Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses The Almighty Buck

Networking in the Danger Zone? 691

Croaker-bg asks: "I currently am an Information Security/ Network Engineer for a large government contract firm and have recently seen several solicitations come across email regarding gigs in the Middle East and surrounding regions, including both Iraq and Afghanistan. Understanding that the pay might be good for being willing to face the hazards, I continue to have my curiosity perked by these short-term jaunts. Lately however, the news of fellow contractors being abducted has put a new spin on the hazards of working abroad in these areas. Has anyone survived such a trip and lived to tell the tale with a fat wallet? If so, would you consider doing it again or is it just to dangerous?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Networking in the Danger Zone?

Comments Filter:
  • Ask this guy (Score:5, Informative)

    by eagl ( 86459 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:29PM (#9469437) Journal
    Ask this guy: http://www.savagenet.com/expat/viewforum.php?f=1
  • You're not alone (Score:5, Informative)

    by Solidsnot ( 169219 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:32PM (#9469454)
    Many of us in the military, especially the one's seperating from the military, are getting these same offers. Its definitely tempting to some of these guys but all of them passed on it. Who wants to go do their same job that they were doing in the military and not have at least some sort of self protection, ie. M16, M9 pistol, squad of Marines behind you......
  • pics (Score:5, Informative)

    by Phrack ( 9361 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:36PM (#9469488)
    see this gallery of a contractor's 1year stint in afghanistan.

    http://www.darchiver.com/gallery/Vince

    well, some personal pics in there as well. skip those.
  • Hazard Pay (Score:5, Informative)

    by Geminus ( 602334 ) * on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:36PM (#9469489)
    I know of several former coworkers who are there right now. You can chech out two of their websites here [ilovemyhazardpay.com] and here [uberforce.com]. I have been approached by these companies as well, and my expedited passport ($188.00) should be here next week. $120K/yr is too enticing for me to pass this up. Additionally, if you're doing IT work and are worried about danger, pick Kuwait as it is the safest environment. I'm married with two kids, and this certainly seems like a good option for mom to finally have a house. Keep in mind that the captured contractors mostly put themselves in danger by being in open public areas... IT guys are very well protected, probably because they are required to have an active secret clearance.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:37PM (#9469494)
    I'd recommend you listen to the 06/06/2004 episode of This American Life which devotes an entire hour to stories of civilian contractors and mercs in Iraq. I believe it would answer your questions and you should be able to download it for free from http://www.thislife.org/
  • Go to the Balkans (Score:5, Informative)

    by karniv0re ( 746499 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:38PM (#9469503) Journal
    I recently got back from Kosovo (though I was there with the Army, not a contractor unfortunately). It's safe enough to hang out in town during the days, and the pay is still pretty good. It was rumored that some Brown & Root employees were making $80k for sitting in a watch tower. I'm sure IT guys would bank better than that.

    As far as the Middle East, I think you could remain pretty safe if you just kept to yourself and didn't do too much playing around outside of the base.

    On a related note, I would like to see a comparison of the daily murder rate in Iraq compared to the daily murder rate for an inner-city such as, oh, let's say Detroit. Granted, beheading is a bit worse than a drive-by, but it's not like it's an every-day thing.
  • Re:Only one way... (Score:5, Informative)

    by azav ( 469988 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:39PM (#9469516) Homepage Journal
    One of my friends is over there in the service.

    Whether you think the war is right or not, he is there and feels like he is "serving his country." This is not your average yahoo.

    Anyway, he sums it up like this. 60% of the people want us there, 20 percent don't care and would like us to get out as soon as we can and the reamaining 20% are completely insane and un/miseducated fanatics.

    If you're interested in reading his blog, he is at :
    http://www.missick.com

    Enlightening reads whether you agree with his views or not.

    Hope you find this worthwhile.
  • by PaulBu ( 473180 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:41PM (#9469533) Homepage
    the other guy was an Afghan POW, not Iraqi civilian.

    To contribute to the grandparent's discussion, as far as I know you are kind of supposed to know how to deal with a gun if you are a civilian contractor down there, or at least carry it. (Got the story from a lady working for one of the aerospace companies who was visiting Iraq briefly, and she told that you are given a gun to hold and at least pretend that you know how to use it).

    As to the actual 'Ask /." question -- I think that the editors are either in very-long-latency mode or entirely detached from the rest of the world. The poor guy was killed today!

    To answer the question, I guess that my wife would not let me go there...

