Nominations Open For "Most Likely to be Shut Down By Government" 629
The corporate overlords at SourceForge asked me to name a Slashdot category for their upcoming
Community Choice Awards and to let you guys select the winner. I have named my category "Most Likely to be Shut Down by a Government Agency." We're going to run this like we do an Ask Slashdot call for questions — post your nominations into the comments here. Use moderation to send up good ideas. In the upcoming days we'll post another story where you can vote on the actual winner. Nominations need to include the project name, a link to some sort of official website, and a paragraph of why you think they deserve to win. The project that wins will gain fame, notoriety, and maybe a cease and desist order that they could print out and frame if they had that kind of time.
Patent Busting (Score:5, Interesting)
Or has it been shut down already?
Software radio... (Score:5, Interesting)
The GNU software radio project
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/
is a good candidate. It proposes to let you make electromagnetic waves in a manner not subject to prior restraint by the FCC, and without the back-doors intelligence agencies have on many current means of communications.
This is naughty.
wikileaks, followed by cryptome.org (Score:5, Interesting)
Matt
MediaDefender (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:wikileaks, followed by cryptome.org (Score:5, Interesting)
Which Government? (Score:2, Interesting)
Freenet (Score:5, Interesting)
Enzyte (and others) (Score:0, Interesting)
I've read most of these fake non perscription miracle drugs make their money by giving a "free" 30 day trial for like $30 bucks or something and rake it in off the people who forget to cancel. Obviously this pill doesn't enhance penis size. I think there is another one for weight loss where they go on and on about how 76% of each pound lost was actual fat, but if you read the fine print the usual weight loss is 3 pounds (doubt it even does that).
Trapster (Score:5, Interesting)
www.trapster.com [trapster.com]
It's an interactive thingy where you post where cops are hiding in speed traps.
I'm surprised it's still up, honestly.
Our right to know. (Score:5, Interesting)
In terms of software, PirateBay/Cryptome/GnuRadio. Anything dealing with encryption will NOT be shutdown, unless it involves a brand new and interesting algo.
Liberty Dollar (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Truecrypt (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Slashdot (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Truecrypt (Score:2, Interesting)
Yes, you can import strong encryption but you can't export un-approved encryption (ie what the US can't crack). So does that mean you have to worry about leaving the U.S. with too strong of encryption on your laptop then?
Tor? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Truecrypt (Score:5, Interesting)
The drawback of a one-time pad system is the logistics of transporting the keys and having only two copies, that are destroyed after they are used.
Roosevelt and Churchill had transatlantic voice conversations during World War II that were encrypted using one-time pad technology. The conversations would remain unbreakable even if recordings of the radio transmissions were available today.
Re:Truecrypt (Score:5, Interesting)
It was an experimental encryption algorithm and I screwed up
my hard drive, and now I can't decrypt it.
Does that help?
But isn't this fear mongering? (Score:5, Interesting)
Most take down notices have come not from law enforcement but from companies not the government.
The vast majority of these are civil actions.
Isn't this heading into the tin foil hats and black helicopter area?
www.tudou.com/ (Score:2, Interesting)
Second Life (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:ThePirateBay (Score:5, Interesting)
Sure they have lax rules surrounding them in the countries that they are based but it's only a matter of time before it goes beyond "making an example" and they are made "a precedent".
After them, the next on the chopping block would be Mininova.
I see BitTorrent going the way of the dodo... (Score:5, Interesting)
What's going to stop it? The RIAA, MPAA and giant ISP's like Comcast and Verizon that throttle back torrent traffic. They will make cases for costs in bandwidth and network maintenance. The fact that many people use these types of peer-to-peer networks successfully and almost untraceably to share copyrighted information only adds to the arguments that the RIAA and MPAA will make to get it shut down. Since there entire websites like The Pirate Bay, Mininova, IsoHunt and even the BitTorrent website that link users to a large number of seeds for the torrent swarms of information copyrighted and non-copyrighted and such, it doesn't bode well for the tool either.
The RIAA and MPAA will use strong arm tactics and cite currently pending investigations in other parts of the world against such sites that employ the use of such software to cut the problem off at the head. It will likely lead to sweeping legislation that will outlaw many forms of file sharing. For references, look at what the RIAA and MPAA have managed to successfully do against those users with home media center looking to place digital copies of their license media on to online storage. Sure, selling the means to do the illegal act isn't illegal but that doesn't mean someone won't try to make it illegal.
Re:But isn't this fear mongering? (Score:3, Interesting)
DIY Drones (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Truecrypt (Score:3, Interesting)
Just say no to homemade A-bombs (Score:3, Interesting)
Seem pretty obvious to me. Of course if you are making substantial progress on this, you're going to get something a little more difficult to ridicule than a cease and desist letter from some lawyers.
Indymedia (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Truecrypt (Score:1, Interesting)
A troll for a troll - lets see if this post also gets a +1 interesting.
Re:Truecrypt (Score:5, Interesting)
We're talking about a device that has a radio antenna, a microphone, and probably CCD. It moves around all day, seeing inputs from all those different sensors, from your unique perspective. It's practically an entropy engine.
