Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship

How To Configure Real PC Parental Controls? 618

Orange Crush writes "As the resident computer geek in an office full of accountants, my boss recently asked me how she could reasonably keep her teenage son from using the family computer to 'access inappropriate sites.' I of course responded 'Give up now. There's nothing in this world that can keep a determined teenager from acquiring porn.' Sadly, she was dissatisfied with this answer. I mentioned that there was in fact software available for this purpose, but that all of it was trivially easy to bypass for a clever young mind. I really can't think of another answer. She could password protect the BIOS to prevent booting a different OS, but that's easily defeated with a screwdriver at most. The only solutions I can think of involve upstream firewalls/proxies/etc to which I gleefully redirected her to her ISPs tech support number. As much as I disagree with her reasoning — and ignoring the obvious 'go to a friend's house' loophole — is there really any other way (on a home budget) to netnanny a household computer?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How To Configure Real PC Parental Controls?

Comments Filter:
  • Not really (Score:5, Insightful)

    by geekmansworld ( 950281 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:05PM (#20606799) Homepage
    If the son has a decent knowledge of computing, there's really nothing that can be done.

    My opinion is that she should just approach her son and talk to him frankly about any issues that she's concerned about.
  • CyberSitter (Score:1, Insightful)

    by iamacat ( 583406 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:06PM (#20606811)
    Why waste time looking for a more sophisticated solution to a problem that is misunderstood by your boss anyway? Just get one of off-the-shelf filtering solutions and let the teenager bypass it if he is smart and determined enough to install Firefox.

    I shudder at the lack of trust between this young man and his mother though. If it is justified, he will probably end up in jail once he turns 18 and can no longer be legally restrained.
  • by dj.delorie ( 3368 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:06PM (#20606819) Homepage
    At my house, all outgoing traffic passes through an OpenWRT firewall, which redirects all web traffic to my caching proxy. It logs all accesses. I get reports. If I see something "unusual", I bring my kids in and have them explain it. I TALK TO THEM. It's useless to try to mechanically block their access, but if they know that EVERYTHING they do IS monitored (and they do), they seem to act responsibly.

    Technology is not a substitute for good parenting, but it can be a useful tool for it.
  • by datapharmer ( 1099455 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:07PM (#20606833) Homepage
    Put the computer in a public area. Remove the ram everytime you aren't going to be in that public area. Install all the limitations you can on the user account in whatever operating system you are using so settings can't be changed and run everything through a proxy server with a filter list that is also updated from a third party service with a block list. Seriously though - this is rather extreme. How about just having the parent talk to the kid about why they think porn is bad and put the computer in a public place.
  • If you must... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by posterlogo ( 943853 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:07PM (#20606837)
    I don't think anything short of good parenting will help. But, if you must, perhaps blocking in combination with monitoring might help. At the most extreme, this would mean putting in a surveillance tool (software or preferably hardware) that monitors all traffic.
  • by krgallagher ( 743575 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:08PM (#20606861) Homepage
    "The only solutions I can think of involve upstream firewalls/proxies/etc to which I gleefully redirected her to her ISPs tech support number."

    That is about all I can think of that really works. The other thing I would do is to not actually block anything, but to maintain copious logs and review them regularly. I think it makes more sense to have an open frank discussion with your child than to simply block access. There will always be a loophole to blocked access, but there is no way around a parent who is genuinely interested in their child's welfare.

  • Edwards' Law (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Jeremiah Cornelius ( 137 ) * on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:08PM (#20606867) Homepage Journal
    Is probably a worth a reference in this context:

    "You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem".

    It's not exactly true. You can very well do so. To expect a determinable result is to court dissapointment, however.
  • Training (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Jaguar777 ( 189036 ) * on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:09PM (#20606887) Journal
    How do you keep your children away from drugs, cursing, promiscuous activity, and other undesirable things?

    You can't be with your children 24/7, and they will leave the house someday (no basement jokes needed). You need to train them to think for themselves, and how to recognize good and bad decisions before they learn the hard way.

    A measure of character is how you act when nobody is watching. Do you want a child that knows he shouldn't be looking at midgets with horses porn, and keeps his own activity in check? Or do you want a child that you have to keep in check using technological measures?

    I wonder if people once had the same discussion about chastity belts.....
  • by bigtangringo ( 800328 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:09PM (#20606889) Homepage
    When you said "Give up". If the kid is going to have access to the internet, he'll have access to pr0n, period.

    Any sufficiently motivated teen will circumvent even the best system. You can try to fight human nature, but in the end you will lose.

    I'd put my money on the kid ending up even more depraved as a result of such a tight parental grip.
  • Easy (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Supergood-ape ( 959376 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:11PM (#20606913)
    Put it in a high traffic area where it is easily viewed and monitored.

    How hard was that?

    (and if you plan to respond with why this won't work, don't bother, I have no desire to read excuses from lazy parents)
  • by YrWrstNtmr ( 564987 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:11PM (#20606923)
    PC in a common room of the house, screen facing out into the room. Knowing at any time a parent or sibling may walk past does wonders.

    Next step is NoFun(tm). Kid gets caught doing someting mommy doesn't want him to, mommy takes away some priveledge.

    You can't fix this with technology. Not on a home budget, anyway.
  • Parenting (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nuzak ( 959558 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:13PM (#20606959) Journal
    Seriously, this is a teenager, not a six year old. Her concern should be revolving around what her kid is actually motivated to view, because it ain't being pushed to him against his control.

