Quality Open Source Calendaring / Scheduling? 492
Jim R. Wilson writes "In past jobs, I've used Microsoft Outlook/Exchange, Novell Groupwise, and Google Calendar for handling business appointments. I'm sorry to say it, but I have yet to see a rival to Microsoft's scheduling features. On Slashdot I have occasionally read rumblings that there are better open source email and calendaring solutions out there. Can anyone substantiate this claim? What are the OSS alternatives? Can any compete with Microsoft's resource scheduling?"
no (Score:5, Informative)
Haven't found much (Score:4, Informative)
Evolution works great with Exchange; all they need now is to create their own back-end =)
PS. Public folders have gone away in Exchange 2007; big mistake if you ask me. It was a selling point for Exchange.
Citadel is the best i know of: (Score:3, Informative)
Could you help us help you? (Score:5, Informative)
I hate to say this, but unless you give us a few reasons why some of the solutions you have looked at are not sufficient I doubt you will get any meaningful response.It's a pretty common problem when people ask for an open source replacement for a program they have used and were reasonably happy with.
Without some starting point for comparison you will just get dozens of stories about how product X works fine for them.
Kontact (Score:1, Informative)
Re:.....or (Score:3, Informative)
Sam
CalDav (Score:5, Informative)
What about Darwin Calendar Server? (Score:5, Informative)
Not really (Score:5, Informative)
Scalix http://www.scalix.com/ [scalix.com]
are the two closest, but honestly, neither is a perfect replacement.
No callenders? (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/ [mozilla.org]
Re:.....or (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Haven't found much (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/topquestions.mspx?wt.svl=overview [microsoft.com]
Q. What is happening with Public Folders?
A.
Public Folders are included and supported in Exchange Server 2007. Microsoft has communicated that future releases of Exchange Server may not include public folders. If you use Public Folders, read the Exchange Team Blog on the topic of public folders for more guidance.
Re:What features? (Score:5, Informative)
Sorry I wasn't clear enough in my initial question. What really impresses me about Outlook/Exchange is when you go to schedule a meeting, it allows you to see when all the participants, rooms and resources (like projectors) are available in a horizontal chart of sorts. People who are busy are marked off in blue, out of office is purple, etc. To find a time that works for everyone, you just scan across until you see a vertical bar of white (everyone free), or try to minimize conflicts.
I don't know of MS holds a patent on the UI, but I haven't seen it anywhere else. Also, with respect to calendaring, in Outlook you can open up several calendars (yours and others) side-by-side in order to see who's free when. It's a pretty simple bit of eye candy, but nonetheless, I've only seen it in Outlook.
Re:Haven't found much (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.osafoundation.org/ [osafoundation.org]
It's been a long time coming, but it's finally approaching a useable release and it's quite interesting. I think it will be a real choice in 2008...
iCal Server (Score:5, Informative)
The server just officially went gold with Leopard but has actually been done for a while now. Apple's iCal Server and (closed source) Client are currently the most polished products but now that there is a solid CalDAV server I expect that the various clients with gain alot of polish and other CalDAV servers should start to roll out as well.
Check out the CALCONNECT standards body for more information: http://www.calconnect.org/ [calconnect.org]
=tkk
PS Microsoft is finally a member but their commitment level is not that of the other partners.
Re:iCal Server (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Haven't found much (Score:2, Informative)
Public folders have gone away in Exchange 2007
They are in there, just disabled by default. If you use Outlook 2003 or older they are required, so Exchange 2007 includes them.
Re:What features? (Score:5, Informative)
This function is available with the CalDav server standard and that particular feature is available in the implementations in the open source Zimbra client/server and the 10.5 version Apple's iCal server/client. I don't know about other implementations, but I imagine most other ones either include this or will soon, as Caldav has really taken of in adoption by major projects. Zimbra even offers that feature via the Web interface to their server.
I think Evolution has an interface like this (works with CalDav), but if I recall Zimbra allows you to overlap as many calendars as you want in one window, making the comparison quite a bit easier IMHO.
I'd definitely look at Zimbra if you're serious about a OSS solution with lots of features and compatibility with both standards and proprietary interfaces (they have a full featured Exchange plug-in so users can still use Exchange as their client if they want). The server will run on all the popular Linux distros, OS X, and as a VMWare appliance.
Re:Haven't found much (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Zimbra (Score:3, Informative)
It comes under an 'attribution license' and hence cannot be forked. Its 'badgeware'.
Ie: you cannot take the source code of Zimbra and produce your own version *without* the Zimbra logos.
