Ethics of Proxy Servers? 194
Mav asks: "I was recently asked to host a website for free in return for a lot of advertising. After querying them about how they knew the site would produce traffic they stated the site was going to be running PHPProxy (an open source web proxy). The traffic was a result of him and his contacts (nearly one thousand of them) using the site to bypass his school's firewall in order to view their MySpace pages and get access to their MSN messengers. Given all the attention social networking sites have recently received and the various laws attempting to block or control access to them I feel guilty and unsure making this available. Are there legal implications that I need to worry about? Could I be held liable if one of the students got in trouble? Most importantly, what's the moral thing to do?"
I Don't Know Your Morals (Score:5, Insightful)
As far as the legal aspects, I doubt there are any laws in your jurisdiction regarding setting up a proxy to get around a school's filtering software, but then again, you can always be charged for contributing to the delinquency of a minor for anything these days.
Don't even worry about your morals. (Score:2)
How long until your site is blocked by the school?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I believe it is moral to help people gain access to information
As do I. However, helping doesn't imply providing the facilities.
Rather than host a proxy yourself, offer to help them find other proxies. Offer to teach them about torpark. But mostly teach them how to figure the problem out for themselves. As they encounter this problem repeatedly throughout their lives, they'll be in a better position to recognize it and fight it.
If myspace or facebook is important enough to them, they'll have the motivation to learn how to bypass the firewalls themselves. If
Re:I Don't Know Your Morals (Score:4, Interesting)
"MySpace != information."
No, but 1000 kids accessing it all the time will give you HUGE bandwidth bills.
Add to that the adverts (and the bandwidth for them)
And remember - proxying doubles the bandwidth used - your server has to first fetch the page (as opposed to looking on the local file system) and then it has to send it (after rewriting the page to include YOUR ads ...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The first is the use of a cache. For example, if the primary use of the proxy is to visit myspace, many of the images, stylesheets, scripts, and so on will be cached. That reduces the proxy to internet bandwidth.
Another is compressing text content that passes through the proxy. HTML, javascript, XML, and stylesheets can make up a surprising portion of bandwidth usage these days. By hav
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I Don't Know Your Morals (Score:5, Funny)
You don't use MySpace, do you?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I found my stalker ex's page on there (strictly speaking my wife did) so I did what any overly self important geek would do. I created a bogus account and trolled her.
she's so dumb that she added my troll to her friends list, thus reminding me why she's my ex. lost the will to even troll her after that.
-nB
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Go outside. Play a pick-up game of touch football. Ride your bike. Rollerskate.
Read. Magazines, if your brain hurts, fiction to escape.
Take apart a clock and put it back together again.
Amazing as it may sound, people somehow seemed to survive and even prosper before PCs and the Intarweb.
Re: (Score:2)
football, bikes, roller-skates, magazines, books, and clocks.
They should go outside and poke holes in the ground with a pointy stick.
Re: (Score:2)
football, bikes, roller-skates, magazines, books, and clocks.
My original comment was not about about whether there should be computers. It was a reply to an oh dear, what am I supposed to do if I can't 'use' the computer? comment.
After the teacher in Connecticut - IWGAL (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
My experience was the same. My teachers were gen
Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Mod parent up, please (Score:5, Informative)
Mod parent up, please.
It appears that author of TFA feels they face a moral dilemma and seeks the opinion of a peer group for an answer. Does anyone else see a problem with this behavior??
Not everyone has a strong moral compass, and that's okay. Not everyone needs one. And in any case we know so little about how morals and such are internalized that we can't even study the subject objectively, let alone provide anyone with a procedure for how to strengthen theirs.
Living without morals or ethics is not a great hindrance. For example, the last 20 odd years have shown that a man who is not ethically or morally encumbered can become the richest person on Earth. So don't worry about having a weak moral sense; there are other ways to lead a good life.
