut down this kind of importation (they have tried to sue allofmp3 in Russia, however got nowhere, since it is all according to the laws of the land). They will probably try to A) sue allofmp3 users if they see a chance of winning (might even do it without the chance of winning, just to inflict pain and fear and confusion, they can spend the money, end users are not in the same disposable income category, ie. $100-$500 mil) B) coerce Internet gateways to block intercontinental access to these sites (there is always workaround for that, ie. proxy)

    This is all my opinion, and based on my own shoddy research, take it with a grain of salt, on the rocks, shaken and mashed...
  • by clarkie.mg ( 216696 ) <mgofwd+Slashdot&gmail,com> on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @07:57PM (#8526885) Homepage Journal
    European music and artists [vitaminic.com] : independent (mp3).

    ecompil [e-compil.fr] : universal (wma)

    a cool label [magnatune.com]

    epitonic [epitonic.com] : good independent site (mp3)

    This is just a selection from google [google.com]
  • by LostCluster ( 625375 ) * on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:00PM (#8526912)
    Futhermore, most CD drives still have the headphone port in the front and an audio wire in the back that can output CD audio. That'll let you have the recording start at the exact same time as the track playback...
  • No I don't remember.

    That sounds bogus, if ship ripped MP3's you can't check checksums. MP3 is a lossy format.

    Doesn't mean they can't figure out in some manner, not via checksums.
  • by wfberg ( 24378 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:01PM (#8526924)
    Actually, in the US it does make a difference what the source of the copy is, as mp3.com found out the hard way.

    Here in The Netherlands, anything you download as a private person is legal; how about that for fair use? (Putting stuff up to be downloaded is a different game; that's where the dues should be paid (and they make it hard enough))
  • by arkhan_jg ( 618674 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:09PM (#8526986)
    OD2 [ondemanddistribution.com] are the largest european online distributer, with at least some tracks from all the 'big 4' labels. They sell in germany [ondemanddistribution.com] through a number of resellers, or branded versions.

    They're primarily a WMP9 shop, but I believe at least some of the resellers use mp3's, which should work on your ipod.

    iTunes itself is coming to europe, in theory the first half of this year; but it's anyone's guess as to when they'll actually launch.

    Personally speaking, I prefer to still buy CD's, as I get to choose the rip quality (high quality ogg's for my PC, 128vbr mp3 for my flash mp3 player).

    I just refuse to buy the corrupt disks, and stick to the smaller labels, especially the indie's. If you do want to import (cheap) CD's, I can personally recommend CDBaby [cdbaby.com] for non-label music, and cd-wow [cd-wow.com] are insanely cheap for more well known artists.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:09PM (#8526993)
    You have to have a credit card with US billing address in order to buy songs on iTunes. Proxies will not help.
  • by gfxguy ( 98788 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:13PM (#8527031)
    Just to clarify, while mp3.com required you to have a copy of the CD you were downloading mp3s for, and while you are allowed to make copies of your CD, the court ruled that YOU are allowed to make copies of YOUR CD, but are not entitled to copies from someone elses CD.

    This is why the law is so stupid.

    But believe me, I have downloaded many things I own in one format or another, and feel no guilt.
  • by homer_ca ( 144738 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:17PM (#8527060)
    They ran checksums on the MP3 files, not the audio CD. MP3 compression is lossy and files will be different depending on encoder and options, but once ripped the MP3 files that are traded will be identical byte for byte. There's not that many different rips of the same song being traded so the RIAA has SHA or MD5 sums of the song files being traded online. If the woman's files were identical to the ones on Kazaa, then she must have downloaded them from Kazaa or (less likely) ripped them from her CD with the exact same encoder, bitrate and options as the person who first uploaded it.
  • by kfg ( 145172 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:19PM (#8527069)
    However, unlike downloading a few songs, handing out 10,000 copies would be criminal infringement under the current definition.
  • Bleep! (Score:4, Informative)

    by Blic ( 672552 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:23PM (#8527104)
    Warp Records' Bleep [warprecords.com] has unencrypted MP3s and it's good music too! Well, at least to me it is... =)

    Studio K7 [k7.com] has some limited offerings in MP3 as well.

    I think both sell internationally - Warp is in the UK and K7 is in Germany.