    But this is your boss, and not someone you want to give this lecture to. Just throw the names of some filters and/or logging spyware for corporate intranets at her, and let it go. Do not fight her battles.
  • by Rakishi ( 759894 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:13PM (#20606969)
    It takes me all of 10 seconds to set up an ssh tunnel, 10 minutes if I need to download cygwin first. Even in high school I had a bunch of friends who had ssh servers I could possibly use for this (which also would have had a convenient game on it in case you questioned why I was on it) I could have also used the internet connection at school or at a friends house or stolen wi-fi from a neighbor. Hell there are even likely web based ssh encrypted proxies. I could have run one off my high school web account (or rather someone else's, the passwd file was widely distributed) if I really wanted to.

    In other words if I was being monitored by my parents I'd have simply found a way to make sure they can't see what I'm doing. At worst I'd have told them to f-off and challenged them to do something about it.
  • Re:parenting? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by sTalking_Goat ( 670565 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:15PM (#20607013) Homepage
    I really don't get that at all. What do these people think will happen if these kids run across some porn? I know this one guy I work with has two kids about 13 or 14 and he doesn't have internet access at home for just this very reason. He feels that the safest situation but completey ignores the fact that his kids have friends in the nieghbourhood and some if not all of them have internet access. It seems to me if you rasie your kids right they should be able to handle just about anything they comeacross without completey falling apart. It worked OK for me.
  • by TheReaperD ( 937405 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:18PM (#20607057)
    Putting the computer in a public place really helps a lot. Knowing that they could be walked in on is a great deterrent. It's not 100% but, it does really limit what they can do. It wouldn't help if the child is home alone, however. If the child is home alone often enough that it is an issue, you have a much bigger family problem on your hands then the computer.

    I've worked at multiple ISP's and it amazes me how surprised parent's are by this answer. They had never considered moving the physical computer an option before I mentioned it.

    I agree with the consensus of the other Slashdot posts that no amount of software is going to solve the problem. If the computer is in their room and they have unlimited time to work on it, any software can and will be circumvented.
  • by GroundBounce ( 20126 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:19PM (#20607059)
    This may not be what she wants to hear, but the solution that has worked for us has been a slow process of education, not technical restrictions. Different kids have different issues that need to be addressed. Our son (now on his own at college) mainly had issues with too much non-productive web surfing and to some degree, too much gaming, but not porn. Basically, he wasn't getting his homework done. I could have blocked internet access to his machine, but we decided not to do that. Over time, with constant support from us, he began to realize that doing his homework and getting good grades in school was his ticket to bigger and better things. He eventually learned to balance his time better and had no problem getting into UC Berkeley.

    Our daughter (in 8'th grade) is similar but different. Her issue is also spending too much time surfing sites like myspace and deviantart, and IM'ing with friends. Educating her has been a little harder, but instead of blocking her machine, we moved it out of her room where it is easier for us to keep an eye on how she's spending her time. Since doing that, she is gradually learning to balance her time better.

    Ultimately, your kids are going to be out on there own, and it is better if they can learn to balance their time (with your help) before they're gone than just block everything and have them leave with no time management skills.
  • Re:covenant eyes (Score:4, Insightful)

    by BlowHole666 ( 1152399 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:20PM (#20607083)
    No, sorry most porn is something like www.someurl.com/somefolder/some girl name/some set name/number.jpg All the porn I have ever seen never has xxx in it. I guess you could search for .jpg but it is still a lot of work. I think just talking to your child is the best thing to do. But who has time for that these days?
  • by OS24Ever ( 245667 ) * <trekkie@nomorestars.com> on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:20PM (#20607101) Homepage Journal
    Sounds like the great log of china not a firewall. They can get there, he reviews it, and brings it to their attention.

    So far my kids are 4 and 6. I just use Mac OS X parental controls and they can only visit the sites I book mark for them in Safari. They can't get to getfirefox.com to download it, so problem solved for that.

    As my daughter (the oldest) gets older i'll loosen it up a bit for her as they each will have an account on the machine. I'll log IM chats and use it to gauge what's going on but I'm not going to search it obsessively.

    I look at it this way, I'm a guy, I've used porn, I found it without access to the internet in the early 80s. All it takes is one older brother, one parent, one shoplifting experience and that magazine will be passed around the school until some moron either drops it while walking down the hallway in front of a teacher or is a freak and reports you too a teacher. My wife and I are not afraid of porn. As long as the US Government doesn't go insane in the next ten years it's going to be something both of my children will find out about it, right about the 11 - 13 range if history holds true. Admonishing them for that lovely hormonal surge that is going to happen whether I like it or not and their exploration of it isn't helpful and creates the puritanical environment we enjoy today here in the states. I still fight my upbringing of being ashamed of the human body and somehow just the site of it is 'evil'. Little thing called intent that needs to be adjusted more than just existing.

    That being said, there are several tools available to baby sit your kids computer expierence, pick one and recommend it. I thought there was a windows package that would do similar features that Mac OS X does with the parental controls on IE 7 but i can't find it now that I'm looking for it again.
  • Re:Not really (Score:5, Insightful)

    by toleraen ( 831634 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:21PM (#20607105)
    Why not? That's how I learned to format a computer, and arguably why I started tinkering deeper into computers in the first place. Not really for the end result, but just to see if I could get around it. Parental controls + teenage angst = future geek!
  • by DragonTHC ( 208439 ) <<moc.lliwtsalsremag> <ta> <nogarD>> on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:23PM (#20607137) Homepage Journal
    squid is only part of a solution. The real solution is sending your child to a psychologist to understand what motivates a teenage boy to want to look at naked women in the first place! If porn is wrong, then most of us, including you closeted christian freaks, are wrong.

