Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education Operating Systems Software Sun Microsystems Windows

OpenOffice vs. MS Office for Education? 1039

dbrian asks: "I work in a large high school district where there will be some discussion on whether or not to purchase another term of 'Software Assurance' for MS Office licenses on thousands of computers. This seems to be an ideal opportunity to promote an alternative such as OpenOffice. It will not be an easy sell, even though OpenOffice should more than satisfy all curricular needs and save the district lots of money; like many other districts we have political and cultural 'challenges'. So, I ask you, have you been successful in moving your education or business organization from MS Office to OpenOffice? What were the pros and cons from your migration? What advice do you have in selling this to tech coordinators and administrators who are not enlightened by Open Source?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

OpenOffice vs. MS Office for Education?

Comments Filter:
  • Demo it? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:15PM (#12315295)
    Can't you just do a demo? Call it "microsoft office" and show them the latest features. Then say "oh, by the way, this isn't microsoft office after all. It's a $300 competitor. Then say, "Oh wait. It's not $300 after all. It's free"

    That way you kinda ease them into it.

    Just a thought.
  • by AviLazar ( 741826 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:15PM (#12315307) Journal
    I am not claiming to be an expert on Open Office, but did you consider the tech support of it? Also the compatibility? I know that we cannot use Open Office in our firm because our documents will not open properly there. We have documents that are hundreds of pages of custom work, including our normal.dot files.

    THere are benefits to using industry standard programs.
  • by MPHellwig ( 847067 ) * <mhellwig@xs4all.nl> on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:16PM (#12315309) Homepage
    Be sure it it is indeed a viable alternative, it doesn't need to be better as long as it is good enough for that situation.

    I work as an administrator/application manager at high school, the point you have to consider when trying to switch is:
    Documentation, some teachers probably need to adapt their lessons, are they motivated for that and do they have the experience to make a change for them self?

    Why should teachers be motivated to switch? Because it is a moral obligation for non-profit organizations to use product that are more suitable for the common good and not just profitable for a monopoly.

    Education should be accessible to all layers of society, even the ones that don't have the money to buy "big bucks office".
    So by using open source they aren't forced to use illegal software just to be able to get educated.

  • by gandell ( 827178 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:16PM (#12315312)
    But I'm not impressed with Open Office's load times. One of the reasons we aren't moving more people to this particular open source package is that it typically takes 5 times as long to open the Text Document app if you don't have the tasktray icon loading.
    So no, we're not planning on moving anyone to Open Office. We have, however, moved a few workstations to Star Office.
  • Will it be useful? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Monf ( 783812 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:16PM (#12315319)
    When a kid leaves the school and tries to get a job and says "Yes, I am proficient in OpenOffice", how many employers are going to say "That's great, but we use M$ Office..."
  • Crappy Tech Policies (Score:3, Interesting)

    by suyashs ( 645036 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:17PM (#12315332)
    My school district has the most backward Tech policy I have ever seen. Every computer is licenced for all the MS Office apps, many random apps, and one cannot buy anything from anyone unless that vendor is "approved". This leads to some interesting pricing issues such as $200 for a stick of 128 MB ram, $50 mice, and very expensive computers. Furthermore, the computer science classes are stuck with old 233 Mhz Pentium IIs while keyboarding classes are upgraded to new 2.8 Ghz P4s. It's a big mess and nobody seems to care.
  • by johansalk ( 818687 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:17PM (#12315333)
    I'm a power user and have been using openoffice, and before that staroffice, since 2000. I can't see why kids in a school would need any more than I do. I have access to MS office 2003, yet openoffice, and especially with the promising beta of version 2, remains my choice for now and perhaps a time to come.
  • by winkydink ( 650484 ) * <sv.dude@gmail.com> on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:17PM (#12315335) Homepage Journal
    The decision-makers will be finance-oriented, not technologists. Keep the "just like MS Office" points at a high level and keep pushing how much money it will save. Worst case, MS radically discounts their sw to play for the block. With either outcome, ther's more money to spend on the students, and that is what it's really all about.
  • Compatibility (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ZephyrXero ( 750822 ) <.moc.oohay. .ta. .orexryhpez.> on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:19PM (#12315366) Homepage Journal
    I work as sys admin at a dept. of my University. One of the teachers was having trouble getting a powerpoint to open. It seems she had used Office XP at home to create it, but for some reason Office 2003 at the school would not open it. I opened it with Open Office just fine though....problem solved.