  • by El Volio ( 40489 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:23PM (#8527105) Homepage
    Other than looking for non-RIAA music CDs [magnetbox.com], there are sites with legally downloadable music. It's not the pop hits of the day, but sites like Epitonic.com [epitonic.com] have great music that you can download in MP3 form legally. Google can help you find lots more sites if that's not to your liking; these are just the ones I have bookmarked.
  • by Troed ( 102527 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:26PM (#8527127) Homepage Journal
    Exactly the same is currently true for Sweden, although our implementation of the EUCD (delayed, will probably go through Jan 1 2005) will "correct" that.
  • by MichaelCrawford ( 610140 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:31PM (#8527169) Homepage Journal
    You need to read my article Links to Tens of Thousands of Legal Music Downloads [goingware.com]. It has been the #1 hit at Google for the query legal music downloads [google.com] for several months.

    From the introduction:

    You don't need to worry about getting sued by the Recording Industry Assocation of America [riaa.org] or arrested by the FBI if you download legal music. Many independent and unsigned musicians offer downloads of their music in hopes of attracting more fans. Here's some music from my friends Oliver Brown [kingturtle.com] and Rick Walker's Loop.pooL [looppool.info].

    If everyone started downloading legal music instead of violating copyright with the file sharing programs, we would make short work of the RIAA, because people would start buying CDs directly from the artists and seeing their shows instead of enriching the major labels by buying CDs from the bands the labels have chosen for us to listen to. The RIAA would also have no cause to complain - these music downloads do not infringe copyright because the artists give you permission to download them.

    In particular, you should be listening to iRATE radio [sourceforge.net]. It downloads and plays those legal MP3s that the artists have on their websites, so you don't have to go hunting for them. If you've already tried out iRATE, note that version 0.3 was just released, so get the update if you don't already have it.

  • by mah! ( 121197 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:33PM (#8527191) Homepage
    Seriously!

    As on La Repubblica.it [repubblica.it] (use the fish [altavista.com] if necessary) today, the EU Parliament approved a proposal for regulating P2P stating that acts committed in good faith by consumers - such as downloading music from Internet for personal use - won't be prosecuted. It still has to go through the EU Council, but it's a good start...

  • Re:Is it illegal? (Score:2, Informative)

    by hattig ( 47930 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @08:56PM (#8527413) Journal
    If it wasn't for SuprNova I wouldn't know about Icon of Coil, and then I wouldn't be seeing them play in London later this month with Swarf (excellent ebm industrial techno band) supporting.

    So I support the bands by visiting their gigs, and buying merchandise there. I'll never see the CDs in the shops for these bands anywhere near where I live either. So ... the music labels aren't missing out by me previewing the music, liking it, and then buying it when I finally see it somewhere.
  • Ripping services... (Score:5, Informative)

    by turnstyle ( 588788 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @09:23PM (#8527623) Homepage
    Perhaps not a solution for the original post, but some reading this thread may be interested in RipDigital [ripdigital.com]. You mail them your collection of CDs and they mail back your CDs along with ripped MP3s on a data DVD they burn for you...
  • etree.org (Score:2, Informative)

    by SlashdotOgre ( 739181 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @09:37PM (#8527747) Journal
    For those interested in obtaining legal copies live music by bands that support free trade of live music, check out www.etree.org. The traders there use the SHN format (lossless), and you can frequently get any show you want for free (either via FTP or sending a blank disc and a self addressed stamped envelope - B&P) if you ask nicely. For personal use, you are allowed to transcode the SHN o MP3, but please don't trade any shows in MP3 format (and likewise, don't turn an MP3 show into a SHN).
  • by One Louder ( 595430 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @09:50PM (#8527863)
    Even though it's legal to make such backup copies, the publisher is not legally required to make it easy or even possible for you to do so.

    This came up during the one of the DMCA cases - the court asked about what happens when the protected content enters the public domain if it's illegal to distribute a mechanism to circumvent the protection. Under the current law, even if you have every right to the content, it's apparently illegal to take the necessary steps to get access to it.

    This effectively gives the publisher an infinitely long copyright.