Re:iCal Server (Score:3, Informative)
- Apple's Calendar Server is indeed open source [royhooper.ca], unlike mentioned above.
- Apple's current implementation of recurring events in their CalDav server has some issues.
Disclaimer:
It should also be noted that I work for Oracle in the very same division responsible for the calendaring stuff and that my intent is not to diminish Apple's offering. Oracle aims for full interoperability with other CalDAV-compliant offerings, including that of Apple.
Re:.....or (Score:3, Informative)
Shocking, I know.
But of course... Citadel.. (Score:2, Informative)
Software that actually works. It's in use. It's actively being maintained. As new technology is released, there's a proven track record of it being incorporated into the software.
Then you're really making a mistake if you don't look at citadel.
Email, Calendaring, Contacts, multiple interfaces, multiple standards compliant protocols, instant messaging and it all can run on one server. But wait.. It scales! So if you want to run multiple servers and have them communicate, go ahead. It's built right in.
Visit http://citadel.org/ [citadel.org] for more information and to download or there's even a vmware appliance, all set up and ready to go. All you need to do is download and run. Try http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/723 [vmware.com]. -
Sun's JES is worth evaluating (Score:3, Informative)
It makes my short list, along with ZImbra, Scalix, and Openchange (so far).
The nice things about JES are (a) it's rock-solid (b) it works well with many mail clients, even horribly broken ones like Outlook (c) while it doesn't have every possible calendar feature in the world, it has all of the ones that people actually use (d) it scales amazingly well -- it's really no problem to get it to support millions of users (e) because it's been around for a while (including a prior incarnation as a Netscape product) there's a pretty solid support community for it (in addition to Sun) (f) it's flexible enough to support integration with other products.
The bad things about JES are (a) the install is complicated, even if you're very accustomed to complex installs (b) the documentation, like much of Sun's documentation, is poorly written, verbose, uses opaque terminology, and lacks cohesion (c) the log files are inscrutable (d) it's somewhat bloated (somebody needs to trim all the legacy code out of it) (e) it's overkill for anyone who just needs a mail server (i.e., no calendaring).
But...given that you get mail, calendaring, LDAP, all rolled up in one package -- it's at least worth looking at. I'm aware of any number of places that have migrated from Exchange to JES, so at least their requirements were met.
Re:Citadel is *the* solution (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Haven't found much (Score:3, Informative)
Zimbra! (Score:3, Informative)
You dweebs cant even do a google search before just saying "no", can you?
Re:Haven't found much (Score:5, Informative)
1. They are more pointed than pens, and thus more likely to puncture things that shouldn't be punctured.
2. They create dust, which is a no-no on space missions. Wood pencils (obviously) from sharpening. Mechanical pencils are prone to have their leads break off, and float about. More to the point, the operating mechanism of both kinds of pencil is to rub off graphite dust onto paper. Some of this dust may be released by smudging.
Remember that graphite, and thus graphite dust, is conductive. Do you want to take the risk of conductive graphite dust causing a component to short out?
Why do you want NASA missions to fail???? ( oblig bit o funny )
Re:Zimbra! (Score:2, Informative)
...shameless plug: if you're looking for open source monitoring software either your Exchange or Zimbra installation, you should check out Hyperic. Its open source and manages both of them right out of the box.
Stacey Schneider
http://www.hyperic.com/ [hyperic.com]
Re:no (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Citadel is *the* solution (Score:3, Informative)
Sadly it looks like the connector is being developed by a closed source developer rather than within the Citadel project itself so my prediction isn't quite true. Still it would make a great alternative to Exchange, and fortunately for me Exchange compatibility is not an issue.
I quite enthusiastically plug Citadel wherever I can, not only because it performs extremely well and is easy to administer, but because the project is very open (the citadel.org site has a LOT of info on protocols and other technical developer stuff) and the more people that are aware of it the more likely people will get involved in developing it and moving it forward (eventually, perhaps, leading to a Free exchange connector
Re:Power Failure Resistant: (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Zimbra! (Score:3, Informative)
I upgraded them to two servers: RHEL with Zimbra for everything mail-related and CentOS for fileserving. They were even considering Evolution for the client, which I found funny for a church! Anyway, they've been like this for over a year and there has been no major problems. The new servers even had Gigabit cards so people could get full speed from the gigabit switch!
They were a little against Exchange because their neighbouring retirement village used Exchange on SBS and had no end to problems. Last I heard they linked networks and migrated the retirement village accounts to their Zimbra server.