Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media Software Linux

Decent DVD-Ripping Solution For Linux? 501

supersloshy writes "I'm a user of Ubuntu Linux and I have been for a little while now. Recently I've been trying to copy DVDs onto a portable media player, but everything I've tried isn't working right. dvd::rip always gets the language mixed up (for example, when ripping 'Howl's Moving Castle,' one of the files it ripped to was in Japanese instead of English), Acidrip just plain isn't working for me (not recognizing a disc with spaces in its name, refusing to encode, etc.), Thoggen is having trouble with chapters (chapter 1 repeated twice for me once), and OGMRip has the audio out of sync. What I'm looking for is a reliable program to copy the movie into a single file with none of the audio or video glitches as mentioned above. Is there even such thing on Linux? If you can't think of a decent Linux-based solution, then a Windows one is fine as long as it works."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Decent DVD-Ripping Solution For Linux?

Comments Filter:
  • by Ian Alexander ( 997430 ) on Thursday April 09, 2009 @10:50PM (#27527387)
    http://handbrake.fr/ [handbrake.fr]

    I use it on my Mac and it produces pretty decent encodes, even with the presets.
  • Why bother? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by wampus ( 1932 ) on Thursday April 09, 2009 @10:55PM (#27527433)

    BitTorrent. Its probably faster and definitely easier.

  • by anjilslaire ( 968692 ) on Thursday April 09, 2009 @11:07PM (#27527539) Homepage
    Run the movie through DVDShrink via wine (works flawlessly) in Reauthor Mode, selecting the main movie + just the audio track you want (i grab the 5.0 audio for simplicity, then encode at No Compression, and rip to files on the hard drive. When you have the video_ts folder on your hard drive, run it through Acidrip at will. You can of course correct the folder name so there's no issues with acidrip loading the (now) unencrypted) files. I use this process to encode all my movies to xvid .avi format, so they can easily be streamed to my XBMC box via a samba share and viewed on the living room TV.
  • Re:DVDFab (Score:3, Insightful)

    by BrokenHalo ( 565198 ) on Thursday April 09, 2009 @11:11PM (#27527565)

    The submitter was asking for a Linux solution. I can't say I'm an obsessive purist, but if a piece of software needs to run on Wine, I'd rather just do without.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 09, 2009 @11:30PM (#27527705)

    RTFS!

    The OP specifically stated that Acidrip does not work.

  • Re:This will help. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by teh moges ( 875080 ) on Thursday April 09, 2009 @11:47PM (#27527809) Homepage
    I don't think the "Let me google that for you" joke applies when you add a different keyword in.
  • Re:DVDFab (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 09, 2009 @11:50PM (#27527839)

    Why? I think the idea is that windows developers can build their software against a stable wine version and then you have software for linux as well. Google knows this and it seems to work well. There are many suitable solutions through wine, all functioning just fine.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 09, 2009 @11:57PM (#27527877)

    K9Copy is GREAT! I have tryed so many different apps to copy DVD's and the only one that works right for me is K9Copy. I especially like the fact that I can copy a DVD to an ISO file and set the file size I want. Even after shrinking the DVD the quality is as close to perfect as you can get.

  • by BroncoInCalifornia ( 605476 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @12:09AM (#27527951)
    This will rip:

    bronco@ubuntu:~$ dvdbackup -v -i /dev/scd0 -M -o Videos/

    And this will burn what was ripped:

    bronco@ubuntu:~$ growisofs -speed 1 -dvd-compat -Z /dev/scd0 -dvd-video Videos/[name of DVD]
  • by williamfrantz ( 1528953 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @12:17AM (#27527993)

    Most of the time, you still get XviD with MP3, in a AVI container.

    To be clear, "Xvid" is an encoder (like DivX) and it makes MPEG4 ASP video streams. Calling a file an "Xvid" file is like calling a photocopy a "Xerox". It might have been created with a genuine Xerox machine but just looking at the paper, you wouldn't know or care.

    MKV is still the bleeding edge. The reason AVI/ASP/MP3 is popular is because over 100 million DivX certified devices can play those files. DivX DVD players start around $30 at Wal-mart and are by far the cheapest way to move video from your computer to your living room.

    There are also "DivX Ultra" devices that play AVI/ASP/AC3 with chapters, interactive menus, multiple audio and multiple subtitles. Other than the ASP codec, DivX Plus offers most of what you want.

    Just recently "DivX Plus" was launched which is MKV/H.264/AAC/AC3. Some day DivX Plus devices might also cost $30 but for now MKV is only useful for people with a PC connected to their TV. Sure it has a lot of advantages over AVI/ASP/MP3 but broad compatibility trumps minor improvements in compression ratios.

  • Re:DVDFab (Score:5, Insightful)

    by frieko ( 855745 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @12:17AM (#27527995)

    I can't say I'm an obsessive purist

    Then what IS the reason? I run Linux exclusively, and I independently reached the same conclusion as AC: The best Linux DVD ripper is DVDFab.

    If DVDFab isn't a "Linux solution" because it requires WINE, then KDE isn't a Linux solution because it requires Qt.