  • by TrancePhreak ( 576593 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:15PM (#8528030)
    This is incorrect. The law states that you cannot download music. The law allows you to borrow a CD from a friend and make a copy. A friend cannot copy the music for you, you must do it yourself. That is what the law for Canada states.
  • magnatune & epitonic (Score:3, Informative)

    by lavaface ( 685630 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:16PM (#8528035) Homepage
    You may want to seriously consider alternatives like magnatune.com and epitonic.com. There is a great deal of quality, free music. In my opinion, anything with DRM is not worth owning anyway. Seriously.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:16PM (#8528037)
    Every time someone brings up the topic of "illegal mp3s" (which does not make much sense), dozens of slashdotters respond with links to music services that either sell their music digitally or give it away for free. Here are some of these links:

    http://www.warprecords.com/bleep/
    http://www.dm usic.com/
    http://www.freeplaymusic.com/
    http://m agnatune.com/
    http://www.metropolis-records.com/
    http://www.ninjatune.net/home/

    The big "list", though, is at:
    http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/9/5/05113/ 70314

    There's also an insane amount of free stuff in other formats (usually MOD-like, but you can usually convert to WAV and then compress to whatever format you need) at
    http://www.scene.org/ and http://www.hornet.org/ plus one of the more involved scene artists, Bjorn Lynne, has lots of his stuff available for download, too: http://www.artistlaunch.com/artist4.asp?artistid=5 229

    So, if you want to listen to mostly electronic music, the internet is your playground. If you want to hear the "pop" stuff that plays on the radio, well, listen to the radio! (I'll trade you a radio walkman for that iPod of yours)
  • by ratboy666 ( 104074 ) <<moc.liamtoh> <ta> <legiew_derf>> on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:17PM (#8528044) Journal
    Actually, you *can* download music (in Canada). The other party may, of course, be in violation, but *that* party has to suffer the consequences.

    Ratboy
  • by gfxguy ( 98788 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:34PM (#8528165)
    I disagree. I am not an information anarchist, and I do believe in copyright, even if I think the current system is bad.

    Congress explicitely spelled out fair use, and I believe that the wording does not really support the INTENT of fair use provisions.

    Your example of a somebody making copies on my behalf is wrong, and misses the point entirely. I'd change it to be something like: "We have BS's new CD and ripped it to mp3s. Some guy in Topeka also purchased it, so it should be OK for him to have a copy of our mp3s as a matter of convenience."

    In the case of mp3.com, the person had to put the audio CD in the drive so that the software could verify possession of the CD before "unlocking" those mp3s for that user. So the end result is the same... the person purchased the content from the content provider. Why should it be illegal for him to have that content in other formats? It's not! It's only illegal when someone else makes it available to HIM in those formats.

    Can you tell me, if this person is allowed to download the mp3s of music from a CD he is in possession of, how the copyright holder is hurt any more so than if that person ripped his own mp3s (which is perfectly legal)?

    I generally make it a rule not to reply to anonymous trolls, but it simply sounds like you didn't understand the argument.
  • by Shiifty ( 704247 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @11:00PM (#8528319) Homepage
    Actually, you *can* download music (in Canada). The other party may, of course, be in violation, but *that* party has to suffer the consequences.

    No, you can't legally download mp3's. In Canada, you can ONLY make a copy of an original, not of a copy. mp3's are copies of the original and therefore its illegal to download them.

    Of course its very unlikely you'll get caught, however, it is still illegal.

  • by audiofan2004 ( 761145 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @11:15PM (#8528463)
    Audio Lunchbox [audiolunchbox.com], an indie-only digital music store has made their entire catalog of music available globally. Cross-platform (Linux, PC and Mac compatible), No DRM, the option to choose either Ogg Vorbis (Q6) or high-quality MP3 (192 kbps VBR) and an excellent selection of music (Sasha, Death Cab for Cutie, Mozart and even Jimi Hendrix) is worth checking out. To quote from the About section: 'Audio Lunchbox was founded in April 2003 by 4 individuals with a common vision: to increase exposure and availability of great independent music.'
  • by PyromanFO ( 319002 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @11:52PM (#8528733)
    In Canada, you can ONLY make a copy of an original, not of a copy.
    The regime does not address the source of the material copied. There is no requirement in Part VIII that the source copy be a non-infringing copy. Hence, it is not relevant whether the source of the track is a pre-owned recording, a borrowed CD, or a track downloaded from the Internet.
  • by jwlidtnet ( 453355 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @12:49AM (#8529041)
    Totally untrue. Vinyl has a *much* lower dynamic range (and a much lower SnR) than does 16bit/44.1kHz PCM.
  • by DaOneJT ( 761115 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @01:57AM (#8529401)
    Ok you got me there. I used the wrong terminology.
    I meant sound fidelity. I.E. an actual recording of the music rather than a 16-bit interpretation of one;-)
    This is obviouly why when digital recording is used in most studios (Home or professional) 24bit/96kHz is now used.
    Also the quality of the machine you're using to play the music on is a factor.
    $50 CD player Vs $500 turntable and vice-versa. Who wins?
    You get what you pay for.
  • by gothzilla ( 676407 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @02:16AM (#8529484)
    When people say vinyl has better quality than cd's, they are speaking strictly about quality, not performance. For an extreme example, humans can hear up to around 22kHz. A 22kHz sine wave converted to 44kHz digital then back to 22kHz sine wave becomes horribly distorted. The distortion becomes less as the frequencies drop.
    People who say they can hear the difference are primarily speaking about analog music, like classical. I personally have heard the difference between a perfect quality vinyl and a cd in some classical music. With music thats digitally created and never really becomes analog you most likely won't be able to hear any difference at all.
    This difference in quality also was much more apparent when cd's first came out since AD/DA converters were not the quality they are now. If you can find a perfect vinyl record of classical music, a high end turntable, high quality amp and speakers and compare it to one of the first cd players that ever came out playing the same music, you could hear the difference quite easily.
    Performance comes into play when you start talking about scratched records and cd's. Cd's hold on to their quality much better than vinyl.

