What Is Holding Back the Paperless Office? 511
Drethon writes "CNN has an article (are we up to the millionth article on this topic?) asking if the paperless office has arrived. This got me wondering, what are the main things holding back the paperless office? Just off the top of my head, the main thing keeping me printing out documents is the ability to spread a dozen pages of a document under review out on my table and marking it up by hand. PDF and Word markups are not too bad but they still lack the ability to spread many pages out to look over at the same time and could be improved to make markup a bit less restrictive. I do find myself printing out less with the use of dual monitors to have source documents and work under progress up at the same time, perhaps something like Microsoft's tabletop computer used as a desk will let me have at least a paperless desk. I know there are other reasons why offices are not becoming paperless. What are your reasons?"
Re:Basically? (Score:4, Informative)
The "Paperless" office is less about "no paper" and far more about LESS paper.
Trust me -- in our office, there is a HELL of a lot less paper than there was even 10 years ago.
Re:Workflow (Score:1, Informative)
Re:A: The law. (Score:4, Informative)
Not so. Approvals & audits can be documented via software, as long as the software is certified (which isn't that hard to do).
There are tons of software solutions out there for document management that can push documents through approval workflows, etc., that meet all standards for process control and accountability. I won't mention specific vendor names, but there are literally dozens of vendors that offer these systems at a reasonable price... and they have the SOx certifications to go with them.
Not yet paperless, but.... (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, there is still a lot of paper around, but it is mostly used for personal usage, and can simply be thrown away once a project is over.
Re:Basically? (Score:4, Informative)
There are a number of newer signature pads that record forensic data such as stroke length, pressure, lift points, etc as well as it has certain security to help identify genuine signatures or tampering. Most have plugins for PDFs.
I've used signature pads for banking, renting cars, and accepting packages.
What makes it difficult to implement is the APIs for some of these are not free/cheap, so implementing into, say, a car dealership's management system may not be economical at the moment.
Re:Basically? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:A: The law. (Score:1, Informative)
The bookkeeping end of a business alone makes your keep paper copies of invoices, bills, receipts, journal rolls, deposit slips and more. Your computer records are there for quick reference. If you get audited they aren't going to give two shits about your accounting software, they're going to want every last piece of paper to back up your claims.
Re:Basically? (Score:5, Informative)
People who bought the "paperless office" fad years ago were living in a dreamland.
Let me tell you, it's nice to work in a dreamland. I work in Radiology Healthcare and despite people telling us that we couldn't go filmless, we did it, so we have ignored the people that are telling us we can't go paperless and doing well. Our reqs get faxed to our fax server. The schedulers bring them up on their computer and schedule the exams from the digital req which is now associated with that exam. From there it goes directly to the queue of a doctor, sometimes in another building, to protocol. Once protocoled, it goes to the radtech's queue to have the exam preformed. This all regularly happens in a time quicker that it would have taken the scheduler to walk over to the fax machine and get the paper requisition to begin with. The req doesn't get lost and is available to anybody at anytime in the process with the click of a button.
Radiology has some pretty nice systems built to do all this, and we had to give a good number of people dual monitors (but monitors are cheap and even the cheapo computers we buy are ready for dual monitor support these days). However, the number of printers we have is half what it was several years ago and they break down less often because they get used less. That's less support I have to do. We also got rid of sticker printers. Those were even worse. We still have to print for this or that but our main workflow is paperless. I suspect that the main reasons that offices can't go paperless is inertia of the people who don't want to, poor workflow, and insufficent tools to do so rather than any actual cost or usefullness of paper.
Re:Basically? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Basically? (Score:3, Informative)
This, folks, is why the paperless office isn't here: complete ignorance of technology, and on a nerd site, to boot.
Dude! Wake up. You don't have to pass stuff around. You can both connect to the same file on a server and edit it simultaneously. One of your phones / tablets / computers can even act as the server so that you don't need a standalone one. Look at Abiword's collaboration features. Look at Google Docs'.
My boss just walked out the door for lunch, but I have an important document he needs to sign off real quick...maybe I'll just shout for him to come back in, sign in to his PC, and fire up Google Docs....or maybe I can run out with a sheet of paper and have him scrawl a signature on his way to the car...