Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education Math

Mathematics Reading List For High School Students? 630

Troy writes "I'm a high school math teacher who is trying to assemble an extra-credit reading list. I want to give my students (ages 16-18) the opportunity/motivation to learn about stimulating mathematical ideas that fall outside of the curriculum I'm bound to teach. I already do this somewhat with special lessons given throughout the year, but I would like my students to explore a particular concept in depth. I am looking for books that are well-written, engaging, and accessible to someone who doesn't have a lot of college-level mathematical training. I already have a handful of books on my list, but I want my students to be able to choose from a variety of topics. Many thanks for all suggestions!"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mathematics Reading List For High School Students?

Comments Filter:
  • My math is cool (Score:5, Insightful)

    by CMonk ( 20789 ) on Sunday February 08, 2009 @06:46PM (#26776979)
    http://www.amazon.com/Godel-Escher-Bach-Eternal-Golden/dp/0465026567/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1234132982&sr=8-1 [amazon.com] Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid Very interesting book and should get students of that age excited about math and science IF they are predisposed to that sort of thing.
  • A History of PI (Score:2, Insightful)

    by SmilingSalmon ( 1143805 ) on Sunday February 08, 2009 @07:23PM (#26777389)
    A History of PI [amazon.com] by Petr Beckmann is a great book for that age group. It has lots of historical information about PI and its calculation by various historical figures and cultures. The writing style is engaging and even moving. Another plus for that age group - it's less than 200 pages long.

    I second a previous poster's suggestion of Simon Singh's The Code Book.
  • by rufusdufus ( 450462 ) on Sunday February 08, 2009 @07:37PM (#26777521)

    It seems likes kids only do what you tell them not to do, so this advice may seem wise. However, this is a form of confirmation bias; adults notice when kids don't listen because mainly because they usually do.
    If you tell someone a student some skill is difficult, they will believe you. You have set them up to expect failure. This expectation is easy to meet, and most students will give up early.
    If you tell a student something is easy, they are likely to believe you. Believing a subject is easy, they are more likely to follow through to mastery because they have been set up to expect success.
    Reverse psychology is a trick. Tricking students is a way to alienate them; it may work on the few, but the many will respond better to affirmative attitudes.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 08, 2009 @07:40PM (#26777549)

    I agree completely. High school students are definitely capable of handling abstract algebra, though they should be encouraged to ask you for help with it, since they'll run into a lot of concepts they haven't seen in raw form before (equivalence relation, isomorphism, etc) and will probably get stuck on one of them somewhere. I'm personally a big fan of I.N. Herstein's topics in algebra, but that's somewhat expensive. A good, free, alternative is Robert Ash's Abstract Algebra, which you can download at http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~r-ash/Algebra.html. You can also purchase a paper copy for ~$30. Note that while it says "the basic graduate year," the first five chapters comprise the basic undergraduate year.

  • Here are several (Score:3, Insightful)

    by swillden ( 191260 ) <shawn-ds@willden.org> on Sunday February 08, 2009 @07:41PM (#26777555) Journal

    First, let me add my recommendation for GEB. It's an amazing book.

    Here are some others that I think are good:

    • "The Codebreakers: The Comprehensive Story of Secret Communication from Ancient Times to the Internet", by David Kahn. This is a frighteningly large book, but if you get the right sort of kid to pick it up (s)he will devour it. Most everyone is intrigued by secret writing, and this book covers it all, from ancient techniques like tattooing a message on the shaved scalp of a slave and letting his hair grow back before sending him, to the crypto-drama of WWII, and up to modern times. Not mathematical, per se, but it will quickly lead the interested student into some interesting mathematical territory.
    • "The Code Book: The Science of Secrecy from Ancient Egypt to Quantum Cryptography", by Simon Singh. Similar to the last. IMO, not as good, but also not as large, so perhaps more approachable.
    • "Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk", by Peter Bernstein. Very interesting book that traces the history of risk analysis. Relatively little mathematics, but probability is a crucial concept in modern applied mathematics and this book is a great way to build interest.
    • "Fermat's Enigma: Fermat's Enigma: The Epic Quest to Solve the World's Greatest Mathematical Problem", by Simon Singh. Singh does a good job of exposing the low-key but very real drama behind the centuries of attempts to prove Fermat's Last Theorem.
    • "Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea", by Charles Seife. Seife traces the history of the development of zero, an idea which revolutionized counting and mathematics.
    • "The Divine Proportion", by H.E. Huntley. I read this one when I was a teenager, and it really impressed me just how prevalent phi is in the world, and I liked the tie between mathematics and art. Re-reading it recently I was less impressed -- a lot of the tie-ins really seemed to be reaching, but if the idea is to stimulate thinking and interest this is a good choice.
    • "A Brief History of Time", by Stephen Hawking. It's about physics not math, but it's definitely mind-expanding and fascinating.
    • "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman", by Richard Feynman. This is a book about Feynman, not math or physics, but it's all about the curious and inquisitive nature of great mathematicians and physicists, and I know lots of kids who've found it inspiring.
  • by QuantumG ( 50515 ) * <qg@biodome.org> on Sunday February 08, 2009 @07:41PM (#26777563) Homepage Journal

