Build From Source vs. Packages?

Build From Source vs. Packages? 863

Posted by Cliff on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @01:48PM from the what-do-you-do dept.

mod_critical asks: "I am a student at the University of Minnesota and I work with a professor performing research and managing more than ten Linux based servers. When it comes to installing services on these machines I am a die-hard build-from-source fanatic, while the professor I work with prefers to install and maintain everything from packages. I want to know what Slashdot readers tend to think is the best way to do things. How you feel about the ease and simplicity of installing and maintaining packaged programs versus the optimization and control that can be achieved by building from source? What are your experiences?"

Build From Source vs. Packages?

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Search 863 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

Packages are best (Score:1, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @01:51PM (#8716044)

Packages are the best to work with. There is too much room for error with build from source. Besides that's what you boss likes, so you better love it. Learn young man, learn. If the boss likes it, you love it. Packages!

This is BSD vs Linux argument (Score:4, Funny)

by gtrubetskoy ( 734033 ) * writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @01:55PM (#8716107)

Any BSD user will swear by "build-from-source" and talk about how the ports [freebsd.org] are so great (and indeed they are).
And any RedHat user won't really understand what the BSD user is talking about and will just keep on using binary rpms found from google or rpmfind [slashdot.org]. In a desparate moment one will use any rpm that seems to do the trick - nevermind security, PGP sigs, all that stuff...
Seriously speaking, building from source is the UNIX way in my opinion. There is just something very heart warming and satisfying about seeing all the compiler messages scroll every time you install a package. (And try installing the native Java from BSD ports - several hours of pure joy!)

Re:One word for you... (Score:5, Funny)

by micromoog ( 206608 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @01:55PM (#8716109)

. . . which of course is dying.

Use the Source Luke (Score:2, Funny)

by mike collins ( 576863 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @01:56PM (#8716123)

I always do.

Well, the *best* way is obviously... (Score:5, Funny)

by gosand ( 234100 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @02:11PM (#8716391)

Obviously, the absolute best way to maintain your systems is to install Windows Update. But since Linux is stuck in the dark ages, you'll have to manage your systems like the cavemen did.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go reboot 100 systems.

dear slashdot... (Score:5, Funny)

by DrWhizBang ( 5333 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @02:12PM (#8716407) Homepage Journal

which is better, vi or emacs? ;-)

Re:One word for you... (Score:2, Funny)

by part15guy ( 724057 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @02:13PM (#8716422)

which of course is dead.
No, it's still dying. I am still running FreeBSD at home because I have not found the time yet to switch back to Linux.

Re:One word for you... (Score:5, Funny)

by SoTuA ( 683507 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @02:14PM (#8716428)

Gentoo Linux: Because life is too long to waste on windows reboots, but long enough to 'emerge openoffice'. (laugh, it's a joke!)

But less than 12? (Score:3, Funny)

by dmccarty ( 152630 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @02:29PM (#8716640)

I work with a professor performing research and managing more than ten Linux based servers.
Is that, like, 11 Linux-based servers?

Re:One word for you... (Score:5, Funny)

by TimmyDee ( 713324 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @02:32PM (#8716685) Homepage Journal

That's only because one can associate FreeBSD with Apple, who has been dying for longer than I have been alive.

I think the best method... (Score:1, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @02:58PM (#8717024)

is to use the Click-N-Run warehouse from Lindows.com. They have all the coolest apps in there.

Devine Guidance (Score:2, Funny)

by buffoverflow ( 623685 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @03:01PM (#8717064)

God intended man to compile from source. It's the 11th commandment.

Re:OS is from a package (Score:2, Funny)

by Captain Pedantic ( 531610 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @03:02PM (#8717079) Homepage

I realize your trolling

Could you clarify your meaning there, please? Do you mean that you make a profit on his trolling, or do you bring it to life? Either way, I think that's pretty cool.

Re:Use sources (Score:2, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @03:14PM (#8717218)

People with jobs managing servers use binary packages. Real geeks work at Wendy's and live in their mom's basement.

Re:Personally (Score:5, Funny)

by micromoog ( 206608 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @03:26PM (#8717413)

porsche has a tiny market share - but nobody suggests they should make a k-car version to get a bigger slice of the pie!
Yeah, Gentoo adding an installer would be like Porsche making an SUV . . . oh wait, right . . .

Re:Use sources (Score:3, Funny)

by bigjnsa500 ( 575392 ) writes: <bigjnsa500@nOSpAM.yahoo.com> on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @03:42PM (#8717602) Homepage Journal

People with jobs managing servers use binary packages.
Not necessarily true when your needs are custom.
Real geeks work at Wendy's and live in their mom's basement.
Oh, that's where I remember you from. You didn't give me my Biggie fries.

Re:Not always the case (Score:3, Funny)

by macdaddy ( 38372 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @04:11PM (#8717955) Homepage Journal

Debian made it into the 21st century? No way!

Re:Personally (Score:2, Funny)

by Reorax ( 629666 ) writes: on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @06:52PM (#8719807)

Yup....and with Gentoo, once the install is done...it is SOOOO easy to keep up to date or add new programs. emerge this, emerge that...emerge sync.
Not in that order, of course.

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

Build From Source vs. Packages? 863

Build From Source vs. Packages? More Login

Build From Source vs. Packages?

Packages are best (Score:1, Funny)

This is BSD vs Linux argument (Score:4, Funny)

Re:One word for you... (Score:5, Funny)

Use the Source Luke (Score:2, Funny)

Well, the best way is obviously... (Score:5, Funny)

dear slashdot... (Score:5, Funny)

Re:One word for you... (Score:2, Funny)

Re:One word for you... (Score:5, Funny)

But less than 12? (Score:3, Funny)

Re:One word for you... (Score:5, Funny)

I think the best method... (Score:1, Funny)

Devine Guidance (Score:2, Funny)

Re:OS is from a package (Score:2, Funny)

Re:Use sources (Score:2, Funny)

Re:Personally (Score:5, Funny)

Re:Use sources (Score:3, Funny)

Re:Not always the case (Score:3, Funny)

Re:Personally (Score:2, Funny)

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

Slashdot Top Deals

Slashdot

Packages are best (Score:1, Funny)

This is BSD vs Linux argument (Score:4, Funny)

Re:One word for you... (Score:5, Funny)

Use the Source Luke (Score:2, Funny)

Well, the *best* way is obviously... (Score:5, Funny)

dear slashdot... (Score:5, Funny)

Re:One word for you... (Score:2, Funny)

Re:One word for you... (Score:5, Funny)

But less than 12? (Score:3, Funny)

Re:One word for you... (Score:5, Funny)

I think the best method... (Score:1, Funny)

Devine Guidance (Score:2, Funny)

Re:OS is from a package (Score:2, Funny)

Re:Use sources (Score:2, Funny)

Re:Personally (Score:5, Funny)

Re:Use sources (Score:3, Funny)

Re:Not always the case (Score:3, Funny)

Re:Personally (Score:2, Funny)

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

Slashdot Top Deals

Well, the best way is obviously... (Score:5, Funny)