Anti-Technology Technologies?

shanen writes "A story from the NYTimes about metering internet traffic caught my eye. I thought the exchange of information over the Internet was supposed to be a good thing? Couldn't we use technology more constructively? For example, if there is too much network traffic for video and radio channels, why don't we offset with the increased use of P2P technologies like BitTorrent? Why don't we use wireless networks to reduce the traffic on the wired infrastructure? Such technologies often have highly desirable properties. For example, BitTorrent is excellent for rapidly increasing the availability of popular files while automatically balancing the network traffic, since the faster and closer connections will automatically wind up being favored. Instead, we have an increasing trend for anti-technology technologies and twisted narrow economic solutions such as those discussed in the NYTimes article, and attempts to restrict the disruptive communications technologies. You may remember how FM radio was delayed for years; part of the security requirements of a major company includes anti-P2P software, as well as locking down the wireless communications extremely tightly — but there are still gaps for the bad guys, while the main victims are the legitimate users of these technologies. Can you think of other examples? Do you have constructive solutions?"

Constructive solution

[Anonymous Coward]

Kill all the lawyers.

Sincerely,

Bill Shakespeare

i once invented anti-technology technology...

[canipeal]

couldn't figure out why the darn thing kept blowing itself up....

Re:All right, that does it

[SoapBox17]

We all know the internet is a series of tubes, like water pipes. But you aren't thinking outside the box. Instead of building larger water mains, these cities should just use catapults to throw "packets" of water through the air to parts of the city, thus reducing the load on the old "pipe" infrastructure.