Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Spam Communications The Internet IT

Ask Slashdot: Is Reverse DNS a Worthy Standard For Fighting Spam? 301

Posted by timothy
from the who-the-heck-are-you? dept.
drmartin66 makes it to the front page with this question: "Last weekend I installed a new spam filter server for a client, and enabled connection rejection if the sending server did not have a Reverse DNS record. Since then, I have had a number of emails rejected from regulator bodies that do not have a Reverse DNS record, and are refusing to have one created for their email server. What is your opinion of Reverse DNS records? Are they (or should they be) a standard, and required? Or are they useless for spam fighting?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ask Slashdot: Is Reverse DNS a Worthy Standard For Fighting Spam?

Comments Filter:

% "Every morning, I get up and look through the 'Forbes' list of the richest people in America. If I'm not there, I go to work" -- Robert Orben

Working...