Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Wireless Networking Media Television Hardware Science Technology

How Bad Can Wi-fi Be? 434

Posted by Zonk
from the good-thing-we-have-real-experts-here dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Sunday night in the UK, the BBC broadcast an alarmist Panorama news programme that suggested wireless networking might be damaging our health. Their evidence? Well, they admitted there wasn't any, but they made liberal use of the word 'radiation', along with scary graphics of pulsating wifi base stations. They rounded-up a handful of worried scientists, but ignored the majority of those who believe wifi is perfectly harmless. Some quotes from the BBC News website companion piece: 'The radiation Wi-Fi emits is similar to that from mobile phone masts ... children's skulls are thinner and still forming and tests have shown they absorb more radiation than adults'. What's the science here? Can skulls really 'absorb' EM radiation? The wifi signal is in the same part of the EM spectrum as cellphones but it's not 'similar' to mobile phone masts, is it? Isn't a phone mast several hundred/thousand times stronger? Wasn't safety considered when they drew up the 802.11 specs?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How Bad Can Wi-fi Be?

Comments Filter:

It is not every question that deserves an answer. -- Publilius Syrus

Working...