Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
The Internet

Integrating Wikipedia With a Local Intranet Wiki 121

Posted by samzenpus
from the mix-and-match dept.
An anonymous reader writes "I work for a large company taking a preliminary look at developing an honest-to-goodness wiki. We have tried to launch a company-wide wiki before, but with little success. The technical domains of each part of the company are different, thus each article needs a good deal of background to be useful. Of course, due the proprietary nature of our work we cannot share our articles outside of the intranet. What we would like to do is leverage existing wikis by augmenting our internal wiki with an external wiki. When a user accesses Wikipedia from inside our intranet, they receive the wikipedia content, plus the local domain specific information. For example, links to company-specific wiki pages would be available in Wikipedia pages. Has anyone else tried to do something like this? I know it sounds like a logistical nightmare; are there any thoughts on how to make this successful?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Integrating Wikipedia With a Local Intranet Wiki

Comments Filter:
  • by seifried (12921) on Thursday July 16 2009, @03:05AM (#28713437) Homepage
    I assume you want up to date content and to have it clearly seperated from what is yours. Why not enclose the content within an IFRAME? Seriously, it's stupid and simple but might be all you need. Alternatively you coudl use some form of an intelligent proxy/page modifier, either as a mediawiki plugin or whatever floats your boat (i.e. every time a page is loaded also try to get the wikipedia stuff).
  • by rm999 (775449) on Thursday July 16 2009, @03:11AM (#28713475)

    "What we would like to do is leverage existing wikis by augmenting our internal wiki with an external wiki"

    What does that even mean? If you want to design something, you'll have to use more precise language. And for god's sake, stop using the word leverage without thinking about it. You used it backwards - if you are augmenting your internal wiki with external wikis, you are leveraging your internal wiki with the external wikis. You leverage a boulder with a lever, but you don't leverage a lever with a boulder.

  • Doinitwrong (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 16 2009, @03:35AM (#28713613)

    Agreed. Appending to wikipedia is the ass backwards way to do it. Everyone suggesting greasemonkey and other addons are just enabling your backassery.

    What you do is create an internal wiki, and wherever relevent you link to the wikipedia article. Or an external doc. Or nothing at all and expect your employees to look it up on their own.

  • Re:URLs (Score:3, Insightful)

    by smallfries (601545) on Thursday July 16 2009, @03:49AM (#28713705) Homepage

    Noise.

    It's a good place to bury the signal.

  • Re:Solution (Score:1, Insightful)

    by MaskedSlacker (911878) <.tjscollins. .at. .gmail.com.> on Thursday July 16 2009, @04:01AM (#28713769)

    Your Karma must be shit BadAnalogyGuy.

    Why would anyone one commit be less vetted than any other commit? The old commits don't get new edits merged into them. A commit from year ago is no less likely to have vandalism present than the commit from yesterday. It will just be different vandalism.

"I'm not stupid, I'm not expendable, and I'M NOT GOING!"

Working...