    I can't fathom not allowing my teenage son to view porn. It's the one great teenage pursuit. It's more productive than knocking up some 16 year old girl. That would be great parenting!
  • In other words if I was being monitored by my parents I'd have simply found a way to make sure they can't see what I'm doing. At worst I'd have told them to f-off and challenged them to do something about it.

    You sound like you were a spoiled brat whose parents needed to give a serious attitude adjustment. I would've taken away your computer for a couple of weeks if you spoke to me like that (or if you bypassed my measures), probably along with your cellphone, your ipod and all your music. And if you still had a bad attitude, I'd take your door off the hinges. If you STILL didn't get it, I'd come to school with you and follow you around, making sure your friends saw you, until you begged for mercy.

  • Re:Not really (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jasen666 ( 88727 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:28PM (#20607203)
    Even with little knowledge of computers they're easy to get around. New porn sites pop up everyday, the nanny software has to be updated on the ball to keep up.
    And that's not counting porn that gets shared privately via personal ftp and websites, or through filesharing apps.
    I've pretty much determined it will be impossible to stop my kids once they're that age and are actively searching for it.
  • by UbuntuDupe ( 970646 ) * on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:32PM (#20607279) Journal
    I shudder at the lack of trust between this young man and his mother though. If it is justified, he will probably end up in jail once he turns 18 and can no longer be legally restrained.

    So, let me get this straight: almost every young male who disobeys his mother's command not to look at dirty web sites, will "end up in jail once he turns 18"?
  • Re:parenting? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by kent_eh ( 543303 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:35PM (#20607327)
    I really don't get that at all. What do these people think will happen if these kids run across some porn?

    Indeed. Before the internet, we'd sneak a look at our dad's (or a friend's dad's/big brother's) stash of Playboys.
    I'm pretty sure my childhood friends didn't suffer any psychological damage from it.
  • by Rakishi ( 759894 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:41PM (#20607431)

    You sound like you were a spoiled brat whose parents needed to give a serious attitude adjustment.
    No see I'm the opposite of spoiled, I care little for most things and physical objects. A spoiled brat you can fight by taking away their toys yet I had no toys I wouldn't accept the loss of within a week.

    See that's what my parents tried, all it did was teach me that parents have a limit and all you need to do is be able to survive past it. You apparently are just like them and don't realize that if you keep challenging your child they will learn how little power you really have.

    I would've taken away your computer for a couple of weeks if you spoke to me like that
    And that would have done what? I do wonder how you'd expect me to do my homework. I can be amused by starting at a blank wall to be honest.

    (or if you bypassed my measures),
    How would you know, I'd simply keep trying till you couldn't see I was bypassing them.

    probably along with your cellphone,
    Go right ahead, never used the thing expect to call my parents anyway.

    your ipod and all your music.
    Never listen to music.

    And if you still had a bad attitude, I'd take your door off the hinges.
    Okay, so I'd be down one door.

    If you STILL didn't get it, I'd come to school with you and follow you around, making sure your friends saw you, until you begged for mercy.
    Well enjoy losing your job then. See point above about that simply teaching me to lie better and hide my activities better.
  • What I Did (Score:4, Insightful)

    by YetAnotherBob ( 988800 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:41PM (#20607447)
    Any bright kid can find a way around the automatic nanny systems. There is only one solution that works. Here's what I did. Move the computer to the Family Room, with the screen facing the door. Our family room has one wall open to the Kitchen (the most used room in the house.) Now, when either his Mother or I were there, we could see what was on the screen.

    I also took to checking the computer for where he had been. I only had to point out 2 times that his attempts to delete all traces of his 2AM trips to the porn sites had missed a few traces (deleted photos. Windows never really erases a deleted file.) He stopped using the family computer for that kind of thing completely. Of course, I still checked from time to time, till he moved out on his own.

    A history list that is blank is the first warning sign. A simple search for temp HTML or JPEG's will often turn up the evidence. An undelete utility is handy too. A tool that reports locations where files have been zero'd will let you know quickly if there has been an effort to tamper. It's not too hard to keep a step ahead.

    For those times when one of the children try to cover up the screen, I just killed the power to the machine. Worst case, I might have to re-install the software. Lots better than losing a kid to some online pedophile.I had to let the children know that there is no privacy when safety is involved. after a couple of kills, they stopped trying to keep us out.

    Watch out for Myspace (and its clones) with young girls, they trust everybody and question nothing (except the parents). The boys are marginally better. Especially after 16 or 17. My favorite news story of the last year was where the 35 year old pedophile masquerading as a 15 year old boy onnline went to the mall to pick up the 13 year old girl he had arranged a 'date' with and found out that she was really a 45 year old cop who was working with the guys probation officer.

    Sometimes there is justice.

    You see, there is no substitute for parental presence. There never will be. If your boss wants to really protect her children, she needs to be there with them. Not out bossing you. Sorry, that is just reality. She can't have it both ways. None of us can. She will have to pick the one that is important, and let the other one go.
  • by Chandon Seldon ( 43083 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:45PM (#20607507) Homepage

    You sound like you were a spoiled brat whose parents needed to give a serious attitude adjustment. I would've taken away your computer for a couple of weeks if you spoke to me like that (or if you bypassed my measures), probably along with your cellphone, your ipod and all your music. And if you still had a bad attitude, I'd take your door off the hinges. If you STILL didn't get it, I'd come to school with you and follow you around, making sure your friends saw you, until you begged for mercy.

