Cool RSS Feeds? 78
mgessner asks: "I'm searching for some new and interesting things to read related to geekdom, humor, the Internet, and all things technological. Normally, I'd search Google for this, but trying to find something like RSS feeds on Google would be like looking for a needle in a haystack: there's just too much to sift through. So, does anyone want to share their favorite RSS feeds (other than our own beloved /.) they'd like to recommend?"
Hackers (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.planetplanet.org/ [planetplanet.org] has a list of blog aggregators for various projects!
Gadgetry (Score:2, Interesting)
In other words, if you read these two sites, you can turn off the matching topics on
Here's some funky RSS (and atom) for you (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/wp-rss2.php [stevepavlina.com]
Thomas Warfield about the life of a successful shareware author:
http://www.asharewarelife.com/atom.xml [asharewarelife.com]
Wikinerds RSS feeds (Score:2, Interesting)
Just to clarify that these are not the only RSS feeds I offer, but just the most interesting ones that have useful content. I post this message not as an advertisement, but only because I truly believe that these feeds will be interesting to you (and you asked to be informed about interesting feeds).
Note: Please do not read the RSS feeds more than 4-6 times per day because I want to keep the server utilisation low.
How about my own http://livid.3322.org ? (Score:2, Interesting)
warez the warez? (Score:2, Interesting)
Also what I find cool are rss feeds of tv listings.
Two other feeds I check out regularly that aren't mentioned here are Packet storm & Tomshardware.
Re:good RSS directories -- longevity of protocols (Score:3, Interesting)
Atom's main goal is to have a well specified unambigious specification [intertwingly.net]. The problem behind RSS is that it is ambigious - so leads to silent data loss - and it took the rather public failure at Reuters [intertwingly.net] for the point to sink in [harvard.edu]. As such, it is close to impossible for a specification to be both unambigious and backwards compatible with RSS. A clean break results in a cleaner and more implementable specification, especially since we are not loaded with the baggage of previous unreversable mistakes in RSS. Notwithstanding, the "solution" to the Reuters problem now breaks RSS2.0's backward compatibility with RSS0.91 [harvard.edu].
Even the motivation behind Atom is clear: