Why Don't We Invent That Tomorrow? 439
museumpeace writes "In the NYTimes book review blog, David Itzkoff takes a look at a new book devoted to predicting which 'science fiction' technologies may really fly some day. The author is Michio Kaku, one of the inventors of string theory, so he bears a hearing. His picks include light sabers, invisibility and force fields." Which sci-fi tech do you think needs to get invented over the weekend?
Von Neumann Machines (Score:3, Insightful)
At any scale. But nanoscale is my preference.
Ideally of types that interface cleanly with the human nervous system.
But that's just me.
Teleporters (Score:5, Insightful)
More weapons?? (Score:3, Insightful)
And invisibility? Nothing good would come of that either.
I'd be happy for a cure for the cold personally.
Obligatory (Score:4, Insightful)
But seriously I think that we should invent a real HUD system that could work through contacts but be powered just with body heat.
Mr.Fusion (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:That's an easy one! (Score:5, Insightful)
My pick (Score:5, Insightful)
Physically staying 27 until I die from something other then natural causes.
Re:Kaku bears a hearing? (Score:5, Insightful)
Ah, the delusion of grandure. I do agree that futurologists are guilty of this - but what we have even today is really quite grand.
What he's doing though seems to me to be mere extrapolation. Let us go back a few thousand years and try to explain to your average hunter/gatherer that in the future we have an arrow which can shoot all the way around the world and completely obliterate 50 square miles of whatever we aimed it at. That's pretty godlike, and that kind of technology came along with the microwave oven and color television.
The hunters arrow creates a hole a few inches in diameter - the hydrogen bomb creates a crater many hundreds of meters in diameter, so a weapon of a few thousand years from now should be able to create a blemish in matter approximately 1000 miles in size, a few thousand years past that and the weapon would make a big hole almost 6 million miles in size.
thousands of years are not long periods of time to the universe, I won't continue to extrapolate into the millions of years of humanities progress.
I think, if we survive and continue to progress like this, that we will be pretty bad-ass indeed.
Re:That's an easy one! (Score:1, Insightful)
Most likely, time travel keeps your current inertial frame of reference.
Re:That's an easy one! (Score:3, Insightful)
I endorse the above post. (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh sure... we'll just ignore how something the size of an atom is supposed to contain any sort of parts capable of manipulating the environment as well as how they're supposed to encode information and make decisions. Might as well also ignore where such a machine is getting the energy to spread at light speed. Heck, why don't we just ignore reality entirely and get into exercises of sheer mental wankery, and...
Never mind, I keep forgetting he's a string theorist. Exercises in mental wankery that have no real attachment to physical reality is his bread and butter.
Re:That's an easy one! (Score:1, Insightful)
Cheap abundant energy. (Score:1, Insightful)
At last! (Score:3, Insightful)
Parts of the book relating to wormholes, time travel and teleportation have been adapted by Kaku himself and published in the March 2008 ("Special Einstein") issue of Discover magazine. You can get an unadulterated taste of the book and a bunch of other nifty stuff about Einstein, relativity and such all in one package.
I think the claim he was an inventor of string theory isn't entirely accurate. However, he was co-author of the first paper on string field theory, which showed the five versions of string theory to be different versions of the same underlying mechanism. I think "rescurer" would be more accurate than "inventor" as well as being worth more credit.
Despite publishing other popular books previously including a best seller, hosting a 4 part BBC special, a 3 part Discovery Channel special and two different weekly radio shows, he's so far managed to dodge the inevitable unwashed masses and supposedly washed whiny insiders who show up to tip the ivory tower of popularizers of science. Last time it was Brian Greene. Even Sagan was so assailed until he forced their forgiveness by dying at them. Let's see how Kaku weathers the storm following the massive attention this new book is getting him. Including one picture of the Stargate and one of a Kirk led landing party being beamed down in the Discover article should help bring them out of the woodwork.
ZPM (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:That's an easy one! (Score:2, Insightful)
I got one. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Kaku bears a hearing? (Score:2, Insightful)
Although someone developing technology which could cause a star to enter prematurely into its death phase by interrupting its normal reactions could possibly be smaller (especially if a chain reaction was involved) which could be a devastating but fairly easy to carry weapon if someone was out for interstellar war with someone.
Re:That's an easy one! (Score:4, Insightful)
Layne
Re:That's an easy one! (Score:3, Insightful)
Not to mention getting slammed by a wall of you tried to teleport too far across a planet. The weirdest mix of science and pseudo-science since the golden age of comics.
Moved and seconded... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Teleporters (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:That's an easy one! (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:My pick (Score:4, Insightful)
Why would you need to be allowed to retire. I'm going to retire as soon as I have enough money invested to live on the interest plus some extra to grow the principle enough to offset inflation each year. That's well before "official" retirement age, which is good considering how few of my male relatives even lived to their sixties.
It's not even really hard to save up that money, the key seems to be "don't have kids", which would be even more important in a world with immortality.
Broiled tongue in cheek. (Score:3, Insightful)
A Windows release that actually works as advertised.
Re:That's an easy one! (Score:3, Insightful)
People are quite happy to accept that we cant travel faster that c, but soon forget that all frames of reverance are all equal. There is no aether, no absolute position, no zero velocity, hell there aint much apart from acceleration!
Re:Lightsabers... (Score:1, Insightful)