    Just because OO isn't always perfectly compatible with Office doesn't mean anything since MS Office isn't even compatible with itself sometimes...
  • I've found (Score:4, Interesting)

    by whackco ( 599646 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:20PM (#12315389) Journal
    It is difficult for people to go from Open Office > Microsoft Office, but if they start on Microsoft Office they tend to be much more proficient at Open Office as MS Office tended to set the 'standard' for them on how to critically think where things are and such.

    Rate me flame bait, but this is honestly what I have found. Take somebody that never used MS Office and only used other products, and put them infront of Word and get them to do something reasonabily complicated, they are lost.

    Take the person raised with MS Office and put them infront of OO and they seem to find their way around.

    Strange but true! So I have personal reservations about using one or the other in a public (or private) school or body.
  • by Triumph The Insult C ( 586706 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:20PM (#12315391) Homepage Journal
    our choice was more of choosing between MSCA (pay $X every year, 'free' updates) and MOLP (pay $X once, use the software as long as you want, new version comes out, you have to pay for it)

    we have spent $22k over the past 3 years on MSCA. this year was the final straw, since MS changed the licensing and is hitting us up for many more things (we are a smaller unit in a big .edu)

    so, this is the last year we'll be doing MSCA. we have decided that for the next year, we will be educating users about OO (and Firefox) and encouraging them to switch and letting them know that next year, they'll be on their own for MS software packages
  • Evaluation (Score:5, Interesting)

    by davecrusoe ( 861547 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:20PM (#12315397) Homepage
    The best way to determine if it's going to work for you is to set up 5-10 machines running OO and have a handful of students work with the program for a bit. Have each student complete a short survey, and you'll quickly identify who uses it best, and where the difficulties lie. Otherwise, many of our comments are heresay. Be sure to take into account all the normal uses students might want, for example: dropping images from the web into a document, printing small charts and graphs, and spellchecking. I'm sure you can think of others. Best of luck...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:24PM (#12315450)
    Earlier this week I went to Open House at my daughter's school.

    She is 6yo and in 1st grade at a private elementary school.

    One of the things she had to show me was her computer project. It was an Impress slide show in Open Office. It was a presentation on the solar system, integrating stuff she had done in Draw.

    I told the computer teacher (a 40+ year old woman) I was impressed they were teaching them Open Office. As I looked around the room and saw 12+ computers I said I bet it saved the school a bunch of money, if nothing else.

    She made a "you know it" face and then said that last year they used MS Office, but it was always crashing and they had LOTS of problems. She figured over the summer, why not -- what have we got to lose. She said it was been wonderful and they haven't had a single problem.

    This is heresay, but it is what I heard two days ago at a real school.

  • by Princess Tarja ( 876619 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:24PM (#12315463)
    While I have no experience in this sort of migration I feel that while "we" may see the light & benefits I have to say that when concerning something like a school district it will be a very hard sell. The feeling of dealing with a brick & mortar company is a great relief to people when it comes to support and the like. I think there also may be a feeling of "if they give this stuff away for free then it can't be all that good" They may also use the "kids" card. Just like politicians when they say "it's for the kids" knowing that their bill cannot stand on it's own, they use the kids as a means of playing on the parents feelings.. Whatever happens I wish you all the luck in the world on this endeavour
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:24PM (#12315469)
    When trying to get public schools to recognize the value of OSS and OpenOffice specifically, I would recommend looking up through the ranks. At least in the school district I worked for, many of the "rank and file" school-level tech support people were MS fans. However, as you look at some of the higher level positions, you occasionally find people with a more enlightened attitude. I know that when I showed the 2.0 beta for OO.o to the person in charge of technology, she was impressed. I suspect that the next few thousand PCs purchaced won't have MS office on them. I would recommend that you find the few key people, usually a "Director" or a sys-admin, and show them the advantages of OpenOffice. In my experience, people in the managerial side are much more interested in it because it offers a significant savings, while still providing necessary funcitonality.