For instance, there are all kinds of WWJD models. Choose a couple of people who have made tough moral/ethical decisions that you admire and study them until you could predict what they would do when confronted with any of the tough problems you bump into. Then do the same thing as they would do. To an outsider, it would appear that you have a strong moral compass when all you are really doing is relying on your ability to imagine how some Good Guy would behave in the given situation. Heh, maybe that's all there is to this morality business— who could tell? It's pretty much a black box thing.
Another approach is to forego morals and ethics and all that internal crap that gets in the way of doing the clever thing. Instead, study the laws that apply directly to you, and the reactions of the neighborhoods you find yourself in, and determine from those studies what the boundaries of acceptable behavior are. Then give yourself the freedom to do anything you want within those boundaries. It isn't moral or ethical, and you'll end up with a bunch of people who don't like you very much, but it will keep you out of trouble, mostly. And you can become the richest man in the world using this approach— so it isn't such a bad way to live. Maybe.
I think the question author of TFA really wants to ask is whether the slashdot community would find him acceptable if it learned that he was doing this proxy bypass of high school rules. This is a legitimate question, and should have been asked outright, instead of wrapping it in a moral cloak.
I have a mild dislike for people who attempt to ferret out my likes and dislikes by posing these kinds of substitutiary "moral dilemma" questions. My feeling is that they should grow a pair and ask the hard question directly, providing specifics of the situation, rather than playing dumbass "would you still like me if" games.
My answer to the question that I think TFA would have asked if it wasn't pussyfooting around so much is this: the school has an obligation to the student and his family to act in "loco parentis" (look it up). If the school has banned MySpace, then providing a mechanism for students to get around that ban is equivalent to assisting a kid who has been grounded by his parents in slipping out the back door. I would want to know if the school's action was blocking all student access to certain web sites (constituting undue censorship) or simply causing students the inconvenience of having to wait until they got home or to the library or a cybercafe before they could satisfy their MySpace habit. Unless the case for undue censorship could be made, I would think that anyone assisting students in getting around the school's ban was a jerk. If there is a censorship issue, I would think that anyone profiting from the situation was reprehensible jerk.
That's just my opinion. There are a lot of BG idolizers on slashdot so I'm sure there are a lot of alternate opinions.
Boarding schools? (Score:3, Insightful)
I would want to know if the school's action was blocking all student access to certain web sites (constituting undue censorship) or simply causing students the inconvenience of having to wait until they got home
In some schools, the students can go home only every six weeks if that often. On-campus housing is more common at universities, but some K-12 schools do operate this way. Is there a way for a given high school student's parent to override this block?
or to the library
Some of these proposed bans apply to school libraries and to public libraries as well.
No, mod parent up. (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyway, I think your analysis of morality is right on; there is very little point in discussing morality, at least outside of Philosophy classes, because people approach it from radically different angles. People can take the same action for very different reasons, even if they both end up doing the "right thing" as viewed by a third party.
Also, your comment about what's essentially a 'popularity contest' question cloaked in a moral dilemma is right on. If I had to guess, I'd say about 90% of people's "moral dilemmas" are really nothing more than ways of gauging the relative acceptability of various courses of action within their peer groups, and trying to figure out what's going to score them the most points (or damage them the least). This question in particular reeks of "would people hate me if I did x?"
As to the question at hand, I think providing the service would be a bad idea, but for different reasons; students need to learn to solve problems themselves, and not wait for some deus ex machina in the form of an ad-supported service to solve it for them. Left to their own devices, some enterprising young geek will figure out how to get around the filtering by themselves. It's not as if it's very hard -- a CGI reverse-proxy is one way, SSHing to a home computer on Port 80 (with the -D option) is another, there are lots of other methods -- and once they work it out, they can be the heroes of the day to the other MySpace-loving students. By providing a commercial filter-avoidance service, you are stealing the fire from some student who might figure it out themselves. But more importantly than one or two students, you are teaching all the students who use it, that all they have to do when they run into something that's a pain, is wait for someone else to solve the problem and hand it to them. It's the difference between letting them understand that the solution comes from someone else like them, who happens to understand a bit about computers, versus a solution that seems to come down from On High, by way of an anonymous web site ridden with ads.
