Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications Software The Internet

Cross-Platform VoIP Software? 205

feilkin writes "With the release of Skype's Linux client, I'm wondering about alternatives. Namely, cross-platform solutions for voice communication. I've got friends who are using Windows, Linux and OSX, and I'm hoping that there is a way to communicate with all of them. I myself am using Linux, and I haven't been able to find any solutions that seem fitting to my situation completely. Does anyone have a solution that'll be useful on all three platforms, or solutions that may be coming in the near future?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Cross-Platform VoIP Software?

Comments Filter:
  • err... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by errgh ( 744846 ) on Monday June 21, 2004 @08:28PM (#9490227) Homepage
    http://www.skype.com
  • Vonage (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Gothmolly ( 148874 ) on Monday June 21, 2004 @08:53PM (#9490389)
    For 29.99 USD a month, Vonage [vonage.com] is the way to go.
    No fscking around with codecs.
    No gcc bullshit.
    No patching, only to have an OS upgrade break your app.
    Pay for it, be done with it, move on. What's your life worth? Time = money.
  • TeamSpeak (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Apreche ( 239272 ) on Monday June 21, 2004 @08:54PM (#9490393) Homepage Journal
    Sure, you can't talk to people who only have POTS.

    Sure, its designed to be used with online games.

    But really, its just IRC with voice. I talk to people in Australia with it all the time, for free. You can turn the bitrate down and even talk to people with dial-up. I usually just use gaim to tell someone "hey, join the teamspeak server, let's talk".

    Also, this way I don't have to remember phone numbers.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 21, 2004 @10:05PM (#9490888)
    GNAA in full effect, use your brain before modding.

    VoIP requires H323 and other setuid scripts

    Yes cos H323 being a protocol is really likely to be setuid.

    The internet was simply never designed for realtime interaction

    No because nobody ever thought humans might use it.

    VoIP completely bypasses the government's anti-terrorist infrastructure

    None of the two main VoIP protocol suites include any encryption so beep, 3 out of 3 wrong, but some dick gave you the informative mod so again here I am wasting my time putting crap right.

    I think I just hit the point where I no longer want to visit, read or post to slashdot. When this kind of completely idiotic crap is getting modded up whats the point. I might aswell join GNAA and start trolling, at least then I'll get some fun out of it....
  • Re:Vonage (Score:4, Insightful)

    by dj245 ( 732906 ) on Monday June 21, 2004 @11:09PM (#9491424) Homepage
    Unfortunately vonage requires lots of open ports. Many of these ports are now being camped out by worms and trojans, and are blocked by some ISPs (mine included). Vonage is completely useless on many ISPs due to port blocking of these worm ports.
  • by Elentar ( 168685 ) <slashdot@ul[ ]violet.us ['tra' in gap]> on Tuesday June 22, 2004 @12:18AM (#9491895)
    Walking around with your head crunched over onto your shoulder to squeeze the phone there, getting an ache in your ear from flattening it, and having to hold a cellular/cordless phone close to your head for hours-long conference calls all look very retarded to me. Having a quality headset (like those from Plantronics) and being able to use two hands, walk upright and avoid ear/headaches looks very smart.

    Of course, if you meant that wearing a stupid-looking headset looks retarded, you're absolutely right - just look at the enormous contraptions that Britney Spears, Garth Brooks, and all those other stage performers have to put up with. But regular users just wanting to have a conversation have a wide range of options, if they're willing to spend some money. Even Radio Shack has some decent choices.

    Personally, I like the trend toward USB headsets with built-in sound chips. It makes more sense to put the audio D/A hardware in the actual output device than in the computer, these days - keep it digital for as long as possible, preventing noise and cable mess.

    -Elentar
  • Re:SMTP (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ZigMonty ( 524212 ) <slashdot.zigmonty@postinbox@com> on Tuesday June 22, 2004 @01:34AM (#9492241)
    Uh huh... now explain to me how the "voice" part of the requirements is met, preferably in the same condescending tone.

It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.

Working...