    That is a battle a parent can *never* win against a determined teenager. This is an intelligent human being who lives in your house. Once you take enough away from them that they no longer think they have anything left to lose they'll either completely ignore you or start retaliating.

    A much more reasonable solution is to realize that children are human beings and once they start valuing privacy and autonomy it's 100% reasonable to let them have some. Just because you're their parent doesn't mean you need to be administrating their life. Further, if you can't convince them to do what you want there's very little chance you'll productively force them.

  • Re:parenting? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Otter Escaping North ( 945051 ) <otter@escaping@north.gmail@com> on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:48PM (#20607551) Journal

    Seriously, what is she really worried about? Is she questioning her job as a parent and worried the big, bad internet is going to so corrupt her son that all of the important life lessons she has imparted will be pushed aside?

    My pups aren't teenagers (which really means anything from 13 to 19 - and can warrant very different actions in terms of guidance), but as a parent who thinks of himself as responsible (and pretty liberal, frankly), let me tell you; yeah. It's pretty much me vs. the world, and I'm constantly paranoid about what other information is burrowing its way into their mind and taking root.

    If you've raised kids, you'll know that they are sponges and there's no way to predict what's gonna take hold and what they're going to ignore.

    There's a lot more to be cautious of on the internet than porn; and let's not forget that there IS porn on there that is about as far away from healthy sexual curiosity as you can get. There's also scams, fraud, malware, etc, etc, etc...and we can throw in the predator thing - although the media has blown that out of several proportions.

    There are many aspects of a child's education that are the parent's responsibility; and do not fall into the normal school curriculum. Media education (including the internet), in my opinion, is HUGE. I'm expecting to spend enormous effort on it. How to perceive television and movies; fiction versus reality, how to look at advertising critically, and now that the news has become infotainment I've gotta try and figure out how to encourage a healthy interest in the world around them while at the same time explaining they can't take anything said by anyone at face value. Then there's the internet, which is a whole other category.

    First, I've gotta spend a lot of time explaining how to use it safely - before we even get in to what to do and what not to. Safe browsing's gonna be a little more than just "don't sit so close." Malware, spam, phishing, trojans, cookies, privacy, internet permanence, and explaining there is no such thing as total anonymity -- and we're not even doing anything interesting yet.

    So, frankly, if a parent isn't worried - I'm not sure they're doing they're job.

    Yeah, obviously responsible people of good conscience will disagree about the appropriateness of a lot of internet material - but there is some stuff that I'm pretty sure we can almost all agree on, and I'd value reliable tools that help me prevent that from exposure. I'm not trying to keep the kid from seeing tits - but I am trying to keep them safe.

    My planned approach? Start with pretty locked down access (I've got a router and the skills to more or less pull that off), open it up over time as they learn and mature, and I'm going to monitor what they do. You're freakin' right I am. That doesn't mean I'm going to pour over every mail, and I'm certainly not going to do it secretly. They're going to know I'm watching from the time they start using the internet; I'm going to tell them, and I'm going to tell them it's gonna happen at school and work, and throughout the rest of their accessing lives.

    That approach is not to be taken lightly, obviously. I view it like watching the kids at the playground. Watching to keep them safe, occasionally telling them to 'stop that or you'll break your neck', is not the same as jumping in and managing the kids every time they tussle over a toy, or argue about who is 'it.' It can't be a mechanism for trying to make them behave the way I want them to. I'll have to be an adult about it; I can't read every mail, and I can't come down on them because they call me an ass as they IM to their friends. And yeah, there's screw all I can do if they're at someone else's home.

    If the woman in question doesn't have the skills or time for that - she can use some software, ask the ISP to block stuff, let the mail provider filter the spam; and she has to accept that it's going to be an imperfect situation.

  • Re:Not really (Score:5, Insightful)

    by CastrTroy ( 595695 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:49PM (#20607561)
    Put the computer in a well travelled room, and remove access to the computer when you're not in the house. Lock the case, with a physical lock, and use a hard to guess boot password. Disable booting off removable media. That will probably fix most issues. That's if you want to even bother. What kind of sites are they afraid of the kid accessing, and how much will they really be harmed by accessing the site? I was a kid once, and visited a lot of sites my parents would probably rather I didn't. I don't think I'm that messed up because of it.
  • by profplump ( 309017 ) <zach-slashjunk@kotlarek.com> on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:51PM (#20607613)
    Why would you do DNS queries on the monitored end of the connection -- SOCKS 5, which is built in to modern SSH, supports remote DNS lookups. If you can remember the IP address of your SSH host there are exactly 0 local DNS lookups to log. And thats assuming that DNS is actually logged and that anyone knows how to search those logs, which doesn't seem terribly likely at most places trying to filter children's web access.

    As for disallowing SSH tunnels -- I don't know where you get "trivial". Port-based blocking is right out, as there's a command line option to bypass that. Even if you had a protocol-level filter on the line that only allowed HTTP traffic, and only allowed valid HTML characters in the HTTP stream, I could still form an SSH tunnel by base64 encoding my SSH traffic and wrapping it in HTTP requests.

