Reverse DNS: Standard? Spam fighter?

Slashdot

+ - Reverse DNS: Standard? Spam fighter?-> 0

Submitted by drmartin66 on Thursday October 13, 2011 @12:16PM

drmartin66 writes "Last weekend I installed a new spam filter server for a client and enable connection rejection if the sending server did not have a Reverse DNS record. Since then I have had a number of emails rejected from regulator bodies that do not have a Reverse DNS record and are refusing to have one created for their email server. What is the Slashdot communities opinion regarding Reverse DNS records, are they (should they) a standard and required or are they useless for spam fighting."
Link to Original Source

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Reverse DNS: Standard? Spam fighter?

Load All Comments

Search 0 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

One small step for man, one giant stumble for mankind.

Reverse DNS: Standard? Spam fighter? More Login

Reverse DNS: Standard? Spam fighter?