    Just remember though, it will take time to have any real affect. You have to build up good will towards OSS in general to fight off the FUD.

    HTH
  • At the VERY LEAST... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Doverite ( 720459 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:25PM (#12315479)
    Use this as a barganing tool. MS does NOT want thousands of school kids learning OO.o and finding out about free software. If you can't get them to make the switch at least get them to blackmail MS into practically giving them the licenses. If they won't do that then someone getting kickbacks somewhere.
  • Re:The real question (Score:3, Interesting)

    by philipgar ( 595691 ) <pcg2 AT lehigh DOT edu> on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:27PM (#12315523) Homepage
    Honestly are the computer skills really that different. Most companies hiring kids out of high school aren't expecting the kids to be masters of MS Office. Most schools teach kids the basics of office. Such as writing letters, changing fonts, making a presentation, etc. If the school teaches it properly, switching from using Open Office to MS Office is about as difficult as transforming from using office 2000 to xp. Its just not a big deal, the concepts are the exact same.

    Now of course there are exceptions to this general rule. There are some advanced features in MS Excel that I have yet to be able to do within open office. However I doubt the high schools are coverning those things in the first place.

    A company hiring kids out of high school is not generally expecting the best and the brightest (as those students are generally going to college at least in the USA). They may expect computer skills, but to the extent that they know how to check things on the web, use a mouse, type documents etc. Hell for the most part I think schools should scrap half the computer stuff they teach kids. Do they really learn anything when they play with putting a million clip arts in a document? They'd be far better off just teaching them to type as well as business skills. they'll go much further than knowing how to make hideous word documents with flashy graphics, or worthless powerpoint presentations with a million sounds and transitional effects. Stick to the basics.

    Phil
  • by American AC in Paris ( 230456 ) * on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:27PM (#12315531) Homepage
    If it really is that simple, then why haven't people been flocking in droves to OpenOffice?

    This is an honest question. Why isn't OpenOffice experiencing the same explosive success as Firefox? What is keeping these same Firefox "switchers" from getting their hands on OpenOffice, as well?

  • by PenguinBoyDave ( 806137 ) <davidNO@SPAMdavidmeyer.org> on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:29PM (#12315549)
    It really comes down to font issues really. StarOffice corrects 99% of this. I get resumes all the time at work that are done in OpenOffice (and look good in OpenOffice) but when you read them in word, the formatting is all off. This may have changes in OO 2, but as I said, StarOffice takes care of most of this. Also, Power Point has major issues with anything created in Open Office. I have to use Power Point to create the presentation and then show it in Open Office. At least I know when I create it in PPT it will be viewable on either product. Not the same if created in OO.
  • by eric76 ( 679787 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:30PM (#12315579)
    Three years ago, everything we had used Microsoft Office. We now use Star Office and Open Office on PCs and don't even bother with Microsoft Office.

    The way this came about was I started using it on my own. Whenever someone new came in, I'd set up their PC with Open Office instead of Microsoft Office. Earlier this month, our accounting clerk, the final holdout, asked to switch.

    Now the only Microsoft Office we have is on the Macs. And they are using a really old version of Microsoft Office because of one particular feature available on that version.

    I've talked to many of the school board members about OpenOffice and Star Office. They keep complaining about the school district being short on money but they still haven't seriously looked at switching.
  • This is an honest question. Why isn't OpenOffice experiencing the same explosive success as Firefox? What is keeping these same Firefox "switchers" from getting their hands on OpenOffice, as well?

    My only answer is, that OpenOffice *is* experiencing tremendous growth. My wife actually converted before I did. She got tired of Word blowing up on her all the time and asked if I had something that would work. I sheepishly told her that I could let her *try* OpenOffice, and she agreed. She's never looked back. Shortly thereafter, I started using OO exclusively as well.