    If you knew what was going on and were willing to put the time in to it you might be able to stop me, but it's at best an arms race so long as I have the ability to execute programs on a node inside your network, control of some host outside your network, and any ability to form any sort of IP connection to the outside world.

    That being said, I agree that the grandparent sounds like a dipwad.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:55PM (#20607681)
    Sounds like your parents would have been best off just strangling you at birth. It's never too late for an abortion.
  • by Rakishi ( 759894 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @03:59PM (#20607773)

    easy. computer goes in family room with monitor facing people. it gets locked up when you can't be watched.
    You assume the internet is the worst thing that can happen to me. Some of my friends were much worse, guess who I would hang out more with as a result of your actions?

    you get no car,
    NYC baby, almost no one in high school has or needs a car. Actually since my friends all lived far away we didn't hang out too much after school anyway.

    you don't get to go visit friends, etc, etc, etc. your life eventually just starts to suck because you've proven you can't be trusted.
    I'd have stayed in school longer and hung out with my friends. I came back long before my parents and I came back on my own. You can't stop me from leaving the house and you can't force me to come home save for calling the police.

    You still assume I have a reason to listen to you other than my own temporary convienience.
  • No, actually (Score:3, Insightful)

    by everphilski ( 877346 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @04:05PM (#20607883) Journal
    No, actually it is a very good one and it is what I do at home with my children. All the home computers are in my office, which has French doors with glass window panes, connected to the living room.

    That being said, my parents weren't careful and I did shit they had no clue about (one time they sat me down because they thought I was 'doing things' which they never specified, I showed them my internet history, which was clean... I cover my tracks :) ). I am wiser for the experience any my kids will have to work harder than I did. But eventually, they will find ways to get around me. Its part of life. You teach them as best you can, you set up a basic perimeter to keep them out of trouble, but eventually they will find it. You only hope that they are big enough to handle what they dig themselves into.
  • by Damastus the WizLiz ( 935648 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @04:10PM (#20607999)
    Its comments like this one that need a -1 Disgusting mod.
  • Re:Not really (Score:5, Insightful)

    by multisync ( 218450 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @04:17PM (#20608153) Journal

    My opinion is that she should just approach her son and talk to him frankly about any issues that she's concerned about.


    That's what I tell people when I get similar requests. Put the computer in the living room, explain the rules and hope your work as a parent has been effective. All she is doing by attempting to lock out "inappropriate" material is making said material more desirable and at the same time telling her son she really doesn't trust him. It's like asking him to provide a urine sample to prove he isn't using drugs or alcohol, or to take a lie detector test to prove he isn't cheating on his school work. What's she going to do when he starts driving to make sure he doesn't speed? Is she going to accompany him on dates to ensure he doesn't engage in unprotected sex? Is she going to follow him around stores making sure he doesn't shop lift?

    She should tell her son that sex is a natural and healthy part of life for adults but viewing pornography on the family computer is not acceptable. And she should realize it is not the end of the world if his curiosity gets the better of him some times. There is plenty of intolerant, racist, sexist, negative imagery and speech on the Internet. I would be more worried about him being exposed to that, but that's just my opinion.

    And to the person who modded you Redundant, try using your mod points to promote posts you think are Insightful or Interesting. Save the negative mods for those who are truly abusive.
  • Re:Not really (Score:5, Insightful)

    by h4rm0ny ( 722443 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @04:30PM (#20608415) Journal

    It might not stop them seeing porn, but it will bloody well make sure that the kid learns how much his parents trust him and respect his choices.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 14, 2007 @04:31PM (#20608429)
    First rule of kids, computers and the net is don't let them have a computer in their bedroom. There's more than just pron to get them in trouble.

    If he's clever and determined enough to bypass a siteblocker, keylogger or other monitoring software, then give up. Twenty -ish years ago, I was an thirteen. I was trading floppies of .gif pron (256 colors!) and buying old issues of Playboy and Swank from my friend's older brother. By the time I was 15, I was able to walk into the bookstore and buy them myself with just a few days growth of facial hair.

    Got any Victoria's Secret catalogs arriving in the mail? Do you get the Sunday paper with the lingerie ads? Does his school newspaper/yearbook have pics of underage cheerleaders in their short skirts? Your kid will find something to spank it to. Try to focus more on him getting good grades and not turning you into a grandma.
  • Re:parenting? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sYkSh0n3 ( 722238 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @04:41PM (#20608623) Journal

    This is a real problem, and it is criminal there is no good solution, such as an xxx domain.


    So you want a domain for all porn sites. Who decides what's porn? The internet covers the planet. Some countries don't have a problem with a womans breasts, while others say you can't look at a womans body at all. Can you define porn? Would you say images of genitalia? What about the statue of David? Where do you draw the line between porn and art? What would happen to someone who posted porn on a non-xxx domain? Who do you want to police the internet?

    Why can't I buy internet service from some provider that blocks at least 99.9% if not 100% of porn? Why hasnt the 'free market' given me that choice? There is something wrong here. There is a market for this type of service yet it doesnt exist. Why not? Is it because Comcast relies on porn for their profits? It would seem to be so, judging by their cable line-up.


    Comcast doesn't "rely on porn for their profits." They simply provide a service. Internet Access. Nothing is going to block 100% of porn, and that's why they don't offer it as an option. What do you think would happen the first time some holy roller walked in on their son rubbin' one out to some porn that managed to get through the filter? They'd get sued. So they don't try. They leave it up to parents to make sure the kids don't surf inappropriate material.

