Low Tech Gutenberg? 108
Peace Corps Guy asks: "I have a friend who recently left for a two year Peace Corps stint in Mozambique. While there she has limited access to electricity, no technology, and not a lot to do with her 'off' time. She's a big literature fan, and many of us here at home would like to send a care package - but how best to ship pieces of free online text like Project Gutenberg to a developing nation? We can print it (high shipping and printing costs), print it very small and ship her a high quality fresnel lens (awkward), or put it all on a cheap PDA, which would be a high theft risk en route and in situ. High shipping costs on weight and volume are another major limiting factor. What alternative solutions can Slashdot readers suggest for shipping a freely available byte-stream to someone without a computer?"
Digital media (Score:4, Insightful)
As for powering the PDA, there are a number of options using solar power
Not Gutenberg (Score:5, Insightful)
Amazon delivers to Mozambique (linky [amazon.com]). Just order some actual books and have them delivered. Some nice Penguin Classics paperback edition or so would probably be more practical to read than any of your ideas for delivering a Gutenberg text as well, I would think.
(Possibly giving this answer makes me a total moron because I obviously forgot about a number of problems with it, and it's not even an answer to the question. If so, kindly explain why it won't work. Ta)
Re:A (compartively) new way of encoding byte-strea (Score:4, Insightful)
You're talking about books that are off copyright, anyway -- buy some cheap or used paperbacks and send them as parcels. (I think there's even a discount books-only rate.) It's foolproof, familiar and when she's done, she can distribute or trade the books. A much better plan than microfiche and a Fresnel lens.
One up on the book shipping (Score:2, Insightful)
It would save on shipping costs for you (I think what you're trying to do is ship a huge amount of printed material, right?), and wouldn't cost many other people very much either.
Re:Low tech data transport? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Low tech data transport? (Score:2, Insightful)
http://science.slashdot.org/science/04/03/31/22
Send books (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Just buy real books (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Similar problem here... (Score:4, Insightful)
And still I'm getting serious replies.
Just a thought... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Just buy real books (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Make books on CD (Score:3, Insightful)
Even the best text-to-speech stuff I've heard is, uh, not something I'd want to listen to for hours on end. What you've descrived sounds like a particularly excruiating version of pure hell.
Re:A (compartively) new way of encoding byte-strea (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:A (compartively) new way of encoding byte-strea (Score:3, Insightful)
No no, you've got the specs wrong. The embedded reader is based on reflective technology and absolutely REQUIRES an external energy source. Best results may be achieved using a giant ball of flaming gas positioned above and behind the user's shoulder. This is actually the preferred source of energy, since giant flaming balls of gas are abundant on this world. In this case you don't have to worry so much about environmental conditions, e.g. even backscatter works fine.
If the giant ball of flaming gas is hidden behind solid objects ("gone where the sun don't shine") and/or is difficult to position (e.g. due to lack of levers and/or fixed points from which to move the Earth), you must simply rely on backscatter from other planetary objects or produce your own energy e.g. by incinerating animal fats.
--Bud