I am a firm believer that in order to become productive, fully-mature adults, young people need to develop a healthy cynicism towards, and distrust of, authority. Otherwise, they're nothing but little brainless larval consumers, parroting back what they've memorized, and doing what they're told. They need to learn to break the rules on their own, and that they can break the rules on their own. Replacing one authority (whoever runs the filtering) for another (whoever runs the ad-supported reverse-proxy) isn't instructive. Placing an idiotic barrier (like all web-filtering is) in between them and something they want, and letting them get over it themselves, is.
Re: (Score:2)
Or you just look at the Whitehouse today and realize you can be a man completely bereft of morals and ethics and become President.
Re: (Score:2)
Excellent post, but I have one criticism...
Morality means checking which way the societal wind blows. The FP author did exactly that, on a topic that remains very much a grey area in the modern Western world.
We oppose Chinese or Iranian governmental censorship, yet irrationally believe in doing almost anything "for t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
If everyone tries their best to tak
Re: (Score:2)
Why is it that the poor always complain about the rich not having morals?
Get off your ass and DO something about it, instead of whining about it, like learning about "The Power of Association" and hanging around with wealthy people. The universe has anything you could want in abundance; stop falling for the lie of "artificial scarcity."
Hm, I know the vocabulary being used, but I can't parse meaning from these words without making assumptions about a lot of connective stuff that is not being said. Reading this is like walking in on someone who is in the middle of a phone conversation and hearing my name, but I don't know what the conversation is about, nor what the other voice (which might exist only in the speaker's head) is saying. It is a little weird to encounter this in print.
If it helps you at all, perhaps knowing that as soon as
Re: (Score:2)
Hmm. I take back my previous comment, because I agree wholeheartedly.
I happen to be very good at that game.. and get physically ill if I play it. So, I don't, beca
I run a filter at a boarding school (Score:2)
If the school is actually monitoring their filter usage, you might just give kids a day or two to get around the filter. I don't think it is really a question of morals as much as enforcement.
I must say though, that mathcookbook.com evaded me for weeks.
School? (Score:2, Insightful)
I think if the expected student is a minor (HS or Jr High) I would pass.
Re: (Score:2)
Proxy = good (Score:4, Interesting)
I wouldn't do it (Score:5, Insightful)
Second, I believe that when school kids are on school property using school equipment, the school should get to decide what they're allowed to do. My employer sure has this right, and it's also certainly a firing offense for me to bypass it. I salute schools that don't let kids play on the Internet when they're at school and should instead be learning. Sorry, school time is time that students should be using for, I dunno, learning. MySpace and MSN don't qualify, if this is really what they're looking to get to. So I wouldn't do it on principle (though of course realizing the kids will probably manage to find it somewhere else anyway).
Many people complain about schools, but things which I see as reasonable attempts to keep the kids on target are hollared at as censorship or some other poorly-fitting term which is basically the equivalent of saying, "We think kids should be allowed to do whatever they want, but we also think you should make them learn material they don't want to at the same time."
Re:I wouldn't do it (Score:5, Interesting)
In terms of legality, you're in the clear for that express purpose only (visiting MySpace.) Anything else might make you liable. I would suggest a click-through.
Also, if the school is anything like the one I worked at, the extent of their blocking will be harvesting visited URLs and looking to see if there are any frequent hits at interesting domain names. However, we never caught small *.mine.nu-type DynDNS addresses unless a teacher explicitly told us, and our job was only to enforce teachers' policies, not make up new ones.
Copyright infringement against MySpace and users (Score:3, Interesting)
I think you're way off here. IANAL either but I used to work in intellectual property (patents not copyright however).