    And the snide remark about their cable lineup? What the hell? They just pick what stations to broadcast in their packages, and that's mostly driven my consumer demand. The stations create the content, Comcast just makes those stations available to you. You want them to drop Fox because there are too many adult situations? Or are you referring to actual porn channels? because last time i checked those had to be requested, they weren't exactly part of basic cable. /rant

    ug, you made me defend comcast. i feel dirty.
  • by StarKruzr ( 74642 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @04:48PM (#20608787) Journal
    It's called "Suck it up, Mary, and actually sit down with your kid and have a chat with him about something that makes you uncomfortable. Parenting is uncomfortable sometimes. Fucking deal with it."

    God, I hate people with avoidance issues. Especially when they're raising children.
  • by h4rm0ny ( 722443 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @04:52PM (#20608855) Journal

    Actually, it sounds like he'll have a pretty good handle on the real world. He's clearly willing to put up with a lot of abuse rather than buckle under what someone else wants, solely because they have the power to punish him. Secondly, he also appears determined to get what he wants in that he thinks up ways around how others try to restrict him. If you ever seriously followed through on absurdities like following your child around at school or taking a door off, then there would be one of two results. Your child growing up into a timid, submissive adult, or more likely, pushing them to the point where they strike back at you. Seriously, there are plenty of things a child can do to hit back. Not least of which would be reporting you to the social services for (a) removing their door so that they were monitored at all times (b) following them round school, (c) denying their educational needs by preventing them from using a computer at home. Oh, and I think someone mentioned beating the child further up the thread. All that teaches is that when the child is bigger and stronger than you, there is no longer any basis for them to respect you any more. A close friend of mine was beaten a lot as a child. When he was nineteen, he went home and broke his father's jaw and possibly some ribs as well (I'm not sure).

    The poster seems to me to have grasped early on a very important lesson. Freedom is a willingness to accept consequences. Took me until I was twenty-four to realise that.
  • by ultranova ( 717540 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @04:54PM (#20608887)

    If one of my kids told me to "f-off" they wouldn't be leaving their room for a month.

    Since one of the reasons why children don't have full legal rights but are under their parent's power is that they don't have sufficient self-control to use them wisely, I have to question the wisdom of your statement. A month-long detention is absurdly harsh punishment for a mere insult (and a mild one at that), likely shouted out on impulse in the first place, and it won't stop such impulsive behavior in the future, since its cause is organic immaturity of a child's brain.

    So basically, it is unjust and doesn't stop such incidents as future, and even if it did it the cure is excessive in relation to the illness, so to say.

    Of course it's also possible that you simply happen to be the kind of egomaniacal control freak who gets children in order to have someone to boss around, excercize power on, and inflict arbitrary and excessive punishments upon at the slightest hint of anything besides absolute obedience. In that case, please fuck off, drop dead, and burn in Hell, you sick little freak.

  • by Tim C ( 15259 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @05:08PM (#20609145)
    Sick people will do sick things regardless of external stimulus, likewise stupid people, unwise people, good people, bad people, and so on.

    The ones that try to reenact porn in real life are the ones that would be doing that sort of thing whether they saw it in a film or not.
  • Re:parenting? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Otter Escaping North ( 945051 ) <otter@escaping@north.gmail@com> on Friday September 14, 2007 @05:14PM (#20609243) Journal

    I'd mod you up if I had the points. That was very well-written.

    Appreciated, though when I re-read it, I think I fell into the trap of overusing the word "safe." I stand by what I said about how I plan to handle the internet thing, and safety is certainly an issue - but I meant to talk more about managing the introduction of what's out there, and educating them on how to approach/avoid/process it.

    It can be hard for a parent (well, me) to keep objective and separate what is an actual threat to their child from what, frankly, they're just not ready to handle yet...then of course there's what we parents are not ready for them to handle yet. ;>

    Putting too much of that material under the category of "safety" is what leads to things like the "thinkofthechildren" meme. Images of hysterical parents condemning everything is certainly fair criticism, but for those of you without little ones, please believe me when I say that it's an incredibly hard job, with more nuance than can realistically be managed perfectly, and you often feel like you've got the whole multi-billion media industry against you.

    I want to raise intelligent, critical, reasoned people with healthy egos, tempered consumer appetites, and the skills to thrive in the good times and cope in the bad times. Play about five minutes of television in opposition to that, and please forgive my momentary impulse to board up the windows.

  • Re:parenting? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Brian Gordon ( 987471 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @05:38PM (#20609591)
    I (speaking for a lot of the libertarian single geek males on slashdot I'm sure) will stick up for what I believe in.. namely that censorship is wrong. This includes censorship "for their own good" even when dealing with child development. ESPECIALLY when dealing with child development. Are you seriously going to raise your kids with the philosophy of total lack of privacy and "someone's always watching?" That's a totally dystopian idea, and it's horrifying to hear that you'll force your kids to accept it! Privacy is a right, and while a healthy amount of parental discretion is available in enforcing household rules by looking at logs and things, you shouldn't be telling them "from the day you're born to the day you die someone's watching, so get used to it." Rather teach your kids that privacy is the ideal, the right thing, and that evil men have taken it away, and take that perspective to telling your kids someone's watching. The reality is that you have no privacy, but that's not how it should be, and that's not how it needs to be. Nothing will change if parents like you bring up the next generation accepting no privacy, taking DRM for granted, and thinking it funny that their parents owned their own computers not controlled by trusted computing vendors. et cetera, et cetera. Anyway, I don't know what you're worrying about. The internet is just information, and I think you underestimate your childrens ability to accept it as such, and not instantly open the windows of their souls and suck in 4chan and suddenly become real life /b/tards. Evaluate whether you're being controlled by offspring protection instincts, and also re-read Ender's Game. They were only 9. And I'm sure no kid is going to turn into a twitchy pulp of catatonia at seeing rose de nose's desk screen.
  • by swordgeek ( 112599 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @05:41PM (#20609615) Journal
    "She has sexual hangups and doesn't personally care for porn so she's projecting this on her son."