  • Re:DVDFab (Score:4, Insightful)

    by glitch23 ( 557124 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @12:19AM (#27528005)
    He also said a Windows solution would be sufficient as long as it works. But he wants a single file as output though so dvdshrink won't work.
  • Re:DVDFab (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Miseph ( 979059 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @12:56AM (#27528167) Journal

    I realize that there are about a thousand other posts saying something similar, but...

    I think Wine might be the best thing that can possibly happen to Linux. The fact of the matter is that a small project just isn't likely to have the means of producing functional software on multiple platforms (at least not without sacrificing performance to go with Java or some alternative), and Wine makes it so that they don't have to by creating a target that will work equally on *nix and Windows. While I realize that similar projects exist to allow for Linux-based software to run in Windows, none of them are able to run as cleanly or transparently as Wine, and there just isn't as much demand for software going in that direction. Plus, as it gets better and more software actually performs better under Wine than Windows (I have seen it with a few things), it could become a wedge for FOSS to embrace extend and extinguish on Microsoft, and that's just funny.

  • Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Animaether ( 411575 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @02:42AM (#27528593) Journal

    "If you want chapters, menus and all that why would you use a 700 - 1400MB file size? You're better to go with a full DVD rip at around 5+ GB and get an exact copy of the disc."
    Hear, hear - I was thinking the exact same thing: just make an ISO of the DVD and mount that whenever you want to play it.

    The only criteria that this doesn't meet is the file size... big deal, get another 1TB drive... they're stupid-cheap now. On the up side, you're not re-encoding anything and if something better comes along down the line, you can still transcode from that ISO to that format without any further quality loss.

    But I guess GP was talking about downloads (torrents/otherwise), in which case he probably doesn't have the original (DVD) media to begin with; in which case, sure, you may prefer the high quality MKV over a low-ish quality DiVX.. if you can't find the ISO anyway.

  • Re:DVDFab (Score:5, Insightful)

    by pjt33 ( 739471 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @03:29AM (#27528773)

    at least not without sacrificing performance to go with Java

    The 1990s called: they want their benchmarks back.

  • Re:DVDFab (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 10, 2009 @03:39AM (#27528821)

    After wasting several days of my life on this issue, I gave up, ordered an iMac, and since switching, have spent more time doing what I want on my computer and less time at the computer overall. I no longer have to spend time trying to make sure the tools taht are supposed to help me are set up properly or if I'm using the right settings.

    You know, you could've compiled ffmpeg and vlc if it was that much of an issue. Surely, if you've given up several days of your life, downloading the source and opening the install file should've occurred to you.

    Yes, the packages may be broken, and yes they shouldn't be. But what have you done in several days that couldn't be solved with ye olde ./configure && make && make install ?

    Enjoy your mac.

  • Re:DVDFab (Score:5, Insightful)

    by tsa ( 15680 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @03:40AM (#27528829) Homepage

    That's Linux for you and the reason why I switched to a Mac. Linux is a fantastic OS but many of the applications that run on it are just not mature enough to be used by laymen.

  • Re:DVDFab (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Yfrwlf ( 998822 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @04:19AM (#27528965)
    If the issue was an ffmpeg or VLC issue, then that would qualify as a dependency issue. The newer VLC should have required the newer ffmpeg. If, however, it was an Ubuntu packaging naming issue, I completely blame proprietary Linux packaging for that.

    This is one of the many reasons Linux packaging standards are needed. Distros should be offering the same exact software that you can get easily online. If they want to modify a program, they need to change it's name, but if it's simply distros having different package names then they need to fucking stop it. Metapackages are fine, but fucking around with software names just so you can make your repository be proprietary is wrong. Until Linux users are really free to choose what software to install no matter their distro, and the focus is shifted to making the default software work correctly for all Linux users, you sadly will have more freedom in some ways on a proprietary OS.

    Thank you distro wars for giving everyone less freedom and making Linux suck more.
  • by evil_core ( 987768 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @06:07AM (#27529323) Homepage

    MKV and OGG are both containers, and not audio/video formats! Another thing is that usually in OGG is Vorbis Audio stream.

  • Re:DVDFab (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Shadowmist ( 57488 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @06:47AM (#27529489)
    It's probably likely that the problems he was having in this case was the tipping point of a long series of personal annoyances. What this story seems to illustrate is that Linux is still in the rough Harley Davidson stage, in that almost every Harley Davidson owner I ever met was a fairly decent mechanic as the cycles are famous for requiring a lot of mechanic knowhow. One respondent's answer in brief was "compile your own". While this works for a certain group of user, there are a lot of users which it won't. With Mac OSX now having a lot more common with the 'Nix OS's and featuring software which simply "just works". I can understand why he finally made the switch. (OS X even has it's own versions of WINE working for it now that it's main architecture is Intel based.) and OS X has shed most of what made the original Mac OS such a hostile environment to develop for, as seen from the explosion open source code for the platform. "Stuff just works" is a good benchmark on the maturity of an OS as a user system for other than "Harley Davidson home mechanics." OS X is a good example of that benchmark as a UNIX type OS you can give your grandmother to use. Linux's progress towards that goal has slowed down considerably if not stopped altogether.
  • Re:Oh! hohohohoh! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by shentino ( 1139071 ) <shentino@gmail.com> on Friday April 10, 2009 @07:24AM (#27529621)

    Taking a likely -1 Offtopic mod for violating "Do not feed the trolls"... ...But I have to speak on this.