    The reason why the growth isn't as noticable is that there isn't as big of a marketing push as there was with FireFox. (If you believe the marketing, FireFox will soon pass the 50% penetration range. Not. Quite. Yet.)
  • Re:Demo it? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:33PM (#12315619)
    Christ, I have never encoutered anyone with such poor reading comprehension before - even on Slashdot!

    The point of the post you were replying to was not to sell it on the basis that it was free; it was very clearly and very obviously to focus on demonstating its features. The post very very obviously saw being free as a disadvantage in the minds of the audience and something to be worked around.

    Your response was simply idiotic. Yes, there are costs involved - how does that contradict his post? He wasn't saying "tell them it's free". He was saying "demo it before they know it's free so that the lack of price doesn't put them off".
  • Apple office (Score:2, Interesting)

    by andy753421 ( 850820 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:35PM (#12315647) Homepage
    I don't know what it's called, but my High School used all macs (running os 9) and we learned word processing and everything on whatever the apple version of office is. It made me really mad that we were learning something and that we would never be able to use it because not very many people have macs. If we had used OpenOffice I probably would have been much happier because that would have been something that I could have used at home on my computer because it will run on Windows as well. As a side note, as I look back on it there's really not that much difference between OpenOffice and any other. Sure all the buttons are in different places, but in high school most of the time was spent on learning basic concepts such as what 'margins' are and what a 'table cell' in a 'spreadsheet' is. Those are all universal and most of my classes didn't really teach anything beyond that. If you're going to be having classes on things like VBA macros or advanced stuff like that it might be beneficial to the students to use MS Office (as well?), but if you're just going to be doing word processing I'd say go for OpenOffice. Perhaps you could have OpenOffice on everything and then just have 1 or 2 labs where you do advanced stuff with MS Office.
  • by Malc ( 1751 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:35PM (#12315648)
    I haven't used it, but does OO allow you to track changes and insert comments in the same way that Word does? That would seem to me to be the best way for a teacher to provide feedback. If not, then the students should be providing their documents in PDF format and neatly side-stepping issues of cross application file format compatibility.
  • by Coryoth ( 254751 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:40PM (#12315726) Homepage Journal
    There have been a number of studies with regard to difficulties in shifting businesses over to OpenOffice, but it is important to remember that the school environment provides some key differences.
    1. Training: This is significantly limited in comparison to a large company. Students and teachers are not going to use as much of the complex and or custom features, and the basics of OpenOffice are sufficiently similar that there isn't too much to learn. More importantly a school has massive turnover - students are constantly graduating and new students arriving. The majority of computer users (which is to say students) are going to fresh meat for training anyway. There simply isn't the large staff base that needs to be expensively retrained.
    2. Features and Compatability: As already mentioned, an office suite at a school is not going to get the same work out as it will at a large company - custom macros, document tracking, custom styles etc. are all things that simply aren't going to get used. Compatability is also less of an issue. The majority of material produced on school computers is going to be students typing up reports, or using spreadsheets for assignments. These are transitory - it really doesn't matter very much if they can't be flawlessly imported into the new office suite after the report/assignment deadline has passed. There simply isn't the same amount of critical documents locked up in other formats as a large company will be faced with.
    3. Support: Support can be purchased from Sun if you want, but at schools the majority of users are students who are, let's be honest, often left to figure it out themselves. As an added bonus OpenOffice runs on most operating systems, and the school can easily provide free copies for the students to take home and learn. At High Schools I've been to senior students who are interested are often drafted in to help with a certain amount of system adminstration (the same way senior students can volunteer to help in the library etc.) Given that OpenOffice is freely available even in source form, you can expect interested students to have a high degree of knowledge of OpenOffice and help provide support. Some of them might even be contributing code to OpenOffice!

    Schools are, in general, far better placed than large companies to switch to OPenOffice. That doesn't mean that it is an easy or painless transition, merely that it is a lot easier than it is for corporations to make the move.

