Printing in Linux w/ HP Deskjet 660Cse's? 13
Jason Osborne asks:
"There is one thing though Windows seems to
excel at and that's printing. I have an HP
Deskjet 660Cse and I can't get it to print
correctly. I have searched the Internet
endlessly and have tried many filters and
daemons including both the original BSD
print daemon and the somewhat newer LPRng
daemon. I have seen many filters designed
for HP Deskjet printers, it seems none will
work for me. Does anyone have any
information or filters on/for printing in
Linux with HP Deskjets that may help? Are
there any future development plans by
HP or the Linux Development Team
for any additional and more up to date
information and drivers for the HP Deskjet
660Cse serious and other such 'Made for
Windows' type printers? "
My take is that if the printer says 'Made for Windows'
on it, then it's a closed architecture and
likely that its specs will be unavailable to
anyone without a hefty price-tag and an NDA.
Does the HP 660 series fall under this
category? I miss the days when
hardware manufacturers actually cared if
their products were getting used by everyone
as opposed to everyone running a particular
operating system. Something is inherently
backward in how things stand today.
About HP printing (Score:1)
First of all you must set up Ghostscript.
Download the newest Alladin Ghostscript.
There's an excellent hpdj patch for newer HP Deskjets at
ftp://ftp.pdb.sni.de/pub/utilities/misc/
Download it an follow the instructions.
Also there is a djetool program which uses features of that patch at
http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/printin
I have HP690C and it works well but I'm not sure if it will works well with your "se" printer.
/dev/lp0 (Score:1)
Tim.
*/
A few more tricks up the sleeve. (Score:1)
Printing in the "unix" world is a bit different. (Score:1)
Keep in mind you must format your document for printing. That is, after you finishing your document you must convert it to postscript. Postscript (correct me if I am wrong) was/is a standard that I believe adobe developed. It eventually became the standard for awhile (I think it was something like this, for the most part I am talking out of my ass). For the most part, if you printer has PostScript capabilities, you can just (at the lowest levels) "cat file.ps >>
Things were all good in the printing world.
Then, all of these glorious windows printers came along. Nobody had to conform to standards any longer, thanks to the MS beast.
This is where ghostscript comes in. If ghostscript supports your printer you can just take that Post Script file and run it through Ghostscript. Now this file is in your printer's language, which can be dumped to
All this said, now comes the filters. You have to fondle your printcap so that, if you do not wish to manually go through the ghostscript process, the lpd can intercept the
Anyways, I must go and eat dinner
Better / Faster Ghostview drivers... (Score:1)
As I was mainly intested in regaining speed in draft mode, I ended up using the driver here:
ftp://ftp.pdb.sni.de/pub/utilities/misc/
This driver is very fast in draft mode (faster then the windows driver, in fact)...and is highly configurable. Its biggest problem is that it doesn't do Floyd Steinberg dithering...so while text looks quite nice, graphics don't look so hot...
I also found one here:
http://www.erdw.ethz.ch/~bonk/hp850/hp850.html
I never got around to testing this one, though... It is supposed to support the Photo Ret1 and 2 stuff, though...
Of course, you have to patch ghostscript to get either of these to work...but since the default drivers are so bad, it's probably worth it...
Photo printers? (Score:1)
Webster@veelos.coom
A note on "se"... (Score:1)
I'd assume "Special Edition"), but the hardware
is exaclty the same. Usually, HP doesn't even
put "SE" on the machine itself. The box just
has something additional thrown inside. (Disney
software and such).
There's also a designation for models sold at
Price Club-ish places, that indicates a lack of
all that additional software and such. They're
usually $20 or so cheaper.
Ahh... And I thought a year and a half in retail
taught me nothing.