You're taking a published work (myspace pages) and creating a derivative of it (myspace pages with your ads instead of theirs). You're undoubtedly opening yourself up to a lawsuit here.
In addition, myspace (I gather) now have agreements to compensate original rights holders for bootleg
Re:I wouldn't do it (Score:4, Insightful)
You're supposing that the things that these schools are trying to block access to are not learning. By contrast, most people I know who are good with computers got there by doing things that authorities (parents, schools,
I'm not saying limiting what children can do is a Bad Thing, but you have to consider that, by restricting them, you limit what can go wrong _and_ what can go right. Limiting bright kids in their development is an effective way of turning them into trouble kids.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
These are decisions for schools to make.
These are decisions for parents to make. They are not decisions for you to make. This is where the Geek goes wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I trust the school to make this decision more than I trust the kids. At work, if a site is blocked by our proxy which is legitimate, we can request that it be unblocked, and typically this is done within the same day, often within an hour of the request (unless its borderline, then it is escalated). I'm presuming that if a student contacted the administration with a compelling reason to unblock a site, that
Trouble kids? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
judges have this odd notion that the interests of the child are best served by listening to those who are responsible for his care and instruction.
not to the buttinski who thinks he knows better.
Re: (Score:2)
judges have this odd notion that the interests of the child are best served by listening to those who are responsible for his care and instruction.
Given some of what at least a few school boards have been guilty of lately, and what some spectacularly "gifted" parents managed to pull on a regular basis, I can't say that I would necessarily agree with all judges on this matter. That said, I did specify that I didn't necessarily personally agree with the alternative take on things that I offered.
Parental override? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why, do students suddenly gain the right to use Myspace on taxpayer-funded, government-supplied, equipment provided for educational purpose when they become legal adults? I'm confused.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If I am legally required to be in school and what I am learning is censored.
Then how can I hope to learn the truth?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Could be. But in my experience, the kids more frequently have their act together than the school.
The big problem for me here isn't so much that the school's deciding what they get to do, but that a very flawed program is deciding what they get to do. My employer sure has the right to block my internet use, but they
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, if the kids want to browse the Internet, they should buy their own building! Umm, I mean no.
Re: (Score:2)
In my case I monitor outgoing proxy logs for popular web sites. Proxy sites get are immediately blocked and any student using the site gets written up and has their account suspended for at least a week.
The sites which tend to slip through are the low usage ones, and sites that masquerade [allaboutabe.com] as legitimate (hint, click on Abe in the upper left).
To be honest, I could really care less about what content the students look at, I fix the computers, not teach. But every student sucking down bandwid
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
If you open the hole, people will exploit it. Not everyone is on break at the same time, so you can't poke holes in your firewall at appropriate times, and leaving the ability to access the service begs for someone to use it.
I understand that removing blocking is almost impossible in our current educational and social environment. What I would like to see is user-based security... you log on and your actions online are logged, monitored, tracked, and reported. With that, I wo
Re: (Score:2)
Your sig seems to disagree with the content of your message... :-)
But seriously, though, I don't see what the huge deal is. At my high school, we have many websites blocked. So, when I really need to go to a blocked site (I do not use MSN, MySpace or any such nonesense, but, for example, they had a site with old AMC, AIME, USAMO and IMO problems blocked, I just logged in to my computer at home via SSH and acce
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Schools don't block frivolous uses of their equipment because they don't want kids to have fun; they do it because they want to make sure these tools are available for the purpose they were intended for: as educational resources. If the computer lab is full of kids surfing MyFace and chatting on AIMSN during lunch and breaks
Re: (Score:2)
I can relate.
For a very long time (though I think that it is now fixed), our school blocked a site that had old AMC, AIME, USAMO and IMO problems for no apparent the reason. The only possible explanation that I could give was that it had the word ``demon' in the URL. It was truly ridiculous.