    Companies that want to be commercial dickheads and force you to pay for content you already own are at fault here, not linux.

    First we have the patent holders on the codecs. They get royalties, both from the media stampers that produce the media, as well as the companies that make the hardware that plays said media. You pay for both of these, on top of the part of the sales $$$ that actually goes to the companies that create the content. A classic case of rent seeking, let alone how much the actual creative people themselves are getting screwed over and are effectively sharecroppers using the company roster as a field.

    Then we have the content producers themselves. By making outlandish EULA's and enforcing abusive DRM, they force you to buy the same material multiple times if you want to move it around between formats. That's what DRM does, it makes it a pain in the ass to do anything but bend over and pay $$$ for multiple copies of the same stuff, just in different formats. Yet more rent seeking.

    Linux, by being FOSS, is shut out in the cold because it doesn't dirty itself with such stupid palm-greasing fiddle faddle.

    Unfortunately, if you're a saint in a corrupt world, you will be left out of lots of stuff if you aren't willing to play dirty.

    So rant and rave all you like, but don't blame linux. It's just an innocent bystander in the civil war that is corporate america.

    Personally, I'm glad linux isn't getting involved in it.

  • Re:DVDFab (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Yfrwlf ( 998822 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @08:35AM (#27530007)
    But why are dependencies a problem? The reason is because *those* packages are proprietary. If a package used a universal naming convention, like the actual names of the programs the developers named them, then a program could simply say "I want this, this, and this" and the manager would know what the hell they wanted and install it all easily. Distro repositories should be nothing more than mirrors of sourceforge basically, for the packages they wanted to support, but it should be able to hook into the outside world to pull dependencies when users wanted/needed those. If I wanted, I shouldn't HAVE to install Firefox updates from distro repos, I should be able to get system updates directly from Mozilla. Bad example as Mozilla actually does have a Ubuntu repo, but that's proprietary, I want universal formats so that ALL Linux users can easily install, remove, and update any and all Linux software they want.

    A Mandriva user shouldn't have to install Ubuntu just because OMGAwsomeGame version 5.125.53.325 that they want or need for some reason isn't in Mandriva's repos. These distro companies aren't caring about this problem because they want the size of their repos to *cause* this to happen, for users to switch just for their access to software. That barrier is opposed to Linux's principals and to truly free software. Not to mention, you know, it makes Linux *suck*. Unless you use Ubuntu. But even then, things still suck, and user's freedoms are very much lessened.

    And of course again, yeah yeah, you can compile, but only like 5% of users really care about that, and they're mostly developers. Linux needs more features, and this is a big one. Software packages "just work" on Windows and OS X, Linux users can and should have that same freedom, and there is no reason whatsoever that it's not possible and can't be solved through better programming and standards.
  • Re:DVDFab (Score:3, Insightful)

    by s0l1dsnak3123 ( 1244796 ) <s0l1dsnak3123NO@SPAMgmail.com> on Friday April 10, 2009 @09:04AM (#27530173)
    ImgBurn is another (fork?) of dvddecrypter that is still developed by the original guy (lightningUK! I think he was called...) But seriously, use a Linux native solution. Actually supporting a windows program is like saying "hey, I LIKE windows".
  • Re:DVDFab (Score:3, Insightful)

    by PRMan ( 959735 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @11:23AM (#27532119)

    Are you talking about DVD Rippers or FFMPEG and Mencoder?

    It took me 3 days to find a set of parameters that would let me process the weird Quicktime format from my digital camera and be able to play it on my PS3 and DirecTV DVR.

    Device profiles, anyone?

  • Re:DVDFab (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Blakey Rat ( 99501 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @12:25PM (#27533005)

    Bullcrap. While being able to muck around with all that crap is certainly useful, I don't think anybody would deny that, the *real* problem is that the vast majority of video applications don't have sensible defaults.

    That is to say, if you put in a DVD and hit "rip", it'll either spit out a useless file (all-black video, no video only audio, no audio only video, video and audio out-of-sync) or, even worse, you can't even hit "rip" until you've already fiddled with 3 dozen options you don't give a flying shit about.

    Look, all iPods are the fucking same. All Zunes are the fucking same. Just have ONE BUTTON that says "Rip to iPod". Period. The reason Handbrake is popular is because that's what it did back when it was a Mac program: you put in your DVD, you hit "Rip", and it worked every time, with every disk.

    It's obviously possible, Handbrake *did it*! Years ago!

    (Stupidly, Handbrake now almost never works, especially on Windows. They got their working program and made it into shit. Meaning there's now *no* simple way to just insert a disk, and hit a button that says "put this on my iPod.")

  • by Jearil ( 154455 ) on Friday April 10, 2009 @02:58PM (#27534815) Homepage

    MythTV using MythVideo will play .iso files just fine. Technically on the backend it's mplayer, vlc, or xine that's playing it, but still they play.

The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin

Working...