Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Wikipedia

+ - How can Wikipedia's upcoming Visual Editor be better than other word processors?->

Submitted by azadnama
azadnama (2701015) writes "Wikimedia Foundation, the organization behind Wikipedia, is aware of the fact the MediaWiki formatting syntax is a major obstacle for people's participation in writing on the site. To address this problem, the Foundation is developing VisualEditor—a web-based WYSIWYG interface for editing articles. It's supposed to be similar to a word processor, like LibreOffice, Microsoft Word, Pages, Google Docs, and others. And this is the time to ask: What did your word processor get wrong and how can Wikipedia's VisualEditor get it right?"
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How can Wikipedia's upcoming Visual Editor be better than other word processors?

Comments Filter:

I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve immortality through not dying. -- Woody Allen

Working...