    Paul B.
  • Re:Not worth it (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:44PM (#9469562)
    Easy. The al-Anbar province, and what you in America know as the "Sunni Triangle". This is an area where you're likely to be kidnapped based on the color of your skin, and the dress you wear. (There's also a danger of kidnapping just because you look rich--nothing political, just for money.) Generally, the Turkomen and Kurdish areas are safe, as are places controlled by Falah al-Naqib. (Perhaps you recognize the name--he's the Interior minister.)

    Was your question about the "front lines" serious, or some sort of display of ignorance?
  • by pancake_lover ( 310091 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:52PM (#9469620)
    This American Life (on NPR) ran a pretty good documentary on this subject a few weeks back. It's available in Realaudio format on the web. It's an hour long though. The archive page is Here [thislife.org]. Or go to the audio directly [thislife.org].
  • Re:I'd do it (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 18, 2004 @09:56PM (#9469662)
    Sorry to wake you up, but the whole point of using contractors is to not having to report their deaths, unlike military personnel. There are a lot more contractors being killed, it's just not being reported.
    Only the really gruesome cases like the 4 charred bodies in Falluja, or recently the abductions and beheadings make it to the evening news. In case of the abductions the media attention is guarantued because of the homemade-videos (always something the media jumps on).

    Flamebait:
    As a non-american, I am kinda surprised about the outrage in the US, considering that there are currently 125+ investigations of prisoner deaths killed in US custody going on. Looks as if the US is still winning ...
  • by YrWrstNtmr ( 564987 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @10:01PM (#9469683)
    I have a friend (USAF retired ) in Saudi now, as a contractor associated with aircraft, and he's bailing.

    Money fades. Bullet holes don't.
  • Re:Hazard Pay (Score:3, Informative)

    by Daniel Wood ( 531906 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @10:02PM (#9469691) Homepage Journal
    Considering most of the jobs are tax free, it is a good chunk of change.
  • by ELP000 ( 785771 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @10:07PM (#9469724)
    Computer stuff in the Army... is the Signals Branch. Not the Corps of Engineers.

    USAF are "Combat Communications Groups" or "Com" units suplimented with regular base level "com" people from "Communcations Squadrons" from various bases.

    Navy and Marines .... don't know.

    And of course there are some exceptions to what I just wrote.
  • Re:I did... (Score:5, Informative)

    by konfoo ( 677366 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @10:08PM (#9469731)
    Sorry bud, Johannesburg does not count as a dangerous working environment. Its the same like working in LA - the burbs are much removed from the ghetto.

    I say this having been born in south africa, living in Johannesburg, working in malaysia, and living now in LA.
  • by really? ( 199452 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @10:14PM (#9469764)
    You've spent no time in the area, have you? I personally don't think you have.

    Yes, it's more dangerous than a lot of the places in the US/Europe/etc, but, nowhere near as bad as the media tries to make it out.

    Last time I was in the area, during the HIGHT of the previous "war", I found one, yes ONE, person who got in my face for being "American". I politely explained to him that I was not, and even if I were I was there as a traveler not as a representant of my government. He refused let it be and soon enough the other people around told him, in Arabic, to shut up and leave us alone - I was there with a friend.
    Eventually he tried to "get physical" and I chucked him off the ferry (Yes in the water. No the capitan was not amused; but, when the locals explained the situation he had a hard time refraining from laughing.).
    The rest of locals were VERY apologetic for this a-hole's behaviour and congratulated me on having the guts to stand up to him.
    Or, maybe I am just a lucky bastard?
  • by RhettLivingston ( 544140 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @10:23PM (#9469840) Journal

    About a year ago, I purchased a grey market tractor from a man who makes his living off of international trade. He has spent much time on foreign soils wheeling and dealing heavy equipment. He has a physique like a green beret, was raised on a farm, and yet has a law degree with a specialty in international law. I recognized him as an expert in international affairs. Someone in the trenches, not the ivory towers. And I started asking him about his experiences.

    Amongst the more interesting things he stated was that given the current world situation, even before the whole deal with Iraq started, he had decided to stay home for a while. He might consider a trip to Canada, but would not go to Mexico without a few of his ex-Ranger body guards and would under no circumstance venture to South America. He said that worldwide, it had become an accepted business to capture Americans and ransom them back or use them for political means. The authorities in the countries were of no help and usually on the bankroll themselves.

    This was not your average everyday traveller, but a seasoned veteran with heavy duty protection.

    After that discussion and listening to his accounts of how common this problem actually was, especially of friends and acquaintances he knew in the biz who had actually encountered troubles, I'm surprised that there hasn't been far more trouble in Iraq. In truth, it sounds as if the heavy protection being supplied to the contractors there is making them safer than if they were in South America. The only difference is that both the news media and the captors involved in the Iraq situation are motivated to amplify this microcosm of the overall story while they seem motivated to suppress the story of the true worldwide situation.