Re: (Score:2)
While games tended to be optimized for 56k modems, they usually aren't optimized for all types of routing equipment. That is, MMOs in general and WoW specifically tend to spew out a huge number of packets per second (pps). Lots of network gear is optimized for throughput rather than pps, so lots of really small packets might actually cause it to choke.
It's also possible that you've got a smaller pipe
Re: (Score:2)
My guess is that the filters they have in place at college are meant to conserve bandwidth. Right after I started university, they established dorm room connectivity, and brought a whopping (for the tim
Re: (Score:2)
Dear Slashdot (Score:5, Funny)
Last night when I was standing in front of my local 7-11 waiting for my bus, two teenagers came up to me and asked me to buy them some beer. I like having a beer as much as the next guy, but is it ethical for me to buy it for them?
Ethical? Depends on your view. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Morally/Ethically there is no difference.
Legally, there is.
It is up to every person to decide when and where those two intersect, and when they don't.
Re: (Score:2)
Only if they buy you some, free beer trumps all.
Sounds bad (Score:4, Interesting)
Leave school stuff to school kids. If you really want to help them out, tell your friend about free proxies that he can find via google, or even better, TORpac. Even better still, tell the spoilt brats to wait until they get home. If you want to earn some more money, either work harder at your present job, or look for a new one.
I don't want to sound blunt, but there's better ways of making a living than facilitating kid's "social networking".
Re: (Score:2)
I don't want to sound blunt, but there's better ways of making a living than facilitating kid's "social networking".
Well, not everyone can be a firefighter. And it's not ignoble, like being a car salesman or lawyer.Re:Sounds bad (Score:4, Funny)
True, but not every job requires you to log on to Slashdot to see if it's morally correct or not.
Re: (Score:2)
It's up to you... (Score:4, Insightful)
Morally though, that only you can answer. You bothered to ask, so that may be your answer right there. Personally I think school filters are annoying and pointless, because everybody assumes that the second you turn 18 you somehow become magically mature enough to handle porn/violence/cigarettes/lotteries, things which you apparently couldn't handle at 17.995. Schools just want to cover their butts and I can't say I blame them. However our society as a whole is increasingly becoming a nanny-state where people must be 'protected' from 'bad things' rather than educated about them and informed on how to protect themselves or make good choices.
Realistically though, whoever runs IT on the school probably isn't stupid. If they see a bazillion hits to the same site they'll probably check it out, and figure out what it is. At that point it gets blocked. And if you don't use HTTPS, they can just traffic sniff it.
What I would do is make the site go HTTPS immediately, and the resulting page looks like a search engine, and function like one with a google API or something. Have your friend encourage everybody to use it as a search engine as much as possible, so the resulting traffic spike doesn't look suspicious. However script it so if you search for a particular string of terms (IE the password of the week) it dumps the facade and takes you to the proxy page. Also have a cookie so if you manually punch in the address to the proxy page w/out first searching for the password, it takes you back to the search page. This should make it last quite a bit longer.
Click through? (Score:2)
These are kids in school (assuming that means not adults) so it's unlikely that any click-through contract/disclaimer is valid anyway. IANALE.
Censorship? C'mon, now (Score:5, Insightful)
My advice, don't be a dick, if people need their goddamned myspace they can buy a computer and an internet connection. I get sick and tired of waiting in a queue at uni to use the library catalogue because every 18 year old tool is busy "LOL ASL"ing away on the machines my fees pay for.
Ah, that rant felt gooooood.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Compared to the risk it puts the school at, is it greater than or less than?
IANAL (Score:3, Interesting)
So I won't comment on the legal aspects. Ask a lawyer.
The moral aspects are easier, because you don't need a degree to argue ethics. Just an over inflated sense of self importance. Check.
Is it moral to do X? Well, that depends, on you, the society you live in and how willing that society is to beat in your head for violating the morality of that society.
