Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Almighty Buck Patents

Who Can Open Sourcers Support in the CFC? 21

gov_coder asks: "I was looking forward to supporting the EFF this year in the Combined Federal Campaign, however, I have learned that I can't do that anymore. Looking at the the Public Patent Organization's list of partners, I can't seem to identify an organization fighting software patents that's on the CFC's list. What a government coder to do if they wanna support the fight on software patents through the Combined Federal Campaign?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Who Can Open Sourcers Support in the CFC?

Comments Filter:
  • The article is short on details for why the EFF was dropped. It says, in part:

    "the government decided to change the rules and require charities to enforce government blacklists against their own employees in order to be able to participate in the campaign. Charities should not have to investigate their own employees in order to receive these personal funds from government workers."

    Umm... what the hell does this mean? Is a 'government blacklist' a secret ops thing, or does it just mean that the charities
    • I read it to mean:

      The government have a list of bad guys. The government wants the charities to check that none of the employees are on this list.

      EFF are complaining that this is a loss of privacy.

      Personally I think charities should be open for inspection to all, and that a list of banned people from working for charities is a good thing. Charities are too open to abuse as they are.

      • Isn't that list private?
      • Personally I think charities should be open for inspection to all

        Sure.

        and that a list of banned people from working for charities is a good thing.

        No, it's as stupid as the "no-fly" list.

        "Lessee, John Fluxx? There's a John Flucks on the list. Sorry, we can't hire you."

        "But that's not me!"

        "Sorry, too close. As far as we're concerned your name's on list. Take it up with Homeland Security. Good luck, heh heh."

        Meanwhile, you're banned from transacting any business in the U.S. [sptimes.com].

        • So your problem with it is false-positives:?

          While I feel this could be fixed, I doubt the competence of them to do this correctly.
          • So your problem with it is false-positives:?

            That's certainly a big problem with it. The whole utter lack of due process is another. If you've got real evidence that someone is a terrorist, you don't put them on a no-fly or no-hire list, you put them on the most-wanted list and arrest and prosecute them.

    • EFF decided on its own not to participate in the government blacklist. The ACLU made the same decision [aclu.org].
  • Easy. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by DAldredge ( 2353 ) <SlashdotEmail@GMail.Com> on Friday October 01, 2004 @09:31PM (#10410542) Journal
    Do not donate via the CFC and mail the EFF a check directly.
    • Which leads us to our next question: how did a question with such a simple, self-evident answer become an "Ask Slashdot"?
    • My question specifically reads _THROUGH_THE_CFC_.

      If I wanted to know about other ways of donating - I would have asked that question.

      I want to be able to tell other feds what OSS supporting organizations they can easily choose to contribute to within the CFC.
    • Do not donate via the CFC and mail the EFF a check directly.

      You've obviously never worked for the Federal Government.

      It is customary to engage in the use of peer pressure to ensure that every person in an organization donates to the CFC.

      The boss gets up and says something like: "It's CFC time again. I'm going to make a promise to you all... if everyone in this Office (or
      unit/organization/etc.) donates to the CFC, everyone will get pizza for lunch on Thursday, and a day off next Friday. Now, who wants
  • In NY's SEFA and United Way campaigns, a payroll deduction can be designated to any 501(c)(3) organization, even those not on the list.

    You should ask the person running you office's campaign what your options are. Tell them that you want to donate to one particular charity that isn't on the list. If they don't have a process to help you out, just decline to participate in the CFC and send your donation seperately.
    • This is often true.

      The write-in option at my workplace has allowed me to donate to the FSF [fsf.org] for several years using only its address:

      Free Software Foundation, Inc.
      59 Temple Place - Suite 330
      Boston, MA 02111, USA

      and that it qualified as a 501(c)3 organization.

      Usually I still give about 2/3 of my donation to the local United Way - there's a lot of worthy and underfunded organizations under that umbrella.

      Some corporations have matching gifts policies to leverage your donation.

      For example, in 2004, t

  • ....Ruby Central [rubycentral.org] is a worthy recipient of your tax-deductible donation. They arrange and sponsor Ruby conferences and generally support the Ruby community in a variety of ways. There's a Paypal donation link [rubyforge.org] on the front page of RubyForge.

    Props to David Allen Black and Chad Fowler who are the prime movers behind RubyCentral!
  • The whole point of the question is;

    • given that the CFC has tons of organizations in it
    • the CFC makes it brain dead simple for feds to contribute to any of those organizations

    Do any of them fight software patents or otherwise support OSS?

    Don't say use paypal and call that an answer; it simply isn't.

  • Just tried to check the lists [opm.gov], but they are in M$ DOC format. Why can't they use PDF, which is more portable than "DOC" ?

    If you're concerned about this issue, I'd suggest sending them an email [mailto] and expressing your views.

  • I've made a copy of the lists and converted the lists into HTML [brownsite.net]. THanks OOo!

    This should make it somewhat easier for someone to look at - but its still 750+ K (its a huge list).

One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...