    So, enjoy your trip to Iraq. But be very careful of Columbia, Peru, Brazil, Indonesia, etc.

  • Re:Hazard Pay (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 18, 2004 @10:29PM (#9469872)
    It's a tax break for active duty serving in a war zone. In a war zone designated by executive order, you have to serve at least one day out of one month to benefit from federal tax exclusion for that month.
    Contractors also have income tax exclusions up to a certain pay amount but I don't have the details.
  • Re:Not worth it (Score:5, Informative)

    by natebow ( 789544 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @10:30PM (#9469884)
    It's not all that bad, its a lot of territory, the media focuses on the glaring horror stories. I 've been on 2 tours as a contractor in direct support of ground forces, and have been just about everywhere in the theater, Iraq and Afghanistan. My first tour was during the initial ground war, and I travelled with the troops all the way to Tikrit, 2nd tour I was based out of kuwait and travelled as required, to Falluga, Baghdad, and Afghanistan. I would definately recommend the Kuwait tour. Good network and I was able to do most work over the net.
  • by cmholm ( 69081 ) <cmholmNO@SPAMmauiholm.org> on Friday June 18, 2004 @10:54PM (#9470085) Homepage Journal
    Here's what I'm hearing from widely scattered classmates from the former American School Of Isfahan, Iran:

    Afghanistan: The Kabul/Bagram area are relatively safe. Occasional bombings and shootings sound worse in the media than is perceived locally. Locals don't see you as a target. Resist the temptation to see the rest of the country, and you'll be fine. Heroin use among foreign rear echelon motherfuckers is 'way up... do avoid that.

    Kuwait: basically safe, but events in Iraq and SA will continue increase tensions. Do as you would in most poor nations (which Kuwait is not) and try not to stand out. Do a year or two and call it a day.

    Bahrain: more of a disconnect between rulers and ruled than Kuwait. Looks good compared to SA, Iraq, Afghan.

    Qatar & UAE: Looks good. Act conservatively, as has been the case in the Gulf all along. If SA goes down the shitter, there will be spill over, but at least you'll have plenty of warning.

    Saudi: things are going to get worse before they get better. Do not take your family, as you'll be forced to live in a foreign compound. If at all posible, live in well off but Arab-heavy apartment complexes or developments. Make a habit of varying your routine outside of the office. Have in mind an alternate exit from said office.

    Iraq: If you're lucky enough to work AND live strictly within the occupation authority's green zone in downtown Baghdad, knock yourself out. Keep in mind that that zone will be shrinking considerably over the next 12 months into a still huge US Embassy, so make sure you don't get stuck outside with a housing allowance and a pat on the back. For the less risk adverse, 24x7 at one of the bigger military bases is a consideration. Next down the list is Metro Basra as long as the Badr (as opposed to Sadr) militia and it's political front stay happy. Ditto with the Kurdish areas, which aren't much worse than eastern Turkey. Pass on Mosul, Kirkuk, and the whole rest of the country. If you're going to be driving anywhere, for God's sake opt for small, cheap sedans. Big sedans are begging to be car jacked, and SUVs broadcast "USA" like a HUMMV.

    Iran: I throw this in for contrast. If a US citizen/resident alien, your biggest problem will be explaining yourself to Uncle Sam. Consult with an attorney to make darn sure you aren't in conflict with US economic restrictions on trade with Iran before you go. Don't hit on local women, bad mouth Islam or the government, or take pictures of any thing that even resembles a government or military installation. In fact, this is more of a normal overseas posting, so it's not nearly as lucrative. There are some up to date tourist guide books on the country, and good poop from the British and Australian Embassy web sites.

  • by DrunkenTerror ( 561616 ) * on Friday June 18, 2004 @11:10PM (#9470182) Homepage Journal
    Here's one place you can look, the FEDZ official job site, USAJOBS [opm.gov] (OPM = US Office of Personnel Management). You can input a resume, search for jobs, &/or set up search agents. One program relating to this topic is SOFIA [opm.gov] (Support Our Friends in Iraq and Afghanistan.)
  • This is complete FUD (Score:4, Informative)

    by stripmarkup ( 629598 ) on Friday June 18, 2004 @11:32PM (#9470316) Homepage
    I am in South America right now, more precisely in Argentina. There is a thriving expat community here, last night I attended a late dinner at a restaurant with a bunch of Americans. This city (Buenos Aires) is as safe as any US city if not safer. I know dozens of Americans here and never heard of anyone having any problems besides a few being victims of petty theft, just like in any other big city.

