Off Grid Via Slow Moving River? 452
einstein writes "I live out in the middle of nowhere, and I lose power at the drop of a hat. My house is right next to the Susquehanna river, and all the kinetic energy going past my house makes just want to go off grid. Most homebuilt hydro power is lower volume/high speed. What would be a good, unobtrusive way to generate electricity from a high volume/low speed body of water? I'm between two large hydro dams, so the water level is fairly constant, but does tend to fluctuate 4-6ft in the winter due to ice floes and melting snow. I think maybe a miniature version of one of the recent submerged tidal generators might work... Does anyone have some suggestions on how I might go about this project?" More than a few people have done this before.
The Romans (Score:4, Interesting)
High torque (Score:5, Interesting)
does this remove energy from the current? (Score:5, Interesting)
hydroelectric power (Score:3, Interesting)
Wind Power (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Stay on-grid while generating power (Score:3, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:-1, Interesting)
Permits? (Score:5, Interesting)
Years ago my family spent a few years trying to get a 30' fix pier (that others on our street could use for free) built by our property. Between the hassles of the town, state and MEPA we gave up. Strangely a few years later a neighbor (and state senator) who opposed to our project build his own from our prints 100' away. I guess we didn't grease the right gears.
My advice, make it small, discrete, quite and easily removable. Be forward that running your own generator over a long period is probable cause for the DEA to search your house as a suspected grow-op. It sounds crazy but again it's all about politics.
Bonne Chance.
Is your land hilly? (Score:2, Interesting)
And for many here, the ram does not use electricity.
The Standard Way to Do This... (Score:2, Interesting)
Unfortunately, making a long-term sealed generator and submersible it is probably not a home project. I suppose it also depends on what sort of stuff coming down the river might eventually plug the rotors. But at least it would be submerged and hidden. As long as it does not impact river navigability (and you don't chew up a few swimmers with the blades, ha ha) who's going to notice and complain?
If you don't actually have a drop, the usual waterwheel, dam, etc. solutions won't work. You could try that Roman trick, if you are allowed to moor a barge in the river; put a big paddlewheel in the barge; hook it to a bunch of auto alternators, and get some power inverters?
If you had the paddlewheels mounted in the center of the barge and enclosed in an insulated deckhouse and turning all the time, probably (?) they would not freeze. (Just HOW cold does it get there? Flowing water, of course is never below zero...)
Re:Stay on-grid while generating power (Score:2, Interesting)
Convert the river to youre needs. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Dear Slashdot (Score:2, Interesting)
but how to deal with the hippos? (Score:0, Interesting)
Re:yes, but investigate 'net metering' (Score:4, Interesting)
I'd worry about that, too...
Looking at my own electric bill, it divides almost perfectly in half, with 50% going to electric "supply", and 50% going to "distribution". So, even if they paid me the same rate they charge me, it would seem that, no matter how much I produce, I could at best break even (since presumeably I would make the money on supply, but still have to pay almost the same rate for distribution).
I dunno. But personally, I'd stay on the grid (unless something major happened, in which case, I'd make damn sure I had an overly-dramatic Very Big Switch I could throw to disconnect me) just for the convenience factor in case something goes wrong with my own production system (generator breaks, stream dries up, whatever).
As an aside, though, I still consider wind the way to go (though would certainly not suggest we completely skip solar, but I would consider solar more of a backup system than a primary one). With hydroelectric, you need year-round running water with a decent head. With solar, you need a fairly high-capacity storage system for the 60-80% of the day when you can't generate enough to match usage. With any sort of combustion, you need fuel. But with wind? It doesn't even really matter where you live - an 80' tower will produce a few kW just about anywhere. Aside from the "ugly" factor, including a wind turbine into the cost of every new house would reduce our current electric grid from a critical utility, to little more than a backup system. When I finally "settle down", I consider that a major point in my decision of where to buy property - If I can't have a wind turbine due to local BS laws and zoning regs, I won't live there.
Re:Stay on-grid while generating power (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:The most cost-effective solution ... (Score:2, Interesting)
From your post I get the impression it has been done, but I think it wouldn't be easy and you'd need to apply quite some circuitery to get some usable output.
Grain Mills (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:does this remove energy from the current? (Score:5, Interesting)
yes, but just momentarily
Huh? Let's not forget the law of conservation of energy. Of course a waterwheel/generator takes energy from the river as it puts out electrical energy. There is nothing "momentary" about it.
