What Kind of Alternate Business Models Could ISPs Use? 360
esocid writes "After reading multiple stories over the past few months about the practices of ISPs within and outside of the US I have started to actually contemplate the benefits of the pay-per-use broadband service. Monopolistic practices have strangled broadband to the throttled money-draining cesspool that it is today. Would a pay-per-use option, or some other strategy, be better than the flat fee offered by companies today? When you think about it you are paying for an XMbps connection, when in actuality you get an 65-85%XMbps connection that you may or may not use all of the time. In addition to that, speaking as a Comcast customer, you get a throttled connection that limits your usage of certain protocols. Essentially you pay about $60-70 for a connection that you only squeeze maybe $35-45 worth of usage out of it. If a pay-per-usage option were implemented, how do you think the best way to charge for it would be? Is there some other scheme that would deliver customers the kind of QOS and value they seek?"
who cares about business models? (Score:5, Funny)
Where's the A material? Even Poniez is looking good at this point.
Where the hell are the April Fool's Stories? (Score:2, Funny)
Has slashdot gone too corporate for April Fools stories now?? Not even one OMG Ponies story??
Geez...I usually look forward to April 1st just to see what kind of stuff shows up on /., but, this year...what happened?
Re:first post (Score:5, Funny)
Re:who cares about business models? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:first post (Score:3, Funny)
Nevermind... the parent was right. Slashdotters would be the major bandwidth users.
Re:first post (Score:3, Funny)
Re:first post (Score:3, Funny)