Re:Truecrypt (Score:5, Interesting)
Very good point. the whole 'possession with intent' argument used by our Gov't. and law enforcement/court system is just pure FUD. Currently THEY get to define 'intent' just based on possession, and that is the problem.
Common sense would dictate that 'intent' should be a seperate issue from possession, but by 'bundling' intent with possession,all bets are off.
It seems to be 'the WAR on mentality has automagically equated possession with 'intent', despite the facts actually present.
The 'facts' don't matter as long as you fit (even loosely) the 'profile'.
ARRGHHH! This 'New World Order' mentality really chaps my ass.
How is Boston Harbor setup for a 21'st century Tea Party these days? I think we need to explore this question here in the USA. Just thinking...
P.S. I know I am ranting in an offtopic direction, but when I enlisted in the US Army, I took an oath to defend our Constitution from enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC. WTF?!?!?!
I am really confused by what my proper course of action should be anymore. My instincts reload '1776-The Revolution' into RAM, but I doubt it would work now days with the apathy and 'consumerism' that is rampant here. I AM A CITIZEN (Egads- I hate this Newspeak Spelling, but nevermind), not a CONSUMER! I am a consumer when I go to a restaurant or pub- maybe when I go to a grocery store- otherwise I am a citizen, not a 'consumer'.
Is it too off-topic to say: I miss the social attitudes of my youth? (for reference, I was born in 1958- grad'ed HS in 1976- yes, I am older than dirt for most of you, and proud of it- I have seen a lot of really cool shit happening, but also a lot of not-cool shit too)
Re:Truecrypt (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Truecrypt (Score:3, Interesting)
Widespread use of Palladium, without careful thought, could lead to exactly the forbidding of non-backdoor-burdened encryption. And discovering a backdoor-free way to use it is one of the fastest ways to get such a technology dropped: take a look at what happened with the 'Clipper Chip' for an example of that.
DIYDrones.com (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Don't need government - doing it themselves. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Truecrypt (Score:3, Interesting)
High bandwidth hardware RNGs aren't that hard. I could design a circuit that ran at a multi-kilobit output rate (plenty for text messaging), occupied under a square cm of board area, and a parts cost under $3 in qty 1k -- with provable minimums for the amount of quantum mechanically generated entropy. And the price would drop dramatically in large quantity. Or you could take VIA's approach of noisy ring oscillators that's very fast, almost certainly good enough, but not quite guaranteed -- and can be integrated on a modest sized piece of digital logic at very very low cost. So why don't more people use high quality random number generators? No one cares.
The hard part isn't generating the pads; it's managing them securely (or generating them on hardware not intended for the task). But, if you happen to want a good hardware RNG designed, it's quite doable (though not trivial; it requires attention to detail, as always).
Vote Powerpoint! (Score:1, Interesting)
Finally we will be free from those brainless "funny" chain emails that waste all your mail space.
Re:Truecrypt (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Tor, Freenet, and I2P (Score:3, Interesting)
And yet, Tor development was partially funded by the DoD.
Even more ironic, the entire internet was a DoD DARPA project.
Personally, it wouldn't surprise me if the internet itself was "The Most Likely To Be Shut Down (by the) Government". At least, the internet as we now know it as a general-purpose two-way distributed-node type network that is as hard to control and censor as the current iteration is.
Cheers!
Strat
SCO (Score:2, Interesting)
They are in Chapter 11 bankruptcy at the moment. The next stage is Chapter 7 hopefully when Kimball's ruling comes through. Then the Government through the agency of the Delaware court will terminate them.
mySociety's parliament video site (Score:2, Interesting)
Just announced yesterday: mySociety's House of Commons video [mysociety.org] site. Crowd-source some video timestamps [theyworkforyou.com] today!
Why might the government seek to close the site down? After all, aren't mySociety "the biggest single catalyst for political change in this country"? (Lord Gould of Brookwood, House of Lords debate, 15/6/06 [theyworkforyou.com])
Well, they may be, but they may have fractured, or at least bent, a copyright law or two.
You see, Parliamentary video exists under a draconian copyright license under which it "must not be hosted on a searchable website and must not be downloadable", apparently for fear of naughty citizens making humorous or satirical use of it; or indeed any use at all.
To which the mySociety guys and gals seem to have said a collective, "Well that's silly," and gone ahead and done it anyway. Good on you, people.
Seriously, do your bit for democratic transparency and go and timestamp a few videos [theyworkforyou.com] now. It's curiously addictive.
Re:Truecrypt (Score:3, Interesting)
In other words, if you don't buy, the company could go out of business (by not meeting their costs), but if not they can't really affect you. If you don't vote, someone still gets voted in, and it might be someone whose policies are quite opposed to how you might run things yourself, which might affect you directly through new laws.
So, you're wrong; "not voting" is not even close to the same as "boycotting a company".
The solution to "I hate the two-party system" is to vote for a third party. If that's not enough for you (and it probably won't be successful at first) you'll have to campaign for a third-party candidate and rally support. If I recall correctly, you can even write in whatever name you want for your vote.