Is it moral to have sex with your childeren and then kill them for your own pleasure? I think the general opinion is not.
Is it moral to kill thousands of childeren each and every year because you like to drive to fast/drunk for your own pleasure? Look at the number of childeren killed year in year out because of dangerous driving and I think that the general opinion is yes. Except offcourse nobody will admit it.
Morality is a complex thing and it seems to have a lot to do with whatever the "people" can be bothered to get upset about. Or rather a small group of people can be bothered to shout very loudly about without anyone else shouting back.
It ain't even consistent. On a small scale people might agree on say restricting road speeds near schools, but if you suggest that the speed across the entire town is brought down to a safe limit, or even worse, put up camera's to enforce the speed limit, then you find yourselve with massive opposition. Or at least very loud and that surely means massive.
At the moment you got a "thinkofthechilderen" movement who is very massive, or at least very loud. They say, that it ain't right to let childeren access places like myspace unrestricted. Are they right? Do they even represent a majority of the people? Do you consider what the majority considers to be right, to be right? Note that the "thinkofthechilderen" group can't seem to be bothered by the deaths in traffic wich outnumber the victims of sexual predators.
I myself got the following problem with this idea.
Not to long ago there was a police request for witnesses in a the free dutch newspaper metro or spits about a rape case. A woman returning from a date late at night had been assaulted and raped walking back alone. A comment by a collegue was that her boyfriend should have walked her back.
In a way he was right except that he shouldn't be. Should women be restricted from were and when they can walk because some men are rapists?
Should childeren be banned from socializing online because some people prey on them online?
The next step in that logic is that they asked for it. This is the old sexist way of thinking wich I definitly think is amoral.
So I don't think childeren should be prevented from accessing spaces like myspace. Restrict the criminals, not the victims.
Is it then moral for you to break restrictions against childeren that can be considered by some to be morally wrong.
Well, obviously not. The only thing that could be wrong if you consider breaking that restriction itself to be a morally wrong act.
Like say, you consider it morally wrong to let someone starve to death but your only option would be to steal the food wich you also consider to be morally wrong. A choice of the lesser of two evils.
But I find it hard to consider a proxy to myspace to be morally wrong on its own. Myspace may be wrong, but not on any moral grounds.
Say you provide the access to these childeren. This results in them posting their details on myspace. Someone else uses these details to hunt one down and rape and kill them. Are you then morally to blaim?
That depends on the morals of the person judging you.
Is the boyfriend in the above real example to blaim for not escorting his girlfriend home? Is society as a whole? Is the girl? Or is it just the rapist and nobody else that should be held accountable for what happened?
If you provide access you provide access for, what I would consider, a in itself harmless actions. There are plenty of safe ways to behave on myspace. You do not make these kids behave in an unsafe manner. Part of living is t
Morality is relative. (Score:3, Insightful)
Or another pair:
I think that someone who believes in any of the opinions above, and lives by them, can be a moral person. You need to think about what YOU believe in. We can't answer that for you.
what an issue! (Score:2)
Why even get involved? (Score:2)
Many will even pass through https traffic. Personally I use MegaProxy [megaproxy.com] so the banks NetCop can't snoop, but even the free sites are feature rich these days.
I'd say just stay away unless your friend can offer up a better explanation.
Proxy, controlled proxy, or open proxy ? (Score:2)
Giving something to someone's child allowing them to circumvent parental authority is bad. The school's authority? I'm kind of split down the middle. Legally, you'd be screwed and could be held accountable if you're a US citizen.
A kid would ask for a proxy to use his myspace account meanwhile dreaming of the gigs of porn he's going to download on county bandwidth. We're rather evolved, but givi
Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor (Score:2)
Most states have laws against "Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor". If I were making a buck off a kid who I knew used my service to do something illegal, or even possibly if I knew that it was reasonable to believe that some kid using my service would eventually do, then this law would apply to me.