    Wow, how much did you pay for your psychology degree?

    The first part of your post is pretty much on the money. Then you got to this point, and totally lost it.

    A concerned parent is a GOOD thing, regardless of their technical naivetee. Being later than she should have been (and how much later--is he 13 or 17?) isn't ideal, but she's trying to deal with things. Accusing her of having sexual hangups and disliking porn as a result is total and utter conjecture on your part.
  • by NoOneInParticular ( 221808 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @05:43PM (#20609639)
    Chill dude. Your kids have your password already, and use it to get to your porn collection. Furthermore, they've also got root access and all your reports are doctored. No wonder they seem to act responsibly.
  • by Rakishi ( 759894 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @05:44PM (#20609657)
    Respect and fear are not the same. You seem to think they are. We're wired to be social creatures and if properly raised the mere upsetting of a loved one (who you love and later respect) is punishment in of itself.

    My parents failed because they thought punishment could induce respect on its own. Rather over many years it eroded that respect to almost nothing.
  • by Chandon Seldon ( 43083 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @05:46PM (#20609675) Homepage

    Children will learn there are rules in society that must be obeyed if they wish to live in that society.

    Don't confuse the rules of society with your obsessive parenting. Everyone has to deal with the former, whereas only your unfortunate children are forced to deal with the latter.

  • Sheltering? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by spiedrazer ( 555388 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @06:09PM (#20609973) Homepage
    Boy did you miss the point... Are you a parent? The original poster did an excellent job differentiating between sheltering and protecting. If he sees healthy curiosity in his monitorng activities, it looks like he plans to ignore it, but file that knowledge away and keep an eye out for additional actions that might stray further. This is about the best tack you can take. When I was a teen, you would be happy if you found a playboy or more graphic mag in the woods by where the older kids drank, but it didn't have pop-ups leading to ever more graphic and just plain disturbing stuff. A kid could get from googling for Vanessa Hudgens tits to some hardcore beastiality in about 3 clicks on today's Internet. Kids have to grow up too fast Today anyway... Why speed it up by ignoring the possiblity of filtering some stuff out based on your own tolerances.
  • Re:Not really (Score:3, Insightful)

    by suggsjc ( 726146 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @06:14PM (#20610037) Homepage
    Children have to earn trust. If you truly practice what you preach, then you should give all children loaded guns to play with...because you can trust them not to harm anyone, right? The GP's method is one way to make it more difficult for the kid to see porn/whatever, but it doesn't eliminate it. Asking others for advice on how to raise your kids is easy, actually parenting (not just when it is convenient for you) is hard.
  • by ultranova ( 717540 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @06:33PM (#20610243)

    How do you think I child develops that self-control? It is through receiving consequences for his actions, preferably starting at an early age.

    Actually, no. Impulse control develops as the brain does. No amount of punishment can hasten this process, altought it can instill learned helplesness, which might look a bit similar in the beginning. The only thing consequences teaches is what impulses should be controlled.

    It is also how many important values, such as respect, are instilled.

    Fear isn't respect. Respect can't be forced, it must be earned. Altought I admit that it is a very useful skill to be able to pretend respect towards people who have the power to hurt and/or harm you.

    Besides, if you teach your kid to show respect by punishing him whenever he doesn't, won't he simply continue to do what you've taught after you aren't the authority figure anymore, and bow down to anyone stronger than himself - the government, Mafia, religious demagogues, political leaders...? Is that a good value to learn ?

    If you want to teach someone respect, show it yourself. Monkey sees, monkey does. But trying to force someone to be respectful will simply teach them that it's okay to hit - methaphorically or literally - those weaker than yourself to make them "respect" you, which is fine if you're trying to bring up future Mafia members but not otherwise.

    If you think that telling a parent to f-off is a "mild insult," then respect might be a value you haven't yet learned.

    If you think that "fuck off" is worth a month-long detention, or any significant punishment for that matter, then a sense of proportion might be a value that you haven't yet learned. In fact I'd go a step further and say that treating any show of disrespect as deserving harsh punishment might indicate that the parent himself has some serious issues with his self-esteem or confidence, and is reacting out of fear and pride rather than any rational reason.

    And yes, "fuck off" is a very mild insult. It isn't even really an insult, but rather a rude way to tell someone to leave the speaker alone. It is worthy of a lecture on manners, not punishment (besides the inherent punishment value of a lecture from a parent ;).