    Umm.. the material likely *is* too hard for them. You're not tricking them at all.. you're just giving them the opportunity to accept the challenge.

  • by mewshi_nya ( 1394329 ) on Sunday February 08, 2009 @07:56PM (#26777701)

    I would go for things in other fields that are math-heavy - economics, science, business, stuff like that.

    Shows the usefulness of math!

  • by Jurily ( 900488 ) <jurily&gmail,com> on Sunday February 08, 2009 @08:02PM (#26777751)

    Abstract algebra is beyond the capabilities of most adults.

    True. We're talking about children though. All you need is a good teacher to fire up their imagination, and they can learn anything.

    That's all it takes. But you better make sure it's a good teacher.

  • Re:Real analysis (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ClassMyAss ( 976281 ) on Sunday February 08, 2009 @08:21PM (#26777897) Homepage
    Real analysis? Woof. I suppose if you want to make your students passionately despise math forever, that's one way to go.

    High school kids need to be exposed to the fun parts of math, not the parts that make people that love math groan. Even complex analysis is far more enjoyable (not to mention useful) than real analysis. Nobody likes to sit around proving the obvious for no other reason than to prove that you can do it, and high school students will never realize that the reason for all of the rigor is to expose the edge cases where things break down.
  • by AstrumPreliator ( 708436 ) on Sunday February 08, 2009 @08:50PM (#26778143)
    I agree sort of. I actually did a major in math and I focused primarily on algebraic geometry. I have to admit that math didn't really get interesting in college until upper division math courses. The problem is these courses are extremely rigorous. I remember abstract algebra being very difficult to learn when I was used to my previous college level calculus courses which were basically memorization and solving equations. Abstract algebra on the other hand was taught by proof. Groups, rings, fields, homomorphisms, isomorphisms, and Galois Theory are all very interesting, but I think this might be tough to teach to high school kids.

    I think perhaps a better subject to teach would be topology. I realize this is probably a more rigorous class than abstract algebra, but I think you can skip some of the details and present it to them in an easily understandable way. Also, the pre-requisites are fairly minimal if you don't advance to algebraic topology, you really only need a decent background in set theory. I think for an average high school student it'd be hard to grasp the idea of what a homomorphism is, or an automorphism. These are largely shown through proofs. However, you can show what a homeomorphism is visually by using say, a rubber band, or a piece of clay. I think at the high school level you really only need to impart the idea behind the math and perhaps get them interested.

    Also, if you skip metric spaces you can bypass the analysis prerequisite. I think you could easily teach them what a topological space is, the fundamental idea behind homeomorphisms, closure, compactness, connectedness, path-connectedness*, and the separation axioms.

    This [amazon.com] is the book I used in my topology class, although I think it'd serve better as a reference to the teacher than the students.

    They might not understand the prototypical example of a topological space which is connected but not path-connected though.
  • by the cheong ( 1053282 ) on Sunday February 08, 2009 @08:52PM (#26778159)

    Being about "how not to use math" and about math as such are pretty different things. It's like you were teaching a class on car repair and assigning a book on consumer fraud.

    No. It's like you were teaching a class on car repair and telling your students how to not screw up. e.g. "Do not ever adjust the stabilizer based on popular arguments such as ___ and ___ because it will only screw with the engine and may even cause permanent damage." It's actually very relevant, especially in the early stages of learning.

  • by zdavkeos ( 1472529 ) on Sunday February 08, 2009 @10:16PM (#26778685)
    The Constants of Nature -- Barrow Prisoners Dilemma -- Poundstone The man who loved only numbers -- Hoffman Unknown Quantity: A Real and Imaginary History of Algebra -- Derbyshire Excursions in Number theory -- Ogilvy
  • by FiniteSum ( 1409667 ) <clockwork.human@NospaM.gmail.com> on Monday February 09, 2009 @12:20AM (#26779613)
    No. Simply no. There is no better way to turn a student off of math than to make them work SAT problems ad nauseum. It's so far removed from what an undergrad pursuing a degree in math will learn.

With your bare hands?!?

Working...