    Jedidiah.
  • by no reason to be here ( 218628 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:40PM (#12315729) Homepage
    People have been switching to Firefox because it is a superior offering to the dominant product(IE). People can say that Firefox is more secure, has fetures that IE doesn't (built in pop blocker, tabbed browsing), and is smaller and faster. One cannot make such claims vis-a-vis OO.o and MS Office. There is nothing that OO.o offers that Office doesn't, apart from price.
  • by cyclop ( 780354 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:46PM (#12315831) Homepage Journal

    Well, I did my graduate thesis presentation in OO.org 1.1.2 on my Linux box. Problem was students graduating had to upload their PPT files on a WinXP, Office 2003 machine.

    Since my university was aware that PowerPoint presentations are particularly sensitive to Office version changes (let alone OO.org!), they allowed students to "test" their PPT files on the machine they would have used the next day.

    My PPT was almost OK. There were minor issues: some font rendered slightly differently and arrows and graphs needed a bit of care. But it was nothing more than 30 minutes of work, and it was absolutely comparable with corrections people using non-MS Office 2003 had to do. I was pretty satisfied of OO.org this time.

  • by Lumpy ( 12016 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:55PM (#12315958) Homepage
    I wish that was true with microsoft office.

    it will not open older Word documents in Office 2003 that were created in office 97 correctly. OO.o opens them far closer to the actual desired output.

    yes, this is true, after upgrading marketing tyo office 2003 we had a rash of complaints opening word documents from 1998 was causing problems or looked wierd.

    microsoft cant even be compatable with it's self.
  • Re:Demo it? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by mr_z_beeblebrox ( 591077 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @02:59PM (#12316015) Journal
    So please stop being the typical mindless free software drone and start being a bit more realistic.

    Even as an OO user, I have to agree with you. Open Office does not have much penetration in the corporate space, so why put it in the schools? Kids need skills to be competitive. Yes you could say that proper training will make them able to adapt and learn software, but unfortunately they are taught rote monkey skills and are unadaptable (typically). Teach them the skills they need not the ones that appeal to your oss vanity.
  • Re:Demo it? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by DrXym ( 126579 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @03:00PM (#12316022)
    I use OpenOffice everyday, and although it's usable I wouldn't say for a second that it was a $300 competitor. It's not that it's bad, more that it's arcane. The UI is arcane, the functionality (aside from certain things like PDF support) is arcane. There's too many menus, the common things are mixed in with the uncommon things, the icons and L&F feel old etc. The drawing module is evil and essential features like outline mode don't exist at all.


    But for what I use it for, it's mostly usable, albeit not pretty. It's fine for letter writing, or timesheets. But writing a technical document is painful due to the missing outline mode and nasty graphics.


    I've used the 2.0 beta and some things such as drawing have improved massively even if there is still no outline mode. I'm still not sure I'd believe it cost the same as MS Office. To use the US vernacular, I'd probably say 2.0 is software "of $150 value".


    Did I mention there's no outline mode?

  • Re:Demo it? (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 22, 2005 @03:03PM (#12316063)
    Ahh.. but if "you get a bunch on non-technical bureaucrats with a bunch of taxpayers' money to spend, they'll spend it." they could still get the free software and find other ways to spend the money like books, better cafeteria food, not to mention live models for sex ed.
  • by Just Some Guy ( 3352 ) <kirk+slashdot@strauser.com> on Friday April 22, 2005 @03:09PM (#12316120) Homepage Journal
    I've already upgraded my friends and relatives. My office has completely switched (except for a person or two that relies on years' worth of VB automation). Our local city government is considering it. My oldest kid's school is looking into it and talking about handing out CDs to parents.

    People are flocking in droves to OpenOffice. It just doesn't get as much press as Firefox.

  • OO.o works on WIN95 (Score:3, Interesting)

    by bach37 ( 602070 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @03:10PM (#12316135)
    The current version of openoffice.org runs on windows 95, and can do the latest Office XP formats. Even Office XP/04 won't run on Win95- at all!
  • by 16K Ram Pack ( 690082 ) <(moc.liamg) (ta) (dnomla.mit)> on Friday April 22, 2005 @03:17PM (#12316226) Homepage
    The storage system of OOo files make so much more sense to me. If a corruption occurs, you've got a lot more chance of resolving it.