    Obviously this person does not know what he's talking about. The world outside the US is not as frightening as some people want to make it sound. Warzones, of course, are a different matter.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 18, 2004 @11:40PM (#9470354)
    don't believe everything you see on CNN! their in the business to make money, and violance sells!

    So, there really haven't been a number of civilian contractors recently tortured, shot, and beheaded in Iraq? I knew CNN was making all that up, down to publishing the videos of Nick Berg's "death" on the web...

    I'm not one to blindly buy everything the media is selling, but I'd probably guess that in this case, assuming Iraq is a dangerous place and that going there might get you killed is not an unreasonable conclusion.

  • by mooman ( 9434 ) * on Saturday June 19, 2004 @01:00AM (#9470717) Homepage
    Argentina and Chile are pretty benign. It's a little nastier in the Central american area, Colombia probably being the worst, with Guatemala and Nicaragua behind.

    When I was younger (77-82) I lived in Panama, then Colombia. Panama had the Canal Zone back then and that was completely safe. Bogota on the other hand was not. Within one month of living there, our house was burglarized (while we were out for lunch) and had thousands of dollars of jewelry, cameras, and electronics taken. Oh, and a loaded 9mm.

    After that the embassy posted a 24hr armed guard on my doorstep. For every day of the next two years I had some guy in a uniform with a .38 revolver sitting outside my front door and walking me across the street to the schoolbus. The general next door to us had *two* guards with machine guns.

    About 6 months later (and a few hundred miles away) we had our van broken into and more stuff taken including *another* pistol.

    Most of the vehicles that the Embassy used or loaned out there had bullet-proof inserts behind the windows. Most of the moderate to high ranked Colombian officials had similar vehicles as well.

    I'd still like to go back and visit again someday, but would feel rather leery staying more than say a week or so. Iraq may be worse for more personal attacks, but Central America is still pretty high risk in several of the countries. But there are many that are probably fairly safe.. I just haven't kept track of which lately. For the latest, you should check out the travel warnings [state.gov] put out by the US Department of State...

  • Re:Are you joking? (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 19, 2004 @01:02AM (#9470726)
    Halliburton is unreasonably overcharging YOU, taxpayer, even if they're passing on a reasonable amount to the contractor.
    Do you want to support this? The issue is not whether you get paid reasonable wages. That's shortsighted. Find other work that doesn't make the world a worse place by supporting cronyism and big government.
    The Iraqis can rebuild for themselves.
    It's true! They don't need foreign operations building an infrastructure so their money for services can go to non-local businesses.


    You've proven yourself to have poor insight into the poster's comment. I hate it when people mock others self-righteously (whether ignorantly).
  • by Dun Malg ( 230075 ) on Saturday June 19, 2004 @01:03AM (#9470736) Homepage
    I thought the whole point of having an Army Corps Of Engineers was so that when technical skills were needed in a war zone, the Army would be able to provide them.

    The CoE does mostly CIVIL engineering. Dams, flood control, and miscelaneous hydrology are their main contribution to infrastructure creation. They're mainly a construction corps. Anything requiring esoteric technical knowledge is generally contracted out to private companies that specialize in those sorts of things.

  • Re:Are you joking? (Score:5, Informative)

    by httpoet ( 231453 ) <aestes@@@vt...edu> on Saturday June 19, 2004 @01:17AM (#9470800)

    Yes, because as we all know, Halliburton is in Iraq to establish a better way of life for Iraqis, not because of the huge no-bid contracts [commondreams.org] that were coordinated by ex-CEO and now Vice Predident Dick Cheney. [yahoo.com]

    Pardon me if I fail to see the humanitarian intentions of an oil company with close - possibly criminal - ties to the administration.

  • Re:Only one way... (Score:4, Informative)

    by Dachannien ( 617929 ) on Saturday June 19, 2004 @01:47AM (#9470891)
    According to President Bush, the administration has never said that Iraq was directly complicit in the September 11 attacks. He does say, however, that the Saddam regime was involved in providing a safe haven inside Iraq for the training of al-Qaeda operatives.

  • by Lokinator ( 181216 ) on Saturday June 19, 2004 @05:12AM (#9471403)
    If you're *going* to do it, it's just not true that you've gotta be gun-free and you can't shoot back. From what I hear, quite a few contractors have acquired assault prevention devices and have utilized them successfully and quietly.