But this energy is otherwise "lost" to heat as the water flows downstream anyway. IIRC it was Joule [hometrainingtools.com] (whose energy scale we use today) that originally did the science on waterfalls, showing the water temerature at the bottom of the falls is higher than at the top. As water flows downhill, it pummels into itself, and the gravitation potenital energy is converted to heat.
A waterwheel simply takes some of this energy and converts it to rotation instead of heat. With a waterwheel in place, the temperature of the water will be ever-so-slightly cooler downstream.
The downstream reservoir has a level, and it is the difference between this elevation and the tailrace (water exit) elevation that determines the amount of energy the hydro plant can extract. The difference is called "head" (I kid you not).
So the energy of the water used by a waterwheel is not "stolen" from the downstream plant... because it would have already been "lost" to heat as it reached the reservoir anyway.
fascinating case study (Score:2, Interesting)
That sounds like a good idea to me (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:That sounds like a good idea to me (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Stay on-grid while generating power (Score:3, Interesting)
Hydro Radio (Score:3, Interesting)
- http://www.wjffradio.org/
for them to be able to render him any assistance or inspiration. WJFF is a public radio station that is run entirely off a hydro generator(water conditions permitting). It makes a nice little case study for those who say it can't be done, or for those who do not live in a state that has net metering laws, or one with intolerably cumbersome restrictions.Re:Stupid Romans (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Don't forget your 60Hz and the phase! (Score:2, Interesting)
Maybe a sling pump... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Township Approval (Score:3, Interesting)
With attitudes like this, we would have waited for the proper government bureau approval before dumping the tea in the harbor.
What ever happened to good old American rule breaking?
The paddelwheel method is the way to go (Score:4, Interesting)
More than likely this would be an illegal to do and dangerous as well. A better way to go would be a diversion channel that diverts a small amount of water from the river. At the top of the project or head would be a simple weir or gate to control the flow of water during the changing levels of the river. Depending on the amount of drop between the head and the wheel might give you higher speeds than the river itself could create. After the wheel you simply channel the water back to the river. The channeling back may be the hardest part of the project. As changing river levels might be harder to control and water may back up into the system. It depends on your situation. You may be able to gain a little elevation by using a shallower slope than the river has. Water needs at least a
In any case, you would need to survey the job and use an optical level or a laser level to determine the drop between where you pull the water out and where you put it back in. This could be a costly project depending of the generating needs and your state laws, county laws..etc. But the way stated above is probably the only way to do it legally.
Don't miss work done in India on this (Score:3, Interesting)
interesting hits on this topic. NOTE: Hydel is
the Indian-English term for Hydro power.
When I was working at IIT Delhi I interviewed
a young woman who had just completed a research
assistantship during which she and her professor
developed a generating unit that would fit your
requirements. They used a type of rotary pump
that is mass-produced cheaply in India (used it in
reverse of course), and they got good results.
Unfortunately I wasn't able to hire the young
woman, and I don't have any references for you.
Re: High volume, low speed (Score:3, Interesting)
Old Fashion Rule breaking = Jail Time (Score:4, Interesting)
My neighbor wanted to take down his tree. It was 150 feet tall. The city only allows licensed tree cutters, which wanted in excess of 500$ to do so.
So... we took it down. Six guys and a 1987 GM pickup truck.
Mind you it took 5 hours, and had I not removed the gutters from my roof to work on the soffits, the top of the tree would have removed them for me (and probably much faster with less trepidation).
So the city makes a drive by midweek... and he gets a phone call and a citation for a whopping fine for not having used a licensed tree removal service. Convincing them that 6 guys and a pickup truck actually did the work took some time, but eventually he won.
He was then cited for not having replanted a tree within 10 feet of the road within 1 week (another ordinance) and fined 150$.
Face it- the government can and will spank you if someone gets their panties in a big of enough twist.
Re:The Romans (Score:3, Interesting)
Personal hydroelectric power (Score:4, Interesting)
Jack Rabbit Submersible Hydro Generator
No Pipes or Dams! Power from any Fast-Running Stream or Tidal Flow!
The Jack Rabbit is a special low-speed alternator mounted in a heavy-duty, oil-filled, cast aluminum housing with triple shaft seals. Orginally designed for towing behind seismic sleds for oil exploration, this marine-duty unit is ideal for home power generation near a reasonably fast-moving stream. In a 9 mph stream (slow jog) the Jack Rabbit produces about 2,400 watt-hours daily. Ina 6 mph stream (brisk walk) it produces over 1,500 watt-hours. The 12.5" propeller requires 13" of water depth. A rock or timber venturi can often be constructed to increase stream speed and power output.