    I've had Word documents corrupt in such a way that the corruption was only recognised later (it occurred when you scrolled to a particular page). All the backups had the same corruption because it was there but not spotted. So, we had to print, scan and OCR the files and then reformat them all.

  • by CoccaNut ( 855912 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @03:20PM (#12316266)
    I am the tech coordinator for a very well known LA Charter School. We recently completed a huge expansion project, and now have over 400 PCs on campus. Rather than paying Microsoft and other vendors thousands of dollars, we decided to transition over to a hybrid "Closed/Open Source" software model. That is, we run Windows XP (which came preinstalled on all of our machines), but primarily use F/OSS software otherwise (OpenOffice, GIMP, Anim8or, WorldWind, Celestia, etc). Doing so resulted in huge savings for the tech portion of our capital campaign, and (as others have mentioned), we're able to freely share all of our application software with our staff and students without worrying about copyright issues. It is with great rarity that anyone "complains" that we're using a non-MS office suite...
  • by freelock ( 755655 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @03:32PM (#12316420)
    Why not switch?

    1. Laziness
    2. Ignorance
    3. Word outlining
    4. Powerpoint Presentation mode
    5. Laziness
    6. Never heard of it--no killer marketing campaign ala "Get Firefox"
    7. Better the devil you know
    8. It's not what people are comfortable with.
    9. Envelopes. I still can't get them to print the way I expect.
    10. Annoying type-ahead that's always wrong. (Yes, you can turn it off, but see reasons #1 and #5).
    11. Data entry in Calc sucks. (can't they get Tab/Return to accept your entry, without autocomplete?)
    12. Help sucks.

    Why switch?

    1. Save $$$
    2. Cross platform
    3. Encourages style use
    4. Built-in bibliography
    5. Save $$$
    6. Bullets and numbering actually work (if you don't save as Word)
    7. Great templating ability
    8. Built-in vector drawing--can replace Visio for basic diagrams
    9. Consistent UI across apps
    10. Master documents ACTUALLY WORK, without LOSING DATA.
    11. Page, frame, and list styles.
    12. Word feels clunky, overengineered, and awkward after you get accustomed to OOo.
  • Re:Demo it? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by ultimabaka ( 864222 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @04:00PM (#12316850)
    When was the last time someone was provided on the job training for MS Office?

    Just last Wednesday, actually. I took an Intro to Access class and an Advanced Excel class at work, for two reasons:
    (1) They were free. Free is an actually free - even got paid as if I was still working.
    (2) Maybe I'm just an idiot, but I don't know very many people that really know how to use Access at all, and definitely don't know how to use Excel's advanced functions. Granted, I don't know all too many of the programmer type (anymore at least), so most of the rest of the people I've seen find using it difficult.

    To get back on topic though, OpenOffice is an excellent program, and I hope he succeeds in switching them over.
  • Re:Hard one (Score:4, Interesting)

    by DevNull Ogre ( 256715 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @04:20PM (#12317119)
    The number one reason we are sticking with Microsoft though is textbooks. The textbooks are written for Microsoft Office. The buisness teachers, for the most part, are not savy enough to explain how to find similar functionality in a different program. If they follow the step by step in the book and it doesn't work, we get a call. Anyone know of any good textbooks for Open Source software?

    Sounds like you guys (well, the business department anyway) should be looking for good textbooks period--even if you stick with MS Office. (Though I don't know if any exist in that genre.)

    I used to work in the computer lab at a community college. I couldn't stand all those stupid textbooks (they don't really deserve to be called that, BTW) that "taught" the student in terms of step-by-step click at the mouse coordinates kind of lessons. Nobody actually learned anything about computers.

    No learning meant that students had questions, which meant less time for me to play Doom. And they were always stupid questions. My favorite was the time when somebody brought the book and told me they didn't know how to do it. I read the book back to them and they walked away contented! If only all problems were so easily solved.