From the school IT perspective... (Score:3, Insightful)
As with many places these days IT departments (if there even is a department) in k-12 educational facilities are understaffed, under-funded and over worked. This is not a complaint this is just stating the facts. There are several districts that I can think of off the top of my head that do not have a full time technician or administrator. The care of IT systems is left to the librarian, math teacher or whomever is the most "technically inclined" teacher or staff person in the building. They will get paid a couple grand to do this as well as their main job of teaching. The main work is left to consultants who might be good. But nevertheless are only onsite when called for. This is not the description of some poor district in "Middle America" either. (No offense to the poor districts in Middle America) For the districts that or fortunate enough to have an IT department the staff is busy with the maintenance of the districts networks, systems, training users, etc. There is little time left to monitor the browsing habits of a 14 year old. We rely on content filters with updated rule sets and teachers who spot a kid doing something bad in class.
I would humbly request that you do not open yet another proxy. That will eventually end up on my content filters list. But students these days are not looking for free access to information. They are looking to bully the kid next to them. They are looking to surf sites that no 14 year old should be on or play games during class because they are too important to learn.
I am all for students pushing the edge and learning. I applaud the first kid who figured out that a proxy would work on content filters. If they figured out why I would even be happier. Heck I would explain it to them if they asked.
Hopefully someone reads this and figures out that it would be nicer to help out the school district in their area versus work against it. It has a hard enough time educating your children or friends. Why make it work harder than it reasonably needs to?
Call a lawyer. (Score:2)
I don't know of any basic theory of civil law which would allow a claim by the school - but local laws can add to that, and I'm not faimilar with the DMCA or the child protection laws.. but I would look to those as sources of trouble as well.
If th
Just study harder and leave the web for college... (Score:3, Insightful)
It Pisses me off to no end when little snaughts think they are hot just because they can find a proxy and surf myspace or adult sites.
(Yes, after 7 years in HS and 5 yrs before in college support, I've grown cynical of the crap that is turned out as brains...)
MySpace and other social networking sights (yes, this is gonna be a blanket statement) are worthless and BAD for children. I don't care about the age 18 thing.... If you need "faceless" friends that bad, then purchase your own pipe at home and surf from there... but considering that we are ALL paying for the internet in schools (Universal Cost recovery Fee/tax on phone bills) then it is a waste of my time and the money of the tax payers for you to be using it to watch the latest viral video advertisment from coke or pepsi. (Product placement... watch for it...then ask how many of those vids are "REAL") Or looking for boobies on myspace or google images.
I admit that there are some legit uses for a proxy... like if you live in China or some country where access to books and information is banned by the gov, etc.. BUT, using it to bypass a school filter is NOT a legit reason.
The second reason the filter exists is because you should be LEARNING! Not learning how to hack/bypass things, but shit that matters.... This is one of the reasons (IMHO) why we rank so low on the global education scale... The internet should NOT be in cassrooms, Computers SHOULD NOT be in classrooms. Maybe a computer teacher with overhead and possibly smartboard, but nothing else... Have a few labs for the classes teaching computer software @ HS Level and a bank in the library... As it is now, 4/5 computers per room results = teacher that cant watch and guide the kids to use the internet in any responsible manner.
Get a life... Go HOME to get your vids/kicks and actually LEARN in school... When you get to college, you can waste YOUR parents money on MUDS and MOOS and I don't give a crap. (Ok, that gave away what I did in college...)
Most important, RESPECT the schools computers, we are just trying to do our job, and follow the rules that have been laid down by your parents! (And they supposedly care and love you...)
Re: (Score:2)
Another ALA representative v. Gonzales? (Score:2)
In the United States, as an employee of the school district, I am BOUND by LAW
Law in the form of the Constitution, or law in the form of a statute? The Congress of the United States is bound by the Constitution as amended. Public schools are state institutions, which are bound by the 14th Amendment's extension of the 1st Amendment to the states.