    Before you do, however, I strongly sugest you look into the courses available at the Gunsite Academy or with Massad Ayoob's group or LFI..and take all you can afford before boarding that plane.
  • Political prisoners/hostages are not always simply killed right away. Many are held in, uh, shall we say less than comfortable conditions before finally being set free or killed. John Mccain was held in Vietnam for 9 years. American hostages in Iran were held for what, three years(correct if wrong, this top of head)? Also, what if these "terrorists" decide not to just kill you, but maim you or mutilate you. Maybe then they'll release you, maybe not. Maybe your new nickname will be "lefty," maybe it will be "one-eyed Willy." If you are sent to jail, then you at least have a release date or the possibility of parole. You do in fact have a chance at a normal life, with all the limbs/organs you went in with! If you are being held as a hostage/captive by rogues, you do not know if you will die tomorrow or life years in a filthy hole. You have no idea the kind of terror that may be waiting for you. In jail, everything operates according to legal precedent. You have a sentence, a release date(if applicable), parole, time off for good behavior. You have rights and expectations as a prisoner. If you are to be executed, you will be notified and killed in a humane fashion. You have none of this as a hostage in a hostile situation like that of Nick Berg. Does that answer why going to jail might be preferable to being captured by terrorists?
  • by Arker ( 91948 ) on Saturday June 19, 2004 @06:03AM (#9471497) Homepage
    Skin colour can be an element, but I think you put far too much emphasis on it. I'm guessing your from the states where it has a great import. But in Iraq, or Afghanistan? Many of the natives are probably whiter than most USians, at least underneath the tan (which can, of course, be acquired.) Plenty of blue-eyed 'aryan' types in both these places - in fact a man of colour would stand out much more in either area than a blue-eyed nordic type with a good tan, because the indigenous population in both places is predominantly caucasian, and there is no indigenous negro element in either place.

    What's much more important in terms of standing out is how you dress and how you act. If you can speak the local language, or at the very least Arabic which is something of a lingua franca throughout the region, you've got a huge advantage. If you can dress like the locals and walk like you belong there, you're not likely to stand out as a target regardless of skin colour.

    Nonetheless, neither place is at all safe for westerners, particularly ones carrying blue passports, regardless of skin colour or even linguistic ability. There is a lot to be said for travelling to broaden your worldview, but right now Iraq and Afghanistan would not be on my list of places to go.
  • Re:Not worth it (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 19, 2004 @10:07AM (#9472098)
    Was your question about the "front lines" serious, or some sort of display of ignorance?

    Someone's safety may be at stake here; so rein in that ego.

    I would concur that so-called "lines" do indeed seem very blurry in this mess. This "Sunni triangle" you refer to is primarily a linguistic construct, with only a distant basis in geography. It's not as if you can actually draw such a triangle on a map with the intention of using it as a guide for safety on the ground!

    Areas of influence are very fluid, and difficult to identify, especially in the ethnically-diverse urban environments where such technical contracts would be most likely found. Extremists are filtering in from other countries to wreak havoc.

    Being armed or having guards may not be enough. If you are white, affluent, foreign, non-Muslim, working for the occupation or worst yet all of the above, you become a target. To get comfortable and establish a routine is to risk making oneself an easy target. You can't even trust your cab driver.

    IMHO there are many ways to see the world and make money which would be far safer.
  • by The Tyro ( 247333 ) on Saturday June 19, 2004 @12:13PM (#9472646)
    I was forward-deployed during the early phase of the Afghanistan war, and the KBR guys were great.

    In case you were unaware, these contractors keep guys on the ground in those countries; some of them have been there for 20 years or more. These are local people who live there, speak the language, and are employed/paid by these companies to maintain caches of equipment, buildings, etc... these companies don't just fly in a bunch of pale-faces, rake in the cash, and fly out.

    They subcontract with a lot of local people to cook food, do construction, and all manner of services for the military, and they do a fair job of it. They maintain a lot of relationships... It's probably a little unfair to simply characterize them as profiteering gluttons (and no, I don't work for them, never have, and don't plan to).

    Contractors provide a lot of services, and while they certainly do it for a profit, that's no different from 99% of people in a capitalist system. Doing things out of the goodness of your heart is very noble, but money's a powerful motivator, and people going out into a war zone to do a job (particularly if they're providing expertise that the Iraqis need) should get a fair wage... I'd say they're earning it.
  • No, don't go (Score:2, Informative)

    by anti-auctor ( 777084 ) on Saturday June 19, 2004 @02:10PM (#9473262) Homepage Journal
    Yeah, I've been but in Saudi and you have seen what is happening there. I got the bucks fine and returned to tell the tale. But even if they don't behead you or otherwise kill you for real, you die a different death there anyway - the death that in the eyes of the native population they would see you really have if they could. You're a dog there. You're the 'other'.

This file will self-destruct in five minutes.

Working...