  • by slapout ( 93640 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @04:41PM (#12317351)
    The source code is available. You could have students in programming classes tinker with it as part of their assignments. Then if you ever need a change/bug fix, you could go to them and ask for it. Of course, I would reward then in same way.
  • Re:Demo it? (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 22, 2005 @04:50PM (#12317471)
    Why don't you get realistic?

    What office productivity suite are the majority these students most likely to be expected to have proficiency with when they enter the workplace?

    I agree with other poster s in saying that it's preferable that students learn how to use software in general so they aren't hamstrung when the software they have to use isn't exactly the same as what they have experience on, but failing that...
  • Re:Hard one (Score:5, Interesting)

    by WhyCause ( 179039 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @04:52PM (#12317513)
    I used to work in the computer lab at a community college. I couldn't stand all those stupid textbooks (they don't really deserve to be called that, BTW) that "taught" the student in terms of step-by-step click at the mouse coordinates kind of lessons. Nobody actually learned anything about computers.

    I used to teach computer skills at a college level (Intro to Computer-Aided Engineering), and we didn't bother with a textbook for that reason. What we did was present them with a finished product, some useful tips (e.g., Need to change font color? Look under Format...), and then turned the students loose. It was my job to assist as they worked, and generally make sure that everyone was on track. If they had questions, I would generally say something like, "I don't know, but let's see if we can find it." The fact that I, the authority figure, also had to look for things really drove home that using software is just remembering simple rules, not remembering how to do everything in every program. I even got a nomination for the department's 'Teacher of the Year' award (not that I was elligible, being a TA and all) from someone in that class.

    Of course, as we got into more complicated software packages, I had to teach them the basics of programming, Finite Element Analysis, and drafting as well, but by that time, most of the students had picked up on the fact that if they looked, they would find it.

  • by geekee ( 591277 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @05:09PM (#12317707)
    "The biggest problem with people adopting open source in my mind is that they are afraid to try something new. Introduce them to something new in the beginning and they will use it. Chances are they will stick with it. If they move to Word later, at least they gave it a chance."

    Yes, Indoctrinate them into your belief system early.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 22, 2005 @05:16PM (#12317771)
    And that's an understatement. There are plenty of stories which have been posted here, usenet, and any other forum which isn't prone to "someone's" leverage.

    Generally, the story involves MS's push to the school|district|corporation to remain or go to MS software. When the door has been shut & sealed, it's been made in no undercertain terms they might as well be present at "oh-dark-onehundred" for a unit-by-unit inspection for any license in arrears.

  • by b17bmbr ( 608864 ) on Friday April 22, 2005 @06:12PM (#12318307)
    I am a teacher and can share a similar experience:

    1) district tech people will get freebies er, um, demos, from microsoft. you know, windows server, visual studio, etc., to "tryout" as it were. gonna influence their decision

    2) people will already have 1000's of prior docs in .doc, .xls, and .ppt. OO.org won't do a good enough job on those. plus, asking teachers (and I am one by the way)to learn something new is going to be impossible, no matter how close the two really are.

    3) "if it's free, it can't be good" and "it's what they use in the real world" will prevail. schools are no longer institutions of learning, but exist simply to train workers. i could cry. we don't read nor write nor think anymore. sorry to kvetch. but, there is a mindset about "Office" and you're just a salmon.

    4) teachers get a copy for home. so they think they're getting a steal. kinda hard to overcome that.

    5) here's the glimmer of hope. set up a small lab with OO.org. since the really expensive thing for schools is hardware (software is actually pretty cheap. they want to get the kids hooked.) set up a linux thin client lab, or a linux lab with older computers. then use OO.org there. the other thing is this: since you can't give Office to the kids, but you can OO.org, make a technology plan to have a "give the kids a CD day". perhps if the kids turn in work in .sxw it might be a start.

    6) another alternative. since much school hardware is OOOOLLLLDDDD, try abiword. it's small and fast. that'll get them interested in OSS.

    look, I've been a teacher for ten years and been excited and shot down too many times to tell you. am I cynical, sure. you're going up against a beauracracy who doesn't care about saving money. remember, they have to do budget burning too. saving them money screws that up. sad but true. i hope you get this far down.

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...