  • Re:parenting? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by passthecrackpipe ( 598773 ) * <passthecrackpipe AT hotmail DOT com> on Friday September 14, 2007 @07:04PM (#20610547)
    yes, and how many kids do you have, exactly? and your justification for being right is based on fictional characters in a sci-fi novel? Please, STFU. You are clueless.
  • Re:Not really (Score:3, Insightful)

    by The Mighty Buzzard ( 878441 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @08:17PM (#20611293)
    Anyone who trusts and respects the choices of a teenager has obviously forgotten their own stint as one.
  • Re:Not really (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Kelz ( 611260 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @11:37PM (#20612727)
    And anyone who doesn't at least put on a show of trying to respect the choices of a teenager obviously forgot what exactly goes through their head when their parents say "because I said so".
  • Re:covenant eyes (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Gordonjcp ( 186804 ) on Saturday September 15, 2007 @04:36AM (#20614329) Homepage
    What we did for a friend of mine who has two young teenage boys was we set up a transparent proxy with logging. The house rules are "no looking at stuff that you think I'd be annoyed about". You can easily tell if a dodgy link has been clicked on and then surfed away from, or if it's part of a bit of exploration of dodgy sites. Of course, if they crack root on the proxy server and zap the logs, well that just shows initiative and fair play to them.

    The other thing, of course, is not to be such a neo-puritan prude.
  • Re:parenting? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by strikethree ( 811449 ) on Saturday September 15, 2007 @06:33AM (#20614721) Journal
    "So, frankly, if a parent isn't worried - I'm not sure they're doing they're job."

    You will probably not think that I am doing my job. I have two kids, 15 and 10 and I am not worried in the least about what they will find on the internet. Both of them have run across porn and both of them quickly ignored it. The younger one thought it was gross and the elder one did not wish to see it.

    While I am checking their computer for spyware, malware and other baddies, I do look through their browser histories and such but they have no idea that I check such things. All of their online activities are 100% innocent even without the fear of me monitoring them.

    I trust my kids 100% but I do know that children can make mistakes which is why I check sometimes. I have taught my children about all sorts of things and let them explain to me how it could affect them. I tell them they can do anything they want and they turn around and limit themselves even more than I would limit them if I were an authoritarian parent.

    At their ages, I was always rebelling against my parents. I swore I would never be like my parents and it has paid off in spades. My kids get excellent grades, A- is the lowest for the 15 year old and a B is the lowest for my 10 year old. All of their teachers have always complimented me on how courteous and hard working both children are. Both children are well disciplined and never do anything (major/serious) that I would not want them to do. Most importantly though, both of them love and trust me. They know that they can talk to me about _anything_ even if it is embarrassing or against the rules.

    A web filter is bad parenting in my book. The real world does not censor itself and showing your kids a censored world will only hurt them by limiting their view/knowledge. Murderers, child molesters, thieves, etc do not perform their crimes only on other bad people. They perform their crimes on innocent people too. Better yet, innocent people make great targets because an innocent person does not know what to look for or know how to defend themselves. When they run across bad stuff make sure that your kids can, and will want to, talk to you about it so you can provide the knowledge that they need to get along in this world.

    Teach your children properly and you will have less to worry about. (kind of like the saying, "do not tell lies so you do not have to remember as much")

    strike
  • Re:parenting? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by nuintari ( 47926 ) on Saturday September 15, 2007 @09:34AM (#20615535) Homepage

    All the knee-jerk comments about 'do your job, be a parent' miss the point, and serve only to gratify the poster's ego and holier-than-thou self-image.
    So, it is not the parent's job to police their children's activities? So, if the kid comes over to my yard and vandelizes my car, is it my fault for putting my car in a place where someone else's child can destroy it? Way to pass blame, you are the modern parent, if your children are so perfect and angelic, why do you expect the rest of the world to police their activities when you have demonstrated that you will not do so? They are your kids, this is your rule, why do I have to enforce it?

    This is a real problem, and it is criminal there is no good solution, such as an xxx domain.
    Define porn, define porn in an international sense. From place to place, you will get a widely different answer. The xxx domain is purely pointless, will solve nothing, and is just another example of, "the world should police my children for me" attitude of the modern breeder. If created, _some_ porno sites will be on the xxx domain, some won't, and you people will whine and bitch, and moan that the precious, and always right, and never evil U.S. government didn't pass yet another wonderful law that limits personal freedom is some small way that was good enough for you. Guess what? Some of us don't want to be regulated by other peoples' rules.

    Why can't I buy internet service from some provider that blocks at least 99.9% if not 100% of porn? Why hasnt the 'free market' given me that choice? The, and re is something wrong here. There is a market for this type of service yet it doesnt exist. Why not? Is it because Comcast relies on porn for their profits? It would seem to be so, judging by their cable line-up.
    I run an ISP and no there isn't. For every 1 subscriber call I get wanting us to filter this or that, I have 300 who don't give a shit, and another 25 who are vehemently (not to mention vocally) aware of their rights and responsibilities as consumers, and do not want me, their service provider, playing big brother. I deliver internet service, I want to deliver internet service, my customers do not want filtered access, nor do I want to deliver filtered access. The market has spoken.

    I actually ran across a reasonable solution some 3 years ago where a router mfr had bundled a proxy server in there router so all web page loads were checked at a remote server first before being served to the client browser. It worked pretty good. But this service went away, and is apparently no longer available.
    If you found it effective, then your kids were probably laughing at you behind your back. No technological solution is going to cure what is a social issue. If your children want to look at porn, they will find a way. If you actively try to stop them, they will try harder. The social problem isn't the porn, rather our societies puritanical view of sex. These children are growing up, they are asserting their independence for the first time, and they need to explore their sexuality. Your solution is to say, "no, you aren't ready to have independence, and you aren't allowed to be a sexual creature. Someone else, make sure that stays true until I am ready to admit that my child has grown up!" Great solution bub, every chance they get to defy you, they will do so. No technology is going to save your children from the dangerous boobies.

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...