AND if cerain congress acts get passed
Then Attorney General Gonzales is going to have to talk to his lawyer because librarians are going to put up a heck of a fight in court.
Not just problems with ethics but also business (Score:2)
First there is the questionable ethics of providing filtered sites to high-school students, things like MSN messenger and MySpace, which is much in the same league as cell phones, and are used for similar purposes, which are frequently quite OK, but which also might include bullying, and this might be one of the reasons why the school has put up the limitations to begin with.
Going around this filtering seems to be similar in spirit to aiding and abetting a crime. I don't find this particularly ethical at
Easy ethics, potential risks (Score:2)
The ethics here are actually pretty easy. This desire to block a particular website, is someone else's rule, not yours. Nobody ever asked you if it was a good idea; you had even less representation in this decision, than your distant Senator in Washington who doesn't give a damn about you.
There's nothing wrong with not playing along with someone else's game. Dude, lose the guilt.
The risk, however, is substantial, unless your proxy is really dedicated to providing access to that one website. I'd cautio
Re: (Score:2)
How about this. The bandwidth and the computers belong to the school. Doesn't the School have the right to decide how it's resources are used? While your self centered view is interesting it is also pretty anti-social. These kids could access these sites at home and let's face it MySpace is pretty much a vast wasteland without any real value. If you want to set up a free cyber cafe and let kids use your computers a
Re: (Score:2)
If it's a public school, I'd say no. But let's assume it's a private school. Does a private school have the right to decide how its resources are used? Not if it involves forcing third parties to enforce its policies. If a private school wants to stop its students from accessing Myspace, that's its right. But it's not the right of that school to force others to
Re: (Score:2)
As a Business it sounds like a terrible idea (Score:2)
This sounds like this is purely a business thing, at which point I'd seriously question whether the ad revenue will cover the costs. Even if you don't get screwed by the school or parents (need to hire a lawyer, etc.) you are going to be providing x2 the bandwidth of anything they download, and I'd roughly estimate a click through rate of 0% on any adds, if they don't just block them completely, because if they could affor
Take a good look at the articles icon! (Score:2)
Proxy servers? (Score:2)
Mrs. Turgid teaches at a secondary school in England. The monkeys don't need proxies, they just go to google.de and search from there.
No way in hell (Score:2)
First of all, if your friend isn't savvy enough to set up his own proxy server....I mean, come on, it's a proxy server....he doesn't know enough to be safely gaming the system while he's at school.
Second of all, unless you set up the proxy to only be MySpace, it will be a matter of hours before someone realizes they can surf to AnimalSex.com or something else...and minutes after that before someone like a teacher or administrator walks by the computer, sees it, and gets your server address, where upon you'
As a student and worker (Score:2, Insightful)
The IT people hated the filters more than anyone because we all thought it was pretty stupid. I setup a CGI based proxy for a few of my friends and told my boss about it, my boss told his boss, pretty soo
I'll do it. (Score:2)
Seriously, while I wouldn't recommend others do it, I would have no problem doing it myself. And if I can make an extra few bucks a month without putting forth much effort, I'm all for it.
We're not talking about buying kids beer, or drugs, or pr0n. We're talking about helping them with their popularity (apparently myspace pages = popularity in many schools, at least that's what the kids tell me).
Also, the police won't be showing
Heres yer advice - (Score:2)
If you are not, then it is a moral decision.
If you ask me, preventing children from reaching social sites from public places is outright oppression - its just over-scared parents going overboard in 'protecting' children by hampering their use of new technology and social changes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But he asked what was the *moral* thing to do.
In which case I would have thought a lawyer would be the last person I would ask...
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
But he asked what was the *moral* thing to do.
In which case I would have thought a lawyer would be the last person I would ask...
Re: (Score:2)
Censorware exemption (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like typical congressman logic.
Re: (Score:2)