    When the cd format was first being worked on, one of the rules was that Beethoven's 9th had to fit on a single disc since it was 74 minutes long. The engineers found that for a disc to hold beethoven's 9th and have the quality of vinyl, it had to be sampled at 16 bit and was 12cm in diameter. This was too big to make portable cd players realistic so its size and sampling rate were decreased, resulting in lesser quality than vinyl. (http://www.urbanlegends.com/misc/cd/cd_length_ske ptical.html)
  • by Pascal Sartoretti ( 454385 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @04:35AM (#8529973)
    Even if I decide to buy a legacy audio CD, it is often copy-protected and won't load in my PC.

    All of the "copy protected" CDs that I ever bought were perfectly readable by iTunes, and are now nicely stored in MP3 format on my iPod.

    Oh, maybe this is because I have a Mac :-)

  • by jwlidtnet ( 453355 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @04:40AM (#8529989)
    No, "sound fidelity" is still wrong, and hopelessly vague.

    Once again: it isn't a 16-bit interpretation. Sampling does not involve taking "pieces" of music and then throwing them back, hoping it's going by too fast for you to hear. Sampling involves getting a collection of samples that, when converted back into analogue, represents the input waveform (up 'til the threshold your current sampling specification allows) almost exactly.

    As for digital recording, 24bit is used precisely because DSP is so popular. 24bit does give you a greater dynamic range (although popular music doesn't tend to use it), but it also removes the amount of dithering you have to do on a signal, as you have many extra bits being used for various digital process computations.

    Sampling rate is another story entirely. Nyquist states that 44.1kHz should be adequate, but I understand the idea of leaving room for error; consequently, 96kHz is certainly appropriate. Anything higher than that, though, and studies show you're probably actually degrading the signal.
  • by parksie ( 540658 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @04:48AM (#8530035)
    Audio CDs ignore a lot of the error-correction you'd have on a data CD, so just ripping it twice on the same machine (to .wav files or something else lossless) may very likely produce different checksums.

    Scratch repair employed by CDex/cdparanoia and suchlike tends to mangle small differences before you even get round to encoding anything.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 11, 2004 @05:35AM (#8530191)
    But there are not **that** many ripping programs around, and they are **mostly** used with the same default setting.

    Rip from a CD with the same ripper, with the same encoder settings, you get the same checksum.
  • Warp Records (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 11, 2004 @05:52AM (#8530248)
    Warp make all new releases available electronically via their online store Bleep.com [bleep.com]. It's based in the UK but sells worldwide. They are also ripping their back catalogue as quickly as they can.

    You might also try Epitonic [epitonic.com]. Hasn't been updated for a while but they have lots o'stuff, catgeorised, reviewed legal and free to download.
  • Warp Records (Score:3, Informative)

    by Canis ( 9360 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @05:39PM (#8536558)
    ...they offer the Bleep Music Store [warprecords.com]. All files are high-quality (VBR with the settings cranked up) MP3s, unprotected -- they *gasp* treat you like a customer instead of a serf. Also you can preview tracks -- not just 30 seconds of a track, but all of it (albeit in 30 second chunks, so you can't just rip the whole track to a .wav file before buying). Also there's Magnatune [magnatune.com] (tagline: "We are not evil" ;-} ). Warp have the advantage of 'famous names' though, like Aphex Twin or LFO.

Two can Live as Cheaply as One for Half as